On 10/23/18 9:55 PM, Adrian Turjak wrote:
On 24/10/18 2:09 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 10/22/18 5:40 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 10/22/2018 4:35 PM, Adrian Turjak wrote:
The one other open question I have is about the Adjutant change [2]. I
know Adjutant is very new and I'm not sure what
On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 16:40 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 10/23/2018 1:41 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> > > Yeah, but part of the reason for placeholders was consistency
> > > across all of
> > > the services. I guess if there are never going to be upgrade
> > > checks in
> > > adjutant then I
On 24/10/18 2:09 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>
>
> On 10/22/18 5:40 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> On 10/22/2018 4:35 PM, Adrian Turjak wrote:
The one other open question I have is about the Adjutant change [2]. I
know Adjutant is very new and I'm not sure what upgrades look like for
that
On 10/23/2018 1:41 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
Yeah, but part of the reason for placeholders was consistency across all of
the services. I guess if there are never going to be upgrade checks in
adjutant then I could see skipping it, but otherwise I would prefer to at
least get the framework in
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 10:30:23AM -0400, Ben Nemec wrote:
>
>
> On 10/23/18 9:58 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> > On 10/23/2018 8:09 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> > > Can't we just add a noop command like we are for the services that
> > > don't currently need upgrade checks?
> >
> > We could, but I was
On 10/23/18 9:58 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 10/23/2018 8:09 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
Can't we just add a noop command like we are for the services that
don't currently need upgrade checks?
We could, but I was also hoping that for most projects we will actually
be able to replace the noop /
On 10/23/2018 8:09 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
Can't we just add a noop command like we are for the services that don't
currently need upgrade checks?
We could, but I was also hoping that for most projects we will actually
be able to replace the noop / placeholder check with *something* useful
in
On 10/22/18 5:40 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 10/22/2018 4:35 PM, Adrian Turjak wrote:
The one other open question I have is about the Adjutant change [2]. I
know Adjutant is very new and I'm not sure what upgrades look like for
that project, so I don't really know how valuable adding the
On 10/22/2018 4:35 PM, Adrian Turjak wrote:
The one other open question I have is about the Adjutant change [2]. I
know Adjutant is very new and I'm not sure what upgrades look like for
that project, so I don't really know how valuable adding the upgrade
check framework is to that project. Is it
On 20/10/18 4:09 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> The big news this week is we have a couple of volunteer developers
> from NEC (Akhil Jain and Rajat Dhasmana) who are pushing the base
> framework changes across a lot of the projects [1]. I'm trying to
> review as many of these as I can. The request
10 matches
Mail list logo
