Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][Neutron] Running out of memory on gate for linux bridge job

2017-01-23 Thread Kevin Benton
What I don't understand is why the OOM killer is being invoked when there is almost no swap space being used at all. Check out the memory output when it's killed:

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][Neutron] Running out of memory on gate for linux bridge job

2017-01-18 Thread Joe Gordon
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 1/18/2017 4:53 AM, Jens Rosenboom wrote: > >> To me it looks like the times of 2G are long gone, Nova is using >> almost 2G all by itself. And 8G may be getting tight if additional >> stuff like Ceph is

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][Neutron] Running out of memory on gate for linux bridge job

2017-01-18 Thread Ian Wienand
On 01/14/2017 02:48 AM, Jakub Libosvar wrote: > recently I noticed we got oom-killer in action in one of our jobs [1]. > Any other ideas? I spent quite a while chasing down similar things with centos a while ago. I do have some ideas :) The symptom is probably that mysql gets chosen by the

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][Neutron] Running out of memory on gate for linux bridge job

2017-01-18 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 1/18/2017 4:53 AM, Jens Rosenboom wrote: To me it looks like the times of 2G are long gone, Nova is using almost 2G all by itself. And 8G may be getting tight if additional stuff like Ceph is being added. I'm not really surprised at all about Nova being a memory hog with the versioned

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][Neutron] Running out of memory on gate for linux bridge job

2017-01-18 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 1/13/2017 9:48 AM, Jakub Libosvar wrote: Hi, recently I noticed we got oom-killer in action in one of our jobs [1]. I saw it several times, so far only with linux bridge job. The consequence is that usually mysqld gets killed as a processes that consumes most of the memory, sometimes even

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][Neutron] Running out of memory on gate for linux bridge job

2017-01-18 Thread Jens Rosenboom
2017-01-13 17:56 GMT+01:00 Clark Boylan : > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017, at 07:48 AM, Jakub Libosvar wrote: >> Does anybody know whether we can bump memory on nodes in the gate >> without losing resources for running other jobs? >> Has anybody experience with memory consumption

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][Neutron] Running out of memory on gate for linux bridge job

2017-01-13 Thread Dariusz Śmigiel
2017-01-13 11:13 GMT-06:00 Kevin Benton : > Sounds like we must have a memory leak in the Linux bridge agent if that's > the only difference between the Linux bridge job and the ovs ones. Is there > a bug tracking this? Just created one [1]. For now, this issue was observed in

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][Neutron] Running out of memory on gate for linux bridge job

2017-01-13 Thread Kevin Benton
Sounds like we must have a memory leak in the Linux bridge agent if that's the only difference between the Linux bridge job and the ovs ones. Is there a bug tracking this? On Jan 13, 2017 08:58, "Clark Boylan" wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017, at 07:48 AM, Jakub Libosvar

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][Neutron] Running out of memory on gate for linux bridge job

2017-01-13 Thread Clark Boylan
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017, at 07:48 AM, Jakub Libosvar wrote: > Does anybody know whether we can bump memory on nodes in the gate > without losing resources for running other jobs? > Has anybody experience with memory consumption being higher when using > linux bridge agents? > > Any other ideas?

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][Neutron] Running out of memory on gate for linux bridge job

2017-01-13 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-01-13 16:48:26 +0100 (+0100), Jakub Libosvar wrote: [...] > Does anybody know whether we can bump memory on nodes in the gate without > losing resources for running other jobs? [...] We picked 8gb back when typical devstack-gate jobs only used around 2gb of memory, to make sure there was