Hi All,
As we are using fedora-21-atomic-2 image and that has Kubernetes v0.11.0, I
tried to run v1beta3 APIs on it. Some of the APIs failed.
The Kubernetes developer said v1beta3 wasn't fully supported until the
0.15.0 release. Hence this is causing some APIs to fail.
Below are the failures:
PM
Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] swagger-codegen generated code for
python-k8sclient
Hi All,
As we are using fedora-21-atomic-2 image and that has Kubernetes v0.11.0, I
tried to run v1beta3 APIs on it. Some of the APIs failed.
The Kubernetes developer said v1beta3
From: Madhuri Rai madhuri.ra...@gmail.commailto:madhuri.ra...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Monday, March 23, 2015 at 1:53 AM
To:
Hi Madhuri,
Amazing work! I wouldn't concern the code duplication and modularity issue
since the codes are generated. However, there is another concern here: if
we find a bug/improvement of the generated code, we probably need to modify
the generator. The question is if the upstream will accept
(not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] swagger-codegen generated code for
python-k8sclient
Hi Madhuri,
Amazing work! I wouldn't concern the code duplication and modularity issue
since the codes
@lists.openstack.org
Date: Monday, March 23, 2015 at 8:37 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] swagger-codegen generated code for
python-k8sclient
Hi Madhuri
Hi Steven,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com
wrote:
From: Madhuri Rai madhuri.ra...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Monday, March 23, 2015 at 1:53 AM
To:
Hi Hongbin,
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Hongbin Lu hongbin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Madhuri,
Amazing work! I wouldn't concern the code duplication and modularity issue
since the codes are generated. However, there is another concern here: if
we find a bug/improvement of the generated
