I just read this thread so decided to add my 2 cents into the collection of
opinions.
Guys, I tried it out a couple of weeks ago (was told about it by one of my
colleagues). This is really incredible! Especially given that you completed it
in 24 hours :) I think as YAQL attracts more and more
Dmitry,
yaql 1.0 has both str() and len() and much much more so there is no need to
support them explicitly since Mistral is going to switch to yaql 1.0 and
yaqluator.com is going to do the same
Sincerely yours,
Stan Lagun
Principal Software Engineer @ Mirantis
sla...@mirantis.com
On Tue, Aug
Awesome! Really.
Thank you folks for doing this.
I am so much looking forward to moving it to 1.0 with more built-in functions
and more power to extend it...
Note that Mistral has a few extensions, like `str`, `len`, which are not in the
scope of evaluator.
DZ
On Aug 2, 2015, at 12:44
Hi guys!
That's awesome! It is very useful for all us!
--
Best Regards,
Nikolay
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
Guys, this is awesome!!!
Happy to see yaql gets attention. One more initiative that you may find
interesting is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/159905/
This is an attempt to port yaql 1.0 from Python to JS so that the same can
be done in browser
Sincerely yours,
Stan Lagun
Principal Software
