Yes, dnsmasq is there as a simple solution for people that didn't want a
separate DNS server specified in their subnet.
Can you just enable DHCP on the subnet? Even though your containers don't
use it for addressing, it will still work for resolving DNS. (it doesn't
answer anonymous DHCP queries
On 11/05/2016 18:45, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Kevin Benton wrote:
>> neutron subnet-show with the UUID of the subnet they have a port on
>> will tell you.
>>
>> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Mike Spreitzer
> wrote:
>>
Whoops. What I just said was wrong if it hadn't been explicitly overwritten.
I think you will end up having to do a port-list looking for the DHCP
port(s).
http://paste.openstack.org/show/496604/
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Kevin Benton wrote:
> neutron subnet-show
neutron subnet-show with the UUID of the subnet they have a port on will
tell you.
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
> "Hayes, Graham" wrote on 05/10/2016 09:30:26 AM:
>
> > ...
> > > Ah, that may be what I want. BTW, I am not
On 09/05/2016 21:48, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
> "Hayes, Graham" wrote on 05/09/2016 04:08:07 PM:
>
> > ...
> > On 09/05/2016 20:55, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
> > ...
> > > Oh, right, the network gets to specify the rest of the FQDN. In my
> case
> > > I am interested in
On 9 May 2016 9:48 p.m., Mike Spreitzer wrote:
>
> "Hayes, Graham" wrote on
"Hayes, Graham" wrote on 05/09/2016 04:08:07 PM:
> ...
> On 09/05/2016 20:55, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
> ...
> > Oh, right, the network gets to specify
"Hayes, Graham" wrote on 05/09/2016 04:08:07 PM:
> ...
> On 09/05/2016 20:55, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
> ...
> > Oh, right, the network gets to specify the rest of the FQDN. In my
case
> > I am interested in Neutron Ports on tenant networks. So with a
per-port
> >
t;
> > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> > Date: 05/09/2016 03:05 PM
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [designate] multi-tenancy in
> > Neutron's DNS integration
> >
> > On 09/05/2016 19:21, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
> > > I jus
05/09/2016 03:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [designate] multi-tenancy in
> Neutron's DNS integration
>
> On 09/05/2016 19:21, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
> > I just read
> >
http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/adv-config-dns.htmland
> , unless
&
On 09/05/2016 19:21, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
> I just read
> http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/adv-config-dns.htmland,
> unless
> I missed something, it seems to be describing something that is not
> multi-tenant. I am focused on FQDNs for Neutron Ports. For those, only
> the
10 matches
Mail list logo