Another question about this, Kyle:
once merged, will there be a place where to read these approved specs, or
should we run it locally? I tried to find the approved *nova-specs *in
docs.openstack.org, but I couldn't find them.
Regards,
jaume
On 21 April 2014 09:02, Mandeep Dhami
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Jaume Devesa devv...@gmail.com wrote:
Another question about this, Kyle:
once merged, will there be a place where to read these approved specs, or
should we run it locally? I tried to find the approved *nova-specs *in
docs.openstack.org, but I couldn't find
Great! Thanks Anne!
On 22 April 2014 16:44, Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Jaume Devesa devv...@gmail.com wrote:
Another question about this, Kyle:
once merged, will there be a place where to read these approved specs, or
should we run it
Just for clarification. Jenkins link in the description puts the generated
HTML in the section Juno approved specs even tho' the blueprint is still
being reviewed. Am I looking at the right link?
Regards,
Mandeep
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Mike Scherbakov
mscherba...@mirantis.comwrote:
Yes. It shows up in the approved section since it's just a build of the
patch as-is.
The link is titled gate-neutron-specs-docs in the message from Jenkins.
--
Kevin Benton
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Mandeep Dhami dh...@noironetworks.comwrote:
Just for clarification. Jenkins link in
That's because spec was proposed to the juno/ folder. Look at
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openstack/neutron-specs/master/doc/source/index.rst,
if spec is in juno/ folder, then contents shows it as approved one.
Once merged, it means approved, right? So it is going to be Ok after merge.
Got it. Thanks.
Regards,
Mandeep
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Mike Scherbakov
mscherba...@mirantis.comwrote:
That's because spec was proposed to the juno/ folder. Look at
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openstack/neutron-specs/master/doc/source/index.rst,
if spec is in juno/ folder,
Hi Kyle,
I built template and it looks awesome. We are considering to use same
approach for Fuel.
My assumption is that spec will be on review for a negotiation time, which
is going to be quite a while. In my opinion, it is not always very
convenient to read spec in gerrit.
Did you guys have any
