>
> ...then there's no way I can know ahead of time what all those might be.
> (In particular, if I want to support new devices without updating my
> code.) I.e. I *can't* write the corresponding
> provider_tree.remove_trait(...) condition. Maybe that never becomes a
> real problem because
Excellent and astute questions, both of which came up in the discussion,
but I neglected to mention. (I had to miss *something*, right?)
See inline.
On 03/15/2018 02:29 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, Eric Fried wrote:
>
>> One of the takeaways from the Queens retrospective [1]
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, Eric Fried wrote:
One of the takeaways from the Queens retrospective [1] was that we
should be summarizing discussions that happen in person/hangout/IRC/etc.
to the appropriate mailing list for the benefit of those who weren't
present (or paying attention :P ). This is
