Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [nova] [all] potential enginefacade adjustment - can everyone live with this?

2015-01-26 Thread Matthew Booth
On 23/01/15 19:47, Mike Bayer wrote: Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2015, at 12:49 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote: Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/23/2015 05:38 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: Doug Hellmann

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [nova] [all] potential enginefacade adjustment - can everyone live with this?

2015-01-26 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015, at 08:55 AM, Matthew Booth wrote: On 23/01/15 19:47, Mike Bayer wrote: Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2015, at 12:49 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote: Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [nova] [all] potential enginefacade adjustment - can everyone live with this?

2015-01-23 Thread Mike Bayer
Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/23/2015 05:38 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: We put the new base class for RequestContext in its own library because both the logging and messaging code wanted to influence it's API. Would it make sense to

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [nova] [all] potential enginefacade adjustment - can everyone live with this?

2015-01-23 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
On 01/23/2015 05:38 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: We put the new base class for RequestContext in its own library because both the logging and messaging code wanted to influence it's API. Would it make sense to do this database setup there, too? whoa,

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [nova] [all] potential enginefacade adjustment - can everyone live with this?

2015-01-23 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015, at 12:49 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote: Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/23/2015 05:38 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: We put the new base class for RequestContext in its

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [nova] [all] potential enginefacade adjustment - can everyone live with this?

2015-01-23 Thread Mike Bayer
Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: We put the new base class for RequestContext in its own library because both the logging and messaging code wanted to influence it's API. Would it make sense to do this database setup there, too? whoa, where’s that? is this an oslo-wide

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [nova] [all] potential enginefacade adjustment - can everyone live with this?

2015-01-23 Thread Mike Bayer
Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote: Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/23/2015 05:38 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: We put the new base class for RequestContext in its own library because both the logging and messaging code wanted to

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [nova] [all] potential enginefacade adjustment - can everyone live with this?

2015-01-23 Thread Mike Bayer
Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2015, at 12:49 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote: Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/23/2015 05:38 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: We put the new base

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [nova] [all] potential enginefacade adjustment - can everyone live with this?

2015-01-23 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015, at 10:36 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: Hey all - Concerning the enginefacade system, approved blueprint: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/125181/ which will replace the use of oslo_db.sqlalchemy.EngineFacade ultimately across all projects that use it (which is, all of