On 24 Aug 2015, at 20:17, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
My point is the following: we’re not getting rid of oslo.messaging for
several reasons (community standard,
its developers have better vision and expertise at messaging etc.). In any
case we’ll have oslo.messaging as one
Renat,
Please file a blueprint to discuss the problem and options against
oslo-specs repository so we can get a headstart before the Tokyo summit.
thanks,
dims
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Renat Akhmerov rakhme...@mirantis.com
wrote:
(Resending the email that I sent last week but it
(Resending the email that I sent last week but it doesn’t seem to have been
sent out actually…)
On 19 Aug 2015, at 21:44, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
mailto:d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
Excerpts from Nikolay Makhotkin's message of 2015-08-19 17:16:14 +0300:
Hi, Davanum!
Have
Excerpts from Renat Akhmerov's message of 2015-08-24 19:03:51 +0600:
(Resending the email that I sent last week but it doesn’t seem to have been
sent out actually…)
On 19 Aug 2015, at 21:44, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
mailto:d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
Excerpts from
Nikolay,
Do you mean that you will *NOT* use oslo.messaging and use pika directly.
I'd strongly discourage that possibility.
Few members on the oslo.messaging team are looking at pika library already
and are doing a prototype:
Hi, Davanum!
Have you already read the thread [1]? It is about acknowledge feature in
oslo.messaging. Particularly, about the absent of this feature in
oslo.messaging.
The guys from messaging said that it is very problematically to add that
kind of feature to oslo.messaging because it does not
Excerpts from Nikolay Makhotkin's message of 2015-08-19 17:16:14 +0300:
Hi, Davanum!
Have you already read the thread [1]? It is about acknowledge feature in
oslo.messaging. Particularly, about the absent of this feature in
oslo.messaging.
The guys from messaging said that it is very
