Hi,
Le 18/06/2015 15:44, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
As per the subject line, we already have Python 3.5 in Debian (AFAICT,
from Debian Experimental, in version beta 2). As a consequence, we're
already running (unit) tests using Python 3.5. Some have failures: I
could see issues in
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2015-06-20 16:22:51 +1200:
On 19 June 2015 at 02:18, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote:
On 6/18/15, 08:44, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
Does this mean that Debian is going to ignore classifiers for all projects
that list
Excerpts from Dave Walker's message of 2015-06-20 14:05:48 +0100:
On 20 Jun 2015 1:05 pm, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
SNIP
Whether we want to support 3.4 and 3.5, or just 3.4 and then just 3.5
is an ecosystem question IMO, not an upstream one. 3.4 and 3.5 are
very
On 20 Jun 2015 1:05 pm, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
SNIP
Whether we want to support 3.4 and 3.5, or just 3.4 and then just 3.5
is an ecosystem question IMO, not an upstream one. 3.4 and 3.5 are
very similar when you consider the feature set crossover with 2.7.
Right, and
On 21/06/15 01:32, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Dave Walker's message of 2015-06-20 14:05:48 +0100:
On 20 Jun 2015 1:05 pm, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
SNIP
Whether we want to support 3.4 and 3.5, or just 3.4 and then just 3.5
is an ecosystem question IMO, not an
On 19 June 2015 at 02:18, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote:
On 6/18/15, 08:44, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
Does this mean that Debian is going to ignore classifiers for all projects
that list 3.4 without listing 3.5 and will start reporting bugs against
them before
On Jun 19, 2015 1:19 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/18/2015 09:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Brian Curtin's message of 2015-06-18 13:17:52 -0500:
On Thursday, June 18, 2015, Doug Hellmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 18/06/15 21:44, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
Based on that, I am confident in sticking with our plan of gating
using
3.4 for now and keeping an eye on the 3.5 packages being built
by Debian and Canonical.
Unless we shift platforms and go back to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/18/2015 09:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Brian Curtin's message of 2015-06-18 13:17:52 -0500:
On Thursday, June 18, 2015, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-06-18
On 6/18/15, 08:44, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
Hi!
tl;dr: skip this message, the subject line is enough! :)
As per the subject line, we already have Python 3.5 in Debian (AFAICT,
from Debian Experimental, in version beta 2). As a consequence, we're
already running (unit) tests using
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-06-18 15:44:17 +0200:
Hi!
tl;dr: skip this message, the subject line is enough! :)
As per the subject line, we already have Python 3.5 in Debian (AFAICT,
from Debian Experimental, in version beta 2). As a consequence, we're
already running
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
On Thursday, June 18, 2015, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-06-18 15:44:17 +0200:
Hi!
tl;dr: skip this message, the subject line is enough! :)
As per the
On Thursday, June 18, 2015, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-06-18 15:44:17 +0200:
Hi!
tl;dr: skip this message, the subject line is enough! :)
As per the subject line, we already have Python 3.5 in Debian (AFAICT,
from Debian
On 2015-06-18 15:48:28 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote:
Based on that, I am confident in sticking with our plan of gating using
3.4 for now and keeping an eye on the 3.5 packages being built by Debian
and Canonical.
Unless we shift platforms and go back to special-casing Py3K jobs, I
expect
Excerpts from Brian Curtin's message of 2015-06-18 13:17:52 -0500:
On Thursday, June 18, 2015, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-06-18 15:44:17 +0200:
Hi!
tl;dr: skip this message, the subject line is enough! :)
As per the
15 matches
Mail list logo
