Dear Horizon core reviewers,
I filed a bug recently (https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1231248) to add
Horizon UI support for Neutron NVP advanced service router. The Neutron plugin
has been merged and we would like to have the Horizon UI support for Havanas
release if possible.
I have
Hi,
The gating is broken due to the Neutron/Quantum name change. The root cause was
that the devstack code was accessing quantum directories for configuration
files and the repo has neutron directories. Please see the devstack patch
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/49483/. I hope that this will
Please see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/49483/
From: Matt Riedemann mrie...@us.ibm.commailto:mrie...@us.ibm.com
Date: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 7:19 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: Administrator
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Thomas Spatzier thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com
wrote:
A way to achieve the same behavior as you suggest but less verbose would be
to use relationships in HOT. We had some discussion about relationships
earlier this year and in other contexts, but this would fit
2013/10/3 Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com:
Please see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/49483/
That's s/quantum/neutron/ on stable - I'm confused why is that, it
should have been quantum everywhere in Grizzly.
Could you please expand your reasoning in the commit message? It also
doesn't help,
On 10/3/13 11:59 AM, Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/10/3 Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com:
Please see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/49483/
That's s/quantum/neutron/ on stable - I'm confused why is that, it
should have been quantum everywhere in Grizzly.
Please see below:
Hello everyone,
This morning we've got Nova, Neutron, Heat and Horizon all publishing
their first release candidate for the Havana release ! You can download
those RC1 tarballs at:
https://launchpad.net/nova/havana/havana-rc1
https://launchpad.net/neutron/havana/havana-rc1
On Wed, Oct 02 2013, Thomas Maddox wrote:
I'm working to make the sample pipeline optional and I'm stuck at a
decision point about whether I ought to use a collector config option
(like 'enable_sample_pipelines'), or let it be driven by setup.cfg (i.e.
the existence of sample plugin
Hi,
This seems to be my bad. I have abandoned the patch and am still looking
into the problems.
Thanks
Gary
On 10/3/13 12:14 PM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
On 10/3/13 11:59 AM, Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/10/3 Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com:
Please see
Hi Chris,
You probably encountered this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1156269
It been fixed here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/24600/
Btw, what code are you using?
Thanks,
Pavel
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:30:11 -0600
From: Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com
Hi all,
The Ceilometer project team holds a meeting in #openstack-meeting, see
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MeteringAgenda for more details.
Next meeting is on Thu Oct 3rd at 1500 UTC
Please add your name with the agenda item, so we know who to call on during
the meeting.
* Release
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02 2013, Thomas Maddox wrote:
I'm working to make the sample pipeline optional and I'm stuck at a
decision point about whether I ought to use a collector config option
(like 'enable_sample_pipelines'), or
On 10/3/13 8:15 AM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.commailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Julien Danjou
jul...@danjou.infomailto:jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02 2013, Thomas Maddox wrote:
I'm working to make the sample pipeline optional
On Thu, Oct 03 2013, Thomas Maddox wrote:
Interesting point, Doug and Julien. I'm thinking out loud, but if we wanted
to use pipeline.yaml, we could have an 'enabled' attribute for each
pipeline?
That would be an option, for sure. But just removing all of them should
also work.
I'm curious,
Hi,
I think that I may have stumbled upon the problem, but need the help from
someone on the infra team. Then again I may just be completely mistaken.
Prior to the little hiccup we have at the moment VM's that were used for
devstack on the infra side would have 1 interface:
2013-09-10
Hi Christopher,
Thanks for replying! I've been out last week hence this late email.
Le 20/09/2013 21:22, Christopher Armstrong a écrit :
Hello Simon! I've put responses below.
I'm kind of confused about your examples though, because you don't show
anything that depends on ComputeReady in your
Hi Clint,
Thanks for the reply! I'll update the bug you raised with more
information. In the meantime, I agree with you that cfn-hup is enough
for now.
BTW, is there any bug or missing feature that would prevent me from
replacing cfn-hup by os-collect-config?
Simon
Le 20/09/2013 22:12,
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Proposed_Agenda_for_October_3_2013
Blueprints (sdague)
* started cleaning up blueprints, need to start a purge of all the
Unknown items
Neutron job status (sdague)
Elastic Recheck Top issues found (mtreinish)
Stable branch timing
On 2013-10-03 06:54:10 -0700 (-0700), Gary Kotton wrote:
I think that I may have stumbled upon the problem, but need the help from
someone on the infra team.
[...]
I'm manually launching the test script on a fresh VM now and should
have something shortly.
--
Jeremy Stanley
The problems occur when the when the the following line is invoked:
https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/blob/stable/grizzly/lib/quantum#L302
But that line is reached only in case baremetal is enabled which isn't
the case in gate, is it?
Cheers,
Alan
Hi,
I'd like to raise an issue in the hopes of opening some discussion on the IRC
chat later today:
We see a critical requirement to support the creation of a savanna cluster
with neutron networking while leveraging a private network (i.e. without the
assignment of public IPs) - at
On 10/03/2013 11:21 AM, Jon Maron wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to raise an issue in the hopes of opening some discussion on
the IRC chat later today:
We see a critical requirement to support the creation of a savanna
cluster with neutron networking while leveraging a private network
(i.e. without the
On 10/03/2013 05:45 AM, Pavel Kravchenco wrote:
Hi Chris,
You probably encountered this bug:
*https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1156269*
It been fixed here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/24600/
Yes, that looks like what I'm seeing. Thanks for the pointer.
Btw, what code are you
This approach looks good.
But I'd like to outline an issue people might hit in real-world production
installations:
Let's imagine OpenStack is installed in HA mode. There are several
controllers,
they run Savanna and Q3 services in HA mode. The problem is that active
Savanna
service should run on
On 10/02/2013 11:42 PM, Lingxian Kong wrote:
Hi Chris:
Aftering exploring the code, I think there is already clean up on the
original compute node, it will check that the instances reported by the
driver are still associated with this host. If they are not, they will
be destroyed. Please refer
Is there a target date for updating the release notes at
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseNotes/Havana (other than
Keystone, which is already there)? I'm trying to get a handle on what
new features actually made it into Havana. Or is there a better way to
figure that out, other than
Nicholas Chase wrote:
Is there a target date for updating the release notes at
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseNotes/Havana (other than
Keystone, which is already there)? I'm trying to get a handle on what
new features actually made it into Havana. Or is there a better way to
figure
Hi,
I would like to share what Gary and I investigated, while it is not
addressed yet.
The cause is the failure of quantum-debug command in setup_quantum_debug
(https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/blob/stable/grizzly/stack.sh#L996).
We can reproduce the issue in local environment by
Hi all,
A quick update on some recent SmokeStack additions in the Havana dev cycle:
Several weeks back we added support for Ceilometer. Test configuration using
both MongoDB (Fedora 19) and MySQL (Centos 6.4) are currently being used to
test Ceilometer. Currently only the compute agent is
Hi all,
The [state-management] project team holds a weekly meeting in
#openstack-meeting on thursdays, 2000 UTC. The next meeting is today,
2013-10-03!!!
As usual, everyone is welcome :-)
Link: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/StateManagement
Taskflow:
Thomas Hervé the...@gmail.com wrote on 03.10.2013 09:59:02:
From: Thomas Hervé the...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 03.10.2013 10:01
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Autoscale and load balancers
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:07 PM,
On 01/10/13 00:07, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Just BTW:
I know that lot of folks were watching the youtube stream
(http://youtu.be/m3y6uD8yKVQ), so please feel free to give any feedback
you have to this thread. I believe that this is good way to proceed
forward and how to make things flexible
+1
-Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Iccha Sethi iccha.se...@rackspace.com
Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2013 12:28am
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] Nominating Fei Long Wang for glance core
Hey,
I would like to
+1
-Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Iccha Sethi iccha.se...@rackspace.com
Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2013 12:25am
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] Nominating Zhi Yan Liu for glance-core
Hey,
I would like to nominate
Hi All,
A blueprint has been registered to add IPAM and Policy
extensions to Neutron. Please review the blueprint and
the attached specification.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/juniper-contrail-ipam-policy-extensions-for-neutron
All comments are welcome.
Thanks,
Rudra
Hi!
We @Cisco just made the following repos public
https://github.com/CiscoSystems/donabe
https://github.com/CiscoSystems/curvature
Donabe was pitched as a recursive container before Heat days.
Curvature is an alternative interactive GUI front end to openstack
that can handle virtual resources,
Greetings,
The Havana feature freeze is over and the master branch is open for
Icehouse development. We put a -2 on a *lot* of patches during the
feature freeze. It seems that most of the ones I blocked have already
been automatically expired.
If you had a patch blocked for the feature freeze,
And just for some history on Donabe: the idea was 1st presented at the
E summit along with @dendrobates at
http://www.slideshare.net/ddutta1/donabe-models-openstack-essex-summit
debo
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Debojyoti Dutta ddu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
We @Cisco just made the following
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Debojyoti Dutta ddu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
We @Cisco just made the following repos public
https://github.com/CiscoSystems/donabe
https://github.com/CiscoSystems/curvature
Donabe was pitched as a recursive container before Heat days.
Curvature is an
If User X's existing instance is isolated from the change, but there's
no snapshot/clone/versioning of the current settings on X's instance
(via the trove database or jinja template), then how will
GET /configurations/:id return the correct/current settings? Unless
you're planning on communicating
I was wondering if there is any interest in adding an
on_shared_storage field to the Instance class. This would be set once
at instance creation time and we would then be able to avoid having the
admin manually pass it in for the various API calls
(evacuate/rebuild_instance/migration/etc.)
On October 3, 2013 12:44:50 PM Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com
wrote:
I was wondering if there is any interest in adding an on_shared_storage
field to the Instance class. This would be set once at instance creation
time and we would then be able to avoid having the admin
On 10/03/2013 02:02 PM, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
On October 3, 2013 12:44:50 PM Chris Friesen
chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote:
I was wondering if there is any interest in adding an
on_shared_storage field to the Instance class. This would be set
once at instance creation time and we would
Oops forgot the link on BP for versioning templates.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/trove/+spec/configuration-templates-versionable
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Craig Vyvial cp16...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been trying to figure out where a call for the default
configuration should go. I
On 10/3/13 8:53 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03 2013, Thomas Maddox wrote:
Interesting point, Doug and Julien. I'm thinking out loud, but if we
wanted
to use pipeline.yaml, we could have an 'enabled' attribute for each
pipeline?
That would be an option, for sure.
Hi Robert,
In general I buy the vision laid out in this email. I think Starting with the
customer story will keep us on the right track as to what features to
implement, working on most important stuff, etc. A CD tripleO setup sounds just
grand. For me though most of what you've laid out here
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
Now for a less condensed, and hopefully more useful version :)
Our goal is to deliver a continuously deployed version of OpenStack.
Right now, we're working on plumbing to build a /good/ version of
that. Note the
On 4 October 2013 11:00, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Robert,
In general I buy the vision laid out in this email. I think Starting with
the customer story will keep us on the right track as to what features to
implement, working on most important stuff, etc. A CD tripleO setup
Hi Kaiwai,
First, the bad news:
1. The Horizon release candidate has already been cut, so for Havana we're only
considering release-blocking bugs at this point (and even those have to meet a
high bar to warrant a new release candidate). The feature freeze deadline was
almost a month ago.
2.
RE: vlan trunking support for network tunnels
Copying to dev mailing list.
- Greg
-Original Message-
From: Kyle Mestery (kmestery) [mailto:kmest...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 6:33 AM
To: Bob Melander (bmelande)
Cc: Regnier, Greg J
Subject: Re: Service VM
On 4 October 2013 11:03, James Slagle james.sla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Robert Collins
In the call we had, we agreed that this approach makes a lot of sense,
and spent a bunch of time talking through the ramifications on TripleO
and Ironic, and sketched out one
51 matches
Mail list logo
