Hi Chris, Jiang,
We are also looking into enchantment of basic PCI pass-through to provide
SR-IOV based networking.
In order to support automatic provisioning, it requires the awareness to what
virtual network to connect the requested SR-IOV device.
This should be considered by the scheduler in
Hi,
The problem seems to be with the boto python library. I am not really familiar
with this but I have seen this is the last – we may need to update the
requirements again to exclude a specific version.
Thanks
Gary
From: Lingxian Kong mailto:anlin.k...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: OpenStack Developmen
Be patient. We can try to debug by ourselves to help the infra-team figure
it out.
2013/10/10 Gary Kotton
> Same on trunk!
>
> From: Administrator
> Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Date: Thursday, October 10, 2013 9:10 AM
> To: OpenStack De
Hi Gary:
Same problem with me. There may be some races between the parallelled
unittests.
2013/10/10 Gary Kotton
> Hi,
> The gate is once again broken:
>
> 2013-10-10 05:15:05.036 | Traceback (most recent call last):
>
> 2013-10-10 05:15:05.036 | File
> "/home/jenkins/workspace/gate-nova-py
Same on trunk!
From: Administrator mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>>
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Thursday, October 10, 2013 9:10 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: [openstack-de
Thanks for the pointer -- was not able to attend that meeting,
unfortunately. Couple of observations, based on what I've heard till now.
1. I think it is important not to restrict the discussion to Nova
resources. So, I like the general direction in [1] to target a generic
mechanism and API. How
Hi,
The gate is once again broken:
2013-10-10 05:15:05.036 | Traceback (most recent call last):
2013-10-10 05:15:05.036 | File
"/home/jenkins/workspace/gate-nova-python26/nova/tests/test_api.py", line 389,
in test_group_name_valid_length_security_group
2013-10-10 05:15:05.036 | self.expec
Debojyoti Dutta wrote on 10/09/2013 02:48:26 AM:
>
> Mike, I agree we could have a cleaner API but I am not sure how
> cleanly it will integrate with current nova which IMO should be test
> we should pass (assuming we do cross services later)
I think the cleaner APIs integrate with Nova as well a
Yes, there is more than the northbound API to discuss. Gary started us
there in the Scheduler chat on Oct 1, when he broke the issues down like
this:
11:12:22 AM garyk: 1. a user facing API
11:12:41 AM garyk: 2. understanding which resources need to be tracked
11:12:48 AM garyk: 3. backend impl
Aparna Datt writes:
> hi i was going through code of nova on github...but there are no readme
> files available regarding code organization of nova. Can anyone provide me
> with a link from where i can begin reading the code ? or if anyone can help
> me by indicators on from which files / fol
Hi Rudra,
Please see inline:
Thanks,
Ronak
> --
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 18:25:15 +
> From: Rudra Rugge
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Extraroute and router extensions
> Message-ID: <172af81c
I'm interested in serving on the OpenStack TC.
# About me
I've been working on OpenStack for only a year now, since joining
Monty's merry gang of reprobates at HP. However I've been
entirely focused on networking and distributed systems since ~2000 -
having as highlights -core membership in the s
+1. Thanks Monty, very good clarification and suggestion!
2013/10/9 Nachi Ueno
> +1
>
> 2013/10/8 Monty Taylor :
> > Hey!
> >
> > Got a question on IRC which seemed fair game for a quick mailing list
> post:
> >
> > Q: I see both addCleanup and tearDown in nova's test suite - which one
> > shou
Thanks for the docs. It looks like I got through all of that already, its the
authentication module part that is throwing me.
I managed to manually get a token by putting mod_krb5 on and using curl against it, giving curl a
username/password.
If I try and give that generated token back though i
On 09/10/13 19:31 +0100, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 06:59:22PM +0200, Alex Rudenko wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've read this thread and I'd like to share some thoughts. In my opinion,
workflows (which run on VMs) can be integrated with heat templates as
follows:
1. workflow defini
Hi Kevin,
It has been awhile, but here are some notes I took.
Regards,
Mark Miller
-
Keystone Apache2 frontend Installation and Configuration
Instructions below are based off of documentation/examples from URL
https://keystone-voms.readthedocs.org/en/latest/re
Hi all,
The [state-management] project team holds a weekly meeting in
#openstack-meeting on thursdays, 2000 UTC. The next meeting is tomorrow,
2013-10-10!!!
As usual, everyone is welcome :-)
Link: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/StateManagement
Taskflow: https://wiki.openstack.org/Tas
In an effort to better support the upcoming design summit the Infra
team will be upgrading etherpad.openstack.org at 1600UTC Sunday,
October 13. There will be a short time period where etherpads are
inaccessible as we update DNS records and replicate databases. You
might also need to clear your bro
I've just started playing around with Keystone under Apache. I have managed to
get it embedded now and all services talking to it.
Now, I'm trying to get it to do apache authentication. The documentation states
that it should honor REMOTE_USER if its present.
The default wsgi-keystone.conf has
Stan Lagun wrote on 10/09/2013 04:07:33 PM:
It seems to me that something is missing in our discussion.
> If something depends on something else there must be a definition of
> that something. It is clear that it is not the case that one
> instance depends on another but one application depend
Thanks for the clarification.
I'm not sure how much of heat has to change to support what you are aiming for.
Maybe heat should use taskflow ;)
From: Lakshminaraya Renganarayana
mailto:lren...@us.ibm.com>>
Date: Wednesday, October 9, 2013 4:34 PM
To: Joshua Harlow mailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com>
Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote on 10/09/2013
03:37:01 PM:
> From: Georgy Okrokvertskhov
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
> Date: 10/09/2013 03:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software orchestration
> proposal for workflows
>
> Thank you for bringing your use case and your
Hi Joshua,
I agree that there is an element of taskflow in what I described. But, I am
aiming for something much more lightweight which can be naturally blended
with HOT constructs and Heat engine. To be a bit more specific, Heat
already has dependencies and coordination mechanisms. So, I am aimi
Hi all,
I'd like to announce my candidacy for a seat on the OpenStack
Technical Committee.
- General background -
I have over 15 years of experience designing and building distributed
systems. I am currently a Principal Engineer at Rackspace, where
I have been for a little over 3 years now. Mo
Hi,
The original use cases I called out include multiple service instances within a
single VM, but not your use case of a single logical service spread across
multiple VMs for scale-out. Have you identified requirements for these VMs
that might be specified within the scope of this blueprint?
Hi Sumit,
Please see inline.
On Oct 9, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Sumit Naiksatam
mailto:sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
Hi Harshad,
I agree with you that the "service instance" terminology might be a little
confusing here. The way it was phrased in the original email, I believe it was
meant to s
Hi Sumit,
I also got confused with service VM and service instance definition. I assumed
both being the same and hence the networks question.
Rudra
On Oct 9, 2013, at 1:54 PM, Sumit Naiksatam
mailto:sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
Hi Rudra,
We tried to separate policy from mechanism for t
On 10/9/2013 12:55 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Your example sounds a lot like what taskflow is build for doing.
I'm not that familiar with Heat, so I wanted to bounce this off of
you before doing a public foot-in-mouth on the mailing list.
Is the real issue here the difference between *building*
Thanks Bob, I agree this is an important aspect of the implementation.
However, apart from being able to specify which network(s) the VM has
interfaces on, what more needs to be done specifically in the proposed
library to achieve the tenant level isolation?
Thanks,
~Sumit.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 a
Hi Harshad,
I agree with you that the "service instance" terminology might be a little
confusing here. The way it was phrased in the original email, I believe it
was meant to suggest an association with the corresponding Neutron logical
service (the XaaS to be precise).
That said (and to your poi
Adam,
Thank you for the reply. The extension document is pretty good. The
configuration instructions on the other hand need some help and I had to
combine information from multiple sources to get OS-EP-FILTERing up and
running. Following are the final steps that I used.
Mark
---
Hi Salvatore,
Thanks for your comments. I agree backward compatibility would be the most
important aspect and the change can be managed accordingly.
Regarding host_routes in subnet:
Do we need to keep host_routes in the subnet - could this be moved to
extraroutes extension and linked back to su
Hi Rudra,
We tried to separate policy from mechanism for this blueprint, and are
trying to address the latter. I believe the logic for scaling, and or
clustering multiple service VMs to map to a logical service instance would
lie in the service plugin which realizes the logical service instance.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - R&D -
Corvallis) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am attempting to test the Havana v3 OS-EP-FILTER extension with the
> latest RC1 bits and I get a 404 error response.
>
> The documentation actually shows 2 different URIs for this API:
>
>
We have imporved the extension enumeration in Keystone. If you got to
http://hostname:35357/v3 you should see a listing of the extensions that
are enabled for that Keystone server
On 10/08/2013 07:07 PM, Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - R&D - Corvallis)
wrote:
Sorry to send this out again, but
It seems to me that something is missing in our discussion.
If something depends on something else there must be a definition of that
something. It is clear that it is not the case that one instance depends on
another but one application depends on another application. But there is no
such thing a
Your example sounds a lot like what taskflow is build for doing.
https://github.com/stackforge/taskflow/blob/master/taskflow/examples/calculate_in_parallel.py
is a decent example.
In that one, tasks are created and input/output dependencies are specified
(provides, rebind, and the execute funct
Correct links
Agenda:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SavannaAgenda#Agenda_for_October.2C_10
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Savanna+Meeting&iso=20131010T18
Sincerely yours,
Sergey Lukjanov
Savanna Technical Lead
Mirantis Inc.
On Oct 9, 2013, at 23:32, Sergey
Hello all,
Is anyone working on NATaaS?
I know we have some developer working on Router as a Service and they
probably want to include NAT functionality but I have some interest in
having NAT as a Service.
Please, response is somebody is interested in having some discussions about
it.
Thanks,
Hi Lakshminaraya,
Thank you for bringing your use case and your thought here. That is exactly
tried to achieve in Murano project.
There are important aspects you highlighted. Sometime resource model is
two high level to describe deployment process. If you start to use more
granular approach to ha
Hi folks,
We'll be having the Savanna team meeting as usual in #openstack-meeting-alt
channel.
*I would like to see all Savanna contributors to discuss talks for Design
Summit at this meeting.*
Agenda:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SavannaAgenda#Agenda_for_October.2C_3
http://www.
Hi,
I'd like to put my candidacy for a position on the OpenStack Technical
Committee.
I have been involved with OpenStack since before it actually existed
while working on Swift at the Rackspace Cloud.
My experience with OpenSource started in the late 90s while working on
the Linux-Mandrake dist
Hi Rudra,
Some comments inline.
Regards,
Salvatore
Il 09/ott/2013 19:27 "Rudra Rugge" ha scritto:
>
> Updated the subject [neutron]
>
> Hi All,
>
> Is the extra route extension always tied to the router extension or
> can it live in a separate route-table container. If extra-route routes
> are
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Sumanth Suresh Nagadavalli <
suma...@thoughtworks.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Recently we had a bug where page-size parameter was not passed in from
> nova while making a call to glance for image list. This was addressed by
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/43262/.
>
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 06:59:22PM +0200, Alex Rudenko wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've read this thread and I'd like to share some thoughts. In my opinion,
> workflows (which run on VMs) can be integrated with heat templates as
> follows:
>
>1. workflow definitions should be defined separately
Steven Hardy wrote on 10/09/2013 05:24:38 AM:
>
> So as has already been mentioned, Heat defines an internal workflow,
based
> on the declarative model defined in the template.
>
> The model should define dependencies, and Heat should convert those
> dependencies into a workflow internally. IMO
Updated the subject [neutron]
Hi All,
Is the extra route extension always tied to the router extension or
can it live in a separate route-table container. If extra-route routes
are available in separate container then sharing of such
containers across networks is possible.
Another reason to re
Howdy ya'll!
==Who am I==
I'd like to also put myself up for the Technical Committee candidate position,
via one of the seats that are being made available.
I have been active with OpenStack since ~around~ diablo and have helped lead
the effort to 'marry' OpenStack and Y! in a way that benefits
The Heat team holds a weekly meeting in #openstack-meeting, see
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/HeatAgenda for more details
The next meeting is on Wed Oct 9th at 2000 UTC
Current topics for discussion:
* Review last week's actions
* RC2 bug status
* https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Relea
Hi All,
Is the extra route extension always tied to the router extension or
can it live in a separate route-table container. If extra-route routes
are available in separate container then sharing of such
containers across networks is possible.
Another reason to remove the dependency would be to
I'm copying openstack-dev for posterity and because smarter people than me hang out there and might be able to answer any questions I can't. :-)
There are a couple of other dependencies you will need to install before the test cases will run successfully (I always forget because my development en
Excerpts from Georgy Okrokvertskhov's message of 2013-10-09 08:37:36 -0700:
> Hi,
>
> In addition I want to add couple words about flexibility and debugging
> capabilities. I believe it is quite important for HOT template engine to
> control all aspects of deployment process execution including so
I favor separation of concerns. I think (4), at least, has got nothing to
do with infrastructure orchestration, the primary concern of today's heat
engine. I advocate (4), but as separate functionality.
Regards,
Mike
Alex Rudenko wrote on 10/09/2013 12:59:22 PM:
> From: Alex Rudenko
> To:
Hi everyone,
I've read this thread and I'd like to share some thoughts. In my opinion,
workflows (which run on VMs) can be integrated with heat templates as
follows:
1. workflow definitions should be defined separately and processed by
stand-alone workflow engines (chef, puppet etc).
2.
Admin creating service instance for a tenant could common use case. But
ownership of service can be controlled via already existing access control
mechanism in openstack. If the service instance belonged to a particular
project then other tenants should by definition should not be able to use
this
There are also times when I know a hypervisor needs to be failed even if Nova
has not detected it. Typical examples would be an intervention on a network
cable or retirement of a rack.
The problem of VM Zombies does need to be addressed too. Not simple to solve.
Thus, I feel a shared effort in
Hi Yathi,
Thanks for having taken time explaining your vision.
Climate is about reservations, ie. preempting resources capacity and
granting a user he will actually get exclusive access to a certain set
of resources he asks for a certain period of time.
The resource placement decisions are the
Hi,
In addition I want to add couple words about flexibility and debugging
capabilities. I believe it is quite important for HOT template engine to
control all aspects of deployment process execution including software
components. Right now I believe Heat lack of control of what is going on
the VM
> Thanks, we're certainly interested in Murano, and are keen to discuss your
> roadmap, and where requirements and integration opportunities exist
Glad to here it. The same is true from Murano side.
On sample SQL workflow: that was just an example. I didn't want to bother
you with a SQL Server dep
Just a quick note to say that we're skipping the XenAPI meeting this week as a
couple of key participants have other commitments.
Normal service will resume next week.
Bob
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 02:31:34PM +0200, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On 2013/08/10 13:13, Chris Jones wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On 8 October 2013 11:59, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
>
> * Example: It doesn't make sense, that someone who is
> core-reviewer
> based on im
The Ceilometer project team holds a meeting in #openstack-meeting, see
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MeteringAgenda for more details.
Next meeting is on Wed Oct 9th at 2100 UTC
Please add your name with the agenda item, so we know who to call on during
the meeting.
* Release python-ce
Thanks, that helps a lot. At what point in the process is it decided (and
by what) which host will run the VM instance? Is that host picked from
the same pool as is used for non-reserved instances? How does the outline
go if there is not enough capacity for the reserved instance?
Thanks,
Mik
Alex,
You are absolutely right. We need multiple confirmations that host is
actually failed on physical level and must be evacuated before we proceed
with auto-evacuate. Fencing is also requirement for such kind of action.
This etherpad [1] has some great notes and suggestions on the topic. Hope
Tim,
Right now it won't and that is the problem we are trying to solve: combine
HARestarter with additional script/service so one doesn't interfere with
the other.
And this exposes a design gap or glitch, as we effectively going to have 2
services to execute the same task. This gap is something w
> Hypervisor failure detection is also more or less solved problem in Nova
[2]. There are other candidates for that task as well, like Ceilometer's
hardware agent [3] (still WIP to my knowledge).
The problem is that in some cases you want to be *really* sure that the
hypervisor is down before r
Hello Aparna,
I would suggest to start from Nova Developer Guide [1] to understand what
Nova is in general, what services it consists of and so on.
There are different approaches how to learn new stuff. I personally prefer
the 'top-bottom' one, i.e. when you start from high-level concepts
and gra
Hi Aparna,
These posts are a little out of date (written during the switch to openstack
common/oslo), but might help?
http://www.sandywalsh.com/2012/04/openstack-nova-internals-pt1-overview.html
http://www.sandywalsh.com/2012/09/openstack-nova-internals-pt2-services.html
If you find they're ter
Would the HARestarter approach work for VMs which were not launched by Heat ?
We expect to have some applications driven by Heat but lots of others would not
be (especially the more 'pet'-like traditional workloads).
Tim
From: Oleg Gelbukh [mailto:ogelb...@mirantis.com]
Sent: 09 October 2013 1
Hi, Giuseppe,
Right now I'm preparing a review with very initial MongoDB support. It is
not a fully working solution but rather a point to start. I hope it will be
available in gerrit today.
If you will not find it by today's evening, please, ping me tomorrow, I'll
send the link.
Best wishes
On
Hello,
We have much interest in this discussion (with focus on second scenario
outlined by Tim), and working on its design at the moment. Thanks to
everyone for valuable insights in this thread.
It looks like external orchestration daemon problem is partially solved
already by Heat with HARestart
Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
> I'd like to announce my candidacy for the TC.
> [...]
Confirmed.
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Mike, I'll try to describe the reservation process for the virtual
reservations. I'll use Nova project as an example.
As I said, this Nova workflow is only the example that may and certainly
will be modified for other 'virtual' projects.
1) User goes to Nova via CLI/Dashboard and commits all usua
Gareth wrote:
> it seems that we didn't log this channel in
> here: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2013/
Meetings are logged per-meeting. This one in particular is logged at
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/project/
Cheers,
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
I'd like to announce my candidacy for the TC.
I have been actively involved with OpenStack for about a year and before that I
was in observer mode since Diablo timeframe. I have contributions to different
OpenStack projects including Oslo, Swift, Nova client, Hacking, Pbr, Jeepyb and
etc., you
Anita Kuno wrote:
> Candidate proposals for the Technical Committee positions (11 positions)
> are now open and will remain open until 23:59 UTC October 10, 2013.
Reminder: You have until tomorrow Thursday, 23:59 UTC to announce your
candidacy to the TC. We currently have 17 candidates for 11 posi
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 12:53:45AM +0400, Stan Lagun wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I’m one of the engineer working on Murano project. Recently we started a
> discussion about Murano and Heat Software orchestration and I want to
> continue this discussion with more technical details.
Thanks, we're certainly
Hello everyone,
The havana release cycle for Swift already saw the releases of the 1.9.0
and 1.9.1 versions. The final coordinated release for the Havana cycle
shall include Swift 1.10.0. We now have a Swift release candidate for this:
https://launchpad.net/swift/havana/1.10.0-rc1
Unless release
On 10/9/13 6:53 AM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Yes, that helps. Please, guys, do not interpret my questions as
hostility, I really am just trying to understand. I think there is
some overlap between your concerns and mine, and I hope we can work
together.
No probs at all. Don't see a sign of hosti
On 2013/08/10 23:53, Robert Collins wrote:
On 9 October 2013 07:24, Jiří Stránský wrote:
Clint and Monty,
thank you for such good responses. I am new in TripleO team indeed and I was
mostly concerned by the "line in the sand". Your responses shed some more
light on the issue for me and i hope
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message
> From: Clint Byrum
> To: openstack-dev ,
> Date: 09.10.2013 03:54
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software orchestration
> proposal for workflows
>
> Excerpts from Stan Lagun's message of 2013-10-08 13:53:45 -0700:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > That is why
81 matches
Mail list logo
