Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][horizon]Heat UI related requirements & roadmap

Excerpts from Tim Schnell's message of 2013-11-26 13:24:22 -0800: > So the originally question that I attempted to pose was, "Can we add a > schema-less metadata section to the template that can be used for a > variety of purposes?". It looks like the answer is no, we need to discuss > the features

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Definition feedback

> On Nov 26, 2013, at 11:10 PM, Adrian Otto wrote: > > > >> On Nov 26, 2013, at 4:20 PM, "Clayton Coleman" wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Nov 26, 2013, at 6:30 PM, Adrian Otto wrote: >>> >>> Tom, >>> >>> On Nov 26, 2013, at 12:09 PM, "Tom Deckers (tdeckers)" >>> wrote: >>> Hi All,

[openstack-dev] [Mistral] Invitation to discuss DSL and API specs

Hi, I’d like to invite everyone to start discussing in details Mistral DSL and API specifications. Here are the links to the corresponding etherpads: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MistralDSLSpecification https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MistralAPISpecification Please share what you think abo

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][horizon]Heat UI related requirements & roadmap

Excerpts from Ladislav Smola's message of 2013-11-26 06:04:12 -0800: > Hello, > > seems too big to do the inline comments, so just a few notes here: > > If we truly want to have Templates portable, it would mean to have the > 'metadata' somehow standardised, right? Can you point to another port

Re: [openstack-dev] excessively difficult to support both iso8601 0.1.4 and 0.1.8 as deps

after update to iso8601>=0.1.8, it breaks stable/neutron jenkins tests, because stable/glance requires iso8601<=0.1.4, log info https://jenkins02.openstack.org/job/periodic-tempest-devstack-vm-neutron-stable-grizzly/43/console , I have filed a bug to track this https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+b

<    1   2