On 12/06/2013 09:39 PM, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote:
Thanks for the comments and questions! I fully expect that this list of
requirements
will need to be fleshed out, refined, and heavily modified, so the more the
merrier.
Comments inline:
*** Requirements are assumed to be targeted for
On 09/12/13 18:01, Jay Dobies wrote:
I believe we are still 'fighting' here with two approaches and I believe
we need both. We can't only provide a way 'give us resources we will do
a magic'. Yes this is preferred way - especially for large deployments,
but we also need a fallback so that user
On 12/09/2013 05:16 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
Hi,
A patch in neutronclient [1] which updates iso8601 requirement to 0.1.8
fails with grenade due to iso8601 version mismatch [2].
(It blocks the patch for a month.)
The error occurs in old devstack (i.e., grizzly devstack).
I I see both
- As an infrastructure administrator, Anna wants to be able to unallocate a
node from a deployment.
Why? Whats her motivation. One plausible one for me is 'a machine
needs to be serviced so Anna wants to remove it from the deployment to
avoid causing user visible downtime.' So
On 2013-12-09 08:02, Maru Newby wrote:
Are any other projects interested in adding back the post-mortem
debugging support we lost in the move away from nose? I have a patch
in review for neutron and salv-orlando asked whether oslo might be the
better place for it.
On 12/06/2013 05:40 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-12-06 16:30, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2013-12-06 13:38:16 -0800:
On 2013-12-06 15:14, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
Hello, Sean.
I get the issue with upgrade path. User doesn't want to update
config unless one is
Ack
On 09/12/2013 15:54, Tiwari, Arvind wrote:
Thanks David,
Let me update the etherpad with this proposal.
Arvind
-Original Message-
From: David Chadwick [mailto:d.w.chadw...@kent.ac.uk]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 2:44 AM
To: Tiwari, Arvind; Adam Young; OpenStack
Hi All,
Last couple of month Mirantis team was working on new scalable scheduler
architecture. The main concept was proposed by Boris Pavlovic in the
following blue print
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/no-db-scheduler and Alexey
Ovchinnikov prepared a bunch of patches
Thanks for the clarification.
After I posted the mail, I found the bug [1] due to the same cause and
ongoing work.
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1255419
jenkins tests fails for neutron/grizzly duo to iso8601 version
requirement conflict
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Sean
Hi,
We will hold our second Git Integration working group meeting on IRC in #solum
on Monday, December 9, 2013 1700 UTC / 0900 PST.
Agenda for today's meeting:
* Administrative:
* Decide whether to continue this meeting at the same time in
January
* Topics:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-09 08:17:45 -0800:
On 12/06/2013 05:40 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-12-06 16:30, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2013-12-06 13:38:16 -0800:
On 2013-12-06 15:14, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
Hello, Sean.
I get the
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 12/08/2013 07:36 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 8 December 2013 17:23, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
I suggested salt because we could very easily make trove and savana into
salt masters (if we
- Original Message -
Hi,
We will hold our second Git Integration working group meeting on IRC in
#solum on Monday, December 9, 2013 1700 UTC / 0900 PST.
Agenda for today's meeting:
* Administrative:
* Decide whether to continue this meeting at the same time in
Excerpts from Herman Narkaytis's message of 2013-12-09 08:18:17 -0800:
Hi All,
Last couple of month Mirantis team was working on new scalable scheduler
architecture. The main concept was proposed by Boris Pavlovic in the
following blue print
On Dec 5, 2013, at 8:11 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
I think the security issue can be handled by not actually giving the
underlying resource to the user in the first place.
So, for example, if I wanted a bare metal node's worth of resource for my own
containering, I'd ask for a bare metal
On 12/09/2013 11:38 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-09 08:17:45 -0800:
On 12/06/2013 05:40 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-12-06 16:30, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2013-12-06 13:38:16 -0800:
On 2013-12-06 15:14, Yuriy Taraday
On Sunday, December 08, 2013 11:32:50 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote:
Hi Neutron team,
I'm working on building Third-party testing for Neutron Ryu plugin.
I intend to use Jenkins and gerrit-trigger plugin.
It is required that Third-party testing provides verify vote for
all changes to a
Hi,
Thanks for joining today’s Mistral community meeting. Here are the links to
meeting minutes and log:
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2013/mistral.2013-12-09-16.01.html
Log:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2013/mistral.2013-12-09-16.01.log.html
Responses inline.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 12/09/2013 10:12 AM, Brant Knudson wrote:
Monty -
Thanks for doing the work already to get the infrastructure set up.
Looks like I've got the easy part here. I posted an initial patch that
has one
On 2013-12-09 11:07:50 -0600 (-0600), Brant Knudson wrote:
[...]
Is testing multiple versions of keystoneclient actually worth it?
If the other projects don't feel the need for this then why does
Keystone? It's actually caught problems so it's proved useful to
Keystone, and we're making
On 2013-12-09 10:55, Sean Dague wrote:
On 12/09/2013 11:38 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-09 08:17:45 -0800:
On 12/06/2013 05:40 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-12-06 16:30, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2013-12-06 13:38:16 -0800:
I'm thinking more generic:
The cloud provider will provide one or more suballocating images. The one
Triple O uses to take a bare metal node and make vm's available would be the
obvious one to make available initially. I think that one should not have a
security concern since it is already
On 12/09/2013 09:41 AM, David Boucha wrote:
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
mailto:mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 12/08/2013 07:36 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 8 December 2013 17:23, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
mailto:mord...@inaugust.com
The Marconi project team holds a weekly meeting in #openstack-meeting-alt
on Tuesdays, 1500
UTChttp://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?hour=15min=0sec=0.
The next meeting is Tomorrow, Dec. 10. Everyone is welcome, but please
take a minute to review the wiki before attending for the
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2013-12-09 11:07:50 -0600 (-0600), Brant Knudson wrote:
[...]
Is testing multiple versions of keystoneclient actually worth it?
If the other projects don't feel the need for this then why does
Keystone? It's
Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2013-12-09 09:34:06 -0800:
I'm thinking more generic:
The cloud provider will provide one or more suballocating images. The one
Triple O uses to take a bare metal node and make vm's available would be the
obvious one to make available initially. I
On 09/12/13 06:31, Steven Hardy wrote:
Hi all,
So I've been getting concerned about $subject recently, and based on some
recent discussions so have some other heat-core folks, so I wanted to start
a discussion where we can agree and communicate our expectations related to
nomination for
On 12/09/2013 04:10 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
From looking it appears that RabbitMQ's support is via an experimental
plugin. I don't know any more about it. Has anyone looked at it in
detail?
I believe initial support was added in 3.1.0:
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
Hi,
We will hold our second Git Integration working group meeting on IRC in
#solum on Monday, December 9, 2013 1700 UTC / 0900 PST.
Agenda for today's meeting:
* Administrative:
* Decide whether to
Sorry for the broken link
Here is a better one:
https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/119JV_dG_odWVVKTcn51qyRh3rW-253uUqfcg9CFQDtg/pub?w=960h=720
Sent from my iPhone
On 8 בדצמ 2013, at 17:31, Avishay Balderman
avish...@radware.commailto:avish...@radware.com wrote:
Hi
I was thinking about a
Excerpts from Steven Dake's message of 2013-12-09 09:41:06 -0800:
On 12/09/2013 09:41 AM, David Boucha wrote:
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
mailto:mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 12/08/2013 07:36 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 8 December
If I am correct of my parsing of the salt nomenclature, Salt provides a
Master (eg a server) and minions (eg agents that connect to the salt
server). The salt server tells the minions what to do.
Almost - salt can use master, but it can also use the local filesystem (or
other providers of
This list of features makes me very nervous from a security standpoint. Are we
talking about giving an agent an arbitrary shell command or file to install,
and it goes and does that, or are we simply triggering a preconfigured action
(at the time the agent itself was installed)?
From: Steven
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/09/2013 09:41 AM, David Boucha wrote:
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.comwrote:
On 12/08/2013 07:36 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 8 December 2013 17:23, Monty Taylor
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting tomorrow, Tuesday December 10th, at 19:00 UTC in
#openstack-meeting
Meeting agenda available here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is
welcome to to add agenda items)
Everyone interested in
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Steven Dake's message of 2013-12-09 09:41:06 -0800:
On 12/09/2013 09:41 AM, David Boucha wrote:
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
mailto:mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Clark Boylan clark.boy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:53 PM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote:
It's great that tempest tests for ironic have been submitted! I was
reviewing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/48109/ and noticed that the
tests
Hi,
On Wednesday December 11, 2013 we will remove the ability to use
reverify no bug to re-trigger gate runs for changes that have failed
tests.
This was previously discussed[1] on this list. There are a few key
things to keep in mind:
* This only applies to reverify, not recheck. That is, it
Hi, ALL
Recently I've been working on two blueprints[1][2], both involved with
recording scheduling information. And would like to hear some comments for
several design choices.
Problem Statement
--
* NoValidHost exception might masked out real failure reason to spin up an
instance.
Consider
Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2013-12-09 03:31:36 -0800:
Hi all,
So I've been getting concerned about $subject recently, and based on some
recent discussions so have some other heat-core folks, so I wanted to start
a discussion where we can agree and communicate our expectations
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2013-12-09 09:52:25 -0800:
On 09/12/13 06:31, Steven Hardy wrote:
Hi all,
So I've been getting concerned about $subject recently, and based on some
recent discussions so have some other heat-core folks, so I wanted to start
a discussion where we
2013/12/9 Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
Excerpts from Steven Dake's message of 2013-12-09 09:41:06 -0800:
On 12/09/2013 09:41 AM, David Boucha wrote:
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
mailto:mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 12/08/2013 07:36
On 2013-12-09 11:50:31 -0600 (-0600), Brant Knudson wrote:
[...]
I don't know of any specific testing that verifies that the
client works against older (stable/*) servers. Maybe it happens
when you submit a change to stable/ later.
When a change is submitted or approved for a stable/foo server
On 12/09/2013 12:56 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
In the case of Nova (and others that followed Nova's messaging
patterns), I firmly believe that for scaling reasons, we need to move
toward it becoming the norm to use peer-to-peer messaging for most
things. For example, the API and conductor services
2013/12/9 Kurt Griffiths kurt.griffi...@rackspace.com
This list of features makes me *very* nervous from a security
standpoint. Are we talking about giving an agent an arbitrary shell command
or file to install, and it goes and does that, or are we simply triggering
a preconfigured action
On 09/12/13 14:03, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2013-12-09 09:52:25 -0800:
On 09/12/13 06:31, Steven Hardy wrote:
Hi all,
So I've been getting concerned about $subject recently, and based on some
recent discussions so have some other heat-core folks, so I wanted
On 12/09/2013 11:07 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 12/09/2013 10:12 AM, Brant Knudson wrote:
Monty -
Thanks for doing the work already to get the infrastructure set up.
Looks like I've got the easy part here. I posted an initial patch that
has one test from keystone in
On 10 December 2013 00:31, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
So I've been getting concerned about $subject recently, and based on some
recent discussions so have some other heat-core folks, so I wanted to start
a discussion where we can agree and communicate our expectations
On 12/06/2013 04:44 AM, David Chadwick wrote:
Another alternative is to change role name into role display name,
indicating that the string is only to be used in GUIs, is not guaranteed
to be unique, is set by the role creator, can be any string in any
character set, and is not used by the
As per https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings there is no meeting at 2000
UTC, so let's meet up together on #openstack-meeting in 10 mins.
Thanks,
-Sylvain
2013/12/9 Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.com
Time is ok for me too.
@Sylvain, IMO policies could not be high prioritized when
On 09/12/2013 19:37, Adam Young wrote:
On 12/06/2013 04:44 AM, David Chadwick wrote:
Another alternative is to change role name into role display name,
indicating that the string is only to be used in GUIs, is not guaranteed
to be unique, is set by the role creator, can be any string in any
On 9 December 2013 23:56, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2013/07/12 01:59, Robert Collins wrote:
* Creation
* Manual registration
* hardware specs from Ironic based on mac address (M)
Ironic today will want IPMI address + MAC for each NIC + disk/cpu/memory
On 12/09/2013 03:04 PM, David Chadwick wrote:
On 09/12/2013 19:37, Adam Young wrote:
On 12/06/2013 04:44 AM, David Chadwick wrote:
Another alternative is to change role name into role display name,
indicating that the string is only to be used in GUIs, is not guaranteed
to be unique, is set
Huge thanks for our Russian peers who did exceptional efforts for joining
us exceptionnally today at 2000 UTC (midnight their time), I owe you a beer
:-)
You can find our weekly meeting minutes on
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/climate/2013/climate.2013-12-09-20.01.html
Thanks,
-Sylvain
Hi David,
I have updated the ether pad with below comments.
Regards,
Arvind
Another alternative is to change role name into role display name, indicating
that the string is only to be used in GUIs, is not guaranteed to be unique, is
set by the role creator, can be any string in any
On 6 December 2013 14:11, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov wrote:
I think the security issue can be handled by not actually giving the
underlying resource to the user in the first place.
So, for example, if I wanted a bare metal node's worth of resource for my own
containering, I'd ask for a
On 12/09/2013 04:05 PM, Brent Eagles wrote:
On 12/04/2013 07:56 PM, Tom Fifield wrote:
On 05/12/13 01:14, Brent Eagles wrote:
Hi,
snip
I think that's a great idea.
What kind of format would you like to see the recepies in?
Regards,
Tom
I think a wiki is the right way to start. It
On 10 December 2013 07:37, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
We can test the ironic services, database, and the driver interfaces by
using our fake driver within a single devstack VM today (I'm not sure the
exercises for all of this have been written yet, but it's
Hi,
As a part of Language pack workgroup session we created an etherpad for
language pack attributes definition. Please find a first draft of language
pack attributes here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Solum-Language-pack-json-format
We have identified a minimal list of attributes which
Thanks Clayton! I added your new content.
To all:
The OpenStack Security Guide is a very good resource to read -
http://docs.openstack.org/security-guide/content/openstack_user_guide.html
Apologies for not being up to speed on how things work in OpenStack yet
but here is a list of topics that I
On 10 December 2013 09:55, Tzu-Mainn Chen tzuma...@redhat.com wrote:
* created as part of undercloud install process
By that note I meant, that Nodes are not resources, Resource instances
run on Nodes. Nodes are the generic pool of hardware we can deploy
things onto.
I don't think
Hi There!
I¹m not 100% sure what the process is around electing an individual to the
core team (i.e., can a non-core person nominate someone?). However, I
believe the ceilometer core team could use a member who is more active in
the development of the event pipeline. A core developer in this area
Hi Gordon,
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 18:36 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 11/18/2013 04:44 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 11:29 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
IIRC, one of the concerns when oslo.messaging was split out was
maintaining support for existing deployments with
Hi,
We've got a grizzly setup using quantum networking and libvirt/kvm with
VIR_MIGRATE_LIVE set.
I was live-migrating an instance back and forth between a couple of
compute nodes. It worked fine for maybe half a dozen migrations and
then after a migration I could no longer ping it.
It
So the question is are we looking at /nodes/ that have a /current
role/, or are we looking at /roles/ that have some /current nodes/.
My contention is that the role is the interesting thing, and the nodes
is the incidental thing. That is, as a sysadmin, my hierarchy of
concerns is something
Hi Folks,
We are in the process of defining the API for the Neutron Distributed Virtual
Router, and we have a question.
Just wanted to get the feedback from the community before we implement and post
for review.
We are planning to use the distributed flag for the routers that are supposed
to
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:34:04AM +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
On 10 December 2013 00:31, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
So I've been getting concerned about $subject recently, and based on some
recent discussions so have some other heat-core folks, so I wanted to start
On 10 December 2013 10:57, Jay Dobies jason.dob...@redhat.com wrote:
So we have:
- node - a physical general purpose machine capable of running in
many roles. Some nodes may have hardware layout that is particularly
useful for a given role.
- role - a specific workload we want to map
Hi Arvind
this is still mixing up two separate concepts: naming and policy
constraints. Scope is a policy constraint but in the proposal below is
also part of the unique naming of the role. The fields making up both
concepts need to be separate (e.g. what if 2 different roles from the
same domain
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 11:11 -0600, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-12-09 10:55, Sean Dague wrote:
On 12/09/2013 11:38 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-09 08:17:45 -0800:
On 12/06/2013 05:40 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-12-06 16:30, Clint Byrum wrote:
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 10:49 -0800, James E. Blair wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday December 11, 2013 we will remove the ability to use
reverify no bug to re-trigger gate runs for changes that have failed
tests.
This was previously discussed[1] on this list. There are a few key
things to keep in
On 10 December 2013 11:04, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote:
So it's a gross mischaracterisation to imply that a democratic process
aided by some [crude] stats has been reduced to name shame, and a
rather offensive one.
Yes I have read your monthly core reviewer update emails[1] and I
On Dec 6, 2013, at 2:09 PM, Paul Michali p...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi,
For Neutron, I'm creating a module (one of several eventually) as part of a
new blueprint I'm working on, and the associated unit test module. I'm in
really early development, and just running this UT module as a
I think that make sense, how does below data model looks?
{
role: {
id: 76e72a,
name: ---role_name---, (resource name spaced name e.g.
nova.east.admin)
scope: {
id: ---id---, (resource_id)
type: service | file | domain etc.,
endpoint:---endpoint---
Hi all,
I have some queries about what the future of the ec2tokens API is for
keystone, context as we're looking to move Heat from a horrible mixture of
v2/v3 keystone to just v3, currently I'm not sure we can:
- The v3/credentials API allows ec2tokens to be stored (if you
create the
Thanks for the explanation!
I'm going to claim that the thread revolves around two main areas of
disagreement. Then I'm going
to propose a way through:
a) Manual Node Assignment
I think that everyone is agreed that automated node assignment through
nova-scheduler is by
far the most ideal
On 12/09/2013 05:16 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 12/09/2013 07:15 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 12/09/2013 12:56 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
In the case of Nova (and others that followed Nova's messaging
patterns), I firmly believe that for scaling reasons, we need to move
toward it becoming the norm to
Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com writes:
I wonder could we make it standard practice for an infra bug to get
filed whenever there's a known issue causing gate jobs to fail so that
everyone can use that bug number when re-triggering?
(Apologies if that's already happening)
I guess we'd
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 09:40 +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
On 6 December 2013 14:11, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov wrote:
I think the security issue can be handled by not actually giving the
underlying resource to the user in the first place.
So, for example, if I wanted a bare metal
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:25:49AM +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
On 10 December 2013 11:04, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote:
So it's a gross mischaracterisation to imply that a democratic process
aided by some [crude] stats has been reduced to name shame, and a
rather offensive one.
Hi,
I’m trying to fix up some cells issues related to objects. Do all compute api
methods take objects now?
cells is still sending DB objects for most methods (except start and stop) and
I know there are more than that.
Eg. I know lock/unlock, shelve/unshelve take objects, I assume there are
I love the idea of treating usability as a first-class citizen; to do that, we
definitely need a core set of people who are passionate about the topic in
order to keep it alive in the OpenStack gestalt. Contributors tend to
prioritize work on new, concrete features over “non-functional”
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 16:05 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
As $subject mentions, I'd like to start discussing the support for
AMQP 1.0[0] in oslo.messaging. We already have rabbit and qpid drivers
for earlier (and different!) versions of AMQP, the proposal would be
to add an
On 09/12/13 11:31 +, Steven Hardy wrote:
Hi all,
So I've been getting concerned about $subject recently, and based on some
recent discussions so have some other heat-core folks, so I wanted to start
a discussion where we can agree and communicate our expectations related to
nomination for
Thanks! That worked
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL p...@cisco.com
IRCpcm_ (irc.freenode.net)
TW@pmichali
GPG key4525ECC253E31A83
Fingerprint 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525 ECC2 53E3 1A83
On Dec 9, 2013, at 5:27 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
On 6 December 2013 21:56, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey there,
thanks Rob for keeping eye on this. Speaking for myself, as current
non-coder it was very hard to keep pace with others, especially when UI was
on hold and I was designing future views. I'll continue working on
This is the first time I've heard of the dispatch router, I'm really
excited now that I've looked at it a bit. Thx Gordon and Russell for
bringing this up. I'm very familiar with the scaling issues associated with
any kind of brokered messaging solution. We grew an Openstack installation
to about
I guess the question that immediately comes to mind is, is there anyone
that doesn't want a distributed router? I guess there could be someone out
there that hates the idea of traffic flowing in a balanced fashion, but
can't they just run a single router then? Does there really need to be some
I would imagine that, from the Neutron perspective, you get a single router
whether or not it's distributed. I think that if a router is distributed -
regardless of whether it's tenant-tenant or tenant-outside - it certainly
*could* have some sort of SLA flag, but I don't think a simple
If distributed router is good enough, why do we still need non-distributed
router?
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote:
I would imagine that, from the Neutron perspective, you get a single
router whether or not it's distributed. I think that if a router is
On 12/09/2013 05:34 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
Hi all,
I have some queries about what the future of the ec2tokens API is for
keystone, context as we're looking to move Heat from a horrible mixture of
v2/v3 keystone to just v3, currently I'm not sure we can:
- The v3/credentials API allows
Hi Yong
NSX have two kind of router.
Edge and distributed router.
Edge node will work as some VPN services and advanced service nodes.
Actually, VPNaaS OSS impl is running in l3-agent.
so IMO, we need l3-agent also for basis of some edge services.
2013/12/9 Yongsheng Gong
While Python 3 has enumerated types, Python 2 does not, and the standard
package to provide id, Flufl.enum, is not yet part of our code base. Is
there any strong objection to including Flufl.enum?
http://pythonhosted.org/flufl.enum/
It makes for some very elegant code, especially for
Would it make sense to use the `enum34` package, which is a backport of teh
enum package from py3k?
Alex
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
While Python 3 has enumerated types, Python 2 does not, and the standard
package to provide id, Flufl.enum, is not yet
Neutron defines provider attribute and it is/will be used in advanced
services (LB, FW, VPN).
Doesn't it fit for a distributed router case? If we can cover all services with
one concept, it would be nice.
According to this thread, we assumes at least two types edge and
distributed.
Though edge
On Dec 10, 2013 2:37 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 6 December 2013 21:56, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey there,
thanks Rob for keeping eye on this. Speaking for myself, as current
non-coder it was very hard to keep pace with others, especially
2013/12/10 Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com:
On Sunday, December 08, 2013 11:32:50 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote:
Hi Neutron team,
I'm working on building Third-party testing for Neutron Ryu plugin.
I intend to use Jenkins and gerrit-trigger plugin.
It is required that Third-party
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:07:12PM +0900,
Isaku Yamahata isaku.yamah...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:43:59AM +1300,
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 9 December 2013 01:43, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote:
If AMQP service is set up not to lose
On 10 December 2013 19:16, Isaku Yamahata isaku.yamah...@gmail.com wrote:
Answering myself. If connection is closed, it will reconnects automatically
at rpc layer. See neutron.openstack.common.rpc.impl_{kombu, qpid}.py.
So notifications during reconnects can be lost if AMQP service is set
to
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 13:31 +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
We have a bit of a bug in OpenStack today, IMO, in that there is more
focus on being -core than on being a good effective reviewer. IMO
that's backwards: the magic switch that lets you set +2 and -2 is a
responsibility, and that has
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
