Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][external networks] "neutron net-external-list" returns empty list after restart of neutron-server

2014-01-05 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Hi rezoo, This is a known bug for HAavana, which has been fixed (but was not backported), please see: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1254555 Thanks, Eugene. On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 1:25 AM, rezroo wrote: > Hi all, > I'm testing the Havana devstack and I noticed that after killing and

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] The gate and security groups

2014-01-05 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hi, On IRC Yair Fried reminded me that we have not yet solved the issue around security groups not enforced on the gate. An accurate report of the current status is here [1] And it seems there is some consensus around using the additional port binding parameters for security groups (lp: [2] and

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2014-01-05 Thread Rushi Agrawal
I can see people arguing in future over which top IDE's/editor's trashfiles should or shouldn't be included in the gitignores. Also, I believe the concept of global gitignore is a fantastic one. What I'll suggest is, just not include any of the editor/IDE files in project gitignores, AND mention h

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][Cinder] No IRC channel #openstack-cinder !!!

2014-01-05 Thread Rushi Agrawal
You missed the pound sign. It is '/join #openstack-cinder' and not '/join openstack-cinder' :) Regards, Rushi Agrawal Ph: (+91) 99 4518 4519 On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Swapnil Kulkarni < swapnilkulkarni2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just got connected!!! Strange :| > > Thanks :) > > Best Regar

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Gantt][filters] AvailabilityZoneFilter in Gantt and Oslo

2014-01-05 Thread Jay Lau
Greetings, Here come a question related to AvailabilityZoneFilter. A new project Gantt which is a common scheduler for OpenStack is now under incubation, and now most of the code are get from nova scheduler. I'm planning to make Gantt use common scheduler from oslo, and I think that this is the

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2014-01-05 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Rushi Agrawal's message of 2014-01-05 05:41:58 -0800: > I can see people arguing in future over which top IDE's/editor's trashfiles > should or shouldn't be included in the gitignores. Also, I believe the > concept of global gitignore is a fantastic one. > Has it ever actually happe

[openstack-dev] why do we use pip -U in tox.ini?

2014-01-05 Thread Sean Dague
While waiting some inordinate amount of time to compile lxml for a tempest pep8 test, I started to wonder why is it that we are using -U on all our pip install commands in tox (it's a pretty common pattern across projects). It seems like requirements should be sufficient. Forcing -U to the la

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Gantt][filters] AvailabilityZoneFilter in Gantt and Oslo

2014-01-05 Thread Jay Pipes
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 22:13 +0800, Jay Lau wrote: > What about split the AvailabilityZoneFilter in Gantt to two filters, > one is AvailabilityZoneFilter which has same logic with oslo, the > other we can name it as AggregateAvailabilityZoneFilter which will > only handle availability_zone from agg

Re: [openstack-dev] why do we use pip -U in tox.ini?

2014-01-05 Thread Jay Pipes
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 10:47 -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > While waiting some inordinate amount of time to compile lxml for a > tempest pep8 test, I started to wonder why is it that we are using -U on > all our pip install commands in tox (it's a pretty common pattern across > projects). > > It see

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Gantt][filters] AvailabilityZoneFilter in Gantt and Oslo

2014-01-05 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Hi Jay, I have 3 points: First of all: https://github.com/openstack/gantt/ Why this project has all history of Nova? It seems very odd way to create new project aka clone Nova remove all from Nova.. Second: This blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/no-db-schedulershould be impl

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-05 Thread Joshua Harlow
With regards to the futures module it should just work fine with the packaging of https://pypi.python.org/pypi/futures which is a backport of the 3.2 concurrent futures package into 2.6,2.7, so that's the package there. Feel free to bug me on irc if u want any other help with dependencies, the

Re: [openstack-dev] why do we use pip -U in tox.ini?

2014-01-05 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2014-01-05 07:47:22 -0800: > While waiting some inordinate amount of time to compile lxml for a > tempest pep8 test, I started to wonder why is it that we are using -U on > all our pip install commands in tox (it's a pretty common pattern across > projects).

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-05 Thread Clint Byrum
I've skimmed the rest of the thread and not seen something mentioned that seems like it matters a lot. If I missed this suggestion buried deep in the ensuing discussion, I apologize for that. Since TaskFlow wants to be generally consumable and not only driven as an OpenStack component, it should n

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2014-01-05 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-01-05 07:40:52 -0800 (-0800), Clint Byrum wrote: [...] > We have Oslo for algorithms, not configurations. We have global > requirements to control external _dependencies_. This is about > neither. Leave them in, add them when people submit them. How is > this at all hard or controversial to

Re: [openstack-dev] why do we use pip -U in tox.ini?

2014-01-05 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-01-05 10:47:22 -0500 (-0500), Sean Dague wrote: [...] > It seems like requirements should be sufficient. Forcing -U to the > latest all the time seems like it would actually mask a ton of > problems, and makes sitepackages = True to be largely useless. [...] In fact, I believe it was mostl

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Gantt][filters] AvailabilityZoneFilter in Gantt and Oslo

2014-01-05 Thread Jay Lau
Thanks Jay Pipes and Boris for the comments. @Jay Pipes, agree, I can name it as AvailabilityZoneAggregateFilter. @Boris, For your first question, we may want to get some answer from @Robert Collins. For second question, perhaps you can refer to https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/forkli

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-05 Thread Joshua Harlow
Agreed, we are going to expand it and work on figuring out how to test against multiple versions. It does work with 0.8 and it seems even like 0.9 works fine also. But all compatible also means I can't guarantee 0.10 (if it comes out) will work since afaik semver means sqlalchemy could still bre

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Vertica Storage Driver Testing

2014-01-05 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Herndon, John Luke's message of 2014-01-03 08:17:15 -0800: > > On 1/2/14, 7:06 PM, "Sean Dague" wrote: > > >On 01/02/2014 08:36 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > >> On 3 January 2014 14:34, Robert Collins > >>wrote: > >>> On 3 January 2014 12:40, Herndon, John Luke > >>>wrote: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] why do we use pip -U in tox.ini?

2014-01-05 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/05/2014 11:25 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2014-01-05 10:47:22 -0500 (-0500), Sean Dague wrote: [...] It seems like requirements should be sufficient. Forcing -U to the latest all the time seems like it would actually mask a ton of problems, and makes sitepackages = True to be largely usel

Re: [openstack-dev] why do we use pip -U in tox.ini?

2014-01-05 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-01-05 12:17:41 -0500 (-0500), Sean Dague wrote: > Well that's really unfortunate. > > So if I understand that correctly there is *no* way to configure tox > + pip to: > > * use site packages if they are sufficient to requirements.txt > * install packages into venv if they are not (i.e.

[openstack-dev] [climate] PTL elections: final results

2014-01-05 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Hi folks, thank you all for participating elections (80% participation). Here are the results of the PTL election process [0]. Congratulations to the Climate PTL for Icehouse release: *Dina Belova*! Elections process has been recorded in [1]. [0] http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?n

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] - Revert change of default ephemeral fs to ext4

2014-01-05 Thread Clint Byrum
As a follow-up, I've filed this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1266262 We'll be working around this in TripleO by setting default_ephemeral_format for our baremetal clouds, but I feel we should document in Icehouse's release notes that the default will be changed to ext4 in Juno, so th

Re: [openstack-dev] [climate] PTL elections: final results

2014-01-05 Thread Anita Kuno
Well done Climate electorate, 80% participation is a great rate. Thank you to both candidates for running. Congratulations Dina, I look forward to working with you as PTL. Nicely run election, Sergey. Good work, Anita. On 01/06/2014 02:15 AM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote: > Hi folks, > > thank you a

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-05 Thread James E. Blair
Joshua Harlow writes: > It seems simple to have variations of venvs (or something similar) > that taskflow tox.ini can have that specify the different 0.7, 0.8, > 0.9, when sqlalchemy 1.0 comes out then this should become a nonissue > (hopefully). I will bug the infra folks to see what can be don

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron Tempest code sprint - 2nd week of January, Montreal, QC, Canada

2014-01-05 Thread Anita Kuno
On 01/05/2014 03:42 AM, Sukhdev Kapur wrote: > Folks, > > I finally got over my fear of weather and booked my flight and hotel for > this sprint. > > I am relatively new to OpenStack community with a strong desire to learn > and contribute. Having a strong desire to participate effectively is gre

Re: [openstack-dev] [elastic-recheck] Thoughts on next steps

2014-01-05 Thread James E. Blair
Sean Dague writes: >> I think the main user-visible aspect of this decision is the delay >> before unprocessed bugs are made visible. If a bug starts affecting a >> number of jobs, it might be nice to see what bug numbers people are >> using for rechecks without waiting for the next cron run. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [climate] PTL elections: final results

2014-01-05 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Kudos to Dina for the PTL position. 3 vs. 5 with 80% participation means it's a good thing for Climate : this is not a Stackforge project pushed by only one sponsor and having a benevolent dictator, but rather a mix of various experiences and subprojects with people having various ideas. Now, let'

Re: [openstack-dev] [elastic-recheck] Thoughts on next steps

2014-01-05 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/05/2014 05:49 PM, James E. Blair wrote: Sean Dague writes: I think the main user-visible aspect of this decision is the delay before unprocessed bugs are made visible. If a bug starts affecting a number of jobs, it might be nice to see what bug numbers people are using for rechecks with

Re: [openstack-dev] [climate] PTL elections: final results

2014-01-05 Thread Dina Belova
Thank you guys :) Climate really has good community and it's a great opportunity for us to present our ideas to the world :) Anita, I believe we'll do the great job all together. Sylvain, I remember about 0.1 ;) Although in Russia we still have Christmas holidays, I'll find some day this week fo