Cloud-init 0.7.5 (not yet released) will have the ability to read from an
ec2-metadata server using SSL.
In a recent change I did we now use requests which correctly does SSL for
the ec2-metadata/ec2-userdata reading.
- http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~cloud-init-dev/cloud-init/trunk/revision/910
On 01/24/2014 04:41 PM, Peter Pouliot wrote:
Hello OpenStack Community,
I am excited at this opportunity to make the community aware that the
Hyper-V CI infrastructure
is now up and running. Let’s first start with some housekeeping
details. Our Tempest logs are
publically
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2014-01-24 14:17:38 -0800:
Cloud-init 0.7.5 (not yet released) will have the ability to read from an
ec2-metadata server using SSL.
In a recent change I did we now use requests which correctly does SSL for
the ec2-metadata/ec2-userdata reading.
-
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Florian Haas flor...@hastexo.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 2014-01-23 12:03, Florian Haas wrote:
Ben,
thanks
Awesome! But, Ironic will still need a way to inject the SSL cert into the
instance, eg. config-drive over virtual media, or something.
-D
On Jan 24, 2014 2:32 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2014-01-24 14:17:38 -0800:
Cloud-init 0.7.5 (not
Simplest thing is for deployers and image builders to inject the CA that
they want to trust. Another option would be to establish an OpenStack
community CA and ship that along with cloud-init by default.
There are lots of options that don't involve out of band.
Excerpts from Devananda van der
On 25 January 2014 03:15, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
In going through the bug list, I spotted this one and would like to discuss
it:
can't disable file injection for bare metal
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1178103
There's a #TODO in Ironic's PXE driver
I've found out that several jobs are exhibiting failures like bug 1254890
[1] and bug 1253896 [2] because openvswitch seem to be crashing the kernel.
The kernel trace reports as offending process usually either
neutron-ns-metadata-proxy or dnsmasq, but [3] seem to clearly point to
ovs-vsctl.
254
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.comwrote:
I've found out that several jobs are exhibiting failures like bug 1254890
[1] and bug 1253896 [2] because openvswitch seem to be crashing the kernel.
The kernel trace reports as offending process usually either
* Salvatore Orlando (sorla...@nicira.com) wrote:
I've found out that several jobs are exhibiting failures like bug 1254890
[1] and bug 1253896 [2] because openvswitch seem to be crashing the kernel.
The kernel trace reports as offending process usually either
neutron-ns-metadata-proxy or
Excerpts from Devananda van der Veen's message of 2014-01-22 16:44:01 -0800:
1: physical vs. logical grouping
- Some hardware is logically, but not strictly physically, grouped. Eg, 1U
servers in the same rack. There is some grouping, such as failure domain,
but operations on discrete nodes
On 25 Jan 2014 15:11, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Devananda van der Veen's message of 2014-01-22 16:44:01
-0800:
What Tuskar wants to do is layer workloads on top of logical and physical
groupings. So it would pass to Nova Boot 4 machines with (flavor)
and
On 23 Jan 2014 13:45, Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com
wrote:
So, a conversation came again up today around whether or not Ironic will,
in the future, support operations on groups of nodes. Some folks have
expressed a desire for Ironic to expose operations on groups of nodes;
+1
On 25 Jan 2014 14:33, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote:
Solum Core Reviewers,
I propose the following changes to solum-core:
+asalkeld
+noorul
-mordred
Thanks very much to mordred for helping me to bootstrap the reviewer team.
Please reply with your votes.
Thanks,
Shixiong,
I'm fine with the current two modes design.
—
Xu Han Peng (xuhanp)
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 5:17 AM, Shixiong Shang
sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com wrote:
Any decisions yet?
Shixiong
On Jan 23, 2014, at 7:45 AM, Veiga, Anthony anthony_ve...@cable.comcast.com
wrote:
An openstack
Also just to note; file-injection seems unneeded when cloud-init can use
this:
http://cloudinit.readthedocs.org/en/latest/topics/examples.html#writing-out
-arbitrary-files
That I believe is in most modern versions of cloud-init (forgot when I
implemented that).
Just FYI :)
-Josh
On 1/24/14,
+1
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.netwrote:
+1
On 25 Jan 2014 14:33, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote:
Solum Core Reviewers,
I propose the following changes to solum-core:
+asalkeld
+noorul
-mordred
Thanks very much to mordred for
Yahoo! is right in the middle of sunnyvale; and probably has enough free space
to handle all u folks (some rooms are quite big really).
I can talk with some folks here about hosting all of this here if that’s
desired (depending on how big).
-Josh
From: Roman Alekseenkov
+1
On Jan 24, 2014, at 5:35 PM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote:
Solum Core Reviewers,
I propose the following changes to solum-core:
+asalkeld
+noorul
-mordred
Thanks very much to mordred for helping me to bootstrap the reviewer team.
Please reply with your votes.
Hi,
I sent this message to the openstack-qa but it might be more to openstack-dev
Hi everyone,
I would need some clarification of the Tempest testcases.
I am trying to run tempest on a vanilla devstack environment.
My localrc file has the API_RATE_LIMIT set to false.
This is the only
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-01-24 18:48:41 -0800:
On 25 Jan 2014 15:11, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Devananda van der Veen's message of 2014-01-22 16:44:01
-0800:
What Tuskar wants to do is layer workloads on top of logical and physical
101 - 121 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
