Hi, Stackers
When I init a Enforcer class with rules, I find the rules will rewrite by
configure policy rules, because the policy file is modified ,
the load rules always try to load the rules from the cache or configure file
when checks the policy in the enforce function, and
force to
I'd like to say I think this is excellent. Not that things broke ... But that
a) we're consuming from infra but not dying and b) we're producing a vector of
feedback on OpenStack that we did not have as a community before.
On Feb 25, 2014 1:08 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
Hi everyone,
A milestone-proposed branch was created for Swift in preparation for the
1.13.0 release in a few days.
Please test the proposed delivery to ensure no critical regression found
its way in. Release-critical fixes might be backported to the
milestone-proposed branch until final
I could do that but I think I need to be able to scale more without
the need to use this much resources. I will like to simulate a cloud
of 100 maybe
1000 compute nodes that do nothing (Fake driver) this should not take
this much memory. Anyone knows of a more efficient way to simulate
Hi Keith,
The question with Heat plugins is a good one. It actually has several
different answers.
The most important one is that the actual implementation of this approach
may be considered as out of scope for Murano. Think of Murano as an
application integration engine, which allows existing
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 06:08:56PM -0800, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
Dear Horizon developers,
I think that the blueprint to add live migrations support to
Horizon[0] was incorrectly labeled as a duplicate of the earlier
migrate-instance blueprint[1].
[0]
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:15:30 -0500
Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
CC'ing the openstack-operators mailing list to get a wider set of
feedback on this question.
On 02/24/2014 05:26 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
1) Continue as we have been, and plan to release v3 once we have a
Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote:
[...]
As you can see this is complicated topic with a number of possible
solutions. What Murano team is seeking to achieve is to get feedback of
community and TC on the most appropriate way to structure the governance
model for the project.
And that should make
On 24 February 2014 18:11, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 2/24/2014 10:13 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 02/24/2014 01:50 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
Hi,
There has recently been some speculation around the V3 API and whether
we should go forward with it or instead
On 25 February 2014 06:11, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:37:04 -0800
Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote:
onSharedStorage = True
on_shared_storage = False
This is a good example. I'm not sure it's worth breaking users _or_
introducing a new microversion
Hi all,
[1] made it possible for openstack_citest MySQL user to create new
databases in tests on demand (which is very useful for parallel
running of tests on MySQL and PostgreSQL, thank you, guys!).
Unfortunately, openstack_citest user can only create tables in the
created databases, but not to
On 25 February 2014 09:44, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:15:30 -0500
Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
CC'ing the openstack-operators mailing list to get a wider set of
feedback on this question.
On 02/24/2014 05:26 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
1)
On 25 February 2014 09:27, Qin Zhao chaoc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
One simple question about VCenter driver. I feel the VM snapshot function of
VCenter is very useful and is loved by VCenter users. Does anybody think
about to let VCenter driver support it?
It depends if that can be modelled
On 24 February 2014 20:13, David Peraza david_per...@persistentsys.com wrote:
Thanks John,
I also think it is a good idea to test the algorithm at unit test level, but
I will like to try out over amqp as well, that is, we process and threads
talking to each other over rabbit or qpid. I'm
Hi Michael,
2014-02-25 5:07 GMT+01:00 Michael Davies mich...@the-davies.net:
I have a Nova Grizzly backport bug[1] in review[2] that has been hanging
around for 4 months waiting for one more +2 from a stable team person.
thanks for the backport! BTW stable team list is openstack-stable-maint
Sean Dague wrote:
So, that begs a new approach. Because I think at this point even if we
did put out Nova v3, there can never be a v4. It's too much, too big,
and doesn't fit in the incremental nature of the project. So whatever
gets decided about v3, the thing that's important to me is a sane
On 25 February 2014 02:35, Tracy Jones tjo...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi all - i have set up the nova bug scrub meeting for Wednesdays at 1630 UTC
in the #openstack-meeting-3 IRC channel
The first meeting will be all about triaging the 117 un-triaged bugs (here).
Thanks for setting this up.
I
Hi folks,
This is just a reminder that we are going to have a regular weekly meeting
in IRC today at 17:00 UTC (9am PST). The agenda is available at
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MuranoAgenda#Agenda
This may be a good chance to discuss all the recent questions related to
Murano DSL
On 24 February 2014 22:14, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote:
I'm looking at the live migration rollback code and I'm a bit confused.
When setting up a live migration we unconditionally run
ComputeManager.pre_live_migration() on the destination host to do various
things
Hi Stephen,
My comments inline:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.netwrote:
Hi y'all,
Jay, in the L7 example you give, it looks like you're setting SSL
parameters for a given load balancer front-end. Do you have an example you
can share where where
I understand the fact that resources with invalid tenant_ids can be created
(only with admin rights at least for Neutron) can be annoying.
However, I support Jay's point on cross-project interactions. If tenant_id
validation (and orphaned resource management) can't be efficiently handled,
then
Hi,
Thanks to WSME 0.6, there is now possibility to add extra attributes to a
Dynamic basetype.
I successfully ended up showing my extra attributes from a dict to a
DynamicType using add_attributes() but I'm now stuck with POST requests
having dynamic body data.
Although I'm declaring in
Hi folks,
While I am still working on designing artifact-related APIs (sorry, the
task is taking me longer then expected due to a heavy load in Murano,
related to the preparation of incubation request), I've got a topic I
wanted to discuss with the broader audience.
It seems like we have agreed
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:31:42 +
John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote:
On 25 February 2014 06:11, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:37:04 -0800
Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote:
onSharedStorage = True
on_shared_storage = False
This is a good
What I mean is the snapshot of vsphere, which is describe in this page --
http://pubs.vmware.com/vsphere-50/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.vmware.vsphere.vm_admin.doc_50%2FGUID-CA948C69-7F58-4519-AEB1-739545EA94E5.html
It is very useful, if the user plan to perform some risky operations in a
VM. I am not
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:07:59AM +, John Garbutt wrote:
On 25 February 2014 02:35, Tracy Jones tjo...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi all - i have set up the nova bug scrub meeting for Wednesdays at 1630 UTC
in the #openstack-meeting-3 IRC channel
The first meeting will be all about triaging
I'm new to Nova. After some frustration with the review process,
specifically in the VMware driver, I decided to try to visualise how the
review process is working across Nova. To that end, I've created 2
graphs, both attached to this mail.
Both graphs show a nova directory tree pruned at the
Salvatore, thank you very much for your reply.
I know that there was a proposal[1] to handle the message security
stuff. For this proposal implementation, there was a blueprint[2] of
keystone will merge in Icehouse.
I'm looking forward to the notification handling could implemente in
Juno.
There is a blueprint for cinder that is search option for listing backup.
We can search cinder volumes and snapshots for filtering display_name or
status.
We do need search option for backup list also.
I posted blueprint for filtering option for backup list
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54460/
I've sent it to check queue, it should fail due to Boto issue above.
It also failed due to pyopenssl 0.14 update pulling a new dep which
fails to build in Grizzly devstack,
should be fixed by https://review.openstack.org/76189
Cheers,
Alan
2014-02-25 19:48 GMT+09:00 Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org:
Sean Dague wrote:
So, that begs a new approach. Because I think at this point even if we
did put out Nova v3, there can never be a v4. It's too much, too big,
and doesn't fit in the incremental nature of the project. So whatever
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Thanks to WSME 0.6, there is now possibility to add extra attributes to a
Dynamic basetype.
I successfully ended up showing my extra attributes from a dict to a
DynamicType using add_attributes() but I'm now
Hi Don,
Maybe it would be worth discussing on how we could share the blueprints
with people willing to help ?
-Sylvain
2014-02-24 18:08 GMT+01:00 Dugger, Donald D donald.d.dug...@intel.com:
All-
I'm tempted to cancel the gantt meeting for tomorrow. The only topics I
have are the no-db
Let me give you a bit of code then, that's currently WIP with heavy
rewrites planned on the Controller side thanks to Pecan hooks [1]
So, L102 (GET request) the convert() method is passing the result dict as
kwargs, where the Host.__init__() method is adding dynamic attributes.
That does work :-)
On 2014年02月25日 21:17, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
2014-02-25 19:48 GMT+09:00 Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org:
Sean Dague wrote:
So, that begs a new approach. Because I think at this point even if we
did put out Nova v3, there can never be a v4. It's too much, too big,
and doesn't fit in the
Hi,
As a follow up from today's IRC, Irena, are you looking to write the
below mentioned Base/Mixin class that inherits from
AgentMechanismDriverBase class? When you mentioned port state, were you
referring to the validate_port_binding() method?
Pls clarify.
Thanks,
Sandhya
On 2/6/14 7:57
Hi Stackers-
When I configured Jenkins to run the Sandbox tempest testing, While devstack is
running,
I have seen error
ERROR: Invalid Openstack Nova credentials
and another error
ERROR: HTTPConnection Pool(host='127.0.0.1', port=8774): Max retries exceeded
wuth url: /v2/91dd(caused by
Yeah.. That could be a good approach.
Just add some extra info to the tenant creation.. Then, on climate nova, when a
resource is created, check by the tenant id if that tenant has a lease param
(or smth like that). If it does, then act accordingly..
Is that make sense? Dina, Sylvain ??
On 02/25/2014 08:17 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
2014-02-25 19:48 GMT+09:00 Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org:
Sean Dague wrote:
So, that begs a new approach. Because I think at this point even if we
did put out Nova v3, there can never be a v4. It's too much, too big,
and doesn't fit in
I thought micro versioning was so we could make backwards compatible changes.
If we make breaking changes we need to support the old and the new for
a little while.
Adding a new field alongside an old one in a structure that we return is
not a breaking change to me, IMHO. We can clean up the
I think we need to find an alternative way to support the new and old
formats, like Accepts Headers, and retro-fitting a version to
extensions so we can easily advertise new attributes, to those parsers
that will break when they encounter those kinds of things.
Agreed.
Now I am tempted to
I guess that's simple and that's why nice solution for this problem.
So you propose to implement that feature in following way:
1) mark project as 'reservable' during its creation in extras specs
2) add some more logic to reservable resources creation/reservation. Like
adding one more checking in
2014-02-25 15:38 GMT+01:00 Dina Belova dbel...@mirantis.com:
I guess that's simple and that's why nice solution for this problem.
So you propose to implement that feature in following way:
1) mark project as 'reservable' during its creation in extras specs
2) add some more logic to
Why should it require to be part of Keystone to hook up on Climate ?
Sorry, can't get your point.
Provided we consider some projects as 'reservable', we could say this
should be a Climate API endpoint like CRUD /project/ and up to the admin
responsability to populate it.
If we say that new
Hi everyone,
I'm traveling this week and we'll need to cancel the meeting for today.
P
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Provided we consider some projects as 'reservable', we could say this should be
a Climate API endpoint like CRUD /project/ and up to the admin responsability
to populate it.
If we say that new projects should automatically be 'reservable', that's only
policy from Climate to whiteboard these.
On 02/25/2014 05:15 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
On 24 February 2014 22:14, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote:
What happens if we have a shared-storage instance that we try to migrate and
fail and end up rolling back? Are we going to end up with messed-up
networking on the
2014-02-25 16:25 GMT+01:00 Dina Belova dbel...@mirantis.com:
Why should it require to be part of Keystone to hook up on Climate ?
Sorry, can't get your point.
I'm just asking why we should hack Keystone workflow by adding an hook,
like we did for Nova. From my POV, that's not worth it.
Hello,
I have question to You guys. Can someone explain me (or send to link
with such explanation) how exactly ML2 plugin which is working on
neutron server is communicating with compute hosts with openvswitch
agents? I suppose that this is working with rabbitmq queues but I need
to add own
On 2014-02-25 08:19, trinath.soman...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi Stackers-
When I configured Jenkins to run the Sandbox tempest testing, While devstack
is running,
I have seen error
ERROR: Invalid Openstack Nova credentials
and another error
ERROR: HTTPConnection
On 2014-02-25 02:00, Tian, Shuangtai wrote:
Hi, Stackers
When I init a Enforcer class with rules, I find the rules will rewrite by
configure policy rules, because the policy file is modified ,
the load rules always try to load the rules from the cache or configure file
when
Hi, Trinath.
Ideal solution is to rebuild your dev. environnment.
But for the future discussions and questions please use IRC #openstack-dev
to ask any
question about setting up development environment (devstack).
Best regards,
Denis Makogon.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Ben Nemec
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 03:05 +, Liuji (Jeremy) wrote:
Now that USB devices are used so widely in private/hybrid cloud like
used as USB key, and there are no technical issues in libvirt/qemu.
I think it a valuable feature in openstack.
USB key is an interesting scenario. I assume the USB key
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 10:45 +, John Garbutt wrote:
As a heads up, the overheads of DB calls turned out to dwarf any
algorithmic improvements I managed. There will clearly be some RPC
overhead, but it didn't stand out as much as the DB issue.
The move to conductor work should certainly
Ok, so
I'm just asking why we should hack Keystone workflow by adding an hook,
like we did for Nova. From my POV, that's not worth it.
Idea was about some extra specs, that will be processed by Climate anyway.
Keystone will know nothing about reservations or smth.
I think it should be a
Hi, guys! My name is Andrew Chul, I'm from Russia. I had graduated National
Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute a few years ago.
And then I've started to getting post-graduated education in Smolensk
University of Humanities.
The time for filing of an application for
Hi
Hope this helps
http://fr.slideshare.net/mestery/modular-layer-2-in-openstack-neutron
___
Trinath Somanchi
_
From: Sławek Kapłoński [sla...@kaplonski.pl]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 9:24 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject:
Hi all,
Last week we moved the Congress IRC meeting time to every other Tuesday at
17:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 (that's an hour earlier than it was
previously). But we neglected to mail out the new time, and it doesn't look
like anyone remembered the time change. So I'll hang around at
- Original Message -
Hi
Hope this helps
http://fr.slideshare.net/mestery/modular-layer-2-in-openstack-neutron
___
Trinath Somanchi
_
From: Sławek Kapłoński [sla...@kaplonski.pl]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 9:24 PM
To:
Hi Stackers,
I've been contacted by a number of folks with questions about setting up
a third-party CI system, and while I'm very happy to help anyone who
contacts me, I figured it would be a good idea to have a regular meeting
on Google Hangouts that would be used as a QA session or workshop for
A thread [1] was also initiated on the ML by Syvlain but no answers/comment
for the moment.
[1] http://openstack.markmail.org/thread/qy6ikldtq2o4imzl
Édouard.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:35 AM, 黎林果 lilinguo8...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks you very much.
IMHO when admin_state_up is false that
Sylvain-
Good point and, since you drove the discussion, we did talk about it. For
those that weren't there on IRC the log is at:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gantt/2014/gantt.2014-02-25-15.00.log.html
and the etherpad where we are collecting the BPs (don't be daunted by the size
+1 to Dina on the workflow
From: Dina Belova dbel...@mirantis.commailto:dbel...@mirantis.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: martes, 25 de febrero de 2014 13:42
To: OpenStack
Andrew,
Please see some details regarding projects/ideas/mentors etc in our
wiki - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GSoC2014 You can also talk to
some of us on #openstack-gsoc irc channel.
-- dims
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Andrew Chul andymitr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, guys! My name is
OK, that's not how that feature is meant to be used.
The idea is that on application startup plugins or extensions will be
loaded that configure the extra attributes for the class. That happens one
time, and the configuration does not depend on data that appears in the
request itself.
Doug
On
Hi,
Thanks for joining murano weekly meeting.
Here are the meeting minutes and the logs:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/murano/2014/murano.2014-02-25-17.00.html
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/murano/2014/murano.2014-02-25-17.00.log.html
See you next week!
--
Regards,
Hi Eugene!
Responses inline:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 3:33 AM, Eugene Nikanorov
enikano...@mirantis.comwrote:
I'm really not sure what Mark McClain on some other folks see as
implementation details. To me the 'instance' concept is as logical as
others (vips/pool/etc). But anyway, it looks
On 2014-02-24 14:51, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/24/2014 03:10 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2014-02-21 17:09, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/21/2014 05:28 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com
wrote:
On 2014-02-21 13:01, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Roman Podoliaka
rpodoly...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi all,
[1] made it possible for openstack_citest MySQL user to create new
databases in tests on demand (which is very useful for parallel
running of tests on MySQL and PostgreSQL, thank you, guys!).
Thanks. I will do that today and follow up with a description of the
proposal.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Renat Akhmerov rakhme...@mirantis.comwrote:
In process is fine to me.
Winson, please register a blueprint for this change and put the link in
here so that everyone can see what
Sure. Let me give this some thoughts and work with you separately. Before
we speak up, we should have a proposal for discussion.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Dmitri Zimine d...@stackstorm.com wrote:
Winson,
While you're looking into this and working on the design, may be also
think
Hi Alexander, Thank you for your input.
I think we need to clearly define what a version means for an artifact.
First, I would like to comeback to the definition of an artifact: this broader
audience might not be aware of this concept.
As of today, my understanding is the following:
An
Hi again Stackers,
After discussions with folks on the infrastructure team, I'm making some
changes to the proposed workshop venue and time. As was rightly pointed
out by Jim B and others, we want to encourage folks that are setting up
their CI systems to use the standard communication tools to
For purposes of supporting multiple backends for Identity (multiple LDAP, mix
of LDAP and SQL, federation, etc) Keystone is planning to increase the maximum
size of the USER_ID field from an upper limit of 64 to an upper limit of 255.
This change would not impact any currently assigned USER_IDs
On Feb 25, 2014, at 10:10 AM, Stephen Balukoff
sbaluk...@bluebox.netmailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net wrote:
On Feb 25, 2014 at 3:39 AM,
enikano...@mirantis.commailto:enikano...@mirantis.com wrote:
Agree, however actual hardware is beyond logical LBaaS API but could be a part
of admin LBaaS API.
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 18:07 -0800, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
Hi y'all,
Jay, in the L7 example you give, it looks like you're setting SSL
parameters for a given load balancer front-end.
Correct. The example comes straight out of the same example in the ELB
API documentation. The only
Hello,
Trinath, this presentation I saw before You send me it. There is nice
explanation what methods are (and should be) in type driver and mech driver
but I need exactly that information what sent me Assaf. Thanks both of You for
Your help :)
--
Best regards
Sławek Kapłoński
Dnia wtorek, 25
Hi Ed,
That sounds good to me, actually: As long as 'cloud admin' API functions
are represented as well as 'simple user workflows', then I'm all for a
unified API that simply exposes more depending on permissions.
Stephen
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Ed Hall edh...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Hey all!
You may or may not have noticed that there's been a backlog with new
project creation in infra. There are some specific issues with our
automation that are causing this, and we've got a plan in place to fix
them. Until we do, which is targeted to be done by the end of March,
we're
Hi all,
I wanted to send out a quick status update on Congress and start a discussion
about short-term goals.
1) Logistics
IRC Meeting time
Tuesday 1700 UTC in openstack-meeting-3
Every other week starting Feb 25
(Note this is a new meeting time/location.)
2) We have two design docs, which we
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 11:47 -0800, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
For purposes of supporting multiple backends for Identity (multiple
LDAP, mix of LDAP and SQL, federation, etc) Keystone is planning to
increase the maximum size of the USER_ID field from an upper limit of
64 to an upper limit of 255.
Well, I agreed with the fact I switched some way the use of this feature to
match my needs, but then let me ask you a quick question : how can handle
WSME variable request body ?
The first glance I have is that WSME is requiring a static API in terms of
inputs, could you then confirm ?
Do you
Hi folks,
I'm glad to announce that python-savannaclient v0.5.0 released!
pypi: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-savannaclient/0.5.0
tarball:
http://tarballs.openstack.org/python-savannaclient/python-savannaclient-0.5.0.tar.gz
launchpad: https://launchpad.net/python-savannaclient/0.5.x/0.5.0
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:47:43AM -0800, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
For purposes of supporting multiple backends for Identity (multiple LDAP, mix
of LDAP and SQL, federation, etc) Keystone is planning to increase the
maximum size of the USER_ID field from an upper limit of 64 to an upper limit
Folks,
I'm trying to set up a simple single-node devstack + ml2 + vxlan
combination, and though this ought to be a simple RTFM exercise,
I'm having some trouble setting this up. Perhaps I'm doing something
wrong- clues would be welcome.
I made sure to use ovs_version 1.10.2, and followed
the
+1, seems would could explore for another cycle just to find out that
backporting everything to V2 isn't going to be what we want, and now
we've just wasted more time.
If we say it's just deprecated and frozen against new features, then
it's maintenance is just limited to bug fixes right?
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Ziad Sawalha
ziad.sawa...@rackspace.com wrote:
Seeking some clarification on the OpenStack hacking guidelines for
multi-string docstrings.
Q: In OpenStack projects, is a blank line before the triple closing quotes
recommended (and therefore optional - this is
Fellow developers,
I just put together a wiki describing the Arista Third Party Setup.
In the attached document we provide a link to the modified Gerrit Plugin to
handle the regex matching for the Comment Added event so that
recheck/reverify no bug/ can be handled.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@gmail.comwrote:
Well, I agreed with the fact I switched some way the use of this feature
to match my needs, but then let me ask you a quick question : how can
handle WSME variable request body ?
The first glance I have is that WSME
Folks,
I just sent out another email.
Here is the link to the wiki which has details about this patch.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Arista-third-party-testing
Hope this helps.
-Sukhdev
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Sukhdev Kapur
sukh...@aristanetworks.comwrote:
On Thu, Feb 13,
Will be available in global requirements after merging
https://review.openstack.org/76357.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Sergey Lukjanov
slukja...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm glad to announce that python-savannaclient v0.5.0 released!
pypi:
On Feb 25, 2014, at 1:06 AM, Rabi Mishra ramis...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi All,
'subnet_id' attribute of LBaaS Pool resource has been documented as The
network that pool members belong to
However, with 'HAProxy' driver, it allows to add members belonging to
different subnets/networks to a
In the tripleo meeting today we re-affirmed that the tripleo-cd-admins
team is aimed at delivering production-availability clouds - thats how
we know the the tripleo program is succeeding (or not !).
So if you're a member of that team, you're on the hook - effectively
on call, where production
I'm in the process of putting together a bug report and a patch for
properly handling resource tracking on live migration.
The change involves code that will run on the destination compute node
in order to properly account for the resources that the instance to be
migrated will consume.
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 4:02:13 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
+1, seems would could explore for another cycle just to find out that
backporting everything to V2 isn't going to be what we want, and now
we've just wasted more time.
If we say it's just deprecated and frozen against new features,
Thanks Doug for replying,
2014-02-25 23:10 GMT+01:00 Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com:
Do you have any idea on how I could get my goal, ie. having a static
input plus some extra variable inputs ? I was also thinking about playing
with __getattr__ and __setattr__ but I'm not sure
Yeah, so objects is the big one here.
Objects, and everything else. With no-db-compute we did it for a couple
cycles, then objects, next it will be retooling flows to conductor, then
dealing with tasks, talking to gantt, etc. It's not going to end any
time soon.
So what kind of reaction are
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 20:02 -0300, Arx Cruz wrote:
Hello,
Great Idea, I'm very interested!
I wasn't able to see the Google Hangout Event, is the url correct?
Hi Arx!
We changed from Google Hangout to using IRC. See here for more info:
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 00:56 +, Ziad Sawalha wrote:
Seeking some clarification on the OpenStack hacking guidelines for
multi-string docstrings.
Q: In OpenStack projects, is a blank line before the triple closing
quotes recommended (and therefore optional - this is what PEP-257
seems
Greetings,
Here I want to bring up an old topic here and want to get some input from
you experts.
Currently in nova and cinder, we only have some initial placement polices
to help customer deploy VM instance or create volume storage to a specified
host, but after the VM or the volume was
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
