On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Shixiong Shang
sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, guys:
I created a fresh local repository and pulled the most recent Neutron code.
Before I put in my own code, I did TOX run. However, seems like it is stuck
to the following condition for over a hour
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 17:23 -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 15:12 -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 02:11 +0400, Eugene
Clark/Sean/Shixiong...
I have the same error, and tried to import
neutron.tests.unit.linuxbridge.test_lb_neutron_agent (no error4 prefix). I
get the following
(py27)rantuttl-mac:bin rtuttle$ python
Python 2.7.5 (v2.7.5:ab05e7dd2788, May 13 2013, 13:18:45)
[GCC 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5666) (dot
Hi, Randy:
Try this command to install pyudev library….
sudo pip install pyudev
Let me know whether it works or not. Good luck!
Shixiong
Shixiong Shang
!--- Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish ---!
On Feb 27, 2014, at 9:09 PM, Randy Tuttle randy.m.tut...@gmail.com wrote:
Clark/Sean/Shixiong...
Hi, Clark:
Thanks a lot for the prompt response! I added the OS_TEST_TIMEOUT value (300
sec) and was tailing the tmp file. It turned out that the TOX run stopped at
the following point. My machine was tossed so badly that it became unresponsive
and I had to hard reboot it….I am pulling my
Hi,
Yes. I mean the feature like VMware Distributed Resource Scheduler.
Now I am totally clear about the question. Thanks for your explanations.
Thanks,
Jeremy Liu
-Original Message-
From: Renat Akhmerov [mailto:rakhme...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 5:03 PM
To:
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 18:46 +, Brandon Logan wrote:
TL;DR: Are enterprise needed features (HA, scalability, resource
management, etc) on this project's roadmap.
Yes. Although, due to my disdain for the term enterprise, I'd point
out that all of those features are things that most everyone
You’re welcome! Please let us know if you need more info.
Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.
On 28 Feb 2014, at 09:48, Liuji (Jeremy) jeremy@huawei.com wrote:
Hi,
Yes. I mean the feature like VMware Distributed Resource Scheduler.
Now I am totally clear about the question. Thanks for
Ok, thanks guys!
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-rename-event-to-trigger
Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.
On 28 Feb 2014, at 07:41, Dmitri Zimine d...@stackstorm.com wrote:
Agree on both.
On Feb 26, 2014, at 8:51 PM, Renat Akhmerov rakhme...@mirantis.com wrote:
On 2014年02月22日 07:52, yunhong jiang wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 06:43 +, Gouzongmei wrote:
Hello,
In current PCI passthrough implementation, a pci device is only
allowed to be assigned to a instance while the instance is being
created, it is not allowed to be assigned or removed from
Hi,
Dan Smith and I have been working on the integration between nova and
neutron to have neutron issue callbacks into nova to trigger certain
events. One of the things I'm trying to figure out is how to support
multiple nova regions with this kind of interaction since neutron would now
needs to
Hi,
It's been now more than 40 days that this patch needs review:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/67096/
Could some core reviewers have a look, and eventually approve the patch?
It's very important to me, since Horizon is currently considered
non-free in Debian, due to the minified javascript
On 02/27/2014 06:00 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
Does mean our code looks like as below?
if client_version 2:
elif client_version 3
...
elif client_version 4:
...
elif client_version 5:
...
elif client_version 6:
..
And we need test each version... That looks bad...
I don't
Hi-
In the existing Neutron, we have FWaaS, LBaaS, VPNaaS ...etc.
In FWaaS, each Firewall has its own UUID.
It is good to have a unique ID [UUID] for LBaaS also.
Please share your comments on the above.
Regards,
Srikanth.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Hi,
Are you going to file new blueprint or log a bug in Launchpad to encounter this
change.
Thanks,
Abhishek
-Original Message-
From: Nikola Đipanov [mailto:ndipa...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 4:17 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re:
Hi Jay,
Thanks for looking into this.
1) I'm not entirely sure that a provider attribute is even necessary to
expose in any API. What is important is for a scheduler to know which
drivers are capable of servicing a set of attributes that are grouped
into a flavor.
Well, provider becomes
According to this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1268569
I am wondering someone can help me in understanding the concurrent access
prevention on api layer?
if we have more than 1 nova-api server, let's say 2(thread A and thread
B) ,so both of them should be able to handle request from
On 02/28/2014 01:18 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
It's been now more than 40 days that this patch needs review:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/67096/
Could some core reviewers have a look, and eventually approve the patch?
It's very important to me, since Horizon is currently considered
On 02/28/2014 03:10 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 02/28/2014 01:18 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
It's been now more than 40 days that this patch needs review:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/67096/
Could some core reviewers have a look, and eventually approve the patch?
It's very important
The creation a stack is usually a time costly process, considering that
there are cases where software packages need to be installed and
configured.
There are also cases where a stack consists of more than one VM instance
and the dependency between instances. The instances may have to be
101 - 120 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
