Hi,
The wiki is updated to reflect the APIs.
Regards,
-Sam.
From: Palanisamy, Anand [mailto:apalanis...@paypal.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 3:26 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [LBaaS] API spec for SSL Support
Hi All,
Please let us
On 03/05/2014 07:59 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 03/05/2014 12:27 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
On 03/05/14 at 07:37am, Tracy Jones wrote:
Hi - Please consider the image cache aging BP for FFE
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56416/)
This is the last of several patches (already merged) that
Thanks Thierry,
For completeness, the ceilometer links are below.
tarball:
http://tarballs.openstack.org/ceilometer/ceilometer-milestone-proposed.tar.gz
milestone-proposed branch:
https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/tree/milestone-proposed
Cheers,
Eoghan
- Original Message -
On 03/05/2014 08:00 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 03/05/2014 10:34 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
Unfortunately we did not get the ISO support approved by the deadline.
If possible can we please get the FFE.
The feature is completed and has been tested extensively internally. The
feature is very
- Original Message -
From: Alexei Kornienko alexei.kornie...@gmail.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 12:43:13 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] The future of nosetests with
Tempest
Hi,
Let me express my concerns on this topic:
With
I agree, let's rename data to spec and unblock the check-in.
Nikolay - Sorry for the trouble :)
On Mar 5, 2014 10:17 PM, Renat Akhmerov rakhme...@mirantis.com wrote:
Alright, good input Manas, appreciate.
My comments are below...
On 06 Mar 2014, at 10:47, Manas Kelshikar
I'd Like to request A FFE for the remaining patches in the Ephemeral
RBD image support chain
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59148/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59149/
are still open after their dependency
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33409/ was merged.
These should be low risk as:
1.
Manas, Renat, no problem :)
The commit is sent already - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/75888/
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Manas Kelshikar ma...@stackstorm.comwrote:
I agree, let's rename data to spec and unblock the check-in.
Nikolay - Sorry for the trouble :)
On Mar 5, 2014 10:17
Hi Sylvain, Russell, dims
Thanks for your the replies and guidances!
I have read the docs below the title. In my opinion, It is quite a good
idea to take storage component and network component into
consideration of the scheduler of nova. I agree that it is quite a large
job for current GSOC
Ok, good!
Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.
On 06 Mar 2014, at 15:25, Nikolay Makhotkin nmakhot...@mirantis.com wrote:
Manas, Renat, no problem :)
The commit is sent already - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/75888/
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Manas Kelshikar ma...@stackstorm.com
Hi,
As an example you can look at
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D-1n8nCEFurYzvEBxIRfXfffnImcIPwWSctAG-NXonY/edit?usp=sharing
Under the “Logical Model + Provisioning Status + Operation Status + Statistics”
there are some details on thoughts on how to implement this.
Regards,
It seems to be an interesting idea. In fact, a China-based public IaaS,
QingCloud, has provided a similar feature
to their virtual servers. Within 2 hours after a virtual server is deleted, the
server owner can decide whether
or not to cancel this deletion and re-cycle that deleted virtual
Thierry, hello.
Anne Gentle wrote:
It feels like it should be part of a scheduler or reservation program
but we don't have one today. We also don't have a workflow, planning, or
capacity management program, all of which these use cases could fall
under.
(I should know this but)
Thierry Carrez wrote:
We just hit feature freeze, so please do not approve changes that add
features or new configuration options unless those have been granted a
feature freeze exception.
This is also string freeze, so you should avoid changing translatable
strings. If you have to modify a
Savanna milestone cut:
http://tarballs.openstack.org/savanna/savanna-milestone-proposed.tar.gz
https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/savanna/log/?h=milestone-proposed
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Thierry Carrez wrote:
We just hit feature
Sean, you are right. It doesn't work at all.
So I think short term goal is to get that fixed for ICMP and long term goal
is to write an extension as Amir pointed out?
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:55 AM, Collins, Sean
sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 12:01:00PM
Steven Dake wrote:
My general take is workflow would fit in the Orchestration program, but
not be integrated into the heat repo specifically. It would be a
different repo, managed by the same orchestration program just as we
have heat-cfntools and other repositories. Figuring out how to
Michael Still wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Tian, Shuangtai
shuangtai.t...@intel.com wrote:
Hi，
I would like to make a request for FFE for one patch in novaclient for PCI
V3 API : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/75324/
[snip]
BTW the PCI Patches in V2 will defer to Juno.
Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
Unfortunately we did not get the ISO support approved by the deadline.
If possible can we please get the FFE.
The feature is completed and has been tested extensively internally. The
feature is very low risk and has huge value for users. In short a user
is able to
Tracy Jones wrote:
Hi - Please consider the image cache aging BP for FFE
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56416/)
This is the last of several patches (already merged) that implement image
cache cleanup for the vmware driver. This patch solves a significant
customer pain point as it
I'd like to request a FFE for the oslo.messaging migration in Cinder.
Some projects have already switched over oslo.messaging and others are
still doing so. I think we should switch remaining projects to
oslo.messaging as soon as possible and keep the RPC library in use
consistent throughout
+1! according to the low rise and the usefulness for the real cloud deployment.
zhiyan
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Andrew Woodward xar...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd Like to request A FFE for the remaining patches in the Ephemeral
RBD image support chain
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59148/
Dina Belova wrote:
Would Climate also be usable to support functionality like Spot
Instances ? Schedule when spot price falls under X ?
Really good question. Personally I think that Climate might help
implementing this feature, but probably it’s not the main thing that
will work there.
Flavio Percoco wrote:
I'd like to request a FFE for the oslo.messaging migration in Cinder.
Some projects have already switched over oslo.messaging and others are
still doing so. I think we should switch remaining projects to
oslo.messaging as soon as possible and keep the RPC library in use
On 5 March 2014 15:02, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Nova is now feature frozen for the Icehouse release. Patches for
blueprints not already merged will need a feature freeze exception (FFE)
to be considered for Icehouse.
In addition to evaluation the request in terms of risks and
Dear mentors and students,
Hi,
after a short talk with dims, I created an application template wiki
page[1]. Obviously, this is not a completed version, and I'd like your
opinions to improve it. :)
I have :
1) simply added information such as :
・Personal Details (e.g. Name, Email,
(top-post)
Marconi links below:
Tarball:
http://tarballs.openstack.org/marconi/marconi-milestone-proposed.tar.gz
And milestone-proposed branch:
https://github.com/openstack/marconi/tree/milestone-proposed
Cheers
Flavio
On 05/03/14 21:46 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi everyone,
We just
I am out of the office until 05/12/2013.
Avishay Traeger is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)
Note: This is an automated response to your message Re: [openstack-dev]
[Cinder][FFE] Cinder switch-over to oslo.messaging sent on 06/03/2014
12:50:51.
This is the only notification you will
Avishay Traeger wrote:
Avishay Traeger is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)
Wow. Scary.
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Hi Thierry,
2014-03-06 11:46 GMT+01:00 Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org:
Dina Belova wrote:
Would Climate also be usable to support functionality like Spot
Instances ? Schedule when spot price falls under X ?
Really good question. Personally I think that Climate might help
Big +1 on this.
Missing such support would make the implementation useless.
Sébastien Han
Cloud Engineer
Always give 100%. Unless you're giving blood.”
Phone: +33 (0)1 49 70 99 72
Mail: sebastien@enovance.com
Address : 11 bis, rue Roquépine - 75008 Paris
Web : www.enovance.com -
On 6 March 2014 10:51, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote:
On 5 March 2014 15:02, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Nova is now feature frozen for the Icehouse release. Patches for
blueprints not already merged will need a feature freeze exception (FFE)
to be considered for
Sylvain, I love your idea. As you said, that should be designed, but for
the first sight your proposal looks quite nice.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Thierry,
2014-03-06 11:46 GMT+01:00 Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org:
Dina Belova
On 03/06/2014 04:47 AM, Jason Rist wrote:
On Wed 05 Mar 2014 03:36:22 PM MST, Lyle, David wrote:
I'd like to nominate Radomir Dopieralski to Horizon Core. I find his
reviews very insightful and more importantly have come to rely on their
quality. He has contributed to several areas in
On 03/06/2014 05:51 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
On 5 March 2014 15:02, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Nova is now feature frozen for the Icehouse release. Patches for
blueprints not already merged will need a feature freeze exception (FFE)
to be considered for Icehouse.
In addition to
On 5 March 2014 03:44, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
But this plan is certainly something I'm happy to support.
+1
On 5 March 2014 03:44, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
So I think this a good compromise to keep things moving. Some aspects
that we'll need to consider:
Thanks Masaru, I'd encourage other applicants to use add their own
details and get their potential mentors to review their page.
thanks,
dims
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Masaru Nomura massa.nom...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear mentors and students,
Hi,
after a short talk with dims, I created an
On 6 March 2014 11:31, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 03/06/2014 05:51 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
On 5 March 2014 15:02, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Nova is now feature frozen for the Icehouse release. Patches for
blueprints not already merged will need a feature freeze
On 6 March 2014 08:04, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/05/2014 08:00 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 03/05/2014 10:34 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
Unfortunately we did not get the ISO support approved by the deadline.
If possible can we please get the FFE.
The feature is
On 6 March 2014 08:50, zhangyu (AI) zhangy...@huawei.com wrote:
It seems to be an interesting idea. In fact, a China-based public IaaS,
QingCloud, has provided a similar feature
to their virtual servers. Within 2 hours after a virtual server is deleted,
the server owner can decide whether
On 3 March 2014 19:33, David Peraza david_per...@persistentsys.com wrote:
Thanks John,
What I'm trying to do is to run an asynchronous task that pre-organizes the
target hosts for an image. Then scheduler only need to read the top of the
list or priority queue. We have a paper proposed for
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:13 PM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote:
On 6 March 2014 08:50, zhangyu (AI) zhangy...@huawei.com wrote:
It seems to be an interesting idea. In fact, a China-based public IaaS,
QingCloud, has provided a similar feature
to their virtual servers. Within 2 hours
Hi Gordon,
Thanks for the info and reply.
your interest purely to see status or were you looking to work on it? ;)
My interest lies in how to evaluate large number of notifications within a
short time.
I thought moving alarms into the pipelines would be a good start.
From: Gordon
We're at Freeze, so I want to pick up and understand where we currently
stand with both Neutron and Heat actually getting tested fully in the gate.
First Neutron -
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/fix-gate-tempest-devstack-vm-quantum-full
We know that this is *close* as the full
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/05/2014 04:52 PM, Everett Toews wrote:
On Mar 5, 2014, at 8:16 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
I think SDK support is critical for the success of v3 long term. I
expect most people are using the
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 07:53:03AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
We're at Freeze, so I want to pick up and understand where we currently
stand with both Neutron and Heat actually getting tested fully in the gate.
First Neutron -
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:24 PM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote:
On 5 March 2014 03:44, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
But this plan is certainly something I'm happy to support.
One extra thing we need to consider, how to deal with new APIs while
we go through this
Hi PTLs,
I'll be away next week to recharge batteries before the long release +
summit tunnel, so I'll miss our usual 1:1 status update.
There will still be a Release/project meeting Tuesday at 21:00 UTC. Sean
Dague has agreed to run it, and will review the currently-granted
feature freeze
On 03/06/2014 08:11 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 07:53:03AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
We're at Freeze, so I want to pick up and understand where we currently
stand with both Neutron and Heat actually getting tested fully in the gate.
First Neutron -
DSL's are tricky beasts. On one hand I like giving a tool to
non-developers so they can do their jobs, but I always cringe when the
DSL reinvents the wheel for basic stuff (compound assignment
expressions, conditionals, etc).
YAML isn't really a DSL per se, in the sense that it has no language
On 03/06/2014 07:05 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
That being said, importance isn't a FIFO.
Agreed, but it seems most of them are quite useful, and a lot have
already been through a few review cycles.
I think this is a key point. Regardless of how long something has been
in the queue, importance
On 03/06/2014 08:18 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
As an aside, I think we need to improve the process we use for API
related features. Because a lot of the
problems that get picked up during code review could have been avoided
if we had a better review
earlier on that just focussed on the API
On 03/06/2014 05:33 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Tracy Jones wrote:
Hi - Please consider the image cache aging BP for FFE
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56416/)
This is the last of several patches (already merged) that implement image
cache cleanup for the vmware driver. This patch solves
On 03/06/2014 05:31 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Michael Still wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Tian, Shuangtai
shuangtai.t...@intel.com wrote:
Hi，
I would like to make a request for FFE for one patch in novaclient for PCI
V3 API : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/75324/
[snip]
BTW
Got it. Many thanks!
Leiqiang, you can take action now :)
From: John Griffith [mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 8:38 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete
On 03/06/2014 05:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
Unfortunately we did not get the ISO support approved by the deadline.
If possible can we please get the FFE.
The feature is completed and has been tested extensively internally. The
feature is very low risk and has huge
On 03/06/2014 03:20 AM, Andrew Woodward wrote:
I'd Like to request A FFE for the remaining patches in the Ephemeral
RBD image support chain
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59148/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59149/
are still open after their dependency
On 03/05/2014 03:40 PM, Yathiraj Udupi (yudupi) wrote:
Hi,
We would like to make a request for FFE for the Solver Scheduler work.
A lot of work has gone into it since Sep’13, and the first patch has
gone through several iteration after some reviews. The first patch
-
Hi all,
We've not quite managed to land the last few patches for instance-users
in time for FF:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/instance-users
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/heat+branch:master+topic:bug/1089261,n,z
This is due to a combination of
On 06.03.2014 04:00, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Hi all,
The [state-management] project team holds a weekly meeting in
#openstack-meeting on thursdays, 2000 UTC. The next meeting is tommorow,
2014-03-06!!!
[...]
Any other topics are welcome :-)
I dared to add item on documentation
Fangzhen-
Great to see your interest in Gantt but, as Sylvain said, gantt is really not
ready for feature enhancments yet. Our exclusive goal for gantt right now is
to separate it out from nova proper, a daunting task itself.
Having said that, there is no change in development for the current
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.comwrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 03/03/2014 11:32 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com
mailto:mest...@noironetworks.com
Hello magnetodb contributors,
I would like to suggest weekly IRC meetings on Thursdays, 1300 UTC.
More technical details later.
Let us vote by replying this email.
With best regards,
Ilya Sviridov
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
1300UTC is fine for me
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Ilya Sviridov isviri...@mirantis.comwrote:
Hello magnetodb contributors,
I would like to suggest weekly IRC meetings on Thursdays, 1300 UTC.
More technical details later.
Let us vote by replying this email.
With best regards,
Ilya
On 03/05/2014 10:25 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2014 13:31:07 -0500
David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote:
I think it would be a good time to have at least an initial
discussion about the requirements for theses schemas and where they
will live. The next step in tempest around this
On 03/06/2014 08:45 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 03/06/2014 05:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
Unfortunately we did not get the ISO support approved by the deadline.
If possible can we please get the FFE.
The feature is completed and has been tested extensively
On 03/06/2014 07:08 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
But I do worry about having too many FFEs, so we get distracted from bugs.
Fair concern.
To mitigate it we need to have a hard deadline on these. We should aim
for this week and an absolute hard deadline of Tuesday.
--
Russell Bryant
On 06/03/14 11:50 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
I'd like to request a FFE for the oslo.messaging migration in Cinder.
Some projects have already switched over oslo.messaging and others are
still doing so. I think we should switch remaining projects to
oslo.messaging as
On 03/06/2014 03:00 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
On 03/05/2014 07:59 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 03/05/2014 12:27 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
On 03/05/14 at 07:37am, Tracy Jones wrote:
Hi - Please consider the image cache aging BP for FFE
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56416/)
This is the last
Any other opinions?
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Illia Khudoshyn ikhudos...@mirantis.comwrote:
1300UTC is fine for me
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Ilya Sviridov isviri...@mirantis.comwrote:
Hello magnetodb contributors,
I would like to suggest weekly IRC meetings on Thursdays,
+
13.00 UTC is OK.
2014-03-06 17:18 GMT+02:00 Ilya Sviridov isviri...@mirantis.com:
Any other opinions?
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Illia Khudoshyn
ikhudos...@mirantis.comwrote:
1300UTC is fine for me
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Ilya Sviridov isviri...@mirantis.comwrote:
Hello folks,
A number of OpenStack and related projects have a need to perform
operations inside VMs running on OpenStack. A natural solution would
be an agent running inside the VM and performing tasks.
One of the key questions here is how to communicate with the agent. An
idea which was
That sounds a little similar to what taskflow is trying to do (I am of course
biased).
I agree with letting the native language implement the basics (expressions,
assignment...) and then building the domain ontop of that. Just seems more
natural IMHO, and is similar to what linq (in c#) has
thank you very much
seems I should search the launchpad more carefully
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Mehdi Abaakouk sil...@sileht.net wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 10:44:25AM +0800, ZhiQiang Fan wrote:
I already check the stable/havana and master branch via devstack, the
problem
Hi all,
I would like to request a FFE for the following patches of the L3 HA VRRP BP :
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/l3-high-availability
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64553/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/66347/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/68142/
Hi everyone,
I'd like to gauge everyone's interest in a possible mini-summit for Neturon
LBaaS. If enough people are interested I'd be happy to try and set something
up. The Designate team just had a productive mini-summit in Austin, TX and it
was nice to have face-to-face conversations with
+
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Maksym Iarmak miar...@mirantis.com wrote:
+
13.00 UTC is OK.
2014-03-06 17:18 GMT+02:00 Ilya Sviridov isviri...@mirantis.com:
Any other opinions?
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Illia Khudoshyn
ikhudos...@mirantis.comwrote:
1300UTC is fine for me
On Thu, Mar 06 2014, Dmitry Mescheryakov wrote:
So, messaging people, what is your opinion on that idea? I've already
raised that question in the list [1], but seems like not everybody who
has something to say participated. So I am resending with the
different topic. For example, yesterday we
Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes:
#1) do we believe OFTC is fundamentally better equipped to resist a
DDOS, or do we just believe they are a smaller target? The ongoing DDOS
on meetup.com the past 2 weeks is a good indicator that being a smaller
fish only helps for so long.
After speaking
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 15:32 +, Jorge Miramontes wrote:
I'd like to gauge everyone's interest in a possible mini-summit for
Neturon LBaaS. If enough people are interested I'd be happy to try and
set something up. The Designate team just had a productive mini-summit
in Austin, TX and it was
Just so everyone is aware. Glance supports 'delayed deletes' where image
data will not actually be deleted at the time of the request. Glance also
has the concept of 'protected images', which allows for setting an image as
protected, preventing it from being deleted until the image is
Hi,
Anyone know how I cam solve the error below:
Running setup.py install for jsonpatch
/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py:267: UserWarning: Unknown distribution
option: 'entry_poimts'
warnings.warn(msg)
changing mode of build/scripts-2.7/jsondiff from 664 to 775
changing
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 07:37:39AM -0800, Tracy Jones wrote:
Hi - Please consider the image cache aging BP for FFE
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56416/)
This is the last of several patches (already merged) that implement image
cache cleanup for the vmware driver. This patch solves a
Hi Kyle,
I am happy to hear OpenDaylight installation and startup are restored
to devstack.
It really helps openstack integration with other open source based software.
I have a question on a file location for non-OpenStack open source software.
when I refactored neutron related devstack code,
James E. Blair [mailto:jebl...@openstack.org] wrote:
significant amount of time chasing bots. It's clear that Freenode is
better able to deal with attacks than OFTC would be. However, OFTC
doesn't have to deal with them because they aren't happening; and that's
worth considering.
Does anyone
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Dmitry Mescheryakov
dmescherya...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hello folks,
A number of OpenStack and related projects have a need to perform
operations inside VMs running on OpenStack. A natural solution would
be an agent running inside the VM and performing tasks.
I am having a very similar issue with horizon, just today. I cloned the
repo and started from scratch on master.
tools/install_venv.py is trying to install cffi as a depdendency,
ultimately fails with
ImportError: cannot import name Feature
This is Fedora 19. I know some folks on Fedora 20
Hi Masaru,
I tried creating the project template following your suggestions.Thats
really helpful. Only one suggestion:
Under the project description, We can give the link to actual project idea.
The remaining details like these can be removed here since this can be
redundant.
- What is the
Hi Julien,
I there are valid reasons why we can consider MQ approach for communicating
with VM agents. The first obvious reason is scalability and performance.
User can ask infrastructure to create 1000 VMs and configure them. With
HTTP approach it will lead to a corresponding number of
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 15:32 +, Jorge Miramontes wrote:
I'd like to gauge everyone's interest in a possible mini-summit for
Neturon LBaaS. If enough people are interested I'd be happy to try and
set something up. The Designate team just had a productive mini-summit
in Austin, TX and it was
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 08:14 -0800, Gary Kotton wrote:
File /home/gk-dev/nova/.tox/py27/build/cffi/setup.py, line 94, in
module
from setuptools import setup, Feature, Extension
ImportError: cannot import name Feature
Apparently, quite recently, a new version of setuptools was
On Thu, Mar 06 2014, Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote:
I there are valid reasons why we can consider MQ approach for communicating
with VM agents. The first obvious reason is scalability and performance.
User can ask infrastructure to create 1000 VMs and configure them. With
HTTP approach it will
So I submitted this
dochttp://docs-draft.openstack.org/29/70629/3/check/gate-trove-docs/34ceff7/doc/build/html/dev/install_alt.html
(in this patch sethttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/70629/) and Dan Nguyen
(thanks Dan) stated that there were some folks using Vagrant. (My workflow uses
git push
I am interested
On Thursday, March 6, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Jorge Miramontes wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'd like to gauge everyone's interest in a possible mini-summit for Neturon
LBaaS. If enough people are interested I'd be happy to try and set something
up. The Designate team just had a
Hi,
I had a couple of questions regarding this UT and the
JS template that it ends up using.
Hopefully someone can point me in the right direction
and help me understand this a little better.
I see that for this particular UT, we have a total of 3 networks
in the network_list (the second network
Sai,
There may be more than one person on a topic, so it would make sense
to have additional questions per person. Yes, link to project idea is
definitely needed.
-- dims
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:41 AM, saikrishna sripada
krishna1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Masaru,
I tried creating the project
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 07:25:37PM +0400, Dmitry Mescheryakov wrote:
Hello folks,
A number of OpenStack and related projects have a need to perform
operations inside VMs running on OpenStack. A natural solution would
be an agent running inside the VM and performing tasks.
One of the key
Team, we will be discussing Marconi graduation from incubation in a couple
weeks at the TC meeting, March 18th at 20:00
UTChttp://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20140318T20p1=1440.
It would be great to have as many people there as possible to help answer
questions, etc.
For 59148 patch set 23, we nearly merged and had +2 from Joe Gordon
and Daniel Berrange. And appears to have been quite close.
For 59149, we might not be so close, Daniel can you comment further if
you see this landing in the next few days?
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Russell Bryant
On 03/06/2014 03:15 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Steven Dake wrote:
My general take is workflow would fit in the Orchestration program, but
not be integrated into the heat repo specifically. It would be a
different repo, managed by the same orchestration program just as we
have heat-cfntools and
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
