we used to have one compute service corresponding to multiple hypervisors
(like host and nodes concept )
our major issue on our platform is we can't run nova-compute service on the
hypervisor and we need to find another place to run the nova-compute in
order to talk to
hypervisor management API
Added some more samples to the Python SDK waiting for review from core
reviewer
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/85993/
Thanks
Rajdeep
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
2014-04-09 14:48 GMT+08:00 Rajdeep Dua rajdeep@gmail.com:
Added some more samples to the Python SDK waiting for review from core
reviewer
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/85993/
Thanks
Rajdeep
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Hi Eugene,
As far as I recall people wanted to balance how a common case would be used
vs. an advanced case.
For this I have created a range of use cases listed in the document so that
people can go over, make sure they agree (ex: the question about availability
zones) and then we can select
Hello developers.
As discussed many times so far[1], there are many projects that needs
to propagate RPC messages into VMs running on OpenStack. Neutron in my case.
My idea is to relay RPC messages from management network into tenant
network over file-like object. By file-like object, I mean
On 09/04/14 12:10 +0800, Tom Fifield wrote:
Due to the lack of response, I'm proposing to switch the documentation
back to using sql_connection. I hope there wasn't a plan to deprecate
this option any time soon :)
Sorry I missed your previous email.
TBH, I'd rather update the config sample.
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: 08 April 2014 13:13
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Server Groups are not an optional
element, bug or feature ?
On 04/08/2014 06:29 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
On 04/09/2014 11:35 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/04/14 12:10 +0800, Tom Fifield wrote:
Due to the lack of response, I'm proposing to switch the documentation
back to using sql_connection. I hope there wasn't a plan to deprecate
this option any time soon :)
Sorry I missed your previous
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 April 2014 14:25
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hosts within two Availability Zones :
possible or not ?
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 10:49 +, Day, Phil wrote:
On a
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the contribution.
Shawn from VMware already filed a bp to export those resources
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/vmware-auto-inventory , but
this bp might some redesign as we need to decide how we will handle
configuration and convention when it comes to vSphere
-Original Message-
From: Chris Friesen [mailto:chris.frie...@windriver.com]
Sent: 08 April 2014 15:19
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hosts within two Availability Zones :
possible or not ?
On 04/08/2014 07:25 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Avishay Traeger
avis...@stratoscale.comwrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi List,
I had few Qs on the implementation of
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
What components (if any) are vulnerable to heartbleed?
OpenStack in itself is not vulnerable to heartbleed, however OpenStack
makes use of the host SSL library (libssl) and that one should be
properly patched.
If you have a production deployment of OpenStack, you should
source openrc demo demo
keystone user-list
You are not authorized to perform the requested action, admin_required. (HTTP
403)
On Tuesday, April 8, 2014 6:06 PM, Naveen Kumar.S naveen...@yahoo.com wrote:
For an user with role as Member , how to get the contents of extra column
from user
Tina TSOU wrote:
Below is our proposal. Look forward to your feedback.
--
Description
This session focuses on how to improve networking performance at large scale
deployment.
For example
- having many VMs, thousands to tens of thousands, in a single data center
- very
Hi,
I have looked at
https://docs.google.com/a/mirantis.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ar1FuMFYRhgadDVXZ25NM2NfbGtLTkR0TDFNUWJQUWc#gid=1
and have a few questions:
1. Monitoring Tab:
a. Are there users that use load balancing who do not monitor members?
Can you share the use cases where
Hello Isaku,
Thanks for sharing this! Right now in Sahara project we think to use
Marconi as a mean to communicate with VM. Seems like you are familiar
with the discussions happened so far. If not, please see links at the
bottom of UnifiedGuestAgent [1] wiki page. In short we see Marconi's
Hi again,
So there is a reply from the Dmitry Burmistrov which for some reason was
missed in this thread:
Nailgun requires exact version of kombu ( == 2.5.14 ).
This is the only reason why we can't update it.
I think you should talk to Dmitry P. about this version conflict.
I want to take
Dmitry, I don't think you should drop kombu.five so soon.
We haven't heard directly from Fuel python team, such as Dmitry
Pyzhov, what reason we have to lock kombu at version 2.5.14.
I wrote to him earlier today out of band, so hopefully he will get
back to this message soon.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014
2014-04-09 19:04 GMT+08:00 Matthew Booth mbo...@redhat.com:
On 09/04/14 07:07, Chen CH Ji wrote:
we used to have one compute service corresponding to multiple
hypervisors (like host and nodes concept )
our major issue on our platform is we can't run nova-compute service on
the hypervisor
Mattew, main reason is global-requirements.txt
It defines that your app should work with kombu v2.4.8 and upper
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Mosesohn mmoses...@mirantis.com wrote:
Dmitry, I don't think you should drop kombu.five so soon.
We haven't heard directly from Fuel python
Hello everyone,
Due to various release-critical issues detected in Neutron icehouse
RC1, a new release candidate was just generated. You can find a list of
the 34 bugs fixed and a link to the RC2 source tarball at:
https://launchpad.net/neutron/icehouse/icehouse-rc2
Unless new release-critical
Hi Juan, thanks for your response. Comments inline.
On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 10:22 +0200, Juan Manuel Rey wrote:
Hi,
I'm fairly new to this list, actually this is my first email sent, and
to OpenStack in general, but I'm not new at all to VMware so I'll try
to give you my point of view about
On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 15:47 +0100, Matthew Booth wrote:
On 07/04/14 06:20, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Sun, 2014-04-06 at 06:59 +, Nandavar, Divakar Padiyar wrote:
Well, it seems to me that the problem is the above blueprint and the
code it introduced. This is an anti-feature IMO, and probably
Hello Dmitry. Thank you for reply.
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:19:10PM +0400,
Dmitry Mescheryakov dmescherya...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hello Isaku,
Thanks for sharing this! Right now in Sahara project we think to use
Marconi as a mean to communicate with VM. Seems like you are familiar
with
Steve Baker said on Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 10:56:14AM +1200:
On 09/04/14 10:09, Robert Collins wrote:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-config-passthrough
Blast, replied to the earlier thread before I saw this one. That'll
teach me. I've also appended my competing solution, what do you
Robert Collins said on Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:58:59AM +1200:
I like this - something like
nova:
config:
- section: default
values:
- option: 'compute_manager'
value: 'ironic.nova.compute.manager.ClusterComputeManager'
- section: cells
values:
Hello OpenStackers,
I would like to share with you non-narrated demo of current version of
'Tuskar-UI' project, which is very close to Icehouse release (one or two
more patches to come in).
Tuskar-UI is a user interface based on TripleO approach which allows
user to register nodes
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Isaku Yamahata isaku.yamah...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Dmitry. Thank you for reply.
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:19:10PM +0400,
Dmitry Mescheryakov dmescherya...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hello Isaku,
Thanks for sharing this! Right now in Sahara project we think to
I don't, but someone on the infra team (#openstack-infra) should be
able to tell you where the theme is maintained.
Doug
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Zhongyue Luo zhongyue@intel.com wrote:
Do you happen to know where the repo for cgit is? I'll submit a patch adding
font and font size.
On 09/04/14 16:54, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hello OpenStackers,
I would like to share with you non-narrated demo of current version of
'Tuskar-UI' project, which is very close to Icehouse release (one or two
more patches to come in).
Tuskar-UI is a user interface based on TripleO approach
On 04/09/2014 03:45 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
-Original Message- From: Russell Bryant
We were thinking that there may be a use for being able to query a
full list of instances (including the deleted ones) for a group.
The API just hasn't made it that far yet. Just hiding them for now
On 04/09/2014 03:55 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
I would guess that affinity is more likely to be a soft requirement
that anti-affinity, in that I can see some services just not meeting
their HA goals without anti-affinity but I'm struggling to think of a
use case why affinity is a must for the
Hi folks,
We'll be having the Sahara team meeting as usual in
#openstack-meeting-alt channel.
Agenda:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SaharaAgenda#Agenda_for_April.2C_10
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Sahara+Meetingiso=20140410T18
--
Sincerely yours,
Sergey
Hello, everyone!
I am currently a graduate student and member of a group of contributors to
OpenStack. We believe that a dynamic scheduler could improve the efficiency
of an OpenStack cloud, either by rebalancing nodes to maximize performance
or to minimize the number of active hosts, in order to
On 10 April 2014 02:32, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote:
On 04/09/2014 03:45 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
-Original Message- From: Russell Bryant
We were thinking that there may be a use for being able to query a
full list of instances (including the deleted ones) for a
I personally don't like the rename approach (and I implemented it!).
However, as Avishay says, we don't have that many options.
One thing that we could do is start to use the admin_metadata associated
with a volume to store a reference to the volume other than the name
(which is the UUID).
On 2014/09/04 16:31, mar...@redhat.com wrote:
Jarda thanks this was great to watch - seems a lot of things have been
fixed/tweaked in last couple weeks. Is everything running from current
master branches?
marios
Yes, everything what you see is currently in the master branch (last
changes
Hi Jay,
Managing multiple clusters using the Compute Proxy is not new right? Prior
to this nova baremetal driver has used this model already. Also this Proxy
Compute model gives flexibility to deploy as many computes required based on
the requirement. For example, one can setup one proxy
- Original Message -
I'm not writing off vCenter or its capabilities. I am arguing that the
bar for modifying a fundamental design decision in Nova -- that of being
horizontally scalable by having a single nova-compute worker responsible
for managing a single provider of compute
Hi folks,
Our next meeting is as usual on Thursday, 14-00 UTC
From the last meeting there was basically two major action items:
1) contribute to deployment scenarios statistics:
https://docs.google.com/a/mirantis.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ar1FuMFYRhgadDVXZ25NM2NfbGtLTkR0TDFNUWJQUWc
2) Make
Henrique,
You should check out Gantt project [1], it could be exactly the place to
implement such features. It is a generic cross-project Scheduler as a
Service forked from Nova recently.
[1] https://github.com/openstack/gantt
--
Best regards,
Oleg Gelbukh
Mirantis Labs
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at
Hi Enrique,
This bp [1] may cover the uses cases you are proposing. ( maybe not
using ceilometer )
Also, you can take a look at openstack-neat [2] ( outside project ),
that try to achieve something similar, but seems to be outdated.
There's another initiate to have an external scheduler
@Divakar, yes, the Proxy Compute model is not new, but I'm not sure if
this model can be accepted by community to manage both VM and PM. Anyway, I
will try to file a bp and get more comments then. Thanks.
2014-04-09 22:52 GMT+08:00 Nandavar, Divakar Padiyar
divakar.padiyar-nanda...@hp.com:
Hi
Hi
I wasn't able to get % for the spreadsheet but our Product Manager
prioritized the features:
*Function*
*Priority (0 = highest)*
*HTTP+HTTPS on one device*
5
*L7 Switching*
2
*SSL Offloading*
1
*High Availability*
0
*IP4 IPV6 Address Support*
6
*Server Name Indication (SNI)
Steve,
The problem with the support of live-migrate would still exist even if we
decide to manage only one cluster from a compute node, unless one is ok with
only live-migrate functionality between clusters. The main debate started with
supporting the live-migrate between the ESX Hosts in the
Hi,
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 17:33 +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
Hello developers.
As discussed many times so far[1], there are many projects that needs
to propagate RPC messages into VMs running on OpenStack. Neutron in my case.
My idea is to relay RPC messages from management network into
@Oleg, Till now, I'm not sure the target of Gantt, is it for initial
placement policy or run time policy or both, can you help clarify?
@Henrique, not sure if you know IBM PRS (Platform Resource Scheduler) [1],
we have finished the dynamic scheduler in our Icehouse version (PRS 2.2),
it has
@Divakar, exactly, we want do ESX server level live-migrations with vCenter
(VCDriver) by leveraging nova scheduler. Thanks.
2014-04-09 23:36 GMT+08:00 Nandavar, Divakar Padiyar
divakar.padiyar-nanda...@hp.com:
Steve,
The problem with the support of live-migrate would still exist even if we
- Original Message -
Steve,
The problem with the support of live-migrate would still exist even if we
decide to manage only one cluster from a compute node, unless one is ok with
only live-migrate functionality between clusters. The main debate started
with supporting the
2014-04-07 23:11 GMT+02:00 Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@gmail.com:
Hi Phil,
2014-04-07 18:48 GMT+02:00 Day, Phil philip@hp.com:
Hi Sylvain,
There was a similar thread on this recently - which might be worth
reviewing:
-Original Message-
From: Matt Wagner [mailto:matt.wag...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 6:46 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Agent]
On 08/04/14 14:04 +0400, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote:
snip
0)
2014-04-09 17:47 GMT+02:00 Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.com:
@Oleg, Till now, I'm not sure the target of Gantt, is it for initial
placement policy or run time policy or both, can you help clarify?
I don't want to talk on behalf of Oleg, but Gantt is targeted to be the
forklift of the current
On 9 April 2014 08:35, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote:
Alternatively, does this mean we need to make name_id a generic field (not a
ID) and then use somethign like uuidutils.is_uuid_like() to determine if its
UUID or non-UUID and then backend will accordinly map it ?
Definitely not,
I have started writing up some general steps for adding oslo libs to
projects, and I would like some feedback about the results. They can't
go into too much detail about specific changes in a project, because
those will vary by library and project. I would like to know if the
order makes sense and
On 09:54 Wed 09 Apr , Lingxian Kong wrote:
yes, the bp also make sense to nova-cinder interaction, may I submmit
a blueprint about that?
Any comments?
Sounds fine to me!
--
Mike Perez
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
On 04/09/2014 03:54 AM, Lingxian Kong wrote:
yes, the bp also make sense to nova-cinder interaction, may I submmit
a blueprint about that?
Any comments?
I was going to propose that same thing for Nova as well, as well as a
summit session for Atlanta. Would be good to coordinate the
I have submitted a session for the Juno summit for this work:
http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/265
Thanks,
Steven Kaufer
Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote on 04/06/2014 01:21:57 AM:
From: Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
@Oleg, @Sylvain, @Leandro, Thanls. I'll check the Gantt project and the
blueprint
2014-04-09 12:59 GMT-03:00 Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@gmail.com:
2014-04-09 17:47 GMT+02:00 Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.com:
@Oleg, Till now, I'm not sure the target of Gantt, is it for initial
placement
I agree those arguments.
But I don't see how network-based agent approach works with Neutron
network for now. Can you please elaborate on it?
Here is the scheme of network-based agent:
server - MQ (Marconi) - agent
As Doug said, Marconi exposes REST API, just like any other OpenStack
Ditto. I am interested in contributing as well.
Does Gant work with Devstack? I am assuming the link will give me
directions on how to test it and contribute to the project.
Susanne
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Henrique Truta
henriquecostatr...@gmail.com wrote:
@Oleg, @Sylvain,
-Original Message-
From: Chris Friesen [mailto:chris.frie...@windriver.com]
Sent: 09 April 2014 15:37
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hosts within two Availability Zones :
possible or not ?
On 04/09/2014 03:55 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
I
- Original Message -
-Original Message-
From: Chris Friesen [mailto:chris.frie...@windriver.com]
Sent: 09 April 2014 15:37
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hosts within two Availability Zones :
possible or not ?
On
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 05:33:49PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
Hello developers.
As discussed many times so far[1], there are many projects that needs
to propagate RPC messages into VMs running on OpenStack. Neutron in my case.
My idea is to relay RPC messages from management network
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
I think it's important to understand what we mean by stable in the
gate. It means that the end point is 99.% available. And that it's
up or down status is largely under our control.
Things that are not stable by this
Excerpts from Isaku Yamahata's message of 2014-04-09 01:33:49 -0700:
Hello developers.
As discussed many times so far[1], there are many projects that needs
to propagate RPC messages into VMs running on OpenStack. Neutron in my case.
My idea is to relay RPC messages from management
Excerpts from Ruslan Kamaldinov's message of 2014-04-09 10:24:48 -0700:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
I think it's important to understand what we mean by stable in the
gate. It means that the end point is 99.% available. And that it's
up or down
On 8 April 2014 18:25, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Jay Dobies's message of 2014-04-08 06:40:07 -0700:
I've always assumed TripleO is very low-level. Put another way,
non-prescriptive. It's not going to push an agenda that says you should
be doing things a certain way,
Just a quick reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be
tomorrow Thursday, April 10th at 17:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting
channel.
The agenda for tomorrow's meeting can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting
Anyone is welcome to add an item to
Excerpts from Duncan Thomas's message of 2014-04-09 11:11:06 -0700:
On 8 April 2014 18:25, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Jay Dobies's message of 2014-04-08 06:40:07 -0700:
I've always assumed TripleO is very low-level. Put another way,
non-prescriptive. It's not going
2014-04-09 18:57 GMT+02:00 Susanne Balle sleipnir...@gmail.com:
Does Gant work with Devstack? I am assuming the link will give me
directions on how to test it and contribute to the project.
https://github.com/openstack/gantt/blob/master/README.rst#disclaimer
Please consider Gantt repository
I totally agree with Sean. If you're going to weaken the rule in a
codeable way (e.g. it doesn't apply to tests, or to certain named
modules or whatever), then great, fix up the HACKING tool and make the
code slightly more readable. But the general advantages of having the
check outway the
On 6 August 2013 21:18, Christopher Armstrong
chris.armstr...@rackspace.com wrote:
I think it's really unfortunate that people will block patches based on
stylistic concerns. The answer, IMO, is to codify in policy that stylistic
issues *cannot* block a patch from landing.
It think the
So I'm a soft -1 on dropping it from hacking.
Me too.
from testtools import matchers
...
Or = matchers.Or
LessThan = matchers.LessThan
...
This is the right way to do it, IMHO, if you have something like
matchers.Or that needs to be treated like part of the syntax. Otherwise,
Summit time is here - please suggest sessions :)
-Rob
--
Robert Collins rbtcoll...@hp.com
Distinguished Technologist
HP Converged Cloud
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Excerpts from Alexis Lee's message of 2014-04-09 06:44:20 -0700:
Robert Collins said on Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:58:59AM +1200:
I like this - something like
nova:
config:
- section: default
values:
- option: 'compute_manager'
value:
Answers inlined. Thanks for the questions! They forced me to think about
certain features.
Cheers,
--Jorge
From: Samuel Bercovici samu...@radware.commailto:samu...@radware.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Hi,
API Design Document
v2https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nGUqEb4CEdabbTDyeL2ECVicnBRNrK3amJcNi-D4Ffo/edit
Includes following example:
Response:
{
qos:
[
{id: 1234-5678-1234-5678,
description: Gold level service,
type: ratelimit,
Tomorrow's meeting will be at 1500 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3. The
current agenda can be found on the subteam meeting page [1].
New on the agenda this week: Multiple Subnets on External Network
Carl
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-L3-Subteam#Agenda
On 10 April 2014 08:33, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
This is exactly what we're doing. We're just suggesting exposing
variations in the Heat templates, rather than in the elements. It is worth
noting that Heat has grown the ability to grab a local file and inject
it into your template
Hello everyone,
Due to various release-critical issues detected in Nova icehouse RC1
(including a security issue), a new release candidate was just
generated. You can find a list of the 12 bugs fixed and a link to the
RC2 source tarball at:
https://launchpad.net/nova/icehouse/icehouse-rc2
- Original Message -
From: Paul Michali (pcm) p...@cisco.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2014 6:31:09 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [infra]Requesting consideration of httmock
Does anyone have a flowchart of the cloud build/configure process including
interactions between the various components/stages of TripleO and Heat?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Collins [mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 2:29 PM
To: OpenStack
Comments inline.
German
From: Susanne Balle [mailto:sleipnir...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 2:54 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Clarification in regards to
On 07/04/14 21:58, Nachi Ueno wrote:
Hi Zane
Thank you for your very valuable post.
We should convert your suggest to multiple bps.
2014-04-07 17:28 GMT-07:00 Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com:
The Neutron API is a constant cause of pain for us as Heat developers, but
afaik we've never attempted
Hey,
I suspect you're looking for this :
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/config/tree/modules/openstack_project/files/git/openstack.css
Hope that helps!
Cheers,
Josh
From: Doug Hellmann [doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com]
Sent: Thursday, April
The answers for our organization are generally pretty close to those that
Jorge has said. So my response is mostly a big +1 to his, with the
following differences:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Jorge Miramontes
jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com wrote:
1. Monitoring Tab:
a.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Stig Telfer stel...@cray.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Matt Wagner [mailto:matt.wag...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 6:46 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
is definitely broken as far as I can tell, because you have to give up
dynamic allocation of IP addresses to use it
What do you mean you have to give up dynamic allocation of IP addresses? A
user is never required to enter an IP address for a port if they don't want
a specific address. Do you
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov
vkozhuka...@mirantis.com wrote:
Guys, thank you very much for your comments,
I thought a lot about why we need to be so limited in IPA use cases. Now
it much clearer for me. Indeed, having some kind of agent running inside
host OS is not
+2
It'd be nice to start putting historical data by default into HDFS (via
sahara?) and leave the databases as only what exists 'now'.
Then people can setup pig or other hadoop jobs and analyze there data as
they wish (slice and dice thousands of ways...)
-Original Message-
From: Robert
That looks like it. Thanks, Josh!
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Joshua Hesketh
joshua.hesk...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hey,
I suspect you're looking for this :
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/config/tree/modules/openstack_project/files/git/openstack.css
Hope that helps!
On 09/04/14 19:20, Kevin Benton wrote:
is definitely broken as far as I can tell, because you have to give up
dynamic allocation of IP addresses to use it
What do you mean you have to give up dynamic allocation of IP addresses?
A user is never required to enter an IP address for a port if they
I'm not seeing anything here about non http(s) related Load balancing. We're
interested in load balancing ssh, ftp, and other services too.
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Samuel Bercovici [samu...@radware.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 5:51 AM
To: OpenStack Development
2014-04-10 0:33 GMT+08:00 Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com:
On 04/09/2014 03:54 AM, Lingxian Kong wrote:
yes, the bp also make sense to nova-cinder interaction, may I submmit
a blueprint about that?
Any comments?
I was going to propose that same thing for Nova as well, as well as a
Dear Thierry,
Thanks for your suggestion.
It is submitted as below.
http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/create
Topic
Title (Click to view/edit)
Proposer
Status
Neutron
Scaling Network Performance for Large
Cloudshttp://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/270
Tina Tsou
U Unreviewed
Hi.
I can't complete git review,It say set contact info in
https://review.openstack.org/#/settings/contact.
When I login in https://review.openstack.org/#/settings/contact.( I login in
with email hs.c...@huawei.com.)
and I modify Mailing Address and Save changes,It raise the following errors:
On 8 April 2014 10:35, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
To attach a port to a network and give it an IP from a specific subnet
on that network, you would use the *--fixed-ip subnet_id *option.
Otherwise, the create port request will use the first subnet it finds
attached to that
On 04/09/2014 10:06 PM, Chenliang (L) wrote:
Hi.
I can't complete git review,It say set contact info in
https://review.openstack.org/#/settings/contact.
When I login in https://review.openstack.org/#/settings/contact.( I login in
with email hs.c...@huawei.com.)
and I modify Mailing
Thanks! Will submit a patch.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.comwrote:
That looks like it. Thanks, Josh!
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Joshua Hesketh
joshua.hesk...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hey,
I suspect you're looking for this :
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
