Sorry about that. It should be readable now.
From: Eugene Nikanorov [enikano...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 3:51 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements and
Hi, Christopher,
I have some question to the API changes related to
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80707/4/nova/api/openstack/compute/plugins/v3/hypervisors.py
, which adds a property to the hypervisor information.
a) I checked the https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/APIChangeGuidelines
Neutron (and Nova),
I have had one thing come up as I've been using the template. I find
that I would like to add just a little document structure in the form
of a sub-heading or two under the Proposed change heading but before
the required Alternatives sub-heading. However, this is not allowed
From: Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 16/04/2014 19:58
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [heat-templates] [qa] [tempest]
Questions about images
Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com
Hi folks,
Our regular meeting is going to be on Thursday, 17, at 14-00 UTC
We have some data and requirements to discuss.
Also, we'll discuss the API proposal by Jorge Brandon
Thanks,
Eugene.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote:
Neutron (and Nova),
I have had one thing come up as I've been using the template. I find
that I would like to add just a little document structure in the form
of a sub-heading or two under the Proposed change heading but
Hi everybody!
It is my pleasure to announce the final release of Barbican for Icehouse
2014.1
Information on the milestone and its associated tar ball are available at:
https://launchpad.net/barbican/icehouse/icehouse
Many thanks to all the contributors who made this first incubated milestone
Hi Douglas,
could you please point to the project docs?
Thanks,
Eugene.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:48 AM, Douglas Mendizabal
douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hi everybody!
It is my pleasure to announce the final release of Barbican for Icehouse
2014.1
Information on the
On 16/04/14 21:53, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 16/04/2014 00:46
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] computed package names?
On 15/04/14 17:59, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 04/15/2014
Hi Eugene,
Currently, all of our documentation is in GitHub, which can be found at:
https://github.com/cloudkeep/barbican/wiki
We’re working on moving the docs to docbook format, so stay tuned for
updated docs in the future.
Regards,
Douglas Mendizábal
From: Eugene Nikanorov
Eugene,
Towards the bottom of that document it does mention content switching and how
it would work with this. I know its a huge text document and hard to navigate
but it is there. The point of the one pool on a load balancer is because other
than content switching there aren't any other use
Hi Vikash,
Currently this is not supported. the NIC not only needs to be in different
subnet, they have to be in different network as well (container for the
subnet)
Thanks
Ronak
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Vikash Kumar
vikash.ku...@oneconvergence.com wrote:
*With 'interfaces' I mean
Hi folks
My bad,, Issue (1) was my mistake, and fixed
2014-04-16 15:16 GMT-07:00 Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com:
Hi folks
I submitted a wip patch which has diagram examples for both of ascii
flow and blockdiag.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88095/1
This is both output from ascii flow and
Sergio J Cazzolato wrote:
I would to see the operators opinion in this blueprint, we need to
understand if it is useful or it is confusing for you.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/84432/9
Sergio, I'm reposting this in a new thread since this isn't about quota
templates. Also I'm posting
Adding the dev list.
I would to see also the devs opinion in this blueprint, we need to discuss the
approach for this.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/84432/9
-Original Message-
From: Cazzolato, Sergio J
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 5:47 PM
To: Cazzolato, Sergio J; James Penick;
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-04-16 08:39:56 -0700:
On 16/04/14 05:53, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
IMO, it would be desirable to not have things like yum or apt appear in the
template explicitly. For many packages it seems like at least the top level
package names (not including
On 17/04/14 09:11, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
From: Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 16/04/2014 19:58
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [heat-templates] [qa] [tempest]
Questions about
On Apr 16, 2014, at 4:31 PM, Eugene Nikanorov
enikano...@mirantis.commailto:enikano...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I've briefly looked over the doc.
I think whole idea to base the API on Atlas misses the content switching use
case, which is very important:
We need multiple pools within
All,
If anyone has a chance to do some review, we really want to get this one
merged: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/81919/
This will clear the way for us to work on getting the driver reviewed,
followed by a series of smaller patches.
Thanks,
Russell
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Jim
Hi Ramkumar,
Today there is no type of cells integration or cells like logic in neutron.
If using nova cells, each cell must share the same neturon deployment. This
neutron deployment though can be scaled out across several neutron servers
behind a loadbalancer though. Another scaling option
This is true. Several people have asked this same question over the years
though I've yet to hear a use case why one really need to do this. Do you
have one?
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Ronak Shah ro...@nuagenetworks.net wrote:
Hi Vikash,
Currently this is not supported. the NIC not only
Hi y'all!
This is actually a pretty good start for a revision of the Neutron LBaaS
API.
My feedback on your proposed API v2.0 is actually pretty close to Eugene's,
with a couple additions:
You say 'only one port and protocol per load balancer', yet I don't know
how this works. Could you define
Hi,
Does anyone ever create VMWare image using qemu-img convert from a QCOW2
image? I did some test according to the following guide but the VM creation
always failed.
I tried to logon to the console of the VM and found the console is
reporting the VM was boot from PXE and no operating systems.
Hi,
Comments inline:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.comwrote:
I have been recently investigating reports of slowness for list responses
in the Neutron API.
This was first reported in [1], and then recently was observed with both
the ML2 and the NSX
Hi,
Is someone working on release notes for glance? At the moment it's
looking pretty bare :)
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseNotes/Icehouse
Regards,
Tom
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Hi folks,
As part of working on
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-sdk-php/+spec/sphinx-docs, I’ve been
looking at http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/openstack-sdk-php/tree/doc.
Before I start making any changes toward that BP, however, I wanted to put
forth a couple of
Hi, just to avoid any confusion - I'm not putting my hat in the ring
for the TC this cycle - I think I helped make a difference as a member
of the TC over the last 6 months, but TripleO is maturing and growing
rapidly and the TC is (rightly) taking on more and deeper analysis and
coordination work
Good timing. I just tried this today for the first time.
Here's what worked for me:
wget
http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/saucy/current/saucy-server-cloudimg-i386-disk1.img
qemu-img convert -f qcow2 saucy-server-cloudimg-i386-disk1.img -O vmdk
saucy-server-cloudimg-i386-disk1.vmdk
glance
Aaron,
One of the use case is to create L2 segments in a network. I can
elaborate this use case if u want.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Aaron Rosen aaronoro...@gmail.com wrote:
This is true. Several people have asked this same question over the years
though I've yet to hear a use
As a fresh guy on nova(Have about 1+ year in nova but less than 0.5 year
experience to contribute to community)
I'd like to share my feeling on using nova-specs
1) let me know what we are going to do for next release,it wider my
understand of whole nova since
I am able to take a look at the
On Apr 16, 2014, at 7:56 PM, Stephen Balukoff
sbaluk...@bluebox.netmailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net
wrote:
Hi y'all!
This is actually a pretty good start for a revision of the Neutron LBaaS API.
My feedback on your proposed API v2.0 is actually pretty close to Eugene's,
with a couple additions:
Yes please... I don't see why one would need two interfaces on the same L2
to do that though.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Vikash Kumar
vikash.ku...@oneconvergence.com wrote:
Aaron,
One of the use case is to create L2 segments in a network. I can
elaborate this use case if u want.
Hi all,
In order to ease confusion I think I might create use case walk-throughs to
show how the API would work. There's only been one week to work on this (minus
other work) so I haven't had enough time to create them. I'll try to capture
most of them in this form over the following week as I
Web server running multiple SSL sites that wants to be compatible with
clients that don't support the SNI extension. There is no way for a server
to get multiple IP addresses on the same interface is there?
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Aaron Rosen aaronoro...@gmail.com wrote:
This is true.
You can do it with ip aliasing and use one interface:
ifconfig eth0 10.0.0.22/24
ifconfig eth0:1 10.0.0.23/24
ifconfig eth0:2 10.0.0.24/24
2: eth0: NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN
qlen 1000
link/ether 40:6c:8f:1a:a9:31 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet
Ok. The reason I asked about it is because I recognize you guys may be very
busy now for pre-summit activities going on. :)
Thanks!
Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.
On 16 Apr 2014, at 22:18, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 16/04/14 10:29, Renat Akhmerov wrote:
Can we include action
On 17/04/14 14:20, Aaron Rosen wrote:
You can do it with ip aliasing and use one interface:
ifconfig eth0 10.0.0.22/24 http://10.0.0.22/24
ifconfig eth0:1 10.0.0.23/24 http://10.0.0.23/24
ifconfig eth0:2 10.0.0.24/24 http://10.0.0.24/24
The 'ip' command can also do it.
ip address add
I'd like to see your use case too.
I heard a similar demand recently.
It is a case of migration of legacy applicaitons to virtual platform
and the applications which manages redandunt NICs directly and they just
want not to change the applcations itself. It is just server
consolidation and not a
Ooh, I confused the day of meeting :(. My apologies, I’m in a completely
different timezone (for me it’s in the middle of night) so I strongly believed
it was on a different day. I’ll be there next time.
Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.
On 17 Apr 2014, at 11:28, Renat Akhmerov
Lets say I have source S1 on n/w net1, destination S2 on net1 and i want to
firewall traffic coming from S1 destined to S2. I can use L3 firewall but
in that case the packet headers will have different values, not the same
source and destination. Instead, we can divide network in L2 segments and
I was under the impression that the security group rules blocked addresses
not assigned by neutron[1].
1.
https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/agent/linux/iptables_firewall.py#L188
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Aaron Rosen aaronoro...@gmail.com wrote:
You can do it with
To cope with such cases, allowed-address-pairs extension was implemented.
http://docs.openstack.org/api/openstack-network/2.0/content/allowed_address_pair_ext_ops.html
(2014/04/17 13:39), Kevin Benton wrote:
I was under the impression that the security group rules blocked
addresses not assigned
Hi Vikash,
Sorry I don't really follow your example. You're saying you have have two
hosts S1 and S2 that are connected to the same network. Would you mind
explaining this example in a little more details, what ip's do they have
how many interfaces, etc? I've quite curious to hear.
Best,
Aaron
The allowed-address-pair extension that was added here (
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38230/) allows us to add arbitrary ips to
an interface to allow them. This is useful if you want to run something
like VRRP between two instances.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Kevin Benton
Whoops Akihiro beat me to it :)
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Aaron Rosen aaronoro...@gmail.com wrote:
The allowed-address-pair extension that was added here (
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38230/) allows us to add arbitrary ips
to an interface to allow them. This is useful if you want
I'd like to announce my Technical Committee candidacy.
I've been involved with OpenStack since it began. I'm one of the original
authors of Swift, and I have been serving as PTL since the position was
established. I'm employed by SwiftStack, a company building management and
integration tools
Yeah, I was aware of allowed address pairs, but that doesn't help with the
IP allocation part.
Is this the tenant workflow for this use case?
1. Create an instance.
2. Wait to see what which subnet it gets an allocation from.
3. Pick an IP from that subnet that doesn't currently appear to be in
Kevin , this can be one approach but not sure. But certainly won't solve
all cases. :)
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, I was aware of allowed address pairs, but that doesn't help with the
IP allocation part.
Is this the tenant workflow for
Aaron,
The idea is to steer packets coming from source S1 ( belong to net1)
destined to destination D1 (belong to net1) through bunch of L2 appliances
(like firewall) without modifying packet headers. The core idea is to keep
appliances (on net1), source S1 (VM on net1) and destination D1(VM
101 - 149 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
