I see.
Thank you !
*Best Regards!*
*Chao Yan--**My twitter:Andy Yan @yanchao727
https://twitter.com/yanchao727*
*My Weibo:http://weibo.com/herewearenow
http://weibo.com/herewearenow--*
2014-05-19 22:24 GMT+08:00 Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com:
On
Hi,
I am working on setting up Baremetal for a while. I notice that in the process
of deployment in TripleO, I mean in the first round of PXE boot, it will append
the IP info in the configuration and pass to the target machine as kernel
parameters. Then init script will read the parameters and
Hello everyone!
Earlier topic of unconditional migrations was discussed in emails by me
and Salvatore. On summit there was a small meeting on which was discussed
this topic and some others. I haven't participated in this meeting but
member of my team Eugene was there instead of me and told me
On Mon, May 19 2014, Jay Pipes wrote:
I think at that point I mentioned that there were a number of places that
were using the SELECT ... FOR UPDATE construct in Nova (in SQLAlchemy, it's
the with_lockmode('update') modification of the query object). Peter
promptly said that was a problem.
Reminder that the first meeting will kick off today at 1500 UTC on
#openstack-meeting-3 Please add agenda items to the etherpad if you
wish to discuss them this week:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-libvirt-meeting-agenda
Regards,
Daniel
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 01:10:40PM -0400, Daniel
George Shuklin wrote:
Good day.
Could someone, please, review backport of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1240849 to stable/havana.
I've checked it on my laboratory and it fixes problem with 'no network
after soft reboot', but I've done some invasive changes to the logic, so
if
Great idea!
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Alexis Lee alex...@hp.com wrote:
Potentially the TITLES structure could
be read from a per-project YAML file and the test itself could be drawn
from some common area?
I think you can get that data from template.rst file by parsing it and
Hi All,
If you hit an unknown error in a postgres job since Tue May 20 00:30:48
2014 + you probably hit *https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/1321093
https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/1321093*
(*-tempest-dsvm-postgres-full failing on trove-manage db_sync)
A fix is in the works:
Hello Kevin.
There is a similar Neutron blueprint [1], originally meant for Havana but
now aiming for Juno.
I would be happy to join efforts with you regarding our blueprints.
See also: [2].
[1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ml2-external-port
[2]
Hi!
It is nice to see so careful attention for my change requests. In fact they
are related the same topic that Johannes mentioned. The idea of this is
described there
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/db-sync-models-with-migrations
.
Problems that mentioned in
# Added [Neutron] tag as well.
Hi Igor,
Thanks for the comment. We already know them as I commented
in the Summit session and ML2 weekly meeting.
Kevin's blueprint now covers Ironic integration and layer2 network gateway
and I believe campus-network blueprint will be covered.
We think the work
On 05/19/2014 11:49 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:58 PM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com
mailto:dkr...@redhat.com wrote:
Removing [nova]
On 05/19/2014 02:55 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
My suggestion is that we stop merging new Nova v3 tests from here
Hello everyone,
At the Design Summit last week we discussed the Juno release schedule
and came up with the following proposal:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Juno_Release_Schedule
The main reported issue with it is the presence of the US labor day
weekend just before juno-3 (feature freeze)
Greetings,
After lot of talking, planing and, most importantly, the results of
Marconi's previous graduation attempt, we've been thinking about how
incubated projects can be more aligned, integrated and updated with
the TC and the governance changes.
Most of us are subscribed to the Governance
Hi ,
We have been trying to understand behavior of security group rules in icehouse
stable.
The default security group contains 4 rules, two ingress and two egress.
The two ingress rules are one for IPv4 and other for IPv6.
We see both the ingress rules use cyclic security groups,
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 05/19/2014 11:49 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
- if/else inlined in tests based on the microversion mode that is
being tested at the moment (perhaps least amount of code but cost is
readability)
- class inheritance
Hi,
I would like to shed some additional light on this for those who were
not there. So, SELECT ... FOR UPDATE does lock on a single node, as it
is pointed out earlier in this thread, a simple solution is to write
only one node at a time. Haproxy can be set up with both backends, see
this blog
Hi-
The Jenkins CI jobs posted build failed for a gerrit review.
check-tempest-dsvm-neutron-pg in ceilometers-anotifications
(http://logs.openstack.org/92/78092/10/check/check-tempest-dsvm-neutron-pg/312e9c0/)
2014-05-20
+1
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.comwrote:
Trevor, congrats!
welcome to the sahara-core.
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Matthew Farrellee m...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 05/12/2014 05:31 PM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
Hey folks,
I'd like to
Hi,
I am currently improving UI designs for node management via Ironic based
on the feedback from OpenStack Summit. In the Infrastructure dashboard,
there are basic views for nodes, but at this moment it is handled via
nova-baremetal (when we implemented these views, Ironic was not ready
cool
hope to see your design and implementation soon
On May 20, 2014 8:47 PM, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I am currently improving UI designs for node management via Ironic based
on the feedback from OpenStack Summit. In the Infrastructure dashboard,
there are basic views
We agreed just before the summit that we wanted to participate in the
specs repository experiments for this cycle. The repository is set up
[1] and I've just posted a review for an updated template [2] that
includes some sections added to nova's template after we copied it and
some sections we
I think in our eagerness to triage bugs we might have missed that May 26 is a
holiday in the U.S.
I know some of us have the day off work and while that doesn't necessarily stop
the effort, it might throw a wrench in people's holiday weekend plans. I'm
wondering if we should re-evaluate and
Hi,
Also it would be nice to confirm that really SELECT FOR UPDATES are
causing the deadlocks. Since these are row lock waits in a single node
case, with a slow log from a single node, pt-query-digest can help to
determine this.
pt-query-digest /path/to/slow.log --order-by
On 05/20/2014 03:19 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
On 05/19/2014 11:49 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
- if/else inlined in tests based on the microversion mode that is
being tested at the
I think this is a combination of two things...
1. When a VM initiates outbound communications, the egress rules
allow associated return traffic. So if you allow outbound echo
request, the return echo reply will also be allowed.
2. The router interface will respond to ping.
- Jack
From:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Brandon Logan
brandon.lo...@rackspace.com wrote:
In the API meeting at the summit, Mark McClain mentioned that the
existing API should be supported, but deprecated so as not to interrupt
those using the existing API. To me, that sounds like the object model
Just a quick reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be
this Thursday, May 22nd at 17:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel. I'm
sending the reminder out a little earlier this week because the usual meeting
cadence was interrupted by the off week and summit.
The agenda for
Between patch set 1 and patch set 3 here [1] we have different solutions
to the same issue, which is if you don't specify a spacing value for
periodic tasks then they run whenever the periodic task processor runs,
which is non-deterministic and can be staggered if some tasks don't
complete in
Hello, Sean!
I'm trying to use Nova Network instead of Neutron due to its simplicity,
that's why I didn't specify any of this on the controller.
On the compute node, I enabled n-cpu,n-net,n-api,c-sch,c-api,c-vol,
because that's what I thought were needed to become a Host... I'll try to
disable
I'm ok with moving it to May 27.
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014, Michael McCune mimcc...@redhat.com wrote:
I think in our eagerness to triage bugs we might have missed that May 26
is a holiday in the U.S.
I know some of us have the day off work and while that doesn't necessarily
stop the effort,
Hi All,
At the summit I heard that the Barbican meeting time might be moving,
has anything been agreed?
Cheers
-Rob
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
I think May 26 was a random 'day after summit'. I'm Ok with May 27 too.
Andrew.
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.comwrote:
I'm ok with moving it to May 27.
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014, Michael McCune mimcc...@redhat.com wrote:
I think in our eagerness to
API should only be on the controller. You only want compute services
(n-cpu, n-net, c-vol) on the computes.
You also need to set MULTI_HOST=True for nova network. Some examples
of working config at -
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Gauvain Pocentek
gauvain.pocen...@objectif-libre.com wrote:
Le 2014-05-16 17:13, Anne Gentle a écrit :
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Gauvain Pocentek
gauvain.pocen...@objectif-libre.com wrote:
Hello,
This mail probably mainly concerns the doc team, but
Hi folks,
Agree with Kyle, you may go ahead and update the spec on review to reflect
the design discussed at the summit.
Thanks,
Eugene.
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.comwrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Brandon Logan
brandon.lo...@rackspace.com
Yuriy Taraday said on Tue, May 20, 2014 at 01:37:29PM +0400:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Alexis Lee alex...@hp.com wrote:
Potentially the TITLES structure could
be read from a per-project YAML file and the test itself could be drawn
from some common area?
I think you can get that
+1 for May 27.
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Lazarev alaza...@mirantis.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 10:20:58 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] bug triage day after summit
I
Hi,
Could everyone please test OpenStack+SELinux with the latest RHEL7.0 builds.
We are running into the same avc's that have fixes released for them.
https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/buildinfo?buildID=357647
Thank you.
Regards,
Miroslav and Ryan
@Matt,
Agree, My vote would be to change existing behavior.
-- dims
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Between patch set 1 and patch set 3 here [1] we have different solutions to
the same issue, which is if you don't specify a spacing value for
Hi All,
We still have some people travelling after ODS. The meeting for this week
will be cancelled and we will resume next week.
Best,
p
Peter J. Pouliot CISSP
Sr. SDET OpenStack
Microsoft
New England Research Development Center
1 Memorial Drive
Cambridge, MA 02142
P: 1.(857).4536436
E:
Please see inline.
cheers,
Rossella
On 05/20/2014 12:26 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
Some comments inline.
Salvatore
On 19 May 2014 20:32, sridhar basam sridhar.ba...@gmail.com
mailto:sridhar.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
Hello,
this is a followup on the design session we had at the meeting about
the handling of static files. You can see the etherpad from that session
here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-summit-horizon-static-files
The split:
We are going to use rather uninspired, but very clear and
Hi Rob,
Could you please point me where the spec repo is?
Thanks
--Cristian
On 19/05/14 22:46, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
Hey everyone, it was great to see many of you at the summit - if you
were there and we didn't get time to say hello, then hopefully in
Paris we can do
Hi
On 20 May 2014, at 16:25, Sanchez, Cristian A cristian.a.sanc...@intel.com
wrote:
Could you please point me where the spec repo is?
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tripleo-specs/
Cheers,
Chris
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
- Original Message -
Hi Rob,
Could you please point me where the spec repo is?
All the spec repos are under the standard git location:
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/
e.g.
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tripleo-specs/
Thanks
--Cristian
On 19/05/14 22:46,
* balaj...@freescale.com (balaj...@freescale.com) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@noironetworks.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 12:19 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV
We have not changed anything as of yet. The goal was to see if we could
find some times that work for Jamie, but I haven't done it yet. I'll post
something this week and we'll see if there is consensus.
Thanks,
--
Jarret Raim
@jarretraim
On 5/20/14, 9:22 AM, Clark, Robert Graham
Hi,
There are a number of reviews[1][2] where new environment variables are being
disliked, leading to -1 or -2 code reviews because new environment variables
are added. It is looking like this is becoming a policy.
If this is a policy, then could that be stated, and an alternate mechanism
Hi Zane, sorry for the delayed response. Comments inline.
On 05/06/2014 09:09 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 05/05/14 13:40, Solly Ross wrote:
One thing that I was discussing with @jaypipes and @dansmith over
on IRC was the possibility of breaking flavors down into separate
components -- i.e have a
Hi Praveen,
I think we should fix the update_method instead to properly check for this.
I don't see any advantage to allow the fixed_ips/mac to be in the
allowed_address_pairs since they are explicitly allowed. What's your
motivation for changing this?
Aaron
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 4:05 PM,
On 05/20/2014 04:53 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Mon, May 19 2014, Jay Pipes wrote:
I think at that point I mentioned that there were a number of places that
were using the SELECT ... FOR UPDATE construct in Nova (in SQLAlchemy, it's
the with_lockmode('update') modification of the query
Thanks Kyle and Eugene.
I can do this if no one else wants to. If someone really wants to do this then
let me know and I’ll gladly give it up. Just let me know soon. I just want to
get this done ASAP.
Thanks,
Brandon
From: Eugene Nikanorov
Hi Kevin!
I had a few conversations with folks at the summit regarding this. Broadly
speaking, yes -- this integration would be very helpful for both discovery
and network/tenant isolation at the bare metal layer.
I've left a few comments inline
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Kevin
I would to hear your thoughts about an idea to add a way to manage the default
quota values through the API.
The idea is to use the current quota api, but sending ''default' instead of the
tenant_id. This change would apply to quota-show and quota-update methods.
This approach will help to
On 05/19/2014 02:32 PM, sridhar basam wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Stackers,
On Friday in Atlanta, I had the pleasure of moderating the database
session at the Ops Meetup track. We had lots of good discussions
On 05/20/2014 10:07 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 05/19/2014 02:32 PM, sridhar basam wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Stackers,
On Friday in Atlanta, I had the pleasure of moderating the database
session at the Ops
Thanks
On 20/05/14 12:43, Chris Jones c...@tenshu.net wrote:
Hi
On 20 May 2014, at 16:25, Sanchez, Cristian A
cristian.a.sanc...@intel.com wrote:
Could you please point me where the spec repo is?
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tripleo-specs/
Cheers,
Chris
I've proposed May 26 initially because it's a first day after my vacation :)
If there will be no objections, we're moving bug triage day to May 27.
Thanks.
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014, Chad Roberts crobe...@redhat.com wrote:
+1 for May 27.
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Lazarev
Hi Aaron,
The main motivation is simplicity. Consider the case where we want to allow
ip cidr 10.10.1.0/24 to be allowed on a port which has a fixed IP of
10.10.1.1. Now if we do not want to allow overlapping, then one needs to
add 8 cidrs to get around this - (10.10.1.128/25, 10.10.1.64/26,
Hi Tim,
Maybe instead of just a flag like --nested (bool value) to resource-list
we can add optional argument like --depth X or --nested-level X (X -
integer value) to limit the depth for recursive listing of nested resources?
Best,
Bartosz
On 05/19/2014 09:13 PM, Tim Schnell wrote:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_ipv6/2014/neutron_ipv6.2014-05-20-14.00.html
--
Sean M. Collins
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Awesome! Seems like we reached agreement for not covering privacy extension at
this moment. I am totally fine with that. To put closure on this subject, do
you think we need to document it and provide user with work-around in case
somebody asks for it in Juno release?
Shixiong
On May 16,
Bartosz, would that be in addition to --nested? Seems like id want to be able
to say all of it as well as some of it.
On May 20, 2014, at 1:24 PM, Bartosz Górski bartosz.gor...@ntti3.com
wrote:
Hi Tim,
Maybe instead of just a flag like --nested (bool value) to resource-list we
can add
On 5/19/2014 1:25 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 05/19/2014 02:13 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 5/19/2014 11:33 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 5/19/2014 10:53 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
I was looking through this timeout bug [1] this morning and am able to
correlate that around the time of the
Trevor,
you're added to all core-related teams now, if you'll need help, feel free
to contact me and other team members.
Thanks.
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014, Telles Nobrega tellesnobr...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Sergey Lukjanov
Hello All,
The purpose of this email is to document a few discussions from the summit, and
to facilitate communication between parties at Docker and the Heat community.
The way the Docker resource is currently implemented requires the remote Docker
api to be enabled on the compute instances
As I see, the 94315 merged atm, is the issue fixed?
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
If you hit an unknown error in a postgres job since Tue May 20 00:30:48
2014 + you probably hit *https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/1321093
On 20/05/14 12:17, Jay Pipes wrote:
Hi Zane, sorry for the delayed response. Comments inline.
On 05/06/2014 09:09 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 05/05/14 13:40, Solly Ross wrote:
One thing that I was discussing with @jaypipes and @dansmith over
on IRC was the possibility of breaking flavors down
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Elizabeth K. Joseph
l...@princessleia.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting on Tuesday May 20th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting
Great post-summit meeting, thanks to everyone who joined us.
Minutes
Yes, this issue is fixed now that 94315 is merged.
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.comwrote:
As I see, the 94315 merged atm, is the issue fixed?
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
If you hit an unknown error in a
Hi,
I am part of the ServiceVM team and I will attend the NFV IRC meetings.
Thanks,
- Stephen
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Chris Wright chr...@sous-sol.org wrote:
* balaj...@freescale.com (balaj...@freescale.com) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Kyle Mestery
Hi folks, I took the major work items we discussed at the summit and placed
them into the three Juno milestones:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Roadmap_(Marconi)
Let me know what you think over the next few days. We will address any
remaining questions and concerns at our next team meeting
Next meeting will be 2014-05-27
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/python_openstacksdk/2014/python_openstacksdk.2014-05-20-19.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/python_openstacksdk/2014/python_openstacksdk.2014-05-20-19.00.txt
Log:
Hi All,
I put together a page on the wiki [1] capturing a first draft of some ideas on
how to improve the User Experience of the messaging in Horizon. These are not
technical and really just focus on the presentation layer of these messages,
but it would be great to see this be expanded or
The solution I propose to this problem is to integrate docker with
software config, which would allow the Docker api running on a compute
instance to listen on an unix socket
First, thank you for looking at this.
Docker already listens on a unix socket. I'm not as familiar with Heat's
Hi folks
I could deploy it on openshift
http://reviewstat-nachi.rhcloud.com/
2014-05-19 20:36 GMT-07:00 Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com:
Hi Boris
Ya, I know this stats.
The primary usecase for this patch is helping reviewer assignment for
each patch.
2014-05-19 18:50 GMT-07:00 Boris Pavlovic
Excerpts from Andrew Plunk's message of 2014-05-20 13:49:58 -0700:
No Problem.
As the Docker resource in Heat currently works, it will require Docker
running on a customer's vm to listen over a network socket. With software
config you could allow Docker to listen on the instance's local
We shared and discussed the directions on Mistral development session,
and work through the list of smaller post POC steps, placing them on the
roadmap.
The notes are here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-summit-mistral.
Renat and I developed shared understanding on most of them.
Next
Renewing the thread, is there a blueprint for this refactoring effort?
In the email thread till now, we have just had an etherpad link. I would
like to get more deeply involved in design/implementation and review of
these changes and I get a feeling that not being able to attend the Atlanta
This would effectively make Docker another case of syntactic sugar,
much like OS::SoftwareConfig::Chef would be.
Short term I think this will get Docker onto Heat users' instances
quicker.
Agreed.
However I do think that the limitations of this approach are pretty
large, such as how to model
Hi!
Comments inline.
On 20/05/14 21:58, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 20/05/14 12:17, Jay Pipes wrote:
Hi Zane, sorry for the delayed response. Comments inline.
You are assuming a public cloud provider use case above. As much as I
tend to focus on the utility cloud model, where
We've been experimenting some with how to use Neutron with Ironic here at
Rackspace.
Our very experimental code:
https://github.com/rackerlabs/ironic-neutron-plugin
Our objective is the same as what you're describing, to allow Nova servers
backed by Ironic to attach to arbitrary Neutron
I spoke to JP offline and confirmed that the link to 85418 should have been
a link to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88252
I think that
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-incubator-rationalise-ui and
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-devtest.sh-refactoring-blueprintare
the closest
Has anyone had any success with running devstack and neutron in a vagrant
machine where the floating Ips are accessible from outside of the vagrant box (
I.e. From the host ).
I’ve spent a few hours trying to get it working without any real success.
Here is a brief rundown on the majority of the scheduler sessions from the
summit, links to the etherpads and some of my incoherent notes from the
sessions. Feel free to reply to this email to correct any mistakes I made and
to add any other thoughts you might have:
1) Future of gantt
* Stephen Wong (s3w...@midokura.com) wrote:
I am part of the ServiceVM team and I will attend the NFV IRC meetings.
Great, thank you Stephen.
cheers,
-chris
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
I also agree that instead of removing the old test, we keep changing those
as microversion gets changed.
One suggestion (may be same as what Chris is thinking)-
-Tempest can keep the common test directory containing tests which are
going to be same as microversion bump up. Initially all test can
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
I'd like to get some more discussion going for the nova-spec on adding DB2
support [1] especially since we didn't get to the topic for
I agree to continue work on bp/ nova-api-test-inheritance. As its reduce
the duplication code and later will help to remove the V2 tests easily.
V2.1 tests can be written on same design of inheritance.
--
Thanks
Ghanshyam Mann
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Kenichi Oomichi
Elizabeth K. Joseph l...@princessleia.com writes:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Elizabeth K. Joseph
l...@princessleia.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting on Tuesday May 20th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting
Great
We have had some discussions around how to move forward with the LBaaS
service in OpenStack. I am trying to summarize the key points below.
Feel free to chime in if I misrepresented anything or if you disagree :-)
For simplicity in the rest of the email and so I can differentiate between
all
Hi Susanne,
One comment in line.
On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 19:12 -0400, Susanne Balle wrote:
We have had some discussions around how to move forward with the LBaaS
service in OpenStack. I am trying to summarize the key points below.
Feel free to chime in if I misrepresented anything or if
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
Next meeting will be 2014-05-27
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/python_openstacksdk/2014/python_openstacksdk.2014-05-20-19.00.html
These meeting minutes are very sparse.
Minutes (text):
On 21/05/14 02:31, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Gauvain Pocentek
gauvain.pocen...@objectif-libre.com wrote:
Le 2014-05-16 17:13, Anne Gentle a écrit :
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Gauvain Pocentek
gauvain.pocen...@objectif-libre.com wrote:
Hello,
This mail
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote:
@Matt,
Agree, My vote would be to change existing behavior.
Same. I think its reasonable to say the current behavior is not ideal
(otherwise we wouldn't have changed it), and that the new behavior is
better for the
I'm reading through the https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/SSL
docs as well as the https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-lbaas-ssl-l7
document that your referencing below and I think who ever wrote the documents
may have misunder stood the Association between X509 certificates
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
Next meeting will be 2014-05-27
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/python_openstacksdk/2014/python_openstacksdk.2014-05-20-19.00.html
Hi Devananda,
Most of this should work fine. The only problem part is handling the
servers that are first being booted and have never been connected to
Ironic. Neutron doesn't have control over the default network that all
un-provisioned switch ports should be a member of. Even if we added
Hi Russell,
Thanks for sharing this. I introduced this as an extension so it can
hopefully be used by ML2 and any other plugins by including the mixin.
I have a couple of questions about the workflow you described:
1. Nova calls Neutron to create a virtual port. Because this happens
_before_
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo