I am concerned about how block migration functions when Cinder volumes are
attached to an instance being migrated. We noticed some unexpected
behavior recently, whereby attached generic NFS-based volumes would become
entirely unsparse over the course of a migration. After spending some time
we have done some tests, but have different result: the performance is
nearly the same for empty and 5k rules in iptable, but huge gap between
enable/disable iptable hook on linux bridge
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:21 AM, shihanzhang ayshihanzh...@126.com wrote:
Now I have not get accurate test
OVS agent manipulate not only ovs flow table, but also linux stack, which
is not so easily replaced by pure openflow controller today.
fastpath-slowpath separation sounds good, but really a nightmare for high
concurrent connection application if we set L4 flow into OVS (in our
testing, vswitchd
Mike Spreitzer/Watson/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 06/18/2014 05:00:57 PM:
...
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/heat/2014/heat.2014-06-18-20.00.html
I found two goofups so far. One is that the following was not recorded in
the official outline (#agreed only really works for chairs):
20:10:12
In my linux containers running Ubuntu 14.04 64-bit, DevStack fails because
it can not install the package named tgt. The problem is that the install
script invokes the tgt service's start operation, which launches the
daemon (tgtd), and the launch fails with troubles with RDMA. Has anybody
Do you though about nftables that will replace {ip,ip6,arp,eb}tables?
It also based on the rule set mechanism.
The issue in that proposition, it's only stable since the begin of the year
and on Linux kernel 3.13.
But there lot of pros I don't list here (leverage iptables limitation,
efficient
Hi Armando,
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 14:51 +0200, Armando M. wrote:
I wonder what the turnaround of trivial patches actually is, I bet you
it's very very small, and as Daniel said, the human burden is rather
minimal (I would be more concerned about slowing them down in the
gate, but I digress).
Hi Mike,
We worked with Devstack and LXC and got the same issue (
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/devstack/+spec/lxc-computes ).
The issue seems to be linked with namespace:
https://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org/msg00839.html
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:55:59AM +0200, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
My quick questions are:
* Who would be interested (and able) to get to the meeting?
* What topics do we want to discuss?
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-juno-meetup
Thanks for bringing this up!
Do we really have
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:09:33PM -0700, Rafi Khardalian wrote:
I am concerned about how block migration functions when Cinder volumes are
attached to an instance being migrated. We noticed some unexpected
behavior recently, whereby attached generic NFS-based volumes would become
entirely
On 19/06/14 08:32, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hi Armando,
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 14:51 +0200, Armando M. wrote:
I wonder what the turnaround of trivial patches actually is, I bet you
it's very very small, and as Daniel said, the human burden is rather
minimal (I would be more concerned about
On 06/16/2014 10:06 PM, James Slagle wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Tomas Sedovic tsedo...@redhat.com wrote:
If we do promise backwards compatibility, we should document it
somewhere and if we don't we should probably make that more visible,
too, so people know what to expect.
I
The use-case for block migration in Libvirt/QEMU is to allow migration
between two different back-ends.
This is basically a host based volume migration, ESXi has a similar
functionality (storage vMotion), but probably not enabled with OpenStack.
Btw, if the Cinder volume driver can migrate the
Congrats!
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:06 AM, wu jiang win...@gmail.com wrote:
Congratulation!
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Kenichi Oomichi
oomi...@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Michael Still [mailto:mi...@stillhq.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014
Hi,
Chris will have day off tomorrow.
I'd like to run the next meeting instead.
Just a reminder that the weekly Nova API meeting is being held tomorrow
Friday UTC .
We encourage cloud operators and those who use the REST API such as
SDK developers and others who and are interested in the
Hi:
I don't like the idea of ResourceDriver and AgentDriver. I suggested
use a singleton worker thread to manager all underlying setup, so the
driver should do nothing other than fire a update event to the worker.
The worker thread may looks like this one:
# the only variable store all local
On 06/19/2014 03:03 AM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
In my linux containers running Ubuntu 14.04 64-bit, DevStack fails
because it can not install the package named tgt. The problem is that
the install script invokes the tgt service's start operation, which
launches the daemon (tgtd), and the launch
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Treinish [mailto:mtrein...@kortar.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 10:33 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Clarification of policy for qa-specs around
adding new tests
On Tue,
Hi,
definitely nice to have an OS monitoring system alive with Fuel deployments!
I've some questions inline ..
thanks
2014-06-18 11:07 GMT+02:00 Alexander Kislitsky akislit...@mirantis.com:
18.07.2014
Participants:
Szymon Banka,
Bartek Kupidura,
Dmitry Nikishov
Alexander Kislitsky
I can’t make the meeting today, but have updated the agenda for L3 vendor
stuff. Please request team to review the WIP code I have out.
Thanks!
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL …..…. p...@cisco.com
IRC ……..… pcm_ (irc.freenode.com)
TW ………... @pmichali
GPG Key … 4525ECC253E31A83
Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB
On 19 June 2014 10:01, Giulio Fidente gfide...@redhat.com wrote:
From a the 10.000 feet view, I can imagine people relying on a stable API
for services like Cinder but I don't see how that applies to TripleO
Why should one try to install an older version of OpenStack using some
'recent'
Hi!
You are right, we are talking about
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/monitoring-system
We want to estimate required time for merging HA implementation into
current code. If it possible we will try to distribute HA solution in
current release. In other case it will be delivered in
HI,
I am looking at documents to understand how to write a new neutron plugin.
I working with devstack with ryu setup from last 4 months. I am trying to
write some test plugin to get hands-on.
Can any one please help where to start looking neutron code, where to embed
new code. Also I am looking
I think here there are two different processes making us of libvirt
block migration:
1) Instance migration, which should not do anything with cinder volumes
2) Cinder live migration between backends, which is what I think Ronen
Kat is referring to
On 19 June 2014 11:06, Ronen Kat
Hi,
Please review the following git repo(s):
https://github.com/dims/oslo.local
https://github.com/dims/oslo.utils
the corresponding specs are here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98431/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99028/
Thanks,
dims
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
On 06/18/2014 08:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
mailto:cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Duncan Thomas's message of 2014-06-17 03:56:10 -0700:
A far more effective way to reduce the load of trivial review issues
Hey
I had been thinking of going to the Paris sprint:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints/ParisJuno2014
But it only just occurred to me that we could have enough Oslo
contributors in Europe to make it worthwhile for us to use the
opportunity to get some Oslo stuff done together.
For
On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 09:34 +0100, Matthew Booth wrote:
On 19/06/14 08:32, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hi Armando,
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 14:51 +0200, Armando M. wrote:
I wonder what the turnaround of trivial patches actually is, I bet you
it's very very small, and as Daniel said, the human
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 2014-06-19 00:30, Ben Nemec a écrit :
On 06/18/2014 05:45 AM, Elena Ezhova wrote:
So I wonder whether it is something the community is interested in
and, if
yes, are there any recommendations concerning possible implementation?
I
On 19/06/14 13:16 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hey
I had been thinking of going to the Paris sprint:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints/ParisJuno2014
But it only just occurred to me that we could have enough Oslo
contributors in Europe to make it worthwhile for us to use the
On 19/06/14 13:22, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 09:34 +0100, Matthew Booth wrote:
On 19/06/14 08:32, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hi Armando,
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 14:51 +0200, Armando M. wrote:
I wonder what the turnaround of trivial patches actually is, I bet you
it's very very
I've start a spec for using javelin2 with ceilometer to test
resource survival:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/100575
As far as I can tell from the current form of javelin2[1] is
explicit about a mapping between resources and clients to create and
check the existence of those resources.
Hi Samuel,
Yes, it's more friendly to extract this information on behalf of the user,
but does occasionally break use cases we've seen. It should be possible,
when there is hostname overlap, for the user to specify which certificate
to use. It sounds like the Radware solution uses certificate
On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 14:29 +0200, Mehdi Abaakouk wrote:
Hi,
Le 2014-06-19 00:30, Ben Nemec a écrit :
On 06/18/2014 05:45 AM, Elena Ezhova wrote:
So I wonder whether it is something the community is interested in
and, if
yes, are there any recommendations concerning possible
On 06/19/2014 09:39 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 14:29 +0200, Mehdi Abaakouk wrote:
Hi,
Le 2014-06-19 00:30, Ben Nemec a écrit :
On 06/18/2014 05:45 AM, Elena Ezhova wrote:
So I wonder whether it is something the community is interested in
and, if
yes, are there any
I have managed to make zmq work using matchmaker ring, but I haven't tried
it with more than one server.
There are proposed fixes for the bugs that Mehdi mentioned (
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/100236/,
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/84938/).
But in any case, if zmq really is not used by
Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote on 06/19/2014 06:43:36 AM:
On 06/19/2014 03:03 AM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
In my linux containers running Ubuntu 14.04 64-bit, DevStack fails
because it can not install the package named tgt. The problem is that
the install script invokes the tgt service's
Hi it's a very interesting topic, I was getting ready to raise
the same concerns about our security groups implementation, shihanzhang
thank you for starting this topic.
Not only at low level where (with our default security group
rules -allow all incoming from 'default' sg- the iptable
I agree with Amit on this. There needs to be a way for the driver to
indicate that an operation is not currently possible and include some
descriptive message to indicate why. Right now the volume manager assumes
certain behavioral constraints (e.g. that snapshots are completely
decoupled from
Hello Everyone,
I've been recently working on bug/1269990, re: attached volumes to LXC are
being lost after reboot/power on, after fixing it, I've realized that the
initial attach volume to LXC operation is not functional at all. (bug/1330981)
I've described the problem in details in the bug. In
It is defined by the expected behaviour of cinder... and changing that
is hard. Allowing the driver to give feedback is also hard, since the
API returns long before the driver gets called, so there really isn't
an easy route to send feedback, and a 'last status' field or similar
in the
- Original Message -
What's the progress by Terry Wilson?
If not much, I'm willing to file blueprint/spec and drive it.
thanks,
I've been working on some proof-of-concept code to help flesh out ideas for
writing the spec. I'd talked to Maru and he mentioned that he didn't think that
Hello all,
Could we get some reviews through the door? This one is fairly straight-forward
- we discussed and agreed on the action item in IRC:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99633/
Here are some more trivial ones:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/100227/
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Amit Das amit@cloudbyte.com wrote:
Hi Stackers,
I have been implementing a Cinder driver for our storage solution facing
issues with below scenario.
Scenario - When a user/admin tries to delete a snapshot that has
associated clone(s), an error
Hi everyone,
Sorry, I couldn't make it in time for the IRC meeting.
Just saw in the logs:
15:19:12 yamamoto are orange folks here? they might want to
introduce their bgp speaker.
The best intro to BaGPipe BGP is the README on github:
Hi folks,
We have a bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1281838 which prevents
OSTF from working if user changes a password which was using for the
initial installation. I skimmed through the comments and it seems there are
2 viable options:
1. Create a separate user just for OSTF during
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:05:53AM -0400,
Terry Wilson twil...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
What's the progress by Terry Wilson?
If not much, I'm willing to file blueprint/spec and drive it.
thanks,
I've been working on some proof-of-concept code to help flesh out
Hi folks
Thank you for your starting this topic.
Let me share some of my ideas
(1) Improve security_group_rules_for_devices
In current implementation, we are generating rules per port in server side.
It is something like this.
port1[SG_Rule1, SG_Rule2, SG_Rule3] .. port2, port3
This can be
Tomorrow is a holiday in Argentina, so I won't be able to attend to the
meeting.
Pablo.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Hi All,
Thanks for clarifying the Cinder behavior w.r.t a snapshot its clones
which seems to be independent/decoupled.
The current volume its snapshot based validations in Cinder holds true
for snapshot its clones w.r.t my storage requirements.
Our storage is built on top of ZFS filesystem.
So these are all features that various other backends manage to
implement successfully.
Your best point of reference might be the ceph code - I believe it
deals with very similar issues in various ways.
On 19 June 2014 18:01, Amit Das amit@cloudbyte.com wrote:
Hi All,
Thanks for
So, I think we need to check who will be available on the meeting. I can be
there.
Nikolay Starodubtsev
Software Engineer
Mirantis Inc.
Skype: dark_harlequine1
2014-06-19 9:47 GMT-07:00 Fuente, Pablo A pablo.a.fue...@intel.com:
Tomorrow is a holiday in Argentina, so I won't be able to
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Amit Das amit@cloudbyte.com wrote:
Hi All,
Thanks for clarifying the Cinder behavior w.r.t a snapshot its clones
which seems to be independent/decoupled.
The current volume its snapshot based validations in Cinder holds true
for snapshot its clones
Looks like something we can add to Activity reports, if you think it's
useful.
At the moment there are fairly simple charts for bugs but querying the
database to find stale bugs and their reviews shouldn't be too hard.
If I understand correctly, you're querying LP to get the bugs in status:
Hi,
This has to do with a patch I have out for review currently -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90093/
I believe version 5 to be the proper solution for the problem with the
unit tests that I am trying to fix.
However based on some comments that asked me to try a couple things,
version 7 is
Hi,
In keystone, though region table is provided, it is not consumed in the
endpoint table. I have filed bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1332196 to address the same.
Can anyone please provide details on, why this disconnect between endpoint and
region table.
Thanks
Kanagaraj M
On Thu 19 Jun 2014 01:58:15 AM MDT, Matthias Runge wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:55:59AM +0200, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
My quick questions are:
* Who would be interested (and able) to get to the meeting?
* What topics do we want to discuss?
Stackers,
I'm glad to announce that we've deployed a VM to run Fuel in so-called fake
mode [1], which basically runs UI Nailgun (main logic). You can play with
it as much as you wish (I'll be happy if you kill it, we will get logs and
fix bugs :) )
http://fuel-demo.mirantis.com:8000/
It doesn't
Sorry for quoting the entire previous digest, twas a noob mistake.
Thanks,
-Travis
On 6/19/14, 11:22 AM, openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org wrote:
Message: 33
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:21:24 -0700
From: Travis McPeak
On 19 June 2014 19:21, Travis McPeak travis_mcp...@symantec.com wrote:
Hi all,
In the OpenStack Security Group (OSSG) we¹ve been kicking around the idea
of getting some simple non-blocking security-related gate tests going.
These tests would be designed to be simple and automated checks for
Pros:
* This process makes sure implementation design for a feature happens
_before_ the actual implementation. This is very important as it
potentially saves developers from wasting a lot of time implementing a
feature in a suboptimal way.
* By making reviewers explicitly focus on the
Performance hint... Each API call should be fast but the orm wrapper is
very aggressive about asking the server for objects. So build local lookup
tables and use those via the id ... This generally solves lp API
performance issues :)
On 19 Jun 2014 12:25, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks everyone who have joined today's Sahara meeting.
Here are the logs from the meeting:
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2014/sahara.2014-06-19-18.04.html
Log:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2014/sahara.2014-06-19-18.04.log.html
Regards,
Alexander
Hello, Folks!
Please, be informed, that the oslo.db library has been released and is
available on PyPi.
See [1] for the source code, [2] for the documentation.
There is an example of how to switch an OpenStack project to oslo.db - see
patch to Ironic [3]. oslo.db team is going to eventually make
Samuel,
So at the LBaaS hackathon, Dustin, Carlos and I discussed order vs.
hostname and we came to the conclusion that we'd be OK with order on the
SNI list / SNI Policy, so long as we also make note that individual
back-ends may choose to implement this as a hostname hash lookup, based on
- Original Message -
From: Phil Day philip@hp.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Nova now can detect host unreachable. But it fails to make out host
isolation, host dead and nova compute service down. When host
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Victor Sergeyev vserge...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hello, Folks!
Please, be informed, that the oslo.db library has been released and is
available on PyPi.
See [1] for the source code, [2] for the documentation.
There is an example of how to switch an OpenStack
It might be a good idea to add a comment to the RPC layer for the
snapshot call explaining why we haven't implemented a lock check. That
would reduce future confusion as well.
Cheers,
Michael
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 5:06 AM, melanie witt melw...@outlook.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2014, at 13:34,
On Jun 19, 2014, at 13:27, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
It might be a good idea to add a comment to the RPC layer for the
snapshot call explaining why we haven't implemented a lock check. That
would reduce future confusion as well.
I think that's a good idea -- will do that.
This week I gave a webinar offering an overview of the work coming up in
Juno. The Identity and Image program technical leads also gave their
overviews including an exciting update to the glance team's mission. You
can watch the recording here:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
A large majority of the failures I've seen OSSG report have been privilege
escalation in each service.. Trusts not scoping down properly, quotas
not being applied, or cross-project/tenant boundaries not being honored.
I
On 6/19/14, 3:56 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Victor Sergeyev vserge...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hello, Folks!
Please, be informed, that the oslo.db library has been released and is
available on PyPi.
See [1] for the source code, [2] for the documentation.
There
Victor, Roman, Doug
Great work! kudos!
Ready to be first adopter=)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote:
On 6/19/14, 3:56 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Victor Sergeyev vserge...@mirantis.com
I was made aware of the following blueprint today:
http://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/add-quota-api-for-heat
http://review.openstack.org/#/c/96696/14
Before this goes much further.. I want to suggest that this work be
cancelled, even though the code looks excellent. The reason those
Have you looked at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronDevelopment
In particular, this section may be useful to you: Developing a Neutron
Plugin
You may also want to look at the following presentation/talk and look for
more such presentations from OpenStack Summits:
On 06/19/2014 05:47 PM, Mohammad Banikazemi wrote:
Have you looked at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronDevelopment
In particular, this section may be useful to you: Developing a Neutron
Plugin
You may also want to look at the following presentation/talk and look for
more such
I'm in favor of #2. I think users might not want to have their password
stored in Fuel Master node.
And if so, then it actually means we should not save it when user provides
it on HealthCheck tab.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Vitaly Kramskikh vkramsk...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi folks,
We
Howdy y'all!
Among other things that happened at the Neutron LBaaS mid-cycle hackathon,
we have now put together process around, and established Octavia as a
stackforge project. For those just joining us, Octavia is going to become
an open-source operator-grade load balancer implementation. It
On Jun 19, 2014, at 4:17 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
I was made aware of the following blueprint today:
http://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/add-quota-api-for-heat
http://review.openstack.org/#/c/96696/14
Before this goes much further.. I want to suggest that this work
+1 to Mike. Let the user provide actual credentials and use them in place.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com
wrote:
I'm in favor of #2. I think users might not want to have their password
stored in Fuel Master node.
And if so, then it actually means we
I'd like to nominate Brandon Logan and Doug Wiegley as core members.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.net
wrote:
Howdy y'all!
Among other things that happened at the Neutron LBaaS mid-cycle hackathon,
we have now put together process around, and
Excerpts from Randall Burt's message of 2014-06-19 15:21:14 -0700:
On Jun 19, 2014, at 4:17 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
I was made aware of the following blueprint today:
http://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/add-quota-api-for-heat
On 06/19/2014 06:29 PM, Craig Tracey wrote:
I'd like to nominate Brandon Logan and Doug Wiegley as core members.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.net
wrote:
Howdy y'all!
Among other things that happened at the Neutron LBaaS mid-cycle hackathon,
we
Yep, Roman,
mos LP project was just created. So let's inform everyone to use it for
components bugs, and not forgetting about tags.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Roman Podoliaka rpodoly...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
Dmitry, I have nothing against using 'also affects', but
Hello folks,
We have created a blueprint CR to add SSL certificate generation support to
Barbican here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99221
In short, we would like to utilize Barbican's orders resource to initiate and
manage the process of working with a certificate authority (CA) to
Thanks for the link, Anita!
These are definitely good guidelines, but there are a couple problems with
doing the election exactly as described in the document: It looks like to
generate the list of voters, it recommends using the list of people who
have committed code to the project in the last
hi Miguel Ángel,
I am very agree with you about the following point:
* physical implementation on the hosts (ipsets, nftables, ... )
--this can reduce the load of compute node.
* rpc communication mechanisms.
--this can reduce the load of neutron server
can you help me to review my BP
I'll dig into these on Friday. Thanks for the poke. I started to review
them on Thursday and most of them are straight forward. But, something
happened to my test environment and I want to run the full test suite on
each of these. I should have that fixed and be able to finish working
through
Hi y'all!
So, scanning through my e-mail archives, list of people active on the ML
talking about Neutron LBaaS and the load balancer side project (ie. before
we started calling it octavia), people who attended the Neutron LBaaS
mid-cycle hackathon (in person or remotely), people recently
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.net
wrote:
Thanks for the link, Anita!
These are definitely good guidelines, but there are a couple problems with
doing the election exactly as described in the document: It looks like to
generate the list of voters, it
The region table is relatively new, and no one has stepped up to link the
two together. A couple considerations:
A) a data migration will need to be performed to sync up the regions in the
endpoint table with regions in the region table (populate those foreign
keys, creating corresponding regions
Hi, Clint,
Thank you for your comments on my BP and code!
The BP I proposed is all about putting dynamic, admin-configurable limitations
on stack number per tenant and stack complexity. Therefore, you can consider my
BP as
an extension to your config file-based limitation mechanism. If the
Dolph,
I appreciate the suggestion. In the mean time how does the review process
work without core developers to approve gerrit submissions?
Thanks,
Dustin Lundquist
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Stephen
Greetings all,
I'd like to thank everyone who attended the LBaaS mid-cyle sprint for
taking the time and effort to make the trip to San Antonio. This was a
very productive sprint in all forms: direction, consensus, blueprints,
documentation, and of course code. It was just great to be able to
A) Yes, we need to migrate.
B) I have queries:
a. Region is consumed only in the end-point object in keystone. So when
an end point is created, keystone can go ahead and create a region in the
“region” table if the region does not exist. Otherwise keystone can bind the
existing
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/100390/
Angus asked:
Why do we even need start: start-task?
Can't we parse the workbook and figure out what to run? Tasks at the bottom of
the tree have no on-{fail,success} and then
follow upwards until you find a task that is not referenced by anything.
Yes
What does that check that the gate doesn't?
-Rob
On 20 June 2014 14:20, Matthew Farina m...@mattfarina.com wrote:
I'll dig into these on Friday. Thanks for the poke. I started to review
them on Thursday and most of them are straight forward. But, something
happened to my test environment
97 matches
Mail list logo
