> In current Alarm implementation, Ceilometer will send back Heat an
> 'alarm' using the pre-signed URL (or other channel under development).
By the other channel, do you mean the trusts-based interaction?
We discussed this at the mid-cycle in Paris last week, and it turns out
there appear to b
This patch should fix the problem, sorry for the mistakes above.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> On 07/07/2014 05:56 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
> > Please check to see if this patch fixes the issue:
> >
> > https://review.openstack.org/1050
> >
> >
>
> It should be:
>
> http
On 07/07/2014 05:56 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
> Please check to see if this patch fixes the issue:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/1050
>
>
It should be:
https://review.openstack.org/105060
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX Products
Hi All --
It seems as though it would be beneficial to use virDomainSave rather than
virDomainManagedSave for suspending instances. The primary benefit of
doing so would be to locate the save files within the instance's dedicated
directory. As it stands suspend operations are utilizing ManagedSa
On 07/03/2014 02:41 PM, Fawad Khaliq wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Kevin Benton mailto:blak...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>This allows the viewer to see categories of reviews based upon their
>divergence from OpenStack's Jenkins results. I think evaluating
>divergence from Jenkin
On 07/07/14 13:56, Anne Gentle wrote:
> Please check to see if this patch fixes the issue:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/1050
>
That's a patch (actually against quantum, which is amusing) from 2011, I
think you're missing a few numbers at the end. :-)
--
Hi, all
We have a benchmarking for openstack API, we found the performance is not
very well. For instance, with 3000 flavors in database, get all flavors API
TPS
is 4 under 10 concurrency. With 1000 images in glance, get all images API
TPS is
roughly 3. The hardware is Intel(R) Xeon(R) E5640 @ 2.6
Please check to see if this patch fixes the issue:
https://review.openstack.org/1050
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 10:47 PM, stanzgy wrote:
> hi, I use the newest api-ref master branch to generate the neutron API
> docs and
> there is no tenant_id as part of the url.
> I think it is because the api
hi, I use the newest api-ref master branch to generate the neutron API docs
and
there is no tenant_id as part of the url.
I think it is because the api-ref website hasn't updated with the newest
api-ref repo.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
> We have an API doc bug to track
Hi Everyone,
Now, several object storage venders have different style APIs. Maybe, we can
make Swift as an object storage gateway to supply an uniform API. I think Swift
can also work like Cinder.
I registered a BP:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/swift/+spec/gateway-of-object-storage
The wo
Probably should not have posted this over a weekend, especially a Long
weekend.
On 07/04/2014 06:13 PM, Adam Young wrote:
Unscoped tokens are really a proxy for the Horizon session, so lets
treat them that way.
1. When a user authenticates unscoped, they should get back a list of
their pr
We have an API doc bug to track this issue:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-api-site/+bug/1334837
Thanks for reporting, have marked it High.
Anne
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Damon Wang wrote:
> Agree,
> http://docs.openstack.org/api/openstack-network/2.0/content/networks.html
> and
Agree, http://docs.openstack.org/api/openstack-network/2.0/content/networks.html
and http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2.html both have
this problem.
2014-07-07 10:25 GMT+08:00 Yongsheng Gong :
> Hi,
> Today, I found the {tenant_id} is written in neutron API URLs at
> http://de
Hi,
Today, I found the {tenant_id} is written in neutron API URLs at
http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2.html.
But when I tried to access it accordingly, it failed.
I don't think we have tenant_id in network API URL.
any Idea?
regards,
yong sheng gong
UnitedStack Inc.
___
On 07/04/2014 03:57 AM, Luke Gorrie wrote:
On 3 July 2014 19:02, Jay Pipes mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
devstack-gate works very well for what it is supposed to do:
Yeah, I would actually love to use devstack-gate.
I tried that first. There are two problems for me as a user:
First
On 07/03/2014 04:37 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
Are these zuul refs publicly accessible so that the third party CI
systems could reference then to guarantee they are testing the same thing?
Well, if you aren't using Zuul to handle the merging of dependent
patchsets, I'm not entirely sure the ZUUL_
> This is an attempt to summarize a really useful discussion that Victor,
> Flavio and I have been having today. At the bottom are some background
> links - basically what I have open in my browser right now thinking
> through all of this.
Thanks for the detailed summary, it puts a more flesh on
I we increment version to say 2.1 we could add code to dashboard to check
for markup version and if it encounters version 2.0 to print verbose error
telling how to migrate markup to 2.1.
I don't see how both version can be supported simulteniously but at lease
Version attribute must be checked and
18 matches
Mail list logo
