Definitely +1.
This change will allow us to get rid of the of the ugly special cases where we
use the instance name instead of the uuid and will make the code cleaner.
Let's go for it!
Thanks,
Rado
- Original Message -
Currently we create a rescue instance by creating a new VM with
Retested today
ubuntu single nova vlan - works
centos single nova dhcp - works
ubuntu single neutron gre - works
centos single neutron vlan - works
centos ha(1) neutron vlan - fail haproxy issue
ubuntu ha(1) neutron gre - fail haproxy issue.
haproxy / vip issue:
due to whatever reason that I
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote on 07/10/2014 05:57:14 PM:
On 09/07/14 22:38, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote on 07/01/2014 06:54:58 PM:
On 01/07/14 16:23, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
...
Hmm, now that I think about it, CloudFormation provides a Fn::GetAZs
tl;dr: Having a minimum payload standard enables more and more robust
services on both sides of notification bus.
Yes, that's exactly the point of this thread.
We do not have a standard format for the payload. I think we should
(more on that below).
Again, such standardization is exactly
On 07/10/2014 06:46 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 16:27 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hey
This is an attempt to summarize a really useful discussion that Victor,
Flavio and I have been having today. At the bottom are some background
links - basically what I have open in my
On 07/09/2014 10:51 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 6/12/2014 6:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 07:07:37AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 06/12/2014 06:59 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Does anyone have any tip on how to actually run individual tests in an
efficient
John,
Thank you for your quick response.
On Friday, July 11, 2014 12:33 PM John Dickinson m...@not.mn wrote:
Some of the above may be in line with what you're looking for.
They are the one what I'm looking for.
First I will look at the codes of policy engine whether I can use it.
Thanks
I just started the code for processing of notifications from Ironic.
Conceptually they are the same as notifications from Nova but the
actual form of the payload is completely different. This means I have to
write a different processor for that payload. And now so does StackTach
if they want
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
But I guess you're suggesting not only that we version/schematize
individual notification payloads, but that we do so in a way that's
global across event types and emitters?
That's partially correct. I'm suggesting the we consider standardizing a
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
The data format that Ironic will send was part of the spec proposed
and could have been reviewed. I think there's still time to change it
tho, if you have a better format talk to Haomeng which is the guys
responsible for that work in Ironic and
Can you explain whats the use case for running both ovs and userspace ovs on
the same host?
Thanks
Przemek
From: loy wolfe [mailto:loywo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 3:17 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
On 11/07/14 02:04, Michael Still wrote:
Sorry for the delay here. This email got lost in my inbox while I was
travelling.
This release is now tagged. Additionally, I have created a milestone
for this release in launchpad, which is the keystone process for
client releases. This means that users
Matthias Runge wrote:
On 11/07/14 02:04, Michael Still wrote:
Sorry for the delay here. This email got lost in my inbox while I was
travelling.
This release is now tagged. Additionally, I have created a milestone
for this release in launchpad, which is the keystone process for
client
A simple usecase could be to have a compute node able start VM with
optimized net I/O or standard net I/O, depending on the network flavor
ordered for this VM.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Czesnowicz, Przemyslaw
przemyslaw.czesnow...@intel.com wrote:
Can you explain whats the use case for
Hi,
Le lundi 7 juillet 2014, 19:18:38 Mark McLoughlin a écrit :
I'd expect us to add e.g.
@asyncio.coroutine
def call_async(self, ctxt, method, **kwargs):
...
to RPCClient. Perhaps we'd need to add an AsyncRPCClient in a separate
module and only add the method there - I don't
hi, Clark, I have tried recheck several times and got jenkins passed.
Thanks for the explanation.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Clark Boylan clark.boy...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:12 PM, stanzgy stan@gmail.com wrote:
Several jenkins gate jobs failed since some lib
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Outlook harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
On Jul 10, 2014, at 3:48 AM, Yuriy Taraday yorik@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Yuriy Taraday's message of 2014-07-09 03:36:00 -0700:
On Tue, Jul 8,
But I guess you're suggesting not only that we version/schematize
individual notification payloads, but that we do so in a way that's
global across event types and emitters?
That's partially correct. I'm suggesting the we consider standardizing a
general format for notification
On 10 July 2014 16:59, Sylvain Bauza sba...@redhat.com wrote:
Le 10/07/2014 15:47, Russell Bryant a écrit :
On 07/10/2014 05:06 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
Hi all,
===
tl;dr: Now that we agree on waiting for the split prereqs to be done, we
debate on if ResourceTracker should be part of the
On 10 July 2014 16:52, Matthew Booth mbo...@redhat.com wrote:
Currently we create a rescue instance by creating a new VM with the
original instance's image, then adding the original instance's first
disk to it, and booting. This means we have 2 VMs, which we need to be
careful of when cleaning
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:30:19PM +0100, John Garbutt wrote:
On 10 July 2014 16:52, Matthew Booth mbo...@redhat.com wrote:
Currently we create a rescue instance by creating a new VM with the
original instance's image, then adding the original instance's first
disk to it, and booting. This
On 2014-07-11 11:21:19 +0200 (+0200), Matthias Runge wrote:
this broke horizon stable and master; heat stable is affected as
well.
[...]
I guess this is a plea for applying something like the oslotest
framework to client libraries so they get backward-compat jobs run
against unit tests of all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/07/14 13:17, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
Hi all,
Multiple projects are suffering from db lock timeouts due to
deadlocks deep in mysqldb library that we use to interact with
mysql servers. In essence, the problem is due to missing eventlet
On 7/10/2014 12:10 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Julien Danjou wrote:
My initial plan was to leverage a library like voluptuous to do schema
based validation on the sender side. That would allow for receiver to
introspect schema and know the data structure to expect. I didn't
Hi Ronen,
hello everybody else,
now that I'm trying to write a DRBD implementation for the Replication API
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64026/) a few questions pop up.
As requested by Ronan I'll put them here on -dev, so that the questions
(and, hopefully, the answers ;) can be easily
I think that extra_specs in the database is too static, too hard to
change.
In the case of eg. DRBD, where many nodes may provide some storage space, the
list replication_partners is likely to change often, even if only newly
added nodes have to be done[1]
This means that
a) the admin has
replication_rpo_range currently gets set with two values - a lower and an
upper bound. File cinder/scheduler/filter_scheduler.py:118 has
if target_rpo rpo_range[0] or target_rpo rpo_range[1]:
Why do we check for target_rpo rpo_range[1]?
Don't use that one if replication is too fast?
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
A notification of compute.instance.create.start is naturally going to
carry different types of data than a volume.snapshot.delete.end for
example, but of course we'd seek to accommodate that difference within
a generic structure as far as possible.
Is
Hi all,
This is a follow-up to Clint Byrum's suggestion to add the `Map`
intrinsic function[0], Zane Bitter's response[1] and Randall Burt's
addendum[2].
Sorry for bringing it up again, but I'd love to reach consensus on this.
The summary of the previous conversation:
1. TripleO is using some
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 08:45:07AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
I'm hearing that python 2.6 will no longer be support in the K release but
not sure if there is an official statement about that somewhere (wiki?).
I realize this means turning off the 2.6 unit test jobs, but what other
runtime
We consider mounting untrusted filesystems on the host kernel to be
an unacceptable security risk. A user can craft a malicious filesystem
that expliots bugs in the kernel filesystem drivers. This is particularly
bad if you allow the kernel to probe for filesystem type since Linux
has
+1 for me.
Jarret
From: Douglas Mendizabal douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.com
Reply-To: OpenStack List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Thursday, July 10, 2014 at 12:11 PM
To: OpenStack List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Nate Reller
rellerrel...@yahoo.com
Subject: [openstack-dev]
+1 for me as well.
Jarret
From: Douglas Mendizabal douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.com
Reply-To: OpenStack List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Thursday, July 10, 2014 at 11:55 AM
To: OpenStack List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, a...@redhat.com
a...@redhat.com
Subject:
Just a note that yesterday we passed SPD for Neutron. We have a
healthy backlog of specs, and I'm working to go through this list and
make some final approvals for Juno-3 over the next week. If you've
submitted a spec which is in review, please hang tight while myself
and the rest of the neutron
Le 11/07/2014 13:14, John Garbutt a écrit :
On 10 July 2014 16:59, Sylvain Bauza sba...@redhat.com wrote:
Le 10/07/2014 15:47, Russell Bryant a écrit :
On 07/10/2014 05:06 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
Hi all,
===
tl;dr: Now that we agree on waiting for the split prereqs to be done, we
debate
On 7/9/14, 10:59 AM, Roman Podoliaka wrote:
Hi all,
Not sure what issues you are talking about, but I just replaced
mysql with mysql+mysqlconnector in my db connection string in
neutron.conf and neutron-db-manage upgrade head worked like a charm
for an empty schema.
Ihar, could please
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 11:05:40 +0800
童燕群 tyan...@qq.com wrote:
The workflow of this middle-ware working with swift may be like this pic:
Since you're plugging this into a/c/o nodes, there's no difference
between this and Pluggable Back-ends. Note that PBE is already implemented
in case of object
Hi All,
this morning we deployed new testenv images on the rh1 rack for CI, a
number of things have changed
1. Each TE now contains 15 nodes this should allow us to deploy more
VM's per job (essentially paving the way to allow us to add multiple HA
controllers to our overcloud job)
2.
Hello all.
After discussion in IRC, I agree, that we should take care about
interaction with eventlet at least because right now eventlet is the
OpenStack production configuration. So we must be sure, that we'll get no
issues, when we work with eventlet.
So I agree, that it makes a sense - to
On 07/10/2014 07:47 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
Honestly, that seems weird to me.
oslo.db is built as a common layer for OpenStack services.
eventlet is used by most OpenStack services.
There are lots of known issues with eventlet vs. our db access patterns.
Knowing that the db layer works in the
The Keystone team is happy to announce that as of yesterday (July 10th 2014),
with the merge of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/100747/ Keystone is now
gating on Apache + mod_wsgi based deployment. This also has moved the default
for devstack to deploy Keystone under apache. This is in-line
Since Juno-2 is quickly approaching, I wanted to update everyone on where
we're at with regards to third party testing in Neutron. The etherpad here
[1]
was the original link with status. The link here [2] shows what is expected
of
Neutron third party CI systems.
On the CI status side, I'd like
On 07/11/2014 05:43 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
The Keystone team is happy to announce that as of yesterday (July 10th 2014),
with the merge of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/100747/ Keystone is now
gating on Apache + mod_wsgi based deployment. This also has moved the default
for devstack
Hi
As a tenant when I try to create a router and associate a gateway with the
router as a two step process in Horizon things work fine.
Now when I want to do the same thing through a create router API call with
request below I get permission denied to create router
{
router:
{
name:
Thanks Youcef. I didn't see any results or information for it, it would be
excellent if you could reply to the thread with the info and also come to
the meeting Monday.
Kyle
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Youcef Laribi youcef.lar...@citrix.com
wrote:
Vijay, You need to reply to this and
Before we get too far ahead of ourselves mysql-connector is not hosted
on pypi. Instead it is an external package link. We recently managed
to remove all packages that are hosted as external package links from
openstack and will not add new ones in. Before we can use
mysql-connector in the gate
On 07/11/2014 05:29 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Matthias Runge wrote:
On 11/07/14 02:04, Michael Still wrote:
Sorry for the delay here. This email got lost in my inbox while I was
travelling.
This release is now tagged. Additionally, I have created a milestone
for this release in launchpad,
Hi Alexander,
I read through the artifact spec. Based on my reading it does not fix this
issue at all. [1] Furthermore, I do not understand why the glance
developers are focused on adding features like artifacts or signed images
when there are significant usability problems with glance as it
On 07/11/2014 01:27 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 07/11/2014 05:29 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Matthias Runge wrote:
On 11/07/14 02:04, Michael Still wrote:
Sorry for the delay here. This email got lost in my inbox while I was
travelling.
This release is now tagged. Additionally, I have
Thanks Kyle for the update. As noted below, we have been in the process of upgrading the SDN-VE CI system to a Zuul based system and this has caused an interruption in our voting. We have resolved the issues we were facing with standing up our new system and are close to having our system voting
On 11 July 2014 17:56, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com wrote:
1. Tail-F
1. Inconsistent past runs, need updates on status.
I've updated the Etherpad for our Tail-f CI and will be at the meeting.
Cheers,
-Luke
___
OpenStack-dev
Hi
The issue seems to be the following default config in Neutron policy
create_router:external_gateway_info:enable_snat: rule:admin_only,
update_router:external_gateway_info:enable_snat: rule:admin_only,
Puzzling part is from horizon when I set an external gateway for a router is it
Never mind figured it out the rule is on enable_snat inside external gateway
info that was the issue
But I think there is an issue with update because the message is misleading
when I try to update with external gateway info and enable_snat. I get a
message that Resource not found when in
S, how about we can continue this in #openstack-state-management (or
#openstack-oslo).
Since I think we've all made the point and different viewpoints visible (which
was the main intention).
Overall, I'd like to see asyncio more directly connected into taskflow so we
can have the best of
I'm contemplating how to fix
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1339823 and it seems that a part
of the fix would be to track the state of live migrations in the
database, more or less the same way that cold migrations are tracked.
The thinking is that the logic could retrieve
Philipp,
Thanks for the feedback, below if my view, and I would like to hear what
others think.
I would typically expect the replication_partners to be created/computed
by the driver from the underlaying replication mechanism.
I assume DRBD know with whom he is current enabled for replication
Hi Kyle,
There is indeed a NetScaler CI and is currently running API and scenario tests
on LBAAS changes + driver changes. It also votes. What time is the Monday 3rd
party meeting?
Thanks,
Vijay.
Sent using
CloudMagichttps://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=pacv=1.0.21.3pv=4.2.2
On Fri, Jul
I need feedback from the congress team on which two days works for you.
11-12 September
18-19 September
~sean
On Jul 10, 2014, at 5:56 PM, Sean Roberts seanrobert...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm thinking location as yahoo Sunnyvale or VMware Palo Alto.
~sean
On Jul 10, 2014, at 5:12 PM, sean
Hi fuelers,
it is time for Feature Freeze in 5.1.
There are following exceptions we agreed on at the IRC meeting yesterday
[1], which need a bit more time (and actually are almost ready):
1. Mellanox support [2]. Extended FF date is July, 17th
2. Neutron NSX plugin [3] - July, 15th
3.
I'm contemplating how to fix
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1339823 and it seems that a part of
the fix would be to track the state of live migrations in the database,
more or less the same way that cold migrations are tracked. The
thinking is that the logic could retrieve information
I can do another release once https://review.openstack.org/#/c/106447/ merges.
Michael
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/11/2014 01:27 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 07/11/2014 05:29 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Matthias Runge wrote:
On 11/07/14
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2014-07-11 11:21:19 +0200 (+0200), Matthias Runge wrote:
this broke horizon stable and master; heat stable is affected as
well.
[...]
I guess this is a plea for applying something like the oslotest
framework to
Containers Team,
We have decided to hold our Mid-Cycle meetup along with the Nova Meetup in
Beaverton, Oregon on Aug 28-31.The Nova Meetup is scheduled for Aug 28-30.
https://www.eventbrite.com.au/e/openstack-nova-juno-mid-cycle-developer-meetup-tickets-11878128803
Those of us interested in
I'm wondering if we can show all these windows ONLY if there is authz
failure with existing credentials from Nailgun.
So the flow would be: user clicks on Run tests button, healthcheck tries
to access OpenStack and fails. It shows up text fields to enter
tenant/user/pass with the message similar
Hi,
A bug titled Creating quantum L2 networks (without subnets) doesn't
work as expected (https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1039665) was
reported quite some time ago. Beyond the discussion in the bug report,
there have been related bugs reported a few times.
*
Thanks for initiating this discussion. We would be happy to
participate and host this at the Cisco office as well if need be.
~Sumit.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Sean Roberts seanrobert...@gmail.com wrote:
I need feedback from the congress team on which two days works for you.
11-12
Hi Sean,
Yes - please make sure it is going to be in the Bay Area this time :-)
Thanks,
- Stephen
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Sean Roberts seanrobert...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm thinking location as yahoo Sunnyvale or VMware Palo Alto.
~sean
On Jul 10, 2014, at 5:12 PM, sean roberts
I have tried using pymysql in place of mysqldb and in real world concurrency
tests against cinder and nova it performs slower. I was inspired by the mention
of mysql-connector so I just tried that option instead. Mysql-connector seems
to be slightly slower as well, which leads me to believe that
CORRECTION: This event happens July 28-31. Sorry for any confusion! Corrected
Announcement:
Containers Team,
We have decided to hold our Mid-Cycle meetup along with the Nova Meetup in
Beaverton, Oregon on July 28-31.The Nova Meetup is scheduled for July 28-30.
I decided to do some Nova reviews today, and I decided to do it by
pulling up the list of all of them and start from the end. What I've
found is a *lot* of reviews that have been idle for several months.
I've even found one or two that were approved, but weren't merged due to
depending on an
FWIW, I believe TripleO will need this if we're going to be able to do
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-on-openstack
Being able to have instances without IPs assigned is basically required
for that.
-Ben
On 07/11/2014 04:41 PM, Brent Eagles wrote:
Hi,
A bug titled
Hi all!
I skipped looking at our review stats last month - sorry about that. I'll
try to do this more consistently at the beginning of each month, even if
there's not much change.
We're about at the middle of the cycle anyway, so now is a really good time
to look back and see how the team
Hi all!
While David (Shrews) only began working on Ironic in earnest four months
ago, he has been working on some of the tougher problems with our Tempest
coverage and the Nova-Ironic interactions. He's also become quite active
in reviews and discussions on IRC, and demonstrated a good
Hi all!
It's time to grow the team :)
Jim (jroll) started working with Ironic at the last mid-cycle, when teeth
became ironic-python-agent. In the time since then, he's jumped into Ironic
to help improve the project as a whole. In the last few months, in both
reviews and discussions on IRC, I
While expanding the core review team is important, keeping the team's
collective knowledge of the project consistent and accurate is equally
important, and participation in reviews and design discussions is how we do
that.
Roman's (romcheg) review activity has been steadily dropping over the last
I think showing this only upon failure is good if the user is also given
the option to sore the credentials in the browser. That way, you only have
to re-enter the credentials once if you want convenience, or do it every
time if you want improved security.
One downside would be that if you
another +1 from /me.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
While David (Shrews) only began working on Ironic in earnest four months
ago, he has been working on some of the tougher problems with our Tempest
coverage and the
+1 from me.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
It's time to grow the team :)
Jim (jroll) started working with Ironic at the last mid-cycle, when
teeth became ironic-python-agent. In the time since then, he's jumped
into Ironic
On Jul 11, 2014 5:32 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
I have tried using pymysql in place of mysqldb and in real world
concurrency
tests against cinder and nova it performs slower. I was inspired by the
mention
of mysql-connector so I just tried that option instead.
Clark,
You make a good point. It's there some resistance to this or is it just a
matter of asking?
Carl
On Jul 11, 2014 12:23 PM, Clark Boylan clark.boy...@gmail.com wrote:
Before we get too far ahead of ourselves mysql-connector is not hosted
on pypi. Instead it is an external package link.
Unclear if I get a vote, but if so, +1 it is. :)
On July 11, 2014 4:18:55 PM PDT, Chris K nobody...@gmail.com wrote:
another +1 from /me.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
While David (Shrews) only began working on Ironic in
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com
wrote:
1. PLUMgrid
1. Not saving enough logs
All Jenkins slaves were just updated to upload all required logs. PLUMgrid
CI should be good now.
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
On 07/11/2014 08:04 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/07/14 13:17, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
Hi all,
Multiple projects are suffering from db lock timeouts due to
deadlocks deep in mysqldb library that we use to interact with
mysql servers. In
On 7/11/14, 7:26 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote:
On Jul 11, 2014 5:32 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
I have tried using pymysql in place of mysqldb and in real world
concurrency
tests against cinder and nova it performs slower. I was inspired by
Dan, thank you for your reply. Regarding the following:
However, for your immediate bug, I say just have the compute host
abandon the instance if the database says its host != self.host, and
otherwise maybe just return it to a running state.
could you clarify what you mean by abandon?
You should probably add these details to the wiki page for the event
at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints/BeavertonJunoSprint
Unfortunately my travel is booked already, so I wont be there for the Thursday.
Michael
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com
On 07/11/2014 09:17 PM, Mike Bayer wrote:
...
To identify performance that's alleviated by async you have to
establish up front that IO blocking is the issue, which would entail
having code that's blazing fast until you start running it against
concurrent connections, at which point you can
On 7/11/14, 11:26 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
Yep, couldn't agree more.
Frankly, the steps you outline in the wiki above are excellent
examples of where we can make significant gains in both performance
and scalability. In addition to those you listed, the underlying
database schemas themselves,
On 07/11/2014 07:14 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
On 10 July 2014 16:59, Sylvain Bauza sba...@redhat.com wrote:
Le 10/07/2014 15:47, Russell Bryant a écrit :
On 07/10/2014 05:06 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
Hi all,
=== tl;dr: Now that we agree on waiting for the split prereqs
to be done, we debate on
On 11/07/14 09:37, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
Hi all,
This is a follow-up to Clint Byrum's suggestion to add the `Map`
intrinsic function[0], Zane Bitter's response[1] and Randall Burt's
addendum[2].
Sorry for bringing it up again, but I'd love to reach consensus on this.
The summary of the previous
90 matches
Mail list logo
