Definitely fuel spec is needed :)
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Evgeniy L e...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I have some comments regarding to you action items
2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests
3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli
We
Igor,
thanks a lot for improving UX over it - this table allows me to see which
ISO passed verification tests.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Vladimir Kuklin vkuk...@mirantis.com
wrote:
I would also like to add that you can use our library called devops along
with system tests we use for QA
Hi Doug,
I created a i18n blueprint for oslo.i18n.
URL:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-i18n/+spec/more-gettext-supports
Could you review it?
I am reading django gettext code, I think I will use a similar approach
for the contextual markers gettext function.
Thanks,
Peng Wu
On
Hello folks:
I'm proposing to add Amrith Kumar (amrith on IRC) to trove-core.
Amrith has been working with Trove for a while now. He has been a
consistently active reviewer, and has provided insightful comments on
numerous reviews. He has submitted quality code for multiple bug-fixes
in Trove,
Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Aug 22, 2014, at 5:59 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
TL;DR:
Let's create an Oslo projectgroup in Launchpad to track work across all
Oslo libraries. In library projects, let's use milestones connected to
published versions rather than the common
Hi Angus,
We are not using nova-docker driver to deploy docker containers.
In our manual, we are using Heat (thanks to the docker plugin) to deploy
docker containers and nova is just used to deploy VM. Inside this VM
heat deploy the docker software. The figure below describes the
interactions
On Aug 25, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Pradeep Kilambi (pkilambi) pkila...@cisco.com
wrote:
On 8/23/14, 5:36 PM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote:
On Aug 23, 2014, at 4:06 AM, Sumit Naiksatam sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com
Hi Chandra,
I updated the link to the docker guide.
https://github.com/MarouenMechtri/Docker-containers-deployment-with-OpenStack-Heat
Regards,
Marouen
2014-08-26 1:21 GMT+02:00 Chandra Kamalakantha
chandra_kamalakan...@yahoo.com:
Hi, Did you by chance include the wrong link? The link
Hi all,
I want to present you our guide for Docker containers deployment with
OpenStack Heat.
In this guide we dockerize and deploy a lamp application on two containers.
https://github.com/MarouenMechtri/Docker-containers-deployment-with-OpenStack-Heat
Hope it will be helpful for many people.
OK, now that we have evacuated the terminology issue (we'll use liaison
or janitor or secretary, not czar), and side-stepped the offtopic
development (this is not about suppressing PTLs, just a framework to let
them delegate along predetermined lines if they want to)... which of
those unnamed
Hi folks!
I would like to know what is the status on the “Domain-specific Drivers”
feature for Juno.
I see that there’s documentation on this already but I was not able to use it
with the master branch.
I was trying to configure LDAP on the default domain and SQL for heat domain
but with no
I am experiencing the exact same issue. Several reviews did not rebase
recently, which make some of my tests fail.
What should be the behaviour from the CI point of view ?
1) -1 and request a rebase
2) 0 and request a rebase
3) Ci to do the cherry pick but like Kevin was stating, it need some
On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 11:59 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
TL;DR:
Let's create an Oslo projectgroup in Launchpad to track work across all
Oslo libraries. In library projects, let's use milestones connected to
published versions rather than the common milestones.
Sounds good to me, Thierry.
Hi keystone/infra,
One key upcoming Juno feature (Keystone to keystone federation) is
currently blocked on adding pysaml2 to requirements:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/113294/
It was -1ed by Doug after the discussion at the release meeting last
week, where the xmlsec1 dependency was raised
From: Michael Still [mailto:mi...@stillhq.com]
Sent: 25 August 2014 23:38
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] Migration from nova-network to
Neutron for large production clouds
...
Mark McClain and I discussed a
Hi,
I would like to get centos 7 based testing working, but I am stuck
without images being provided in the HP Cloud. Rackspace has a
(slightly quirky, but workable) image and we have an experimental job
that runs fine.
I am aware that building our own custom images with disk-image-builder
is
Hi
It was fully merged for Juno-2 - so if you are having problems, feel free to
share the settings in you main config and keystone.heat.config files
Henry
On 26 Aug 2014, at 10:26, Bruno Luis Dos Santos Bompastor
bruno.bompas...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi folks!
I would like to know what is the
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 03:39:24PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote:
We held the inaugural Heat mid-cycle meetup in Raleigh, North Carolina this
week. There were a dozen folks in attendance, and I think everyone agreed
that it was a very successful event. Notes from the meetup are on the
Etherpad
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 15:06 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Aug 8, 2014, at 7:22 PM, Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
That’s right. The preferred approach is to put the register_opt() in
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 02:55:14PM +0900, Yukinori Sagara wrote:
Hi.
I am trying Heat instance HA, using RDO Icehouse.
After instance boot, instance push own stats to heat alarm with
cfn-push-stats command.
But cfn-push-stats always failed with error '403
It is not enough, you need to review requirements in the code of nailgun,
ostf and astute.
I'll be happy to have our requirements files and specs as close to
global-requirements as possible. It will ruin our current solid structure,
where we have same versions of dependencies on production, on
On 08/26/2014 11:13 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
OK, now that we have evacuated the terminology issue (we'll use liaison
or janitor or secretary, not czar), and side-stepped the offtopic
development (this is not about suppressing PTLs, just a framework to let
them delegate along predetermined
On 08/25/2014 10:06 PM, Brandon Logan wrote:
2. Therefor, there should be some configuration to specifically enable
either version (not both) in case LBaaS is needed. In this case, the
other version is disabled (ie. a REST query for non-active version
should return a not activated error).
On 08/26/2014 05:38 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi keystone/infra,
One key upcoming Juno feature (Keystone to keystone federation) is
currently blocked on adding pysaml2 to requirements:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/113294/
It was -1ed by Doug after the discussion at the release
Team,
Please take a look at the new BP
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-access-filtering.
Interested in your feedback and shared experience. Although it’s a purely
internal design thing I find pretty important to be accurate about things like
that.
Thanks
Renat
Hi,
Openstack deployment detail : Single node devstack setup
Issue Description:
We are writing a core plugin and trying to create instance provisioned by our
plugin. We are able to launch the VM instance successfully via OpenStack
horizon. From the horizon, we could see the IP is getting
Hi stackers,
It goes without saying that end users, that are actually using your
tool/project/service, usually don't have enough time to join community,
understand all technical details and road map of project and after that
contribute code that implements their features... But it's well know
Hi,
I'd like to encourage everybody interested to take a look and leave
comments on the Neutron migration spec here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/101921
The design currently includes both cold and live approaches, supports
host-by-host migration (as opposite to big bang)
and doesn't require
Hi, All:
I've deployed undercloud and overcloud on some baremetals. All
overcloud machines are deployed by undercloud.
Then I tried to shutdown undercloud machines. After that, if I
reboot one overcloud machine, it will never boot from net, AKA PXE used by
undercloud.
Is
Hi, All
I have done some work to test the performance of LUN scanning, use
iscsiadm with --rescan like what Nova dose. In my test, a host
connected with a lot of LUNs , more than 1000 LUNs. Because --rescan
will cause kernel to scan all of the LUNs connected to the host, it
costs several minutes
On 08/25/2014 03:50 PM, Adam Lawson wrote:
I recognize I'm joining the discussion late but I've been following the
dialog fairly closely and want to offer my perspective FWIW. I have a
lot going through my head, not sure how to get it all out there so I'll
do a brain dump, get some feedback and
+1. Congratulations, Amrith.
Best regards,
Denis M.
вторник, 26 августа 2014 г. пользователь Sergey Gotliv написал:
Strong +1 from me!
-Original Message-
From: Nikhil Manchanda [mailto:nik...@manchanda.me javascript:;]
Sent: August-26-14 3:48 AM
To: OpenStack Development
+1
From: Sergey Gotliv [sgot...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 8:11 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove] Proposal to add Amrith Kumar to trove-core
Strong +1 from me!
-Original Message-
On Aug 26, 2014, at 6:30 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 15:06 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Aug 8, 2014, at 7:22 PM, Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
Hi,
Following the conversation [1]:
My understanding was that the way to use out of the tree vif_driver is
to set vif_driver option in nova.conf
until there is a better way to support such cases but the commit [2]
removed this option.
Can someone clarify the current status (i.e. what is the
On Aug 26, 2014, at 7:44 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 08/26/2014 05:38 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi keystone/infra,
One key upcoming Juno feature (Keystone to keystone federation) is
currently blocked on adding pysaml2 to requirements:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/113294/
On Aug 26, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
OK, now that we have evacuated the terminology issue (we'll use liaison
or janitor or secretary, not czar), and side-stepped the offtopic
development (this is not about suppressing PTLs, just a framework to let
them
As an update, please check and review commit [1] to fuel-specs with
detailed feature description.
According to this feature, we are going to switch our CI system to lrzipped
tarballs.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116874/
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Dmitry Pyzhov
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 8:19 PM, John Dickinson m...@not.mn wrote:
I think Anne makes some excellent points about the pattern being proposed
being unlikely to be commonly implemented across all the programs (or, at
best, very difficult). Let's not try to formalize another best practice
that
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Alan Kavanagh
alan.kavan...@ericsson.com wrote:
That's a fair point Jay. The Czar does sound like a reasonable approach and
what would be useful and helpful would be to appoint additional PTL's and not
have the burden of everything falling on one individual
Steve Baker has started the process of moving Heat tests out of the
Tempest repository and into the Heat repository, and we're looking for
some guidance on how they should be packaged in a consistent way.
Apparently there are a few projects already packaging functional tests
in the package
From: Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
(not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 08/26/2014 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [keystone]
pysaml2/xmlsec1 dep
blocking keystone-to-keystone federation
On Aug
On Aug 26, 2014, at 10:18 AM, Steve Martinelli steve...@ca.ibm.com wrote:
From: Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 08/26/2014 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [infra]
On Aug 26, 2014, at 10:10 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 8:19 PM, John Dickinson m...@not.mn wrote:
I think Anne makes some excellent points about the pattern being proposed
being unlikely to be commonly implemented across all the programs (or, at
best,
Hi Peng,
We're using the spec process described in
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo#Design_Proposals to manage
blueprints now. You'll need to create a spec review as described in the
wiki for this. Unfortunately, I don't think we've opened up Kilo specs
yet, so you might want to either wait
On 8/26/14, 4:49 AM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote:
On Aug 25, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Pradeep Kilambi (pkilambi)
pkila...@cisco.com wrote:
On 8/23/14, 5:36 PM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote:
On Aug 23, 2014, at 4:06 AM, Sumit Naiksatam sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu,
On 08/26/2014 05:13 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
OK, now that we have evacuated the terminology issue (we'll use liaison
or janitor or secretary, not czar), and side-stepped the offtopic
development (this is not about suppressing PTLs, just a framework to let
them delegate along predetermined
Horizon has been actively moving away from having 3rd party JavaScript
libraries bundled in the Horizon repo. Most have been removed barring one
or two exceptions. Moving forward new JavaScript libraries dependencies
should either use existing xstatic packages or need a new one created for
the
Oh, after writing my response below I realized this is cross-posted
between openstack and openstack-dev. Please don't do that.
I suppose this probably belongs on the users list, but since I've
already written the response I guess I'm not going to argue too much. :-)
On 08/26/2014 07:36 AM, 严超
On 08/26/2014 10:14 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
Steve Baker has started the process of moving Heat tests out of the
Tempest repository and into the Heat repository, and we're looking for
some guidance on how they should be packaged in a consistent way.
Apparently there are a few projects already
On 08/26/2014 10:04 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Aug 26, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
OK, now that we have evacuated the terminology issue (we'll use liaison
or janitor or secretary, not czar), and side-stepped the offtopic
development (this is not about
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:04:41AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Aug 26, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
OK, now that we have evacuated the terminology issue (we'll use liaison
or janitor or secretary, not czar), and side-stepped the offtopic
development
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 6:44 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 08/26/2014 05:38 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi keystone/infra,
One key upcoming Juno feature (Keystone to keystone federation) is
currently blocked on adding pysaml2 to requirements:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 08/20/2014 12:37 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 11/08/14 05:24, Thierry Carrez wrote:
So the idea that being (and remaining) in the integrated release should
also be judged on technical merit is a slightly different effort.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Wang Shen ws1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, All
I have done some work to test the performance of LUN scanning, use
iscsiadm with --rescan like what Nova dose. In my test, a host
connected with a lot of LUNs , more than 1000 LUNs. Because --rescan
will cause kernel
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote:
Additional cross-project resources can be ponied up by the large
contributor companies, and existing cross-project resources are not
necessarily divertable on command.
Sure additional cross-project
Don't feed the troll. :)
:)=
On Monday, August 25, 2014 12:39 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
So to see if we can get something useful from this thread.
What was your internal analysis, can it be published? Even negative analysis is
useful to make openstack better...
It'd
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Boris Pavlovic bo...@pavlovic.me wrote:
Hi stackers,
It goes without saying that end users, that are actually using your
tool/project/service, usually don't have enough time to join community,
understand all technical details and road map of project and
On Aug 26, 2014, at 11:28 AM, Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:04:41AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Aug 26, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
OK, now that we have evacuated the terminology issue (we'll use liaison
or
+1
On 8/26/14, 6:54 AM, Tim Simpson tim.simp...@rackspace.com wrote:
+1
From: Sergey Gotliv [sgot...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 8:11 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove] Proposal to add Amrith
+1
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Tim Simpson tim.simp...@rackspace.com
wrote:
+1
From: Sergey Gotliv [sgot...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 8:11 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove] Proposal
Hi,
The VMWare NSX CI is failing and I'm not able to get any failure log to
find the reason of failure.
The message that I get is this:
VMware NSX CI has posted comments on this change.
Patch Set 24: Verified-1
You might have hit the following known bug(s):
bug #1271230
Add review
+1
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Robert Myers myer0...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Tim Simpson tim.simp...@rackspace.com
wrote:
+1
From: Sergey Gotliv [sgot...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 8:11 AM
+1
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Vipul Sabhaya vip...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Robert Myers myer0...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Tim Simpson tim.simp...@rackspace.com
wrote:
+1
From:
Just want to clarify something. this public ip as private ip is only for
external facing interfaces on a set of VM instances. At the same time, the
majority of interfaces on hte same set of VM instances will not have public
ip and their subnets are isolated networks. Will this change your
Hey Stackers! Wait! =)
Let me ask something...
Why are you guys using Docker within a VM?!?! What is the point of doing
such thing?!
I thought Docker was here to entirely replace the virtualization layer,
bringing a bare metal-cloud, am I right?!
Tks!
Thiago
On 26 August 2014 05:45,
Hi Nader,
Sorry about that failure.
We have temporarily stopped mine sweeper for neutron while we update our
devstack images.
However, unfortunately some jobs did not complete properly, and therefore
you had failures without logs being reported.
The situation should be back to normal soon, and
On 08/26/2014 03:43 PM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
Hi Nader,
Sorry about that failure.
We have temporarily stopped mine sweeper for neutron while we update our
devstack images.
However, unfortunately some jobs did not complete properly, and therefore
you had failures without logs being
Hi Edgar,
We are also facing CI issues when the neutron patch set is not rebased with
latest changes.
For e.g. CI audit that you posted today
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114393/) is not rebased with neutron test_lib
related changes.
We had refactored the Brocade Vyatta plugin unit tests
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Elizabeth K. Joseph
l...@princessleia.com wrote:
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting on Tuesday August 26th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting
Thanks to everyone who joined us for the meeting, log and minutes
available here:
No, the gateway_external_network_id option just refers to how your network
is deployed. If the external network uses a regular segmentation identifier
like the rest of the networks, this will work. If not, it won't because the
instances will try to use a segmentation identifier.
In other words,
Thanks Salvatore for the quick response for the NSX CI failure!
OpenDayLight CI experts,
We are also seeing a failure on OpenDayLight CI but it appears there is no log
at the link below.
This is an urgent issue for us. Appreciate your prompt help here.
OpenDaylight CI
9:35 AM
Patch Set 24:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
From: Michael Still [mailto:mi...@stillhq.com]
Sent: 25 August 2014 23:38
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] Migration from nova-network to
current specs are updated and current with the project blueprints
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/congress
enjoy!
~ sean
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Thanks everyone for the show of support.
Amrith: welcome to trove-core!
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Craig Vyvial cp16...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Vipul Sabhaya vip...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Robert Myers myer0...@gmail.com
On 27/08/14 03:18, David Kranz wrote:
On 08/26/2014 10:14 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
Steve Baker has started the process of moving Heat tests out of the
Tempest repository and into the Heat repository, and we're looking
for some guidance on how they should be packaged in a consistent way.
Sorry, not good with neutron. Could you explain what use a regular
segmentation identifer like the rest of the network ? What is this
segmentation identifier ?
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote:
No, the gateway_external_network_id option just refers to how
Hi Salvatore,
Thanks for the information. Will do the recheck-vmware.
Regards,
Nader.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com
wrote:
Hi Nader,
Sorry about that failure.
We have temporarily stopped mine sweeper for neutron while we update our
devstack
There is an opendaylight failure on one of my patches as well. Can the
maintainer update the message it posts with the syntax to retrigger a check?
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
Looking at the console output from the ODL Jenkins failure, it appears
VLAN tag, VXLAN id, etc.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Bao Wang bywan...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, not good with neutron. Could you explain what use a regular
segmentation identifer like the rest of the network ? What is this
segmentation identifier ?
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:07 PM,
Hi folks,
I ran some rough benchmarks to get an idea of where Zaqar currently stands
re latency and throughput for Juno. These results are by no means
conclusive, but I wanted to publish what I had so far for the sake of
discussion.
Note that these tests do not include results for our new Redis
Joe,
Why not just use wishlist bugs in launchpad? The launchpad definition of
Wishlist is 'Not a bug. It's an enhancement/new feature.'
The are few reasons:
1) It's not a wish list it's roadmap of project, that is based on end users
requests
2) It should be easy for everybody to understand,
I'd like to propose a meeting at 1300UTC on Thursday in
#openstack-meeting-3 to discuss Neutron BPs remaining for Juno at this
point. We're taking specifically about medium and high priority ones,
with a focus on these three:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/l3-high-availability)
Hi All,
I¹m thrilled to announce that we¹ve reached the beta milestone for the
Fuel Project. This beta release is made available to allow a broad user
base to test and evaluate the next minor version of Fuel, but is not
recommended for production use at this stage.
What¹s New in Fuel 5.1?
Thank you very much.
And sorry for the cross-posting.
*Best Regards！*
*Chao Yan--**My twitter：Andy Yan @yanchao727
https://twitter.com/yanchao727*
*My Weibo：http://weibo.com/herewearenow
http://weibo.com/herewearenow--*
2014-08-26 23:17 GMT+08:00 Ben Nemec
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote:
Additional cross-project resources can be ponied up by the large
contributor companies, and existing cross-project resources are not
Hi Kyle,
I have conflicts for 13 UTC - Thursday is already full for me, but I'll try
anyway, to join the convo on IRC.
I agree the 3 blueprints you've mentioned are the ones we should really
merge for Juno.
To this aim, I wonder why [1] has not been set to high. Nevertheless it
does not matter a
On 23/08/14 07:39, Zane Bitter wrote:
We held the inaugural Heat mid-cycle meetup in Raleigh, North Carolina
this week. There were a dozen folks in attendance, and I think
everyone agreed that it was a very successful event. Notes from the
meetup are on the Etherpad here:
Hi Karthik,
what do you mean that the plugin is incompatible with
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114393/?
you're mentioning a rebase issue - but the patch in question appears to
cleanly apply to master.
Is your probably because patch #114393 does not have in its log some
changes you need to
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message of 2014-08-26 14:25:46 -0700:
On 27/08/14 03:18, David Kranz wrote:
On 08/26/2014 10:14 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
Steve Baker has started the process of moving Heat tests out of the
Tempest repository and into the Heat repository, and we're looking
for
Hi,
After reading https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Incubator I have
some thoughts about the proposed workflow.
We have quite a bit of experience and some good tools around splitting
code out of projects and into new projects. But we don't generally do a
lot of importing code into
Correction: there were 25 workers per producer process, not 10.
On 8/26/14, 4:41 PM, Kurt Griffiths kurt.griffi...@rackspace.com wrote:
### Event Broadcasting (Balanced) ###
This test uses the same number of producers and consumers, but note that
the observers are still listing (up to) 5
On 2014-08-27 00:52:35 +0200 (+0200), Salvatore Orlando wrote:
[...]
In this case you might try to rebase the patch you're going to
test on master before running devstack, which I think it's also
what happens in the upstream gate.
More or less. Technically we try to merge the proposed change
On 08/25/2014 11:25 AM, Joe Cropper wrote:
I was thinking something simple such as only allowing the add
operation to succeed IFF no policies are found to be in violation...
and then nova wouldn't need to get into all the complexities you
mention?
Personally I would be in favour of
TL; DR
A few folks are proposing to stop running tests for neutron advanced
services [ie: (lb|vpn|fw)aas] in the integrated gate, and run them only on
the neutron gate.
Reason: projects like nova are 100% orthogonal to neutron advanced
services. Also, there have been episodes in the past of
From what I understand, the intended projects for the incubator can't
operate without neutron because they are just extensions/plugins/drivers.
For example, if the DVR modifications to the reference reference L3 plugin
weren't already being developed in the tree, DVR could have been developed
in
Hello,
The current agenda for tomorrow's Octavia meeting is posted here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Octavia/Weekly_Meeting_Agenda#Agenda
Please feel free to add agenda items as necessary.
Also, based on the poll Doug Wiegley created on where we should hold our
weekly meetings (IRC vs.
Incubator doesn't mean being kicked out of tree, it just mean that the API
and resource model needs to be baked for fast iteration, and can't be put
in tree temporarily. As kyle has said, incubator is not talking about
moving 3rd drivers out of tree, which is in another thread.
For DVR, as it has
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Luke Gorrie l...@tail-f.com wrote:
On 21 August 2014 12:12, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
Let the ones that are primarily interested in
good quality of that code (vendors) to drive development. And if some
plugins become garbage, it's bad news
Forwarded from other thread discussing about incubator:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-August/044135.html
Completely agree with this sentiment. Is there a crisp distinction between
a vendor plugin and an open source plugin though?
I think that opensource is not the
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
