On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
To: Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 05:43:14PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 09:36:18AM
Hi,
This case is always tested by Tempest on the gate.
https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/master/tempest/api/compute/servers/test_delete_server.py#L152
So I guess this problem wouldn't happen on the latest version at least.
Thanks
Ken'ichi Ohmichi
---
2014-12-10 6:32 GMT+09:00 Joe
Excerpts from Angus Salkeld's message of 2014-12-09 15:25:59 -0800:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org
wrote:
On 12/09/2014 06:04 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
We already have a solution for tracking the contributor-IRC
mapping--add it to your
@Armando,
Okay, so if I understand you correctly, you're saying that was easier for
you to go entirely out of tree, and that you have done so already. Okay,
good for you, problem solved!
One point that should be clear here is that, if someone is completely
comfortable with being entirely out of
Anita,
I really appreciate your willingness to host a meeting, but, the response
from the group in the previous thread was in support of the alternating
meeting approach. Daya, Erlon, Trinath, Steve, Misha and others all agreed.
I am confused why you would not want to go with the consensus on
[I tried to find any previous discussion of this and failed - I'd
appreciate a pointer to any email threads / specs where this has already
been discussed.]
Currently neutron is given the ability to do just about anything to
networking via rootwrap, sudo, and the IpFilter check (allow anything
So far it looks like we have centered around 2 options:
Option A 1200 and 2200 UTC
Option D 1500 and 0400 UTC
There is still time to pick your best time. Please vote at
https://www.google.com/moderator/#16/e=21b93c
Special thanks to Steve, Daya, Markus, Mikhail, Emily, Nurit, Edwin and
Ramy for
Is ovs-vsctl gonna be happy with CAP_NET_ADMIN?
On 12/10/2014 02:43 AM, Angus Lees wrote:
[I tried to find any previous discussion of this and failed - I'd
appreciate a pointer to any email threads / specs where this has
already been discussed.]
Currently neutron is given the ability to do
Hi Armando,
Thanks for your feedback!
Okay, so if I understand you correctly, you're saying that was easier for
you to go entirely out of tree, and that you have done so already. Okay,
good for you, problem solved!
One point that should be clear here is that, if someone is completely
[cid:image003.png@01D0145E.75813DF0]
I have some of the basic question w.r.t Service-VM running the NFV. (These
Service-VMs can be vNAT, vFW, vDPI, vRouting , vCPE etc ),
1. When these service-VM runs over the cloud (over OpenStack CN) each
will be treated as Routable entity in the
Afaik ovs-vsctl just talks to ovsdb-server via some regular IPC mechanism -
usually a unix socket, see --db. So yes, provided the file permissions on
the unix socket work out, then no root powers (or any kernel capability) is
necessary.
Having said that, there will be plenty of examples where
It's set. We'll be having the meetup on Feb 2-6 in San Antonio at RAX
HQ. I'll add a list of hotels and the address on the etherpad.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/lbaas-kilo-meetup
Thanks,
Brandon
On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 17:27 +, Brandon Logan wrote:
Per the meeting, put together an
Hi Folks,
There will be not DVR meeting tomorrow.
See you all next week.
Thanks
Swaminathan Vasudevan
Systems Software Engineer (TC)
HP Networking
Hewlett-Packard
8000 Foothills Blvd
M/S 5541
Roseville, CA - 95747
tel: 916.785.0937
fax: 916.785.1815
email:
Hi all,
Just a reminder that the Telco Working Group will be meeting @ 2200 UTC in
#openstack-meeting on Wednesday December 9th. Draft agenda is available here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nfv-meeting-agenda
Please feel free to add anything you think I missed.
Thanks,
Steve
...and of course I meant December *10th* - sorry!
-Steve
- Original Message -
From: Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com
Hi all,
Just a reminder that the Telco Working Group will be meeting @ 2200 UTC in
#openstack-meeting on Wednesday December 9th. Draft agenda is available
here:
Hundred percent agree with all said by Zane.
Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.
On 10 Dec 2014, at 02:20, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/12/14 03:48, Renat Akhmerov wrote:
Hey,
I think it’s a question of what the final goal is. For just creating
security groups as a resource
HI Team,
I am installing Murano on the Ubuntu 14.04 Juno setup and when I try the below
install murano-api I encounter the below error. Please assist.
When I try to install
$ tox -e venv -- murano-api --config-file ./etc/murano/murano.conf
pip can't proceed with requirement 'pycrypto=2.6
Hi all,
Most of the Neutron third-party Cis are failing at the moment, and it’s
because of the ongoing services split. The patch to get devstack working
again will likely merge tomorrow. We will send another ML message when
the split is “finished”.
Thanks,
Doug
HI Team,
I am installing Murano on the Ubuntu 14.04 Juno setup and when I try the below
install murano-api I encounter the below error. Please assist.
When I try to install
I am using the Murano guide link provided below:
https://murano.readthedocs.org/en/latest/install/manual.html
I am
Nikolay,
Regarding whether the execution environment BP is the same as this global
context BP, I think the difference is in the scope of the variables. The
global context that I'm proposing is provided to the workflow at execution
and is only relevant to this execution. For example, some
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 10/29/2014 10:17 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Hly henry4...@gmail.com wrote:
Sent from my iPad
On 2014-10-29, at 下午8:01, Robert van Leeuwen
robert.vanleeu...@spilgames.com wrote:
Remove everything out of tree, and leave only Neutron API framework as
integration platform, would lower the attractions of the whole
Openstack Project. Without a default good enough reference backend
from community, customers have to depends on packagers to fully test
all backends for them. Can
Hi Daniel,
Please see inline
-Original Message-
From: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 4:04 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] out-of-tree plugin for Mech
Hi Kevin,
Does it make sense to introduce GeneralvSwitch MD, working with
VIF_TYPE_TAP? It just do very simple port bind just like OVS and
bridge. Then anyone can implement their backend and agent without
patch neutron drivers.
Best Regards
Henry
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Kevin Benton
101 - 124 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
