Re: [openstack-dev] [Designate] Core reviewer update

2015-02-12 Thread Rich Megginson
On 02/12/2015 08:51 AM, Hayes, Graham wrote: On 12/02/15 15:50, Kiall Mac Innes wrote: +1 - Tim has been giving good reviews over the last few months and will make a good addition.. Thanks, Kiall On 12/02/15 15:40, Vinod Mangalpally wrote: Hello Designate folks, Betsy Luzader (betsy)

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Lets keep our community open, lets fight for it

2015-02-12 Thread Alan Pevec
I think there's a place for private conversation (eg. discussing a security issue that corresponds to a CVE... CVE's are a special exception and I'd even argue on the need of private conversations there. Discussing CVEs in private came up few times but I'm not sure IRC is secure enough for

Re: [openstack-dev] The API WG mission statement

2015-02-12 Thread Ryan Brown
On 02/10/2015 08:01 AM, Everett Toews wrote: On Feb 9, 2015, at 9:28 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/02/2015 02:51 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote: On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 23:05 +, Everett Toews wrote: To converge the OpenStack APIs to a consistent and

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Metadef-tags create api change request.

2015-02-12 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 2/11/15, 11:10, Okuma, Wayne wayne.ok...@hp.com wrote: Hello, I would like to change the metadef-tags create API which was checked into Kilo (cycle 1). The python-glanceclient that would support metadef-tags has not been released yet and I would like to make this change before doing so. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Question about force_host skip filters

2015-02-12 Thread Jay Pipes
On 02/12/2015 10:10 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: On 02/12/2015 03:44 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Any action done by the operator is always more important than what the Scheduler could decide. So, in an emergency situation, the operator wants to force a migration to an host, we need to accept it and

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Ask for help with devstack error

2015-02-12 Thread Peter Stachowski
Hi, Take a look at this commit, it broke a number of Trove tests last night: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154391 Not sure if it’s related, but it seems similar (try manually backing out the change for cinder and see if it fixes your problem). Good luck! Peter From: liuxinguo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat][API] Filtering by metadata values

2015-02-12 Thread Ryan Brown
On 02/10/2015 10:03 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Miguel Grinberg miguel.grinb...@gmail.com mailto:miguel.grinb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, We had a discussion yesterday on the Heat channel regarding patterns for searching or filtering entities by its

[openstack-dev] [Murano] Environment status

2015-02-12 Thread Andrew Pashkin
Initiall my interest to that problem was caused by the bug [1] due to whose once environment was deployed with failure it stays forever with that status even if it have been deployed sucessfully later. For now status determination happens in three stages: - If at least one of all sessions of

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Question about force_host skip filters

2015-02-12 Thread Chris Friesen
On 02/12/2015 03:44 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Any action done by the operator is always more important than what the Scheduler could decide. So, in an emergency situation, the operator wants to force a migration to an host, we need to accept it and do it, even if it doesn't match what the

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [nova]

2015-02-12 Thread Alexander Makarov
A trust token cannot be used to get another token: https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/master/keystone/token/controllers.py#L154-L156 You have to make your Nova client use the very same trust scoped token obtained from authentication using trust without trying to authenticate with it one

[openstack-dev] [Designate] Core reviewer update

2015-02-12 Thread Vinod Mangalpally
Hello Designate folks, Betsy Luzader (betsy) resigned from her core reviewer position on Designate. In order to keep the momentum of reviews in Designate going, I'd like to propose adding Tim Simmons (timsim) to designate-core. For context on Designate reviews and who has been active, please

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Lets keep our community open, lets fight for it

2015-02-12 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-02-12 17:20:37 +0100 (+0100), Alan Pevec wrote: Discussing CVEs in private came up few times but I'm not sure IRC is secure enough for that. IMHO discussion about embargoed issues must be kept in private Launchpad bugs but I'd like to hear from VMT team. I do from time to time /msg a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] [API WG] Environment status

2015-02-12 Thread Ryan Brown
On 02/12/2015 10:52 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote: I think this is a good case for API WG as statuses of entities should be consistent among OpenStack APIs. As I recall, we are mixing two different statuses for environments. The first dimension for environment status is its content status:

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Metadef-tags create api change request.

2015-02-12 Thread Brian Rosmaita
On 2/12/15, 9:57 AM, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote: On 2/11/15, 11:10, Okuma, Wayne wayne.ok...@hp.com wrote: Hello, I would like to change the metadef-tags create API which was checked into Kilo (cycle 1). The python-glanceclient that would support metadef-tags has not been

Re: [openstack-dev] [Designate] Core reviewer update

2015-02-12 Thread Kiall Mac Innes
+1 - Tim has been giving good reviews over the last few months and will make a good addition.. Thanks, Kiall On 12/02/15 15:40, Vinod Mangalpally wrote: Hello Designate folks, Betsy Luzader (betsy) resigned from her core reviewer position on Designate. In order to keep the momentum of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] [API WG] Environment status

2015-02-12 Thread Georgy Okrokvertskhov
I think this is a good case for API WG as statuses of entities should be consistent among OpenStack APIs. As I recall, we are mixing two different statuses for environments. The first dimension for environment status is its content status: NEW, CONFIGURING, READY The second dimension is deployment

[openstack-dev] [vmware-api] Weekly meeting

2015-02-12 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, Over the last few IRC meetings we have discussed the following: 1. Providing a platform for people other than those working on the Nova driver to take part. There are efforts with the Glance, Cinder, Ceilometer and Neutron projects. Hopefully people working on those can also take part

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Lets keep our community open, lets fight for it

2015-02-12 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-02-12 10:35:18 + (+), Kuvaja, Erno wrote: [...] I'd like to point out that that this discussion has been pushing all inclusive open approach. Not ATC, not specially approved individuals, but everyone. Mailing list can easily facilitate participation of everyone who wishes to do

Re: [openstack-dev] [Designate] Core reviewer update

2015-02-12 Thread Hayes, Graham
On 12/02/15 15:50, Kiall Mac Innes wrote: +1 - Tim has been giving good reviews over the last few months and will make a good addition.. Thanks, Kiall On 12/02/15 15:40, Vinod Mangalpally wrote: Hello Designate folks, Betsy Luzader (betsy) resigned from her core reviewer position on

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Lets keep our community open, lets fight for it

2015-02-12 Thread Amrith Kumar
Flavio, Thanks for your email. I've read your response as well as those from all the others who responded and one thing is very unclear to me in the position being advanced. You write, and other respondents appear to share the following sentiment: | I personally don't care if you have private

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] Versioning, branching, tagging

2015-02-12 Thread Andrey Epifanov
Hello! I would like to discuss which policy we want to recommend for the versioning, branching and tagging for FUEL plugins and how it should correlate with FUEL/MOS versions/releases. According Fuel Plug-in Guide http://docs.mirantis.com/openstack/fuel/fuel-6.0/plugin-dev.html#metadata-yaml

Re: [openstack-dev] [Designate] Core reviewer update

2015-02-12 Thread Kiall Mac Innes
Changes have been applied, welcome Tim :) On 12/02/15 16:18, Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/12/2015 08:51 AM, Hayes, Graham wrote: On 12/02/15 15:50, Kiall Mac Innes wrote: +1 - Tim has been giving good reviews over the last few months and will make a good addition.. Thanks, Kiall On

[openstack-dev] SDN Security in OpenStack

2015-02-12 Thread Patrick Lismore
Hi all, I am a software developer working at HP, I do not work with OpenStack @HP though, only worked with it privately. I am finishing up a Masters and for my dissertation research I am focusing on SDN Security. I wanted to align my research to current SDN uses in the industry and was

Re: [openstack-dev] [Designate] Core reviewer update

2015-02-12 Thread Tim Simmons
Thanks all, I’m honored :) —Tim On Feb 12, 2015, at 10:31 AM, Kiall Mac Innes ki...@macinnes.iemailto:ki...@macinnes.ie wrote: Changes have been applied, welcome Tim :) On 12/02/15 16:18, Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/12/2015 08:51 AM, Hayes, Graham wrote: On 12/02/15 15:50, Kiall Mac Innes

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Priority resizing instance on same host

2015-02-12 Thread Rui Chen
Yes, CONF.allow_resize_to_same_host exist, but the meaning is that the current host have chance to be selected in nova-scheduler, the final chosen host maybe not the current host, in this case, the instance will be migrated from current host to chosen host and the image will be copied to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Lets keep our community open, lets fight for it

2015-02-12 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 11/02/15 17:19 +, Amrith Kumar wrote: [snip] Mostly, I'm very happy to see Flavio's email which ends with this: All the above being said, I'd like to thank everyone who fights for the openness of our community and encourage everyone to make that a must have thing in each

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Priority resizing instance on same host

2015-02-12 Thread Rui Chen
Yes, @Lingxian, I agree with you. Only the host pass the scheduler filters, the resizing can success, 'force_hosts' is not enough IMO. 2015-02-12 16:41 GMT+08:00 Lingxian Kong anlin.k...@gmail.com: Hi, Rui, I think resize VM to the same host if the host could pass scheduler filters makes

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] File-backed glance scrubber queue

2015-02-12 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 11/02/15 13:42 -0800, Chris St. Pierre wrote: I recently proposed a change to glance to turn the file-backed scrubber queue files into JSON: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/145223/ As I looked into it more, though, it turns out that the file-backed queue is no longer usable; it was killed

[openstack-dev] [nova] Question about force_host skip filters

2015-02-12 Thread Rui Chen
Hi: If we boot instance with 'force_hosts', the force host will skip all filters, looks like that it's intentional logic, but I don't know the reason. I'm not sure that the skipping logic is apposite, I think we should remove the skipping logic, and the 'force_hosts' should work with the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [Ceilometer] Real world experience with Ceilometer deployments - Feedback requested

2015-02-12 Thread Diego Parrilla Santamaría
Hi Mash, we dropped Ceilometer as the core tool to gather metrics for our rating and billing system. I must admit it has improved, but I think it's broken by design: a metering and monitoring system is not the same thing. We have built a component that directly listens from rabbit notification

[openstack-dev] [nova] issues with fakelibvirt in tests

2015-02-12 Thread Sean Dague
Looking recently at the following failure - http://logs.openstack.org/04/154804/1/gate/gate-nova-python27/1fe94bf/console.html#_2015-02-12_15_02_19_593 It appears that the fakelibvirt fixture is potentially causing races in tests because after the first test in a worker starts a libvirt

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] File-backed glance scrubber queue

2015-02-12 Thread Chris St. Pierre
Yeah, that commit definitely disables the file-backed queue -- it certainly *looks* like we want to be rid of it, but all of the code is left in place and even updated to support the new format. So my confusion remains. Hopefully Zhi Yan can clarify. Link added. Thanks. On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Lets keep our community open, lets fight for it

2015-02-12 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 12/02/15 16:01 +, Amrith Kumar wrote: Flavio, Thanks for your email. I've read your response as well as those from all the others who responded and one thing is very unclear to me in the position being advanced. You write, and other respondents appear to share the following sentiment:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Lets keep our community open, lets fight for it

2015-02-12 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 11/02/15 11:24 +, Chris Dent wrote: On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, Flavio Percoco wrote: During the last two cycles, I've had the feeling that some of the things I love the most about this community are degrading and moving to a state that I personally disagree with. With the hope of seeing these

<    1   2