Folks,
PLUMgrid CI is down because of unforeseen hardware breakdown issues. We are
working on getting it sorted out asap. I will respond to this thread when
it's back up.
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
__
OpenStack Development Mailing
Hi Ruijing,
I've already created another etherpad for replication and CG integration. It
is referenced at the end of the replication etherpad that Ronen created. I can
move the content to the replication one if that is easier.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-replication-cg
I can help
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote:
* Blueprint/Spec approval deadline - February 15th
* Code freeze for all features - March 10th
After blueprint/spec approval deadline date has passed, you may
request exception by:
1) Email the Openstack Dev mailing list
Hi,
Yes, I think that they go out in batches. It would be best to check with
Stefano if you have any issues.
Thanks
Gary
On 2/15/15, 4:11 AM, Nick Chase nch...@mirantis.com wrote:
Does anybody know if a) ATC emails have started to go out yet, and b)
when proposal voting will start?
Thanks
At the moment there are three columns in the Gerrit overiew page showing
the status of a review request:
* CR (Code-Review)
* V (Verified)
* Workflow (WF).
After a core reviewer +2 (CR) a review request there will be a green
hook in the CR column in the overview page, regardless of -1 reviews.
Awesome, I like the idea.
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Christian Berendt christ...@berendt.io
wrote:
At the moment there are three columns in the Gerrit overiew page showing
the status of a review request:
* CR (Code-Review)
* V (Verified)
* Workflow (WF).
After a core reviewer +2
So I’m Ok with an exception for this, but still have reservations of the this
AE technique (at least the one that is currently proposed). I assume this will
be marked as experimental - since we have not formally agreed that this is a
standard we want to lock into core?
Henry
On 14 Feb 2015,
I have seen the review you provided, but I think there is no relationship to
our problem.
All keystone commands like “keystone user-list”, “keystone role-list”,
“keystone tenant-list” and “eystone user-role-list --user admin --tenant
admin” is ok.
But all the other command returned
On 02/14/2015 07:12 AM, Romil Gupta wrote:
Awesome, I like the idea.
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Christian Berendt christ...@berendt.io
wrote:
At the moment there are three columns in the Gerrit overiew page showing
the status of a review request:
* CR (Code-Review)
* V (Verified)
Hi,
This support was added to the libvirt driver in J. The support is isolated to
the Vmware driver and enables admins to get a better understanding of what is
happening with the running instances. Any chance of getting a sponsor for this?
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/141028/
This also
I must have archived this on accident. Sorry to not respond earlier.
Comments inline...
On Feb 12, 2015 6:40 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote:
I have updated the patch; albeit not complete yet it's kind of closer to
be an allocator decent enough to replace the built-in logic.
I
On Feb 13, 2015 5:54 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote:
- Considering an alternative to availability ranges. Pre-generation of IP
entries is unpractical (think IPv6), so that's not an option.
Unfortunately, I have not yet explored in detail this route.
The availability range stuff
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:36 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote:
- I agree with Carl that the IPAM driver should not have explicit code paths
for autoaddress subnets, such as DHCPv6 stateless ones. In that case, the
consumer of the driver will generate the address and then to the
Hi,
I've seen messages in the logs telling that we should move to the
identity_uri.
I don't really like the identity_uri which contains all of the
information in a single directive, which means that a script that would
edit it would need a lot more parsing work than simply a key/value pair
Hi, Ronen,
I don't know how to edit
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-replication-redoc and add some comments
in email.
1. We may add asynchronized and synchronized type for replication.
2. We may add CG for replication
3. We may add to initialize connection for
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-02-14 16:48:01 -0800:
Hi,
I've seen messages in the logs telling that we should move to the
identity_uri.
I don't really like the identity_uri which contains all of the
information in a single directive, which means that a script that would
Does anybody know if a) ATC emails have started to go out yet, and b)
when proposal voting will start?
Thanks
--- Nick
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
I've got my ATC mail and registration code. No idea about proposal voting.
-amrith
| -Original Message-
| From: Nick Chase [mailto:nch...@mirantis.com]
| Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2015 9:11 PM
| To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
| Subject: [openstack-dev] Summit Voting and ATC
Hi All,
Currently we [Fuel UI team] are planning the features of *sorting and
filtering of node list *to introduce it in 6.1 release.
Now user can filter nodes just by it's name or MAC address and no sorters
are available. It's rather poor UI for managing 200+ nodes environment. So,
the current
This is a follow-up to the discussion at the 12 February API-WG meeting
[1] concerning functional API in Glance [2]. We made some progress, but
need to close this off so the spec can be implemented in Kilo.
I believe this is where we left off:
1. The general consensus was that POST is the
On February 14, 2015 at 5:59:13 PM, Clint Byrum (cl...@fewbar.com) wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-02-14 16:48:01 -0800:
Hi,
I've seen messages in the logs telling that we should move to the
identity_uri.
I don't really like the identity_uri which contains
On February 14, 2015 at 9:53:14 PM, Adam Young (ayo...@redhat.com) wrote:
On 02/13/2015 04:19 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
On February 13, 2015 at 11:51:10 AM, Lance Bragstad (lbrags...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hello all,
I'm proposing the Authenticated Encryption (AE) Token specification [1] as an
On 02/13/2015 04:19 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
On February 13, 2015 at 11:51:10 AM, Lance Bragstad
(lbrags...@gmail.com mailto:lbrags...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hello all,
I'm proposing the Authenticated Encryption (AE) Token specification
[1] as an SPFE. AE tokens increases scalability of
23 matches
Mail list logo
