Excerpts from Andreas Jaeger's message of 2015-03-23 13:16:05 +0100:
The translation jobs [1] are failing since a requirements job merged [2]
with:
error in setup command: 'install_requires' must be a string or list
of strings containing valid project/version requirement specifiers
Mike,
Did not see a response to this request. Please respond, we can discuss in the
Cinder Core meeting this week.
-Original Message-
From: ClaytonLuce, Timothy [mailto:timothy.claytonl...@netapp.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 5:27 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
Excerpts from Li Ma's message of 2015-03-23 18:23:39 +0800:
Hi all,
During previous threads discussing about zeromq driver, a subgroup may
be necessary to exchange knowledge and improve efficiency of
communication and development. In this subgroup, we can schedule a
given topic or just
Timothy
You are very welcome to add it to the meeting agenda if you feel it should
be discussed - the agenda is open and managed on the wiki.
On 23 March 2015 at 15:15, ClaytonLuce, Timothy
timothy.claytonl...@netapp.com wrote:
Mike,
Did not see a response to this request. Please respond,
Hello!
I was wondering how it is possible to use an external Key Management
Server with Barbican? I have configured the barbican-api.conf file for
the KMIP Plugin and also set enabled_crypto_plugins to
kmip_plugin, but it says CryptoPluginNotFound
Any help is appreciated! Thank you :)
--
We’re cancelling today’s meeting since some key members won’t present.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
The translation jobs [1] are failing since a requirements job merged [2]
with:
error in setup command: 'install_requires' must be a string or list
of strings containing valid project/version requirement specifiers
requirements.txt now contains oslo.policy~=0.3.1 # Apache-2.0.
Is this
On 03/21/2015 01:21 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:
Hi,
I've recently been playing around a bit with API microversions and I
noticed something that may be problematic.
The way microversions are handled, there is a monotonically increasing
MAX_API_VERSION value in
Hello everyone,
There is regarding the following bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1373359
May I know what is the significance of having the '*udp_port'* field in the
*'ml2_vxlan_endpoints*' table in Neutron DB, Do we have any plans in
future that we could use this field for
On 3/22/15, 8:05 PM, Ian Wells
ijw.ubu...@cack.org.ukmailto:ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote:
Seems to me that an address pool corresponds to a network area that you can
route across (because routing only works over a network with unique addresses
and that's what an address pool does for you).
Comments inline.
Salvatore
On 23 March 2015 at 15:41, John Belamaric jbelama...@infoblox.com wrote:
On 3/20/15, 8:31 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote:
As the IPAM driver is called in NeutronDbPluginV2, this call happens
while another transaction is typically in
On 3/23/15, 11:03 AM, Salvatore Orlando
sorla...@nicira.commailto:sorla...@nicira.com wrote:
Whether is a big deal or a failure it depends on one's expectation. If the
expectation is to enable external IPAM backends, then I agree that this is not
a big deal.
However, my expectation (and I
Looking at project Calico, I don’t know if what they do is similar to what the
people from
triple-o ironic do with the neutron-dhcp-agent. I believe we should ask them
before deprecation.
I added their tags to the subject.
AFAIK TripleO/Ironic was patching neutron-dhcp-agent too.
For
Hi-
The Issue is resolved. Its an update to the NEW IP address of Gerrit.
--
Trinath Somanchi - B39208
trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048
-Original Message-
From: trinath.soman...@freescale.com [mailto:trinath.soman...@freescale.com]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 11:57 AM
To:
On 21 March 2015 at 18:12, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 03/21/2015 01:21 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:
Hi,
I've recently been playing around a bit with API microversions and I
noticed something that may be
On 03/21/2015 12:12 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
mailto:mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 03/21/2015 01:21 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:
Hi,
I've recently been playing around a bit with API microversions and I
noticed
All vendors working on cinder third party ci are encouraged to attend the 3rd
party ci meetings.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty
This is a great place to ask questions, report issues, and share solutions.
Ramy
On 3/20/15, 8:31 PM, Salvatore Orlando
sorla...@nicira.commailto:sorla...@nicira.com wrote:
As the IPAM driver is called in NeutronDbPluginV2, this call happens while
another transaction is typically in progress. Initiating a separate session
within the IPAM driver causes the outer
Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
[...]
This is one of the benefits/caveats of having a single dev mailing list.
There is lots of noise for everyone, but this particular noise is one of
those I think we should not get rid of.
One area where we could work to remove noise would be to move new core
On 03/23/2015 10:47 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
[...]
This is one of the benefits/caveats of having a single dev mailing list.
There is lots of noise for everyone, but this particular noise is one of
those I think we should not get rid of.
One area where we could work
On 3/21/15, 9:10 AM, Salvatore Orlando
sorla...@nicira.commailto:sorla...@nicira.com wrote:
If we feel a need for specifying the relative position of gateway address and
allocation pools when creating a subnet from a pool which will pick a CIDR from
its prefixes, then the integer value
Hi romil,
I think the main purpose of this DB field is to maintain the compatibility
in dataplane between OVS and LinuxBridge which, by default, don't use the
same UDP port for VXLAN.
It might be useful for a cloud admin which wants to run some nodes with LB
and some others with OVS.
I feel like
From: Madhuri Rai madhuri.ra...@gmail.commailto:madhuri.ra...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Monday, March 23, 2015 at 1:53 AM
To:
I request the same consideration for Huawei 18000 iSCSI driver and 18000 FC
driver. May I also add it to the meeting agenda?
· I promise Huawei Volume CI will become stable and reporting stably
before March 31. Our CI will be moved to a more better environment
tomorrowapp:ds:tomorrow
On 03/23/2015 02:12 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Andreas Jaeger's message of 2015-03-23 13:16:05 +0100:
The translation jobs [1] are failing since a requirements job merged [2]
with:
error in setup command: 'install_requires' must be a string or list
of strings containing valid
Yes this sounds interesting too. In fact the geo diverse failover mentioned in
the “copper” proposal can easily be considered as an extension global DNS
namespace that I am talking about.
Lets see if we get any response from openstack-dev mailer.
Regards,Anik
From: joehuang
I am really sorry it got in as I have -1ed it several times for the same
reason (I _really_ hate using the -2 hammer - we're all adults here
after all).
I guess that I should take some blame as a reviewer on that patch, but
only after this mail do I read some of your comments as fundamentally
On 3/18/15, 9:12 PM, Sean M. Collins s...@coreitpro.com wrote:
My hope is that either the new IPAM subsystem for subnet allocations
would provide this, or that a small API extension could paper over some
of the sharper edges.
In IPAM we have added this concept of a subnet request. The
Hi Madhuri,
Amazing work! I wouldn't concern the code duplication and modularity issue
since the codes are generated. However, there is another concern here: if
we find a bug/improvement of the generated code, we probably need to modify
the generator. The question is if the upstream will accept
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 05:05:17PM -0700, Ian Wells wrote:
On 22 March 2015 at 07:48, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/20/2015 05:16 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
To clarify a bit, we obviously divide lots of things by tenant (quotas,
network listing, etc). The difference is that we
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 04:58:00PM +, Moshe Levi wrote:
Hi,
In the latest master nova code I am keep getting this error An object of
type PciDevicePoolList is required here
My nova.conf contains pci_passthrough_whitelist.
When I tried to launch vm after devstack installation the
Hi Chen,
1. resize the master node. Using command like “nova resize”, to add
more cpu memory and other resources for this single instance.
Instance reside is not supported on Sahara level. But you can always do
that on nova level. Sahara doesn't use any specific information about
flavor
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:18:28AM +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
All the VM information is stored in the instances table.
This includes all the time related field like scheduled_at, launched_at etc.
After upgrading to Juno, I have noticed that my 'scheduled_at' field
is not getting
I think that moving the discussion in whether a pool represents a tenant's
routable address space, or whether we need a new (another?!) API entity do
deal with it probably does not really fall within the scope of this thread.
I am pretty sure Carl will soon push a specification for address scope
A quick reminder for Glance cores to check if the 'Author' changes
between patch sets.
When someone other than the original submitter uploads a new patch set
they should, if appropriate, add themselves as a co-author rather than
replace the original patch author. (It's the 'Author' rather than
Hi-
I get this error from my CI Zuul debug Log.
2015-03-23 12:16:45,618 ERROR gerrit.GerritWatcher: Exception on ssh event
stream:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/zuul/lib/gerrit.py, line 64, in
_run
key_filename=self.keyfile)
File
On 03/23/2015 09:00 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:18:28AM +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
All the VM information is stored in the instances table.
This includes all the time related field like scheduled_at, launched_at etc.
After upgrading to Juno, I have noticed that my
Meeting on #openstack-meeting at 1500 UTC (9:00AM MDT)
1) Patch status -
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-nova-priorities-tracking
2) Vancouver design summit - start thinking about what we want to discuss
--
Don Dugger
Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale
Ph:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:52:14PM +1030, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015 16:14:21 -0400
Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 03/09/2015 03:37 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 03/08/2015 08:10 AM, Alex Xu wrote:
Gary pinged me on IRC earlier today and I missed him, so I’m sending this to
the list in case someone else wants to volunteer.
It sounds like there are some stable branch changes for oslo.vmware that need
attention. Does someone on the oslo.vmware team want to volunteer to be on a
Will do,
And of course, the more reviews the better (and I'm grateful for those
that have put in some time; in there busy day lives to make it possible).
Keep it up as it's always appreciated :)
-Josh
Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-03-23 10:40:09 -0700:
On 2015-03-23 15:15:18 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote:
[...]
I don't want it suppressed. I want the use of API extensions and the
extension framework(s) to be completely dropped for all future
API-affecting work.
[...]
Perhaps controversial, but would it be worthwhile to propose to the
Defcore
From: Hongbin Lu hongbin...@gmail.commailto:hongbin...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Monday, March 23, 2015 at 8:37 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
Excerpts from Russell Bryant's message of 2015-03-23 07:51:43 -0700:
On 03/23/2015 10:47 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
[...]
This is one of the benefits/caveats of having a single dev mailing list.
There is lots of noise for everyone, but this particular noise is one of
On 13:15 Mon 23 Mar , ClaytonLuce, Timothy wrote:
Mike,
Did not see a response to this request. Please respond, we can discuss in
the Cinder Core meeting this week.
Which request? I already responded to your message:
On Mar 23, 2015, at 9:05 AM, Steven Dake (stdake)
std...@cisco.commailto:std...@cisco.com wrote:
From: Hongbin Lu hongbin...@gmail.commailto:hongbin...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:52:14PM +1030, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015 16:14:21 -0400
Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 03/09/2015 03:37 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 03/08/2015 08:10 AM, Alex Xu wrote:
Thanks for Jay point this out! If we have agreement on this and
Following discussion on IRC, a patch is now up to add this config option.
Reviews appreciated.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166973/
Cheers,
John
On 23/03/2015 18:11, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:04 PM, John Davidge (jodavidg)
jodav...@cisco.com
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
One area where we could work to remove noise would be to move new core
reviewers nomination/suggestion threads out of the ML. They are mostly
useless IMHO (only +1s), and PTLs are empowered to make the call anyway.
Sorry for the delay in responding all. Comments inline.
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 03:04:59PM -0700, melanie witt wrote:
On Mar 9, 2015, at 13:14, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
So possibly another way to think about this is our prior signaling of
what was supported by Nova was signaled by
On 03/23/2015 03:59 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 11:43 -0700, Mike Perez wrote:
We've been talking about CI's for a year. We started talking about CI
deadlines
in August. If you post a driver for Kilo, it was communicated that you're
required to have a CI by the end of
Please direct this query to documentation and i18n lists [1, 2, 3] and include
the response (if any) as a comment on the review so that the core reviewers are
aware.
Thanks for bringing this up and helping in contributing to the project!
[1]
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 11:43 -0700, Mike Perez wrote:
We've been talking about CI's for a year. We started talking about CI
deadlines
in August. If you post a driver for Kilo, it was communicated that you're
required to have a CI by the end of Kilo [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. This
should've
I think there are valid reasons to not use namespaces:
* Fewer moving parts == less can potentialy fail
* Troubleshooting is easier due to less places to look / need no
familiarity with namespaces tools
* If I remember correctly setting up a namespace can get really slow when
you
Hi, Anik,
Interesting idea. The use case is quite useful. One project called “Copper” in
OPNFV also mentioned a similar use case “Geo-Diverse Load-Balanced Service
Instance Deployment” here : https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases
Designate may help “Geo-Diverse Load-Balanced Service
+1 for deprecation if people don’t have use cases / good reasons to keep it, I
don’t know
and I can’t think of any, but that doesn’t mean they don’t exist.
Miguel Ángel Ajo
On Monday, 23 de March de 2015 at 2:34, shihanzhang wrote:
+1 to deprecate this option
At 2015-03-21
Are the setups out there *not* using the use_namespaces option? I'm
curious as
to why, and if it would be difficult to migrate such a setup to use
namespaces.
At my previous employer we did not use namespaces.
This was due to a installation a few years ago on SL6 which did not have name
On Monday, 23 de March de 2015 at 8:20, Van Leeuwen, Robert wrote:
Are the setups out there *not* using the use_namespaces option? I'm
curious as
to why, and if it would be difficult to migrate such a setup to use
namespaces.
At my previous employer we did not use
Hi all:
I deploy my OpenStack with VMware driver, one nova-compute connect to
VMware deployment,
there are about 3000 VMs in VMware deployment. I use mysql. The method
of InstanceList.get_by_host
rasie rpc timeout error when ComputeManager.init_host() and
_sync_power_states periodic
Hi all,
I was wondering if there was a neat way to override the settings file
present in the devstack plugin stackforge project.
For eg: stackforge/devstack-plugin-glusterfs
I plan to use `enable_plugin glusterfs repo` in my local to setup
GlusterFS backend for openstack
But I am forced to
Hi,
I want to setup controller-compute-storage multi node setup, could anyone
explain how to configure local.conf file for devstack for storage node(cinder)
Thanks and Regards,
Raghavendrachari kamsali
__
OpenStack
Hi All,
This is to have a discussion on the blueprint for implementing
python-k8client for magnum.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/magnum/+spec/python-k8sclient
I have committed the code generated by swagger-codegen at
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166720/.
But I feel the quality of the
Hi,
In one of the Ironic IRC meetings, a discussion on whether to retain the
‘Chassis’ element in Ironic or not came up.
I am interested to know whether this is still valid and a decision is to be
made on whether the component is retained or not.
Even tho the Chassis resource in our API is
Hi all,
During previous threads discussing about zeromq driver, a subgroup may
be necessary to exchange knowledge and improve efficiency of
communication and development. In this subgroup, we can schedule a
given topic or just discuss some re-factoring stuff or bugs in irc
room at a fixed time.
Hi, Anik,
Interesting idea. The use case is quite useful. One project called “Copper” in
OPNFV also mentioned a similar use case here :
https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases
“a single (flat) external domain name space for floating IPs” could be the
first step, multiple external domains may
I see you point Van,
In the other hand, removing it, cleans up lot of conditional code parts (moving
parts at the other side),
and also the non-netns case is not tested by upstream CI, AFAIK, so it could be
broken anytime
and we would not notice it.
Miguel Ángel Ajo
On Monday, 23 de March
Please see
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2015-February/002425.h
tml
That should explain.
On 3/23/15, 8:53 AM, trinath.soman...@freescale.com
trinath.soman...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi-
The Issue is resolved. Its an update to the NEW IP address of Gerrit.
--
Trinath
On 03/23/2015 05:21 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 16:23 -0400, Anita Kuno wrote:
Some folks just will not respect other people's time. To pretend
otherwise is a huge dis-service to folks trying their hardest to
support those worthy of the support.
This may be true in
Hi,
I'd like to propose (and implement) a feature for Liberty that would allow
configuration of the pinning of the emulator when CPU pinning is enabled.
(Currently the emulator is affined to the logical OR of all pCPUs used by the
instance.)
The general idea is to add an optional flavor
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-03-23 10:40:09 -0700:
Greetings all stackers,
I propose that we add Min Pae[1] to the taskflow-core team[2].
Min has been actively contributing to taskflow for a while now, both in
helping prove taskflow out (by being a user via the project
I’ll take that as a prod to step up on my review contributions, and
definitely will be doing so ;-)
Thank you for the vote of confidence, I’m glad to be helping with what I
think will be an essential part of the underlying software infrastructure
for Openstack services.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at
Excerpts from Walter A. Boring IV's message of 2015-03-23 13:49:48 -0700:
Maybe we can leverage Cinder's use of the abc in the drivers.py now.
We could create an OptionsVD that drivers would add and implement. The
config generator could inspect objects looking for OptionsVD and then
call
On 03/23/2015 01:50 PM, Mike Perez wrote:
On 12:59 Mon 23 Mar , Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 11:43 -0700, Mike Perez wrote:
We've been talking about CI's for a year. We started talking about CI deadlines
in August. If you post a driver for Kilo, it was communicated that
I'm not 100% sure if this would be trivial or not, but the process to
find out isn't scary. We should add this to a nova meeting agenda on
the wiki and talk through it during a meeting.
(Noting that we're not approving specs for liberty in any form until
the Kilo branch is cut, so we have some
I’d like to suggest that the myriad wiki pages and spreadsheets for Third Party
CI also be consolidated to a more manageable count. Just looking for
maintainers contact, you can find information (often conflicting) in
Stackalytics, on the ThirdPartyDrivers page, on the Cinder PTL’s google doc
On 03/23/2015 05:51 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote:
I’d like to suggest that the myriad wiki pages and spreadsheets for Third
Party CI also be consolidated to a more manageable count. Just looking for
maintainers contact, you can find information (often conflicting) in
Stackalytics, on the
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2015-03-23 15:15:18 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote:
[...]
I don't want it suppressed. I want the use of API extensions and the
extension framework(s) to be completely dropped for all future
API-affecting work.
On 12:59 Mon 23 Mar , Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 11:43 -0700, Mike Perez wrote:
We've been talking about CI's for a year. We started talking about CI
deadlines
in August. If you post a driver for Kilo, it was communicated that you're
required to have a CI by the
Maybe we can leverage Cinder's use of the abc in the drivers.py now.
We could create an OptionsVD that drivers would add and implement. The
config generator could inspect objects looking for OptionsVD and then
call list_opts() on it. That way, driver maintainers don't also have
to patch
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 16:23 -0400, Anita Kuno wrote:
Some folks just will not respect other people's time. To pretend
otherwise is a huge dis-service to folks trying their hardest to
support those worthy of the support.
This may be true in general but I have yet to be convinced that this is
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org
wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 11:43 -0700, Mike Perez wrote:
We've been talking about CI's for a year. We started talking about CI
deadlines
in August. If you post a driver for Kilo, it was communicated that you're
+1 from me.
-- dims
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-03-23 10:40:09 -0700:
Greetings all stackers,
I propose that we add Min Pae[1] to the taskflow-core team[2].
Min has been actively contributing to
I'd like to request an exemption for the following to go into the Kilo
release.
This work is crucial for:
- Keystone to Keystone communication. An ECP wrapped SAML assertion will
make it much easier for consumers and clients to use the K2K feature in
Keystone. Currently, a client must take
Hello Cinder team,
Oracle ZFSSA CI has been reporting since March 20th. Below is a link to
the list of results the CI already posted:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z
Our CI system will be running and reporting results from now on, hence I
kindly request
How would you represent that you want the last address in a /26 network if
you don't know what address range you are getting? 0.0.0.63? That seems
pretty confusing when the resulting address turns out to be 192.168.10.191.
It isn't a new concept to think about the network and host parts of an IP
Hi Vijay,
That works because we pin the version of tempest that we run against, via
tox. If you're using devstack-gate in your CI, note the two hooks found
here:
https://github.com/openstack/neutron-lbaas/blob/master/neutron_lbaas/tests/contrib/
If not, you need to mimic the behavior of the
Hi all,
Lbaas meetings are canceled until further notice, including tomorrow
morning.
Thanks,
doug
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Brandon Logan brandon.lo...@rackspace.com
wrote:
That is correct.
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 15:11 +, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote:
+1 For on demand
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:56 AM, John Belamaric jbelama...@infoblox.com wrote:
On 3/22/15, 8:05 PM, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote:
Seems to me that an address pool corresponds to a network area that you can
route across (because routing only works over a network with unique
Hello,
I have submitted a patch to address the
bug(https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1414725).
This patch updates glance-manage documentation. Currently the documentation
misses details
on handling the glance-manage metadata definitions. I have submitted
I disagree with your assertion that NetApp has ignored this for a year and we
are being inconsiderate of the community. The specific drivers (FC) we are
discussing were added in the Kilo-1 period, so since Dec. and are net new
drivers. All other NetApp drivers have had corresponding CI in
On 2015-03-23 15:52:35 + (+), stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote:
A quick reminder for Glance cores to check if the 'Author' changes
between patch sets.
[...]
Also a quick reminder to all devs. If you stick to git commands for
manipulating commits then it should be _very_hard_ to accidentally
Looks good, a couple of things:
Is there a reason that the nodes near to top didn't render in the role group?
Can you render a message like deployment failure, or deployment success?
Can you render the networks or settings page?
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Vitaly Kramskikh
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:04 PM, John Davidge (jodavidg)
jodav...@cisco.com wrote:
The above blueprint outlines an admin-configurable global default pool to
be used in the case of a user calling subnet-create without specifying a
CIDR or subnet-pool ID. If the OpenStack environment has been
Hi everyone,
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is having our next weekly
meeting on Tuesday March 24th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting
Meeting agenda available here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is
welcome to to add agenda items)
Everyone
Jay,
Thanks for the response.
Here is the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1435483
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 5:46 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:52 AM, John Belamaric jbelama...@infoblox.com wrote:
On 3/21/15, 9:10 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote:
If we feel a need for specifying the relative position of gateway address
and allocation pools when creating a subnet from a pool which will pick a
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote:
I think the goal of subnet pools is to use these environments as units of
isolations and ensure no overlapping CIDRs there. However, since there is
no way to identify such environments at the API layers, API clients
Greetings all stackers,
I propose that we add Min Pae[1] to the taskflow-core team[2].
Min has been actively contributing to taskflow for a while now, both in
helping prove taskflow out (by being a user via the project that he is
using it in @ https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cue) and helping
Going forward, I think the best approach for PD would be to align with the
subnet-pools being added by the subnet allocation BP work (thanks to Sean
for bringing this to our attention again).
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/kilo/subnet-alloca
tion.html#rest-api-impact
There is no reason, just a markup demo.
Added a sample deployment failure message to the nodes page.
As for settings or networks page, they should look pretty much the same and
most likely we won't create a markup demo for these pages as they are
mostly built from standard controls.
2015-03-23
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
