On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote:
Actually, I don't see this as a big deal or a failure. In fact, it may be
quite common and useful for a given driver to store some state in its own
tables (like the reference driver is doing). The primary goal is to
Hi,
Following is the subteam report for Ironic. Note that this is pulled from
the weekly meeting we just had. (Normally it comes from the Ironic
whiteboard[0], but the whiteboard seems to have been whitened out.)
Testing (adam_g)
==
working on testing the API microversioning within
Hi,
We're working on migrating Fuel UI from Bootstrap 2 to Bootstrap 3 and
changing the design. It's mostly upgrade of styles and markup, but we also
plan to implement some changes which are frequently requested (like making
action buttons always available on top of the page). Here is markup for
+1
Congrats Min!
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com
wrote:
Greetings all stackers,
I propose that we add Min Pae[1] to the taskflow-core team[2].
Min has been actively contributing to taskflow for a while now, both in
helping prove taskflow out (by being
An integer index doesn't do it for me. Maybe I'm the only one.
It is part of an IP address. It isn't a new concept to think about
the network and host parts of an IP address separately. Why would we
change the notation from dotted quad (ipv4) to integer just because we
mask out the network
On 17:23 Mon 23 Mar , ClaytonLuce, Timothy wrote:
I disagree with your assertion that NetApp has ignored this for a year and we
are being inconsiderate of the community. The specific drivers (FC) we are
discussing were added in the Kilo-1 period, so since Dec. and are net new
drivers.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:22:50PM +0100, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
With the API tests being now available in the neutron repository - and
being actively developed, I would also mandate in reviews that API tests
are provided in lieu of the usual unit tests which at the end of the day do
what
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Sean M. Collins s...@coreitpro.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 06:45:59AM PDT, John Davidge (jodavidg) wrote:
In the IPv6 meeting yesterday you mentioned doing this
with an extension rather than modifying the core API. Could you go into
some detail about how
Hi,
My apologies for the short notice, but I will not be able to run the
IPv6 subteam meeting tomorrow. If one of the attendees who has items to
discuss would like to run the meeting in my absence, that would be
great!
--
Sean M. Collins
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote:
How would you represent that you want the last address in a /26 network if
you don't know what address range you are getting? 0.0.0.63? That seems
pretty confusing when the resulting address turns out to be 192.168.10.191.
I don't think they would be surprised if we call it offset or index.
To me, 0.0.0.63 didn't say that I'd get something ending in .63.
Perhaps this is just a difference in backgrounds then. Even though I'm work
on network stuff all of the time, when I see that it's not obvious that it
will be
Note to community,
The various patches needed to enable the fedora-21-atomic-2 image with k8s
v0.11 are merged after multiple functional tests.
You will need to rebuild your devstack environment with a fresh pull if
you are developing Magnum.
Enjoy :)
On 3/22/15, 8:10 AM, Adrian Otto
I just think that we might bury this discussion considering what Carl said,
and that I agree with.
So far we don't even know if we'll ever need this feature. When a concrete
use case will come for asking things like: gimme a /22 Ipv4 network and
make sure I have a pool spanning from the 1st to the
On 21:51 Mon 23 Mar , Rochelle Grober wrote:
I’d like to suggest that the myriad wiki pages and spreadsheets for Third
Party CI also be consolidated to a more manageable count. Just looking for
maintainers contact, you can find information (often conflicting) in
Stackalytics, on the
Neutron cores,
I have submitted the change [1] which is related to the thread [2]
in January.
Unfortunately it did not attract the interest of many core reviewers,
and only time has passed.
Now it is pointed that it may need FFE/SSE, and the opinion of the
core is a bit divided about
As an Engineer running the NetApp CI, I thought it would be a good time to
chime in here. While I have many opinions around this whole process, I will
try my best to avoid any judgement and minimize ratholes.
Over the past year, we have implemented a scalable CI system that is now
running tests
Hi Steven,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com
wrote:
From: Madhuri Rai madhuri.ra...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Monday, March 23, 2015 at 1:53 AM
To:
Hi Hongbin,
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Hongbin Lu hongbin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Madhuri,
Amazing work! I wouldn't concern the code duplication and modularity issue
since the codes are generated. However, there is another concern here: if
we find a bug/improvement of the generated
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 09:35:50PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-03-23 15:15:18 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote:
[...]
I don't want it suppressed. I want the use of API extensions and the
extension framework(s) to be completely dropped for all future
API-affecting work.
[...]
Hi Andrew.
Thanks for response. My reply in line.
From: Andrew Lazarev [mailto:alaza...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 12:10 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] About Sahara EDP New Ideas for Liberty
Hi Weiting,
1. Add
On 03/23/2015 09:20 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering if there was a neat way to override the settings file
present in the devstack plugin stackforge project.
For eg: stackforge/devstack-plugin-glusterfs
I plan to use `enable_plugin glusterfs repo` in my local to setup
On 2015-03-21 02:57, Assaf Muller wrote:
Hello everyone,
The use_namespaces option in the L3 and DHCP Neutron agents controls if you
can create multiple routers and DHCP networks managed by a single L3/DHCP agent,
or if the agent manages only a single resource.
Are the setups out there *not*
2015-03-21 23:31 GMT+08:00 Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com:
I would vote that we not make this pleasant or easy for vendors who are
wanting to add a feature to the API. As a person who uses several clouds
daily, I can tell you that a vendor chosing to do that is VERY mean to
users, and
On 03/23/2015 03:28 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
We are not stopping vendor specific API endpoints, that appear
separately in the keystone catalog. Certainly, thats where I hope
things that would never go upstream will move to.
How would that be expected to work for things where it's fundamentally
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Ian Wienand iwien...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/23/2015 09:20 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering if there was a neat way to override the settings file
present in the devstack plugin stackforge project.
For eg:
101 - 125 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
