Infrastructure status update:
stable/6.1 branch has been created in following repositories:
fuel-astute
fuel-docs
fuel-library
fuel-main
fuel-ostf
fuel-qa
fuel-web
Master branch in these repositories is unblocked. Please, note that
there is ongoing work to change all the defaults
We originally created https://launchpad.net/murano-applications, and I
misspelled address in my first e-mail, but after I was pointed out to
the mistake I've decided to create new project with URL
https://launchpad.net/murano-apps that correspond to the repository
name.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Paul Carver pcar...@paulcarver.us wrote:
What is the status of the flavor framework? Is this the right spec?
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/neutron-flavor-framework
Yes, that's the correct spec. The status is that we've committed to
delivering
I’ve looked into several OS projects, and they first seen to implement py3
support and create a job later. (Except for heat. They already have a
non-voting py34, which seem to fail every time =))
I suggest we do the same: first make murano work on py34, then make a py34 job.
I’ll file a
Hi folks,
I will be presenting Magnum at the Cisco Live US event in San Diego and demoing
both Kolla and Magnum with Daneyon Hansen at CLUS in demo pods in the devnet
section. If you will be at Cisco Live, feel free to drop by the demo pods to
see demos of both Kolla and Magnum or attend our
Any help, ideas please?
Thx,
Dani
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com wrote:
+ Operators
Much thanks in advance,
Dani
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running IceHouse (build using Fuel 5.1.1) on
On 04/06/15 22:54, Thomas Goirand wrote:
The init scripts used to be hard to maintain because they were many, but
since Debian Ubuntu are using automatic generation out of a tiny
template (with sysv-rc, systemd and upstart all supported), this is a
problem solved.
Ooh, that sounds like
Hi,
I'm the packager of Openstack on Gentoo and have just started generation
of Gentoo Openstack images. Right now it is just a basic amd64 image,
but I plan on adding nomultilib and hardened variants (for a total of at
least 4 images). I plan on generating these images at least weekly
These
You have better chances of getting an answer if you asked the -dev list
and add [Neutron] to the subject (done here).
That said, can you tell us a bit more about your deployment? You can
also hop
on #openstack-neutron on Freenode to look for neutron developers who
can help
you more
Hey everyone,
I drew up a blueprint
(https://blueprints.launchpad.net/bandit/+spec/use-threading-when-running-c
hecks) to add the ability to use multiprocessing (or threading) to Bandit.
This essentially means that each thread will be fed a file and analyze
it and return the results. (A file will
On 2015-06-07 10:55:29 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote:
How do you gpg sign these tags? I hope the solution isn't to store
a key in infra without a passphrase.
How does, e.g., Debian sign its Release file for
jessie-proposed-updates? I hope the solution isn't to store the
ftp-master
On 2015-06-08 00:25:47 +0200 (+0200), Alan Pevec wrote:
BTW there's an issue re. verification that
https://tarballs.openstack.org/ is using cert for
security.openstack.org but should be easily fixed by infra.
Uh, nope. Try again. You're redirected to security.openstack.org if
you accept that
We tested testing Kilo upgrades in our hardware dev environments last week
and the second time through ran into this bug which right now is probably a
show-stopper for us.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1419823
The issue here is that the v1 Glance API allows you to create images with
On 2015-06-08 10:54:32 +1200 (+1200), Robert Collins wrote:
On 8 June 2015 at 10:14, Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-06-06 19:08 GMT+02:00 Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com:
Not exactly. PBR/OpenStack follow SemVer and 2015.1.0.38 isn't valid
SemVer (http://semver.org/)
On 2015-06-08 13:29:50 +1200 (+1200), Robert Collins wrote:
[...]
However, we are going to move from test-requirements.txt to setup.cfg
eventually, but thats a separate transition - and one could still use
test-requirements.txt there to provide git references.
Except please don't. If you put a
On 2015-06-08 16:53:21 +0100 (+0100), Dave Walker wrote:
This breaks the desire of wanting to have a shared version scheme if
consumers add their own local patches via git. This works fine for
consumers that do not use git for handling their local patches, but
does not support the model of
On Jun 8, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2015-06-08 13:29:50 +1200 (+1200), Robert Collins wrote:
[...]
However, we are going to move from test-requirements.txt to setup.cfg
eventually, but thats a separate transition - and one could still use
On 06/08/2015 10:26 AM, James Page wrote:
The Ubuntu packaging is used widely by end-users and a number of other
projects including the OpenStack Puppet and Chef modules as well as
the Juju charms for OpenStack - any changes to structure and behaviour
are going to have much wider impact and
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 1:59 AM Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com wrote:
jshint: still non-free license [1]
Yep! Ergo, we can't really use it.
eslint seems to require to sign a CLA, if we come across an issue and
were going to fix that.
So does the python foundation, I'm not really
On 8 June 2015 at 16:48, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2015-06-08 10:54:32 +1200 (+1200), Robert Collins wrote:
On 8 June 2015 at 10:14, Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-06-06 19:08 GMT+02:00 Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com:
Not exactly. PBR/OpenStack follow
On 06/08/2015 08:32 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
The control files (specs, deb) are indeed different, the question is
what they can share.
I see collaboration possibilities on package names and layout - like how
to split a package up -, configuration files, defaults... This doesn't
need to be
On 06/08/2015 05:29 PM, Neil Jerram wrote:
On 04/06/15 22:54, Thomas Goirand wrote:
The init scripts used to be hard to maintain because they were many, but
since Debian Ubuntu are using automatic generation out of a tiny
template (with sysv-rc, systemd and upstart all supported), this is a
Interesting work,
I guess my initial thought would be - does it need to be faster?
Will this work make maintenance and the addition of features more
difficult?
-Rob
On 08/06/2015 08:26, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hey everyone,
I drew up a blueprint
On 06/07/2015 04:22 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 6 June 2015 at 13:08, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote:
So the problem is with how we use ResponseSerializer and the ChunkedFile
(https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/glance/tree/glance/api/v2/image_d
ata.py#n222). I think the
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 08:50:17PM EDT, Hirofumi Ichihara wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. Do you think that there are cases where
the value for PHYSICAL_NETWORK and PUBLIC_PHYSICAL_NETWORK will be
different?
No, I cannot find the cases. I think it’s traditional something.
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Yanis Guenane yguen...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/03/2015 02:32 PM, Martin Mágr wrote:
On 06/02/2015 07:05 PM, Mathieu Gagné wrote:
On 2015-06-02 12:41 PM, Yanis Guenane wrote:
The openstacklib::db::sync[2] is currently only a wrapper around an
exec
Hi Serg,
Thank you for your feedback.
I'll start working on the spec.
Regards,
-
Vahid Hashemian, Ph.D.
Advisory Software Engineer, IBM Cloud Labs
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
