[openstack-dev] [mistral] Team meeting - 06/22/2015

Hi, This is a reminder that we’ll have a team meeting today at 16.00 UTC at #openstack-meeting. Agenda: Review action items Current status (progress, issues, roadblocks, further plans) Liberty-1 status BP: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-explicit-task-parameters

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle]Weekly Team Meeting starting on Wednesday !

Hi Team, Thanks for expressing your interests in Tricircle. The meeting logistics has been approved by the infra team, therefore starting from Wednesday this week, we will have *weekly* irc meetings on #openstack-meeting, from UTC 1300 to UTC 1400, to discuss the whats, whys and hows in Tricircle

Re: [openstack-dev] [cross-project] RBAC Policy Basics

On Saturday, June 20, 2015 11:16 AM, Adam Young wrote: > > What situations does a shared policy file require? > > For example, there are policy files for Nova and Cinder and they have > > same targets such as > > "context_is_admin", "admin_or_owner" and "default". > > A lot of these internal rul

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing YAMAMOTO Takashi for the Control Plane core team

thank you all. On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Edgar Magana wrote: > Congratulations and welcome to the team! > > Edgar > > From: Kevin Benton > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > Date: Thursday, June 18, 2015 at 3:22 PM > To: "OpenStack Development Maili

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Angular dependencies and the hz.dashboard namespace

On 20 June 2015 at 09:11, Thai Q Tran wrote: > -Richard Jones wrote: - > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > From: Richard Jones > Date: 06/19/2015 03:49PM > Subject: [openstack-dev] Angular dependencies and the hz.

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [Nova] [Ironic] [Magnum] Microversion guideline in API-WG

As an aside, do we think that exposing the exact version of a server process is safe from a security perspective? Michael On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Devananda van der Veen wrote: > Almost all of our discussions so far on this topic have left something out, > which Monty pointed out to me

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Modular L2 Agent

During the last couple of ML2 group meetings, the subject of Modular L2 Agents has come up again and I was tasked to bring up the subject to the attention of the larger community. We are aware of the ongoing efforts to improve the L2 agent(s) and the patches which are currently under review and t

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal of nova-hyper driver

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Peng Zhao wrote: >Hi, all, > > I would like to propose nova-hyper driver: > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nova-hyper. > >- What is Hyper? >Put simply, Hyper is a hypervisor-agnostic Docker runtime. It is >similar to Intel’s ClearCont

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ceilometer] proposal to send bulk hypervisor stats data in periodic notifications

On 6/20/2015 3:35 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 01:50:53PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: Waking up from a rare nap opportunity on a Saturday, this is what was bothering me: The proposal in the etherpad assumes that we are just getting bulk host/domain/guest VM stats fro

Re: [openstack-dev] [Sahara] Difference between Sahara and CloudBrak

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Chris Buccella wrote: > I tried (or tried to try) Cloudbreak recently, as I need to deploy a newer > version of HDP than Sahara supports. > > The interface is slick, but lacks the ability to make some choices about > your OpenStack installation. The heat template

Re: [openstack-dev] stackforge projects are not second class citizens

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov < gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com> wrote: > In Murano project we do see a positive impact of BigTent model. Since > Murano was accepted as a part of BigTent community we had a lot of > conversations with potential users. They were driven exactly

Re: [openstack-dev] stackforge projects are not second class citizens

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Adrian Otto wrote: > Joe, > > I must respectfully disagree. The statistics you used to indicate that > Magnum did not benefit from joining the tent are not telling the whole > story. Facts: > Agreed, after looking at the numbers some more, I don't know if i wo

Re: [openstack-dev] stackforge projects are not second class citizens

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 06/15/2015 06:20 AM, Joe Gordon wrote: > >> One of the stated problems the 'big tent' is supposed to solve is: >> >> 'The binary nature of the integrated release results in projects outside >> the integrated release failing to get the recogni

Re: [openstack-dev] stackforge projects are not second class citizens

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: > One of the stated problems the 'big tent' is supposed to solve is: > > 'The binary nature of the integrated release results in projects outside > the integrated release failing to get the recognition they deserve. > "Non-official" projects are

Re: [openstack-dev] Question regarding openstack heat

The cloud admin does not need to access the templates. The end user instantiates them. The end user can use the heat horizon interface or the cli. Anyone can write a template and the end user can reuse them. We're starting to create a catalog of shared templates here: http://apps.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] Question regarding openstack heat

Thanks Divakar Thanks and Regards Swaroop -Original Message- From: Nandavar, Divakar Padiyar Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2015 12:18 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Question regarding openstack heat You need to use https://ask.