Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][doc] Oslo doc sprint 9/24-9/25

Thanks Anita, +1 to switching to the #openstack-sprint channel - i've updated the wiki page -- Dims On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: > On 09/23/2015 07:18 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > Reminder, we are doing the Doc Sprint tomorrow. Please help out with what > > ever item or

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] PTL & Component Leads elections

Dmitry Thank you for the clarification, but my questions still remain unanswered, unfortunately. It seems I did not phrase them correctly. 1) For each of the positions, which set of git repositories should I run this command against? E.g. which stackforge/fuel-* projects contributors are electing

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Fix order of arguments in assertEqual

Hi everyone! I agree that wrong order of arguments misleads while debugging errors, BUT how we can prevent regression? Imo, this is not a good idea to make patches like https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64415/ in each release(without check in CI, such patches are redundant). PS: This question rel

[openstack-dev] [Nova] [Trove] Liberty RC1 available

Hello everyone, Nova and Trove just produced their first release candidate for the end of the Liberty cycle. The RC1 tarballs, as well as a list of last-minute features and fixed bugs since liberty-1 are available at: https://launchpad.net/nova/liberty/liberty-rc1 https://launchpad.net/trove/libe

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Etherpad for Tokyo design summit topics

Hi, I created an etherpad where you can suggest summit topics for Mistral: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mistral-tokyo-summit-2015 Renat Akhmerov @ Mirantis Inc. _

Re: [openstack-dev] Mitaka travel tips ?

On 24/09/15 16:43, Thierry Carrez wrote: David Moreau Simard wrote: There was a travel tips document for the Kilo summit in Paris [1]. Lots of great helpful information in there not covered on the Openstack Summit page [2] like where to get SIM cards and stuff. Is there one for Mitaka yet ? I c

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Fix order of arguments in assertEqual

Hi, There is a bug for this, you can add murano projects to this bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1259292 Thanks, Abhishek Kekane -Original Message- From: Bulat Gaifullin [mailto:bgaiful...@mirantis.com] Sent: 24 September 2015 13:29 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (no

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Fix order of arguments in assertEqual

Hi! Good catch. Have no objections for fixing it right now. Regards, Kate. On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Bulat Gaifullin wrote: > +1 > > > On 24 Sep 2015, at 10:45, Tetiana Lashchova > wrote: > > > > Hi folks! > > > > Some tests in murano code use incorrect order of arguments in > assert

Re: [openstack-dev] Mitaka travel tips ?

David Moreau Simard wrote: > There was a travel tips document for the Kilo summit in Paris [1]. > Lots of great helpful information in there not covered on the Openstack > Summit page [2] like where to get SIM cards and stuff. > > Is there one for Mitaka yet ? I can't find it. There isn't one yet

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] how to handle AZ bug 1496235?

Le 24/09/2015 09:04, Duncan Thomas a écrit : Hi I thought I was late on this thread, but looking at the time stamps, it is just something that escalated very quickly. I am honestly surprised an cross-project interaction option went from 'we don't seem to understand this' to 'deprecation mer

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Fix order of arguments in assertEqual

+1 > On 24 Sep 2015, at 10:45, Tetiana Lashchova wrote: > > Hi folks! > > Some tests in murano code use incorrect order of arguments in assertEqual. > The correct order expected by the testtools is > > def assertEqual(self, expected, observed, message=''): > """Assert that

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][release] 2015.1.2

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 08:47:31PM -0400, Chuck Short wrote: > Hi, > > We would like to do a stable/kilo branch release, next Thursday. In order > to do that I would like to freeze the branches on Friday. Cut some test > tarballs on Tuesday and release on Thursday. Does anyone have an opinnon on >

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] [Designate] Liberty RC1 available

Hello everyone, Cinder and Designate just produced their first release candidate for the end of the Liberty cycle. The RC1 tarballs, as well as a list of last-minute features and fixed bugs since liberty-1 are available at: https://launchpad.net/cinder/liberty/liberty-rc1 https://launchpad.net/de

[openstack-dev] [murano] Fix order of arguments in assertEqual

Hi folks! Some tests in murano code use incorrect order of arguments in assertEqual. The correct order expected by the testtools is def assertEqual(self, expected, observed, message=''): """Assert that 'expected' is equal to 'observed'. :param expected: The expect

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Consistent support for SSL termination proxies across all API services

On Thu, Sep 24 2015, Jamie Lennox wrote: Hi Jamie, > So this is a long thread and i may have missed something in it, > however this exact topic came up as a blocker on a devstack patch to > get TLS testing in the gate with HAproxy. > > The long term solution we had come up with (but granted not p

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] how to handle AZ bug 1496235?

Hi I thought I was late on this thread, but looking at the time stamps, it is just something that escalated very quickly. I am honestly surprised an cross-project interaction option went from 'we don't seem to understand this' to 'deprecation merged' in 4 hours, with only a 12 hour discussion on t

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Cross-Project track topic proposals

On 23/09/15 18:07 -0700, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:45:56AM +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote: Greetings, The community is in the process of collecting topics for the cross-project tack that we'll have in the Mitaka summit. The good ol' OSDREG has been setup[0] to help collect

<    1   2