Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Release of a neutron sub-project

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Vadivel Poonathan < > vadivel.openst...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> As per the Sub-Project Release process - i would like to tag and release >> the following sub-project as part of

Re: [openstack-dev] Infra needs Gerrit developers

I am definitely interested in helping out with this as I feel the pain of gerrit, particularly around text entry... Not a huge fan of Java but might be able to take on some low-hanging fruit once I've had a chance to tackle the JJB 2.0 API. Maybe this is the wrong place to discuss, but is there

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][glance] glance-stable-maint group refresher

Thank you for your confidence in me folks! I I'll be happy to maintain the stability of our project and continue working on its improvements. Best regards, Mike On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > > > On 9/30/15 8:46 AM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote: > > Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][keystone] Choose domain names with 'composite namevar' or 'meaningless name'?

Gilles Dubreuil writes: > On 30/09/15 03:43, Rich Megginson wrote: >> On 09/28/2015 10:18 PM, Gilles Dubreuil wrote: >>> >>> On 15/09/15 19:55, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: Gilles Dubreuil writes: > On 15/09/15 06:53, Rich Megginson wrote: >>

[openstack-dev] [cinder] [Sahara] Block Device Driver updates

Hi team, I know that Block Device Driver (BDD) is not popular in Cinder community. The main issues were: * driver is not good maintained * it doesn't feet minimum features set * there is no CI for it * it's not a Cinder way/it works only when instance and volume are created on the same host *

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] new yaml format for all.yml, need feedback

Also in favor is it lands before Liberty. But I don't want to see a format change straight into Mitaka. Sam Yaple On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > I am in favor of this work if it lands before Liberty. > > Regards > -steve > > > On 9/30/15, 10:54

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] Congress Usecases VM

Hi David, Exactly what Tim mentioned in his email – there are 2 VMs. The VM that I published has a README file in the home directory when you login with the credentials vagrant/vagrant. Looking forward to your feedback. -Shiv From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:t...@styra.com] Sent: Wednesday,

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] new yaml format for all.yml, need feedback

I am in favor of this work if it lands before Liberty. Regards -steve On 9/30/15, 10:54 AM, "Jeff Peeler" wrote: >The patch I just submitted[1] modifies the syntax of all.yml to use >dictionaries, which changes how variables are referenced. The key >point being in

[openstack-dev] [neutron] pypi packages for networking sub-projects

Folks: In trying to release some networking sub-projects recently, I ran into an issue [1] where I couldn't release some projects due to them not being registered on pypi. I have a patch out [2] which adds pypi publishing jobs, but before that can merge, we need to make sure all projects have

Re: [openstack-dev] Announcing Liberty RC1 availability in Debian

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi everyone! > > 1/ Announcement > === > > I'm pleased to announce, in advance of the final Liberty release, that > Liberty RC1 not only has been fully uploaded to Debian Experimental, but > also that the

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Models and validation for v2

Agree with you. That's why I am asking about reasoning. Perhaps, we need to realize how to get rid of this in glanceclient. Best regards, Kairat Kushaev On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 09/30/2015 09:31 AM, Kairat Kushaev wrote: > >> Hi All, >> In

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container?

Russell, Are any additional options fields used in geneve between hypervisors at this time? If so, how do they translate to vxlan when it hits gw? For instance, I am interested to see if we can translate a custom header info in vxlan to geneve headers and vice-versa. And if there are flow

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] The Absurdity of the Milestone-1 Deadline for Drivers

On 09/30/2015 12:11 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 13:29 Sep 28, Ben Swartzlander wrote: I've always thought it was a bit strange to require new drivers to merge by milestone 1. I think I understand the motivations of the policy. The main motivation was to free up reviewers to review "other things"

Re: [openstack-dev] [election][TC] TC Candidacy

Mike - Congrats on your new position! Looking forward to working with you. Carol -Original Message- From: Mike Perez [mailto:thin...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 1:55 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [election][TC] TC Candidacy Hi all!

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Steve Lewis (stevelle) for core reviewer

+1 from me as well -- Dave Wilde Sent with Airmail On September 30, 2015 at 03:51:48, Jesse Pretorius (jesse.pretor...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi everyone, I'd like to propose that Steve Lewis (stevelle) be added as a core reviewer. He has made an effort to

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] proposing Michal Jastrzebski (inc0) for core reviewer

Michal, The vote was unanimous. Welcome to the Kolla Core Reviewer team. I have added you to the appropriate gerrit group. Regards -steve From: Steven Dake > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] proposing Michal Jastrzebski (inc0) for core reviewer

Thanks everyone! I really appreciate this and I hope to help to make kolla even better project than it is right now (and right now it's pretty cool;)). We have great community, very diverse and very dedicated. It's pleasure to work with all of you and let's keep up with great work in following

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] pypi packages for networking sub-projects

Hey Kyle, I am bit confused by this. I just checked networking-arista and see that the co-owner of the project is openstackci I also checked the [1] and [2] and the settings for networking-arista are correct as well. What else is missing which make you put networking-arista in the second

Re: [openstack-dev] KILO: neutron port-update --allowed-address-pairs action=clear throws an exception

This patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218551/ On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:55 PM, masoom alam wrote: > After I applied the patch set 4 manually, I am still getting the following > exception: > > DEBUG: urllib3.util.retry Converted retries value: 0 ->

Re: [openstack-dev] KILO: neutron port-update --allowed-address-pairs action=clear throws an exception

After I applied the patch set 4 manually, I am still getting the following exception: DEBUG: urllib3.util.retry Converted retries value: 0 -> Retry(total=0, connect=None, read=None, redirect=0) DEBUG: keystoneclient.session RESP: DEBUG: neutronclient.v2_0.client Error message: {"NeutronError":

Re: [openstack-dev] [Large Deployments Team][Performance Team] New informal working group suggestion

Sandeep, sorry for the late response :) I'm hoping to define 'spheres of interest' and most painful moments using people's experience on Tokyo summit and we'll find out what needs to be tested most and can be actually done. You can share your ideas of what needs to be tested and focused on in

[openstack-dev] [nova] Shared storage space count for Nova

Hi Devs, Nova shared storage has issue [1] for counting free space, total space and disk available least which affects hypervisor stats and scheduler. I have created a etherpad [2] which contains detail problem description and possible solution with possible challenges for this design. Later I

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Defining a public API for tripleo-common

Hi, What is the standard practice for defining public API's for OpenStack libraries? As I am working on refactoring and updating tripleo-common I have to grep through the projects I know that use it to make sure I don't break anything. Personally I would choose to have a policy of "If it is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Devstack][Sahara][Cinder] BlockDeviceDriver support in Devstack

Hi Sean, Because the recommended way in now to write devstack plugins. Jordan On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:29 AM, Sean Collins wrote: > This review was recently abandoned. Can you provide insight as to why? > > On September 17, 2015, at 2:30 PM, "Sean M. Collins"

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum]swarm + compose = k8s?

+1 Pretty please don't make it a deployment project; because really some other project that just specializes in deployment (ansible, chef, puppet...) can do that better. I do get how public clouds can find a deployment project useful (it allows customers to try out these new ~fancy~ COE things),

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Steve Lewis (stevelle) for core reviewer

Hi everyone, I'd like to propose that Steve Lewis (stevelle) be added as a core reviewer. He has made an effort to consistently keep up with doing reviews in the last cycle and always makes an effort to ensure that his responses are made after thorough testing where possible. I have found his

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][keystone] Choose domain names with 'composite namevar' or 'meaningless name'?

On 30/09/15 03:43, Rich Megginson wrote: > On 09/28/2015 10:18 PM, Gilles Dubreuil wrote: >> >> On 15/09/15 19:55, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: >>> Gilles Dubreuil writes: >>> On 15/09/15 06:53, Rich Megginson wrote: > On 09/14/2015 02:30 PM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum]swarm + compose = k8s?

Echo with Monty: > I believe that the real win is if Magnum's control plan can integrate the network and storage fabrics > that exist in an OpenStack with kube/mesos/swarm. We are working on the Cinder (ceph), Neutron, Keystone integration in HyperStack [1] and love to contribute. Another TODO is

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] proposing Michal Jastrzebski (inc0) for core reviewer

+1 I actually thought he was core already :) On 30/09/15 01:24, Sam Yaple wrote: +1 Michal will be a great addition to the Core team. On Sep 29, 2015 6:48 PM, "Martin André" > wrote: On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Steven Dake

[openstack-dev] [heat] Convergence: Detecting and handling worker failures

Hi, One of remaining items in convergence is detecting and handling engine (the engine worker) failures, and here are my thoughts. Background: Since the work is distributed among heat engines, by some means heat needs to detect the failure and pick up the tasks from failed engine and

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] pypi packages for networking sub-projects

Kyle, I have taken care of this for networking-infoblox. Please let me know if anything else is necessary. Thanks, John On Sep 30, 2015, at 2:55 PM, Kyle Mestery > wrote: Folks: In trying to release some networking sub-projects recently, I ran

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] pypi packages for networking sub-projects

Sukhdev, you're right, for some reason that one didn't show up in a pypi search on pypi itself, but does in google. And it is correctly owned [1]. [1] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/networking_arista On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Sukhdev Kapur wrote: > Hey Kyle, > > I

[openstack-dev] [puppet] [infra] split integration jobs

Hello, Today our Puppet OpenStack Integration jobs are deploying: - mysql / rabbitmq - keystone in wsgi with apache - nova - glance - neutron with openvswitch - cinder - swift - sahara - heat - ceilometer in wsgi with apache Currently WIP: - Horizon - Trove The status of the jobs is that some

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum]swarm + compose = k8s?

Wouldn't that limit the ability to share/optimize resources then and increase the number of operators needed (since each COE/bay would need its own set of operators managing it)? If all tenants are in a single openstack cloud, and under say a single company then there isn't much need for

[openstack-dev] [election][TC] TC Candidacy

Hi folks, I'd like to propose my candidacy for the technical committee elections. I've been involved in OpenStack for around ~four~ years now, working to help integrate it into various Yahoo! systems and infrastructure. I've been involved with integration and creation (and maturation) of many

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container?

On 09/30/2015 03:29 PM, Murali R wrote: > Russell, > > Are any additional options fields used in geneve between hypervisors at > this time? If so, how do they translate to vxlan when it hits gw? For > instance, I am interested to see if we can translate a custom header > info in vxlan to geneve

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum]swarm + compose = k8s?

Adrian Otto wrote: Thanks everyone who has provided feedback on this thread. The good news is that most of what has been asked for from Magnum is actually in scope already, and some of it has already been implemented. We never aimed to be a COE deployment service. That happens to be a necessity

[openstack-dev] [nova] how to address boot from volume failures

Today we attempted to branch devstack and grenade for liberty, and are currently blocked because in liberty with openstack client and novaclient, it's not possible to boot a server from volume using just the volume id. That's because of this change in novaclient -

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] pypi packages for networking sub-projects

Hey Kyle, I have updated the ownership of networking-l2gw. I have +1'd your patch. As soon as it merges the ACLs for the L2GW project will be fine as well. Thanks for confirming about the networking-arista. With this both of these packages should be good to go. Thanks -Sukhdev On Wed, Sep

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum]swarm + compose = k8s?

Joshua, The tenancy boundary in Magnum is the bay. You can place whatever single-tenant COE you want into the bay (Kubernetes, Mesos, Docker Swarm). This allows you to use native tools to interact with the COE in that bay, rather than using an OpenStack specific client. If you want to use the

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] How to selectively enable new services?

Hi all, So I wanted to start some discussion on $subject, because atm we have a couple of patches adding support for new services (which is great!): Manila: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188137/ Sahara: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/220863/ So, firstly I am *not* aiming to be any

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] -1 due to line length violation in commit messages

On 09/25/2015 05:00 PM, Ryan Brown wrote: > I believe the 72 limit is derived from 80-8 (terminal width - tab width) If I'm not mistaking, 72 is because of the email format limitation. Thomas __ OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container?

On 09/30/2015 04:09 PM, Murali R wrote: > Russel, > > For instance if I have a nsh header embedded in vxlan in the incoming > packet, I was wondering if I can transfer that to geneve options > somehow. This is just as an example. I may have header other info either > in vxlan or ip that needs to

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container?

Russel, For instance if I have a nsh header embedded in vxlan in the incoming packet, I was wondering if I can transfer that to geneve options somehow. This is just as an example. I may have header other info either in vxlan or ip that needs to enter the ovn network and if we have generic ovs

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][keystone] Choose domain names with 'composite namevar' or 'meaningless name'?

On 09/30/2015 11:43 AM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: Gilles Dubreuil writes: On 30/09/15 03:43, Rich Megginson wrote: On 09/28/2015 10:18 PM, Gilles Dubreuil wrote: On 15/09/15 19:55, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: Gilles Dubreuil writes: On 15/09/15 06:53,

Re: [openstack-dev] [stackalytics] Broken stats after project rename

Hi Jesse, Thanks for letting know. Stackalytics team will fix the issue during the day. --Ilya 2015-09-30 12:19 GMT+03:00 Jesse Pretorius : > Hi everyone, > > After the rename of os-ansible-deployment to openstack-ansible it appears > that all git-related stats (eg:

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] PTL & Component Leads elections

+1 to Igor. Do we have voting system set up? On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: > > * September 29 - October 8: PTL elections > > So, it's in progress. Where I can vote? I didn't receive any emails. > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Tomasz

Re: [openstack-dev] [Devstack][Sahara][Cinder] BlockDeviceDriver support in Devstack

Sean, It was already implemented as devstack plugin Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > Hi Sean, > Because the recommended way in now to write devstack plugins. > > Jordan > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:29 AM, Sean

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] PTL & Component Leads elections

> * September 29 - October 8: PTL elections So, it's in progress. Where I can vote? I didn't receive any emails. On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Tomasz Napierala wrote: >> On 18 Sep 2015, at 04:39, Sergey Lukjanov wrote: >> >> >> Time line: >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

> On 30 Sep 2015, at 12:53, Miguel Angel Ajo wrote: > > > > Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >>> On 30 Sep 2015, at 12:08, thomas.mo...@orange.com wrote: >>> >>> Hi Ihar, >>> >>> Ihar Hrachyshka : > Miguel Angel Ajo : >> Do you have a rough idea of what operations you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

Sean, openstack client supports Cinder API v2 since Liberty. What it the right way ti fix grenade? Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny, Web Developer On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 09/29/2015 01:32 PM, Mark Voelker wrote: > > > > Mark T. Voelker > > > > > > > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

Hi Irena, Irena Berezovsky : > I would like to second Kevin. This can be done in a similar way as ML2 Plugin passed plugin_context > to ML2 Extension Drivers: https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/plugins/ml2/driver_api.py#L910. Yes, this would be similar and could indeed

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

On 09/29/2015 01:32 PM, Mark Voelker wrote: > > Mark T. Voelker > > > >> On Sep 29, 2015, at 12:36 PM, Matt Fischer wrote: >> >> >> >> I agree with John Griffith. I don't have any empirical evidences to back >> my "feelings" on that one but it's true that we weren't

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: On 30 Sep 2015, at 12:08, thomas.mo...@orange.com wrote: Hi Ihar, Ihar Hrachyshka : Miguel Angel Ajo : Do you have a rough idea of what operations you may need to do? Right now, what bagpipe driver for networking-bgpvpn needs to interact with is: - int_br OVSBridge

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][python-novaclient] Functional test fail due to publicURL endpoint for volume service not found

Hi! It looks like cause of issue is a disabling Cinder API V1 in gates by default( http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/075689.html) which was merged yesterday( https://review.openstack.org/#/c/194726/17 ). Since Cinder V1 is disabled, python-novaclient has several

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] live migration in Mitaka

> Please respond to this post if you have an interest in this and what you > would like to see done. > Include anything you are already getting on with so we get a clear picture. Thank you to those who replied to this thread. I have used the contents to start an etherpad page here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] proposing Michal Jastrzebski (inc0) for core reviewer

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Hi folks, > > I am proposing Michal for core reviewer. Consider my proposal as a +1 > vote. Michal has done a fantastic job with rsyslog, has done a nice job > overall contributing to the project for the last

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

Hi Ihar, Ihar Hrachyshka : Miguel Angel Ajo : Do you have a rough idea of what operations you may need to do? Right now, what bagpipe driver for networking-bgpvpn needs to interact with is: - int_br OVSBridge (read-only) - tun_br OVSBridge (add patch port, add flows) - patch_int_ofport port

[openstack-dev] [election] [tc] Candidacy for Mitaka

Hi fellow developers, I hereby announce my candidacy for the OpenStack Technical Committee election. I am currently employed by Red Hat and spend all my time working on upstream OpenStack development. Something I've been doing since 2011. Those last years, I ran the Ceilometer project as a PTL

[openstack-dev] [election][TC] TC Candidacy

Hi all! I'm announcing my candidacy for a position on the OpenStack Technical Committee. On October 1st I will be employed by the OpenStack Foundation as a Cross-Project Developer Coordinator to help bring focus and support to cross-project initiatives within the cross-project specs, Def Core,

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Steve Lewis (stevelle) for core reviewer

Fully agree here -- +1 from me. --Matt (mattt) On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Jesse Pretorius wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to propose that Steve Lewis (stevelle) be added as a core > reviewer. > > He has made an effort to consistently keep up with doing

[openstack-dev] [stackalytics] Broken stats after project rename

Hi everyone, After the rename of os-ansible-deployment to openstack-ansible it appears that all git-related stats (eg: commits) prior to the rename have been lost. http://stackalytics.com/?metric=commits=openstack-ansible Can anyone assist with rectifying this? -- Jesse Pretorius IRC:

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Convergence: Detecting and handling worker failures

Excerpts from Anant Patil's message of 2015-09-30 00:10:52 -0700: > Hi, > > One of remaining items in convergence is detecting and handling engine > (the engine worker) failures, and here are my thoughts. > > Background: Since the work is distributed among heat engines, by some > means heat

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Convergence: Detecting and handling worker failures

Hi Anant, For the second option, if the leader engine fails, how to trigger a new leader election progress? Best Regards,Yingzhe Zeng > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > From: anant.pa...@hpe.com > Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:40:52 +0530 > Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat] Convergence:

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Steve Lewis (stevelle) for core reviewer

+1 from me. On 30 September 2015 at 09:51, Jesse Pretorius wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to propose that Steve Lewis (stevelle) be added as a core > reviewer. > > He has made an effort to consistently keep up with doing reviews in the > last cycle and always

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Shared storage space count for Nova

On 09/30/2015 03:04 AM, Kekane, Abhishek wrote: Hi Devs, Nova shared storage has issue [1] for counting free space, total space and disk available least which affects hypervisor stats and scheduler. I have created a etherpad [2] which contains detail problem description and possible solution

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

> On 30 Sep 2015, at 12:08, thomas.mo...@orange.com wrote: > > Hi Ihar, > > Ihar Hrachyshka : >>> Miguel Angel Ajo : Do you have a rough idea of what operations you may need to do? >>> Right now, what bagpipe driver for networking-bgpvpn needs to interact with >>> is: >>> - int_br

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Shared storage space count for Nova

Hi Jay, Thank you for the update. Abhishek Kekane -Original Message- From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com] Sent: 30 September 2015 15:48 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Shared storage space count for Nova On 09/30/2015 03:04 AM, Kekane,

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][glance] glance-stable-maint group refresher

On 9/30/15 8:46 AM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I’d like to propose following changes to glance-stable-maint team: > > 1) Removing Zhi Yan Liu from the group; unfortunately he has > moved on to other ventures and is not actively participating our > operations anymore. > +1

[openstack-dev] [glance] Models and validation for v2

Hi All, In short terms, I am wondering why we are validating responses from server when we are doing image-show, image-list, member-list, metadef-namespace-show and other read-only requests. AFAIK, we are building warlock models when receiving responses from server (see [0]). Each model requires

[openstack-dev] Announcing Liberty RC1 availability in Debian

Hi everyone! 1/ Announcement === I'm pleased to announce, in advance of the final Liberty release, that Liberty RC1 not only has been fully uploaded to Debian Experimental, but also that the Tempest CI (which I maintain and is a package only CI, no deployment tooling involved), shows

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:10:43AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > On 09/30/2015 07:29 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > > Sean, > > > > openstack client supports Cinder API v2 since Liberty. What it the right > > way ti fix grenade? > > Here's the thing. > > With this change: Rally doesn't work,

[openstack-dev] [Kuryr] tox -egenconfig not working

Hi, I tried to generate sample kuryr.using "tox -e genconfig", but it is failing: genconfig create: /home/vikas/kuryr/.tox/genconfig genconfig installdeps: -r/home/vikas/kuryr/requirements.txt, -r/home/vikas/kuryr/test-requirements.txt ERROR: could not install deps

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Convergence: Detecting and handling worker failures

On 09/30/2015 03:10 AM, Anant Patil wrote: Hi, One of remaining items in convergence is detecting and handling engine (the engine worker) failures, and here are my thoughts. Background: Since the work is distributed among heat engines, by some means heat needs to detect the failure and pick up

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Defining a public API for tripleo-common

On 09/30/2015 03:15 PM, Ryan Brown wrote: On 09/30/2015 04:08 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote: Hi, What is the standard practice for defining public API's for OpenStack libraries? As I am working on refactoring and updating tripleo-common I have to grep through the projects I know that use it to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] live migration in Mitaka

> -Original Message- > From: Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) [mailto:pmur...@hpe.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 1:25 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] live migration in Mitaka > > > > Please respond to this post

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] -1 due to line length violation in commit messages

> From: Gorka Eguileor > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Date: 09/29/2015 07:34 AM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] -1 due to line length violation > in commit messages ... > Since we are not all

[openstack-dev] [fuel][shotgun] do we still use subs?

Hello fuelers, My question is related to shotgun tool[1] which will be invoked in order to generate the diagnostic snapshot. It has possibilities to substitute particular sensitive data such as credentials/hostnames/IPs/etc with meaningless values. It's done by Subs [2] object driver. However,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

On 09/30/2015 07:29 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > Sean, > > openstack client supports Cinder API v2 since Liberty. What it the right > way ti fix grenade? Here's the thing. With this change: Rally doesn't work, novaclient doesn't work, grenade doesn't work. Apparently nearly all the libraries

[openstack-dev] [stable][glance] glance-stable-maint group refresher

Hi all, I'd like to propose following changes to glance-stable-maint team: 1) Removing Zhi Yan Liu from the group; unfortunately he has moved on to other ventures and is not actively participating our operations anymore. 2) Adding Mike Fedosin to the group; Mike has been reviewing

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Defining a public API for tripleo-common

On 09/30/2015 04:08 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote: Hi, What is the standard practice for defining public API's for OpenStack libraries? As I am working on refactoring and updating tripleo-common I have to grep through the projects I know that use it to make sure I don't break anything. The API

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nfv][telcowg] Telco Working Group meeting schedule

- Original Message - > From: "Steve Gordon" > To: openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org, "OpenStack Development Mailing > List (not for usage questions)" > > Hi all, > > As discussed in last week's meeting [1] we have been seeing increasingly > limited engagement

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] how to address boot from volume failures

On 09/30/15 at 05:03pm, Sean Dague wrote: Today we attempted to branch devstack and grenade for liberty, and are currently blocked because in liberty with openstack client and novaclient, it's not possible to boot a server from volume using just the volume id. That's because of this change in

Re: [openstack-dev] [ops] Operator Local Patches

On 9/29/2015 6:33 PM, Kris G. Lindgren wrote: Hello All, We have some pretty good contributions of local patches on the etherpad. We are going through right now and trying to group patches that multiple people are carrying and patches that people may not be carrying but solves a problem

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] New Core Reviewers

+1 for both. Welcome! From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:dava...@gmail.com] Sent: September-30-15 7:00 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] New Core Reviewers +1 from me for both Vilobh and Hua. Thanks, Dims On Wed, Sep 30, 2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] should puppet-neutron manage third party software?

Makes sense to me. Opened a bug to track the migration of agents/n1kv_vem.pp out of puppet-neutron during the M-cycle: https://bugs.launchpad.net/puppet-neutron/+bug/1501535 Thanks. Steven Hillman On 9/29/15, 9:23 AM, "Emilien Macchi" wrote: >My suggestion: > >* patch

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] [infra] split integration jobs

On 2015-09-30 17:14:27 -0400 (-0400), Emilien Macchi wrote: [...] > I like #3 but we are going to consume more CI resources (that's why I > put [infra] tag). [...] I don't think adding one more job is going to put a strain on our available resources. In fact it consumes just about as much to run

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Release of a neutron sub-project

Kyle, We referenced arista's setup/config files when we setup the pypi for our plugin. So if it is ok for Arista, then it would be ok for ale-omniswitch too, i believe. You said Arista was ok when you did in google, instead of pypi search, in another email. So can you pls. check again

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] New driver submission deadline

This message is for all new vendors looking to add a new Cinder driver in the Mitaka release as well as any existing vendors that need to add a new protocol/driver to what is already in tree. There has been some discussion on the mailing list and in the IRC channel about changes to our policy

Re: [openstack-dev] [Large Deployments Team][Performance Team] New informal working group suggestion

Hello, Thanks Dina for bringing up this great idea. My team at Intel is working with Performance testing so far so we will be likely to be part of that project. The performance aspect at large scale is an obstacle for enterprise deployments. For that reason Win The Enterprise

[openstack-dev] [puppet] prepare 5.2.0 and 6.1.0 releases

Hi, I would like to organize a "release day" sometimes soon, to release 5.2.0 (Juno) [1] and 6.1.0 (Kilo) [2]. Also, we will take the opportunity of that day to consolidate our process and bring more documentation [3]. If you have backport needs, please make sure they are all sent in Gerrit, so

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Remove nova-network as a deployment option in Fuel?

Hi team, where do we stand with it now? I remember there was a plan to remove nova-network support in 7.0, but we've delayed it due to vcenter/dvr or something which was not ready for it. Can we delete it now? The early in the cycle we do it, the easier it will be. Thanks! -- Mike Scherbakov

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum]swarm + compose = k8s?

Joshua, If you share resources, you give up multi-tenancy. No COE system has the concept of multi-tenancy (kubernetes has some basic implementation but it is totally insecure). Not only does multi-tenancy have to “look like” it offers multiple tenants isolation, but it actually has to deliver

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] New Core Reviewers

+1 from me for both Vilobh and Hua. Thanks, Dims On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Adrian Otto wrote: > Core Reviewers, > > I propose the following additions to magnum-core: > > +Vilobh Meshram (vilobhmm) > +Hua Wang (humble00) > > Please respond with +1 to agree or

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] pypi packages for networking sub-projects

Hi Kyle, Is this only about the sub-projects that are ready for release? I do not see networking-sfc sub-project in the list. Does this mean we have done the pypi registrations for the networking-sfc project correctly or it is not checked because it is not ready for release yet? Thanks, Cathy

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container?

Yes, sfc without nsh is what I am looking into and I am thinking ovn can have a better approach. I did an implementation of sfc around nsh that used ovs & flows from custom ovs-agent back in mar-may. I added fields in ovs agent to send additional info for actions as well. Neutron side was quite

Re: [openstack-dev] Announcing Liberty RC1 availability in Debian

On 09/30/2015 07:25 PM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > We are not used to reading "thanks" messages from you :) So I enjoy this > email even more ! I am well aware that I do have the reputation within the community to complain too much. I'm the world champion of starting monster troll thread by mistake.

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum]swarm + compose = k8s?

Totally get it, And its interesting the boundaries that are being pushed, Also interesting to know the state of the world, and the state of magnum and the state of COE systems. I'm somewhat surprised that they lack multi-tenancy in any kind of manner (but I guess I'm not to surprised, its a

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] should puppet-neutron manage third party software?

On 09/29/2015 12:23 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > My suggestion: > > * patch master to send deprecation warning if third party repositories > are managed in our current puppet-neutron module. > * do not manage third party repositories from now and do not accept any > patch containing this kind of

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] [infra] split integration jobs

Emillien, What image is being used to spawn the image? We see 300 sec as a good timeout time in fuel with a cirros image. The time can usually be substantially cut if the image is of any size using ceph for ephemeral... On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:37 PM Jeremy Stanley wrote: >

  1   2   >