Re: [openstack-dev] [all] DevStack switching from MySQL-python to PyMySQL

2015-10-12 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 12 October 2015 at 17:16, Sean Dague wrote: > > Yes, the last patch was landed on June 16th. We've been running on > pymysql for most of the liberty development cycle. Great news! Thanks Sean. __

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

2015-10-12 Thread Joshua Harlow
Ian Wells wrote: On 10 October 2015 at 23:47, Clint Byrum > wrote: > Per before, my suggestion was that every scheduler tries to maintain a copy > of the cloud's state in memory (in much the same way, per the previous > example, as

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

2015-10-12 Thread Ian Wells
On 11 October 2015 at 00:23, Clint Byrum wrote: > I'm in, except I think this gets simpler with an intermediary service > like ZK/Consul to keep track of this 1GB of data and replace the need > for 6, and changes the implementation of 5 to "updates its record and > signals its

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed solution to "Admin" ness improperly scoped:

2015-10-12 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Sorry for my lack of explanation. Are the both scopes of admin and non-admin totally different? Is each project not nested in admin scope like: admin { Some properties ... { ... project-a { owner-a ... } project-b { owner-b ... } ... project-x {

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed solution to "Admin" ness improperly scoped:

2015-10-12 Thread Adam Young
On 10/12/2015 08:07 PM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: Just question. Will be scopes of non-admin users projects in admin scoped project? I'm sorry I don't understand what you are asking. Shinobu - Original Message - From: "Adam Young" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

2015-10-12 Thread Ian Wells
On 10 October 2015 at 23:47, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Per before, my suggestion was that every scheduler tries to maintain a > copy > > of the cloud's state in memory (in much the same way, per the previous > > example, as every router on the internet tries to make a route table

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

2015-10-12 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Ian Wells's message of 2015-10-12 19:43:48 -0700: > On 11 October 2015 at 00:23, Clint Byrum wrote: > > > I'm in, except I think this gets simpler with an intermediary service > > like ZK/Consul to keep track of this 1GB of data and replace the need > > for 6, and

<    1   2