Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Outcome of distributed lock manager discussion @ the summit

On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, Robert Collins wrote: In the session we were told that zookeeper is already used in CI jobs for ceilometer (was this wrong?) and thats why we figured it made a sane default for devstack. For clarity: What ceilometer (actually gnocchi) is doing is using tooz in CI

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Migration state machine proposal.

On 11/05/2015 02:36 AM, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote: On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 06:17:17PM +, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote: :> From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com] :> A fair point. However, I think that a generic update VM API, which would :> allow changes to the resources consumed by the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [kuryr] external-network-connectivity

++[Neutron] tag On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Fawad Khaliq wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Vikas Choudhary < > choudharyvika...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> @Fawad, >> >> I could not get you completely. Are you suggesting to write a spec my >> already drafter bp[1] .

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][kuryr] mutihost networking with nova vm as docker host

++[Neutron] tag On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Vikas Choudhary wrote: > Hi All, > > I would appreciate inputs on following queries: > 1. Are we assuming nova bm nodes to be docker host for now? > > If Not: > - Assuming nova vm as docker host and ovs as

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] Pagination in thre API

As a consumer of such APIs on the Horizon side, I'm all for consistency in pagination, and more of it, so yes please! On 5 November 2015 at 13:24, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 01:09:36PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > > Hi All, > > Around the middle of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][kuryr] network control plane (libkv role)

++ [Neutron] tag On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Vikas Choudhary wrote: > Hi all, > > By network control plane i specifically mean here sharing network state > across docker daemons sitting on different hosts/nova_vms in multi-host > networking. > > libnetwork

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Default PostgreSQL server encoding is 'ascii'

Hi, I believe we don't have any VirtualBox specific hacks, especially in terms of database configuration. By "development env" Vitaly meant fake UI, when developer installs and configures the database by himself, without any iso images, so probably his db is configured correctly with utf-8. Also

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] external-network-connectivity

@Fawad, I could not get you completely. Are you suggesting to write a spec my already drafter bp[1] . If yes, thanks for the suggestion , will do once design discussion gets finalized. [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/kuryr/+spec/external-network-connectivity Thanks Vikas On Thu, Nov 5,

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] external-network-connectivity

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Vikas Choudhary wrote: > @Fawad, > > I could not get you completely. Are you suggesting to write a spec my > already drafter bp[1] . If yes, thanks for the suggestion , will do once > design discussion gets finalized. > That's right.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] should we open gate for per sub-project stable-maint teams?

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > currently we have a single neutron-wide stable-maint gerrit group that > maintains all stable branches for all stadium subprojects. I believe > that in

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] external-network-connectivity

Hi Vikas, I suggest take a stab at creating a blueprint for this with details through Gerrit on top of this [1]. @Toni/Gal, would be great to have specs as part of Kuryr. I have added the directory with a template here [1] [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241935/ Thanks, Fawad Khaliq On

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] Role for Fuel Master Node

Hi Javeria, As far as I know there is no way to run the task on Fuel master host itself. Since MCollective is installed in the container and tasks get executed using MCollective, as a workaround you may try to ssh from the container to the host. Also I have several additional questions: 1. what

[openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-21, Nov 9-13

This is the first in a series of email reminders about important dates on the schedule as we work towards the Mitaka release. We will be counting down from R-23, the Mitaka summit, to the release in R-0 the week of April 4-8. If all goes as planned, these emails will be sent just before the week

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-ovs-dpdk]

Thanks Mooney, will correct my localrc and run again On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Mooney, Sean K wrote: > Hello > When set OVS_DPDK_MODE=controller_ovs > > You are disabling install of ovs-dpdk on the contoler node and only > installing mechanism driver. > > If you

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-onos]: Proposing new cores for networking-onos

+1 for both. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Gal Sagie wrote: > +1 for both from me > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Vikram Choudhary > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I would like to propose Mr. Ramanjaneya Reddy Palleti and Mr. Dongfeng as >> new cores

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Migration state machine proposal.

On 11/05/15 at 01:28pm, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote: From: Ed Leafe [mailto:e...@leafe.com] On Nov 5, 2015, at 2:43 AM, Tang Chen wrote: > I'm sorry that I cannot understand why resize and migrate are the same thing behind. Resize is essentially a migration to

[openstack-dev] [release][stable] tools for keeping up with stable/liberty releases

Release liaisons, As described in [1], we are changing our stable release policy for Liberty to encourage projects to tag new releases when they have patches ready to be released. There is a script in the openstack-infra/release-tools repository to make it easier to keep track of what has not yet

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] Role for Fuel Master Node

Hi Evgeniy, > > 1. what version of Fuel do you use? > Using 7.0 > 2. could you please clarify what did you mean by "moving to > deployment_tasks.yaml"? > I tried changing my tasks.yaml to a deployment_tasks.yaml as the wiki suggests for 7.0. However I kept hitting issues. > 3. could you

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] mutihost networking with nova vm as docker host

The current OVS binding proposals are not for nested containers. I am not sure if you are asking about that case or about the nested containers inside a VM case. For the nested containers, we will use Neutron solutions that support this kind of configuration, for example if you look at OVN you

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Outcome of distributed lock manager discussion @ the summit

On 11/05/2015 06:00 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hayes, Graham wrote: >> On 04/11/15 20:04, Ed Leafe wrote: >>> On Nov 3, 2015, at 6:45 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Here's a Devstack review for zookeeper in support of this initiative:

[openstack-dev] [networking-onos]: Proposing new cores for networking-onos

Hi All, I would like to propose Mr. Ramanjaneya Reddy Palleti and Mr. Dongfeng as new cores for networking-onos project. Their contribution was significant in the last Liberty cycle w.r.t to this project. *Facts:* http://stackalytics.com/?metric=loc=networking-onos=all Request existing cores to

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-onos]: Proposing new cores for networking-onos

+1 for both from me On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Vikram Choudhary wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to propose Mr. Ramanjaneya Reddy Palleti and Mr. Dongfeng as > new cores for networking-onos project. Their contribution was significant > in the last Liberty cycle w.r.t to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPAM] Arbitrary JSON blobs in ipam db tables

I don't know if this would make more sense. Let's assume that we add arbitrary blobs(ABs) to IPAM even every neutron object. What would happen? People can do anything via those APIs. Any new attribute even the whole model could be passed through those so-called ABs. Except the architecture issues,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] should we open gate for per sub-project stable-maint teams?

Armando M. wrote: On 3 November 2015 at 08:49, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, currently we have a single neutron-wide stable-maint gerrit group that maintains all stable branches for all stadium

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][kuryr] network control plane (libkv role)

Thanks Toni. On 5 Nov 2015 16:02, "Antoni Segura Puimedon" wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Vikas Choudhary < > choudharyvika...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> ++ [Neutron] tag >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Vikas Choudhary < >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Mid-cycle meetup for Mitaka

++ Sounds very sensible to me! John From: "Armando M." > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > Date: Wednesday, 4 November 2015 21:23 To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Outcome of distributed lock manager discussion @ the summit

On 11/05/2015 03:08 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, Robert Collins wrote: > >> In the session we were told that zookeeper is already used in CI jobs >> for ceilometer (was this wrong?) and thats why we figured it made a >> sane default for devstack. > > For clarity: What ceilometer

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] mutihost networking with nova vm as docker host

2015-11-05 21:30 GMT+09:00 Gal Sagie : > The current OVS binding proposals are not for nested containers. > I am not sure if you are asking about that case or about the nested > containers inside a VM case. > > For the nested containers, we will use Neutron solutions that

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-ovs-dpdk]

Hello When set OVS_DPDK_MODE=controller_ovs You are disabling install of ovs-dpdk on the contoler node and only installing mechanism driver. If you want to install ovs-dpdk on the controller node you should set this value as follows OVS_DPDK_MODE=controller_ovs_dpdk See

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

Hi Ihar, Ihar Hrachyshka : Reviving the thread. [...] (I appreciate if someone checks me on the following though): This is an excellent recap. I set up a new etherpad to collect feedback from subprojects [2]. I've filled in details for networking-bgpvpn. Please tell me if you need more

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Migration state machine proposal.

On Nov 5, 2015, at 2:43 AM, Tang Chen wrote: > I'm sorry that I cannot understand why resize and migrate are the same thing > behind. Resize is essentially a migration to the same host, rather than a different host. The process is still taking an existing VM and using

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][kuryr] network control plane (libkv role)

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Vikas Choudhary wrote: > ++ [Neutron] tag > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Vikas Choudhary < > choudharyvika...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> By network control plane i specifically mean here sharing network state >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Outcome of distributed lock manager discussion @ the summit

Hayes, Graham wrote: > On 04/11/15 20:04, Ed Leafe wrote: >> On Nov 3, 2015, at 6:45 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >>> >>> Here's a Devstack review for zookeeper in support of this initiative: >>> >>> https://review.openstack.org/241040 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Dims >> >> I thought

[openstack-dev] [networking-ovs-dpdk]

Hello all, Trying to install openstack with ovs-dpdk driver from devstack. Following is my localrc file HOST_IP_IFACE=eth0 HOST_IP=10.0.2.15 HOST_NAME=$(hostname) DATABASE_PASSWORD=open RABBIT_PASSWORD=open SERVICE_TOKEN=open SERVICE_PASSWORD=open ADMIN_PASSWORD=open MYSQL_PASSWORD=open

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] live migration sub-team meeting

> > Most team members expressed they would like a regular IRC meeting for > > tracking work and raising blocking issues. Looking at the contributors > > here [2], most of the participants seem to be in the European > > continent (in time zones ranging from UTC to UTC+3) with a few in the > > US

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Planning and prioritizing session for Mitaka

Great. That works for ALU folks. -Original Message- From: Renat Akhmerov [mailto:rakhme...@mirantis.com] Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 9:23 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Planning and prioritizing session for

[openstack-dev] [networking-ovs-dpdk]

Hi All, Can we use https://github.com/openstack/networking-ovs-dpdk with packstack?? I'm trying to configure devstack with ovs-dpdk on ubuntu. But till now no success. Could anybody tell whether it is supported on ubuntu or not? or only on Fedora it is tested? Regards, Varun

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][kuryr] mutihost networking with nova vm as docker host

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Vikas Choudhary wrote: > ++[Neutron] tag > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Vikas Choudhary < > choudharyvika...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I would appreciate inputs on following queries: >> 1. Are we assuming nova bm

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]:Subscribe and Publish Notification frame work in Ceilometer !

Hi Pradeep, Presently we are looking for a monitoring service.Using monitoring service user's/application's  will subscribe for few notification's/events from openstack infrastructure and monitoring service will publish these notification to user's/application's. We are exploring Ceilometer

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] Pagination in thre API

On 5 November 2015 at 09:46, Richard Jones wrote: > As a consumer of such APIs on the Horizon side, I'm all for consistency in > pagination, and more of it, so yes please! > > On 5 November 2015 at 13:24, Tony Breeds wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 05,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Stepping Down from Neutron Core Responsibilities

Hey Paisano, Thanks for your great contributions. Un abrazo On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Edgar Magana wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > I have been part of this community from the very beginning when in Santa > Clara, CA back in 2011 a bunch of we crazy people decided

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPAM] Arbitrary JSON blobs in ipam db tables

On 11/04/2015 04:21 PM, Shraddha Pandhe wrote: Hi Salvatore, Thanks for the feedback. I agree with you that arbitrary JSON blobs will make IPAM much more powerful. Some other projects already do things like this. :( Actually, though "powerful" it also leads to implementation details leaking

[openstack-dev] [searchlight] Today's IRC meeting

Hello all, The US time change while many of us were still getting home from Japan threw myself and several others off with today’s meeting time. Sorry about that! We’ll pick back up next week. Next week’s agenda can be found at the below link. Please feel free to add to to it / modify it and

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Autoprovisioning, per-user projects, and Federation

Can people help me work through the right set of tools for this use case (has come up from several Operators) and map out a plan to implement it: Large cloud with many users coming from multiple Federation sources has a policy of providing a minimal setup for each user upon first visit to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] can we deprecate the xvp console?

> I noticed today that nova.console.xvp hits the database directly for > console pools. We should convert this to objects so that the console > service does not have direct access to the database (this is the only > console I see that hits the database directly). However, rather than go > through

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPAM] Arbitrary JSON blobs in ipam db tables

On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 11:55:50AM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 11/04/2015 04:21 PM, Shraddha Pandhe wrote: > >Hi Salvatore, > > > >Thanks for the feedback. I agree with you that arbitrary JSON blobs will > >make IPAM much more powerful. Some other projects already do things like > >this. > > :(

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPAM] Arbitrary JSON blobs in ipam db tables

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 11/04/2015 04:21 PM, Shraddha Pandhe wrote: > >> Hi Salvatore, >> >> Thanks for the feedback. I agree with you that arbitrary JSON blobs will >> make IPAM much more powerful. Some other projects already do things like >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Autoprovisioning, per-user projects, and Federation

Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2015-11-05 12:34:12 -0500: > Can people help me work through the right set of tools for this use case > (has come up from several Operators) and map out a plan to implement it: > > Large cloud with many users coming from multiple Federation sources has > a

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Stepping Down from Neutron Core Responsibilities

Appreciate all the work Edgar! Regards, PCM On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:15 AM Miguel Lavalle wrote: > Hey Paisano, > > Thanks for your great contributions. > > Un abrazo > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Edgar Magana > wrote: > >> Dear

[openstack-dev] [nova] can we deprecate the xvp console?

I noticed today that nova.console.xvp hits the database directly for console pools. We should convert this to objects so that the console service does not have direct access to the database (this is the only console I see that hits the database directly). However, rather than go through the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][bugs] Developers Guide: Who's merging that?

On 2015-11-05 16:23:56 +0100 (+0100), Markus Zoeller wrote: > some months ago I wrote down all the things a developer should know > about the bug handling process in general [1]. It is written as a > project agnostic thing and got some +1s but it isn't merged yet. > It would be helpful when I

[openstack-dev] [Nova] attaching and detaching volumes in the API

Normally operations on instances are synchronized at the compute node. In some cases it is necessary to synchronize somehow at the API. I have one of those cases and wondered what is a good way to go about it. As part of this spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/221732/ I want to

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo_messaging] Regarding " WARNING [oslo_messaging.server] wait() should have been called after stop() as wait() ...

On 05/11/2015 1:06 PM, Nader Lahouti wrote: Hi Doug, I have an app that listens to notifications and used the info provided in http://docs.openstack.org/developer/oslo.messaging/notification_listener.html Basically I create 1. NotificationEndpoints(object):

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Outcome of distributed lock manager discussion @ the summit

Sean Dague wrote: On 11/05/2015 06:00 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hayes, Graham wrote: On 04/11/15 20:04, Ed Leafe wrote: On Nov 3, 2015, at 6:45 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Here's a Devstack review for zookeeper in support of this initiative:

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo_messaging] Regarding " WARNING [oslo_messaging.server] wait() should have been called after stop() as wait() ...

Thanks for the pointer, I'll look into it. But one question, by calling stop() and then wait(), does it mean the application has to call start() again after the wait()? to process more messages? I am also using http://docs.openstack.org/developer/oslo.messaging/server.html for the RPC server Does

[openstack-dev] [magnum] Networking Subteam Meetings

All, I apologize for issues with today's meeting. My calendar was updated to reflect daylight savings and displayed an incorrect meeting start time. This issue is now resolved. We will meet on 11/12 at 18:30 UTC. The meeting has been pushed back 30 minutes from our usual start time. This is

[openstack-dev] [QA][Nova] Tempest Hypervisor Feature Tagging

Is there any way to know what hypervisor features[1] were tested in a Tempest run? From what I’ve seen, currently there is no way to tell what tests cover what features. Looks like Tempest has UUID and service tagging, but no reference to the hypervisor features. It would be good to track/map

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Bugs status

Hi guys, new report is based on 'area' tags. I'm sorry for hardly readable heap of numbers. Here are values for current numbers of open bugs, number of bugs opened since last Thursday and number of closed bug for the same period. Bugs in python, library and UI areas. Format: Total open(UI

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Networking Subteam Meetings

It seems integration of the SocketPlane acquisition has come to fruition in 1.9… Lee > On Nov 5, 2015, at 1:18 PM, Daneyon Hansen (danehans) > wrote: > > All, > > I apologize for issues with today's meeting. My calendar was updated to > reflect daylight savings and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Spam] Re: [all] Outcome of distributed lock manager discussion @ the summit

Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Chris Dent's message of 2015-11-05 00:08:16 -0800: On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, Robert Collins wrote: In the session we were told that zookeeper is already used in CI jobs for ceilometer (was this wrong?) and thats why we figured it made a sane default for devstack.

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][neutron] Kilo is 'security-supported'. What does it imply?

+1 -Original Message- From: Carl Baldwin [mailto:c...@ecbaldwin.net] Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 10:20 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][neutron] Kilo is 'security-supported'. What does it imply? On Thu, Nov

Re: [openstack-dev] [Spam] Re: [all] Outcome of distributed lock manager discussion @ the summit

Excerpts from Chris Dent's message of 2015-11-05 00:08:16 -0800: > On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, Robert Collins wrote: > > > In the session we were told that zookeeper is already used in CI jobs > > for ceilometer (was this wrong?) and thats why we figured it made a > > sane default for devstack. > > For

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [Mistral] Autoprovisioning, per-user projects, and Federation

Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-11-05 09:51:41 -0800: > Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2015-11-05 12:34:12 -0500: > > Can people help me work through the right set of tools for this use case > > (has come up from several Operators) and map out a plan to implement it: > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] can we deprecate the xvp console?

On 11/05/15 at 10:39am, Matt Riedemann wrote: I noticed today that nova.console.xvp hits the database directly for console pools. We should convert this to objects so that the console service does not have direct access to the database (this is the only console I see that hits the database

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo_messaging] Regarding " WARNING [oslo_messaging.server] wait() should have been called after stop() as wait() ...

my understanding is that if you are calling stop()/wait() your intention is to shut down the listener. if you intend on keeping an active consumer on the queue, you shouldn't be calling either stop() or wait(), just start. On 05/11/2015 2:07 PM, Nader Lahouti wrote: Thanks for the pointer,

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo_messaging] Regarding " WARNING [oslo_messaging.server] wait() should have been called after stop() as wait() ...

Hi Doug, I have an app that listens to notifications and used the info provided in http://docs.openstack.org/developer/oslo.messaging/notification_listener.html Basically I create 1. NotificationEndpoints(object):

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][neutron] Kilo is 'security-supported'. What does it imply?

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > - Releases page on wiki [2] calls the branch ‘Security-supported’ (and it’s > not clear what it implies) I saw this same thing yesterday when it was pointed out in the DVR IRC meeting [1]. I have a hard time believing

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Outcome of distributed lock manager discussion @ the summit

On 5 November 2015 at 11:32, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > To clarify that statement a little more, > > Speaking only for myself as an op, I don't want to support yet one more > snowflake in a sea of snowflakes, that works differently then all the rest, > without a very good reason.

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] competing implementations

Sometimes producing alternate implementations can be more effective than abstract discussions because they are more concrete. If an implementation can be produced (possibly multiple different implementations by different contributors) in a short period of time without significant effort, that’s

Re: [openstack-dev] DevStack errors...

Neil Jerram wrote:"When you say 'on Ubuntu 14.04', are we talking a completely fresh install with nothing else on it?  That's the most reliable way to run DevStack - people normally create a fresh disposable VM for this kind of work."    -- I finally got it running!   I did what you said, and

[openstack-dev] [Congress] Summit recap

Hi all, It was great seeing so many Congress people in Tokyo last week! Hopefully you've all had a chance to recover by now. Here's an overview of what happened. I was planning to go over this at this week's IRC meeting, but forgot about the U.S. time change and missed the meeting--sorry about

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Outcome of distributed lock manager discussion @ the summit

Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2015-11-04 14:32:42 -0800: > To clarify that statement a little more, > > Speaking only for myself as an op, I don't want to support yet one more > snowflake in a sea of snowflakes, that works differently then all the rest, > without a very good reason. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [Mistral] Autoprovisioning, per-user projects, and Federation

On 11/05/2015 01:09 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-11-05 09:51:41 -0800: Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2015-11-05 12:34:12 -0500: Can people help me work through the right set of tools for this use case (has come up from several Operators) and map

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [Mistral] Autoprovisioning, per-user projects, and Federation

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-11-05 10:09:49 -0800: > > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-11-05 09:51:41 -0800: > > > Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2015-11-05 12:34:12 -0500: > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Outcome of distributed lock manager discussion @ the summit

Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2015-11-05 13:18:13 -0800: > Your assuming there are only 2 choices, > zk or db+rabbit. I'm claiming both hare suboptimal at present. a 3rd might > be needed. Though even with its flaws, the db+rabbit choice has a few > benefits too. > Well, I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Match type checking from oslo.config.

Hunter Haugen writes: >> Ouha! I didn't know that property could have parent class defined. >> This is nice. Does it work also for parameter ? > > I haven't tried, but property is just a subclass of parameter so > truthy could probably be made a parameter then become a

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Ether pad on O(n)/Linear Execution Time/Hyper-Scale

I promised during the DVR IRC meeting yesterday to re-run the L3 agent experiments that I've been doing that have led to performance based patches over the last two months and to provide an etherpad with both the results and the methodology. The etherpad is up for folks to review at [1]. While

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]:Subscribe and Publish Notification frame work in Ceilometer !

On 05/11/2015 5:11 AM, Raghunath D wrote: Hi Pradeep, Presently we are looking for a monitoring service.Using monitoring service user's/application's will subscribe for few notification's/events from openstack infrastructure and monitoring service will publish these notification to

[openstack-dev] [manila] manila-api failure in liberty

Hi Valeriy, Thank you. Updated api-paste.ini resolved the issue with manila-api failure Thanks, Igor. > Hello Igor, > > Mentioned error indicates that file "etc/manila/api-paste.ini" was not > updated with one from new version of Manila. This file has dependency on > version of project and can

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] [Bug#1497073]The return sample body of sample-list is different when use -m and not

i'm sort of torn on this item. there's a general feeling that regarding api, nothing should be dropped so i'm hesitant to actually deprecate it. i think changing the data also is very dangerous when it comes to compatibility (even though keeping it increases inconsistency). maybe the better

[openstack-dev] [DefCore] Request for reviews and comments for 2016.01 DefCore (interop) guideline

Hello OpenStack Community, The DefCore guideline for 2016.01 is now up for review, and we need your feedback. Please review and comment: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239830/ At this time, we need feedback for capabilities that will become advisory in 2016.01 and required in 2016.07:

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Logging - filling up my tiny SSDs

On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 07:25:24AM EST, Sean Dague wrote: > On 11/02/2015 10:36 AM, Sean M. Collins wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:12:10PM EST, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > >> Sean, > >> > >> I typically switch off screen and am able to redirect logs to a specified > >> directory. Does this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPAM] Arbitrary JSON blobs in ipam db tables

Hi, I agree with all of you about the REST Apis. As I said before, I had to bring up the idea of JSON blob because based on previous discussions, it looked like neutron community was not willing to enhance the schemas for different ipam dbs. Entire rationale behind pluggable IPAM is to provide

[openstack-dev] [infra] Gerrit maintenance for project renames 2015-11-06 (tomorrow) at 20:00 UTC

Sorry for the short notice, but the Infra team will be taking Gerrit offline briefly from 20:00 to 20:15 tomorrow/Friday, November 6 to rename the following projects: openstack-infra/puppet-openstack-health -> openstack-infra/puppet-openstack_health openstack/akanda-rug ->

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [Mistral] Autoprovisioning, per-user projects, and Federation

Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-11-05 10:09:49 -0800: > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-11-05 09:51:41 -0800: > > Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2015-11-05 12:34:12 -0500: > > > Can people help me work through the right set of tools for this use case > > > (has

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Outcome of distributed lock manager discussion @ the summit

Your assuming there are only 2 choices, zk or db+rabbit. I'm claiming both hare suboptimal at present. a 3rd might be needed. Though even with its flaws, the db+rabbit choice has a few benefits too. You also seem to assert that to support large clouds, the default must be something that can

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [Mistral] Autoprovisioning, per-user projects, and Federation

Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2015-11-05 15:14:03 -0500: > On 11/05/2015 01:09 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-11-05 09:51:41 -0800: > >> Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2015-11-05 12:34:12 -0500: > >>> Can people help me work through the

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] manila-api failure in liberty

Hello Igor, Mentioned error indicates that file "etc/manila/api-paste.ini" was not updated with one from new version of Manila. This file has dependency on version of project and can differ from release to release. So, just copy liberty version of this file to "/etc/manila/api-paste.ini" and then

[openstack-dev] What's Up, Doc? 6 November 2015

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi everyone, Wow! What a great Summit! And isn't Tokyo a truly beautiful and amazing city? Thank you so much to the Japanese Stackers who hosted us, and to everyone who came along to the docs sessions and helped us hammer out a great plan for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Migration state machine proposal.

On 11/05/2015 08:33 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: On 11/05/15 at 01:28pm, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote: Or more specifically, the migrate and resize API actions both call the resize function in the compute api. As Ed said, they are basically the same behind the scenes. (But the API difference is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] attaching and detaching volumes in the API

On 11/05/2015 12:13 PM, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote: As part of this spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/221732/ I want to attach/detach volumes (and so manipulate block device mappings) when an instance is not on any compute node (actually when in shelved). Normally this happens in a

[openstack-dev] [nova][policy] Exposing hypervisor details to users

Hello all, I came across [1] which is notionally an ironic bug in that horizon presents VM operations (like suspend) to users. Clearly these options don't make sense to ironic which can be confusing. There is a horizon fix that just disables migrate/suspened and other functaions if the

[openstack-dev] [Senllin][Magnum]Add container type profile to Senlin

Hi all, As we know, currently Senlin supports two kind of profiles: Nova instance and Heat stack, of course, we want to support container. After back from the summit, I discussed it with a Magnum Core yuanying, we reached an agreement that adding a container type profile support in Senlin. Maybe

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo_messaging] Regarding " WARNING [oslo_messaging.server] wait() should have been called after stop() as wait() ...

Thanks Gord for the explanation. Nader. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:49 AM, gord chung wrote: > my understanding is that if you are calling stop()/wait() your intention > is to shut down the listener. if you intend on keeping an active consumer > on the queue, you shouldn't be

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] Pagination in thre API

So lets work on the API WG guideline first, looking forward to get it done sooner, pagination is actually very useful in production deployment. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Everett Toews wrote: > On Nov 5, 2015, at 5:44 AM, John Garbutt

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][kuryr] network control plane (libkv role)

Hi Vikas, I thought the "capability" affected the propagation of the network state across nodes as well. However, in my environment, where I tried Consul and ZooKeeper, I observed a new network created in a host is displayed on another host when I hit "sudo docker network ls" even if I set the

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Deprecation of OFAgent in Mitaka

Hi, The ryu team added the ofagent as a ml2 driver that implements a python native openflow using ryu library. In Liberty, the ovs ml2 driver gained the "native" of_interface driver, which uses the ryu library to communicate with ovs switches. The ryu team believes this is better solution than

[openstack-dev] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer.

Hello all, I'll start by acknowledging that this is a big and complex issue and I do not claim to be across all the view points, nor do I claim to be particularly persuasive ;P Having stated that, I'd like to seek constructive feedback on the idea of keeping Juno around for a little longer.

Re: [openstack-dev] Learning to Debug the Gate

On 11/03/2015 05:30 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: > On 11/02/2015 12:39 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: >> On 10/29/2015 10:42 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: >>> On 10/29/2015 08:27 AM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 10/28/2015 12:14 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > On 10/27/2015 4:08 AM, Anita Kuno wrote: >>

[openstack-dev] [kolla] distributing work using work items - call for participation in distributed blueprint development

HI folks, Sam Yaple had suggested we try using Work Items to track our work rather then Etherpad for complex distributed tasks. I've picked a pretty easy blueprint which should be mostly one line patches where everyone can chip in. The work should be pretty easy, even for new contributors to

  1   2   >