Alexander Kostrikov wrote:
What about Netrone?
That could be a good one but it may also be a violation:
http://www.infomoby.et/en/profile/netrone_networks_plc/64213
One idea I had in my mind for a while is using some alternative alphabet
for project naming. Ideally for some language tha
I probably missed something but...
Is the direct attached public IP available in devstack?
I'm not speaking about the default configuration but just the feature.
--
Jean-Daniel Bonnetot
http://www.ovh.com
@pilgrimstack
> Le 1 avr. 2016 à 00:17, Rochelle Grober a écrit :
>
> Cross posting
What about Netrone?
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
wrote:
> Akihiro Motoki wrote:
>
> IIRC 'Quantum' was renamed to 'Neutron' due to the trademark issue.
>> I don't think reverting it to 'Quantum' resolves the issue.
>> When we chose a new name, the foundation checked the lega
On 01/04/16 02:16, Assaf Muller wrote:
> Have you been negatively impacted by slow development and review
> velocity? Read on.
>
> OpenStack has had a slow review velocity for as long as I can
> remember. This has a cascading effect where people take up multiple
> tasks, so that they can work on so
Shinobu Kinjo wrote:
https://review.openstack.org/300271
This change would make sense. But will we have core reviewers election?
Obviously no, since you won’t have a ‘core reviewer’ term now. But what we
really want is having a separate offensive name for those whole +2 rights
were revo
+1
From: Hongbin Lu
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Date: Thursday, 31 March 2016 at 19:18
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Subject: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Eli Qiao for Magnum core reviewer
team
Hi all,
Andrew,
This is an excellent idea. It is apparently more efficient and error-proof
to make the split not by the resulted data but at the time it is actually
generated. We will play with this idea a little bit, and will come up with
design proposal shortly.
Meanwhile, please be informed that we al
Akihiro Motoki wrote:
IIRC 'Quantum' was renamed to 'Neutron' due to the trademark issue.
I don't think reverting it to 'Quantum' resolves the issue.
When we chose a new name, the foundation checked the legal/trademark issue,
so I think it is better to contact the OpenStack foundation or discus
Due to several release-critical issues spotted in Keystone during RC1
testing, a new release candidate was created for Mitaka. You can find
the RC2 source code tarball at:
https://tarballs.openstack.org/keystone/keystone-9.0.0.0rc2.tar.gz
Unless new release-critical issues are found that warra
Emilien Macchi wrote:
OpenStack big tent has different projects for deployments: Puppet,
Chef, Ansible, Kolla, TripleO, (...) but we still have some topics in
common.
I propose we use the Cross-project day to meet and talk about our
common topics: CI, doc, release, backward compatibility managem
LoL good one :)
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 6:47 AM Jimmy Akin wrote:
>
> Dear Neutrinos,
>
> We've been following the project for quite some time.
> To our satisfaction the project seems to have done well; the base line of
> features that were available to the networking component of OpenStack
> (th
101 - 111 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
