Re: [openstack-dev] How to run a task when multiple tasks are completed

Hi! In case when all 4 tasks are on the same node you should use 'requires' and 'required_for' fields in the task definition to make dependencies between them [0]. E.g.: *- id: Task4* *version: [a version of the tasks graph execution engine] * * type: [one of: stage, group, skipped, puppet,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2016-05-24 19:38:06 +: > Frankly, this is one of the major negatives we've felt from the Big Tent > idea... > > OpenStack use to be more of a product then it is now. When there were common > problems to be solved, there was pressure applied to solve

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [defcore] [interop] Proposal for a virtual sync dedicated to Import Refactor May 26th

On 25/05/16 09:53 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: Thanks Flavio, Erno. Right now we've 10 participants who have RSVP yes. I was waiting for last min additions but I think we can close the RSVP. We should go for a google hangout on air that can be streamed live on youtube for those merely

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] let's give a different warning message for different OS_PROJECT_NAME ?

> -Original Message- > From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 6:06 AM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] let's give a different warning > message for different OS_PROJECT_NAME ? > > On 05/25/2016 04:05 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][oslo] Mitaka neutron-*aas are broken when --config-dir is passed

Excerpts from Ihar Hrachyshka's message of 2016-05-25 14:03:24 +0200: > Hi all, > > Our internal Mitaka testing revealed that neutron-server fails to start when: > - any neutron-*aas service plugin is enabled (in our particular case, it was > lbaas); > - --config-dir option is passed to the

[openstack-dev] [nova] determining or clarifying a path for gabbi+nova

Earlier this year I worked with jaypipes to compose a spec[1] for using gabbi[2] with nova. Summit rolled around and there were some legitimate concerns about the focus of the spec being geared towards replacing the api sample tests. I wasn't at summit ☹ but my understanding of the outcome of

Re: [openstack-dev] [PTLs][all][mentoring] Mentors needed in specific technical areas

Auggy, This is a great wiki page and would love to see a high level "OpenStack Mentoring" page with links to projects that have this kind of "beginners guide". I'll try and do something similar for Trove but you've set the bar very high. -amrith > -Original Message- > From: Augustina

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [defcore] [interop] Proposal for a virtual sync dedicated to Import Refactor May 26th

Yes, downside indeed. We will rely on community being civil about this and me kicking people out for those who did not care to RSVP (if we need free slots). On 5/25/16 10:24 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 25/05/16 09:53 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: >> Thanks Flavio, Erno. >> >> Right now we've

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Log spool in the context

Excerpts from Alexis Lee's message of 2016-05-25 13:46:05 +0100: > Doug Hellmann said on Tue, May 24, 2016 at 02:53:51PM -0400: > > Rather than forcing SpoolManager to be a singleton, maybe the thing > > to do is build some functions for managing a singleton instance (or > > one per type or

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr][magnum]Installing kuryr for mutlinode openstack setup

From: Antoni Segura Puimedon [mailto:toni+openstac...@midokura.com] Sent: May-25-16 6:55 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Gal Sagie; openstack-operators Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr][magnum]Installing kuryr for mutlinode openstack setup On Wed, May

Re: [openstack-dev] [PTLs][all][mentoring] Mentors needed in specific technical areas

From: Augustina Ragwitz [mailto:aragwitz.li...@pobox.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 10:12 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [PTLs][all][mentoring] Mentors needed in specific technical areas On 12:54 May 24, Augustina Ragwitz wrote: Hi Emily, I'm the Nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr][magnum]Installing kuryr for mutlinode openstack setup

Hi, Thanks Jaume and Antoni. I tried the installation by git cloning the kuryr repo. I did pip install -r requirements.txt. After that I did pip install . . But it doesn't end successfully. There are no config files in /etc/kuryr directory. root@compute1:~/kuryr# pip install . Unpacking

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] [nova] live migration, libvirt 1.3, and the gate

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 01:59:17PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: Thanks for the summary, Sean. [...] > It turns out it works fine because libvirt *actually* seems to take the > data from cpu_map.xml and do a translation to what it believes qemu will > understand. On these systems apparently this

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova Live Migration of rescued instances

On 25/05/16 11:59, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, The VMware driver supports rescue. Live migration should be pretty simple here as the rescue is only for the disk. So you can migrate the instance to whatever host you want. The only concern with the VMware driver is that the live migration patches

[openstack-dev] [tc] [heat] [murano] [app-catalog] OpenStack Apps Community, several suggestions how to improve collaboration

Colleagues, having attended many sessions and talked to many customers, partners and contributors in Austin I’d like to suggest several improvements to how we develop OpenStack apps and work with the Community App Catalog ( https://apps.openstack.org/). Key goals to achieve are: - Provide

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Need helps to implement the full baremetals support

Hi, Spyros I fixed a conflicts and upload following patch. * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/320968/ But it isn’t tested yet, maybe it doesn’t work.. If you have a question, please feel free to ask. Thanks -yuanying 2016年5月25日(水) 17:56 Spyros Trigazis : > Hi Yuanying,

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Log spool in the context

Doug Hellmann said on Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:06:35AM -0400: > Excerpts from Alexis Lee's message of 2016-05-25 13:46:05 +0100: > > def some_method(ctx): > > log = tools.get_api_logger(ctx) or LOG > > That "or" statement in some_method() seems to imply though that > when spool logging is

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2016-05-25 13:21:49 +0200: > On 25/05/16 06:48 -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > > [snip] > > >4. Do we want to be in the business of building data plane services that > >will all run into python limitations, and will all need to be rewritten > >in another

[openstack-dev] [app-catalog] [heat] [murano] App Catalog IRC meeting Thursday May 26th

Join us Thursday for our weekly meeting, scheduled for May 26th at 17:00UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 The agenda can be found here, and please add to if you want to discuss something with the Community App Catalog team: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/app-catalog This week we will see

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

On 24 May 2016 at 22:07, Elzur, Uri wrote: > Hi Armando > > > > Pls see below [UE] > > > > Thx > > > > Uri (“Oo-Ree”) > > C: 949-378-7568 > > > > *From:* Armando M. [mailto:arma...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, May 20, 2016 9:08 PM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

In my opinion, it is a better approach to break this down into plugin vs driver support. There should be no problem adding support into networking-sfc plugin for NSH today. The OVS driver however, depends on OVS as the dataplane - which I can see a solid argument for only supporting an

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Zaqar messages standardization

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Jiri Tomasek wrote: > Hey all, > > I've been recently working on getting the TripleO UI integrated with Zaqar, > so it can receive a messages from Mistral workflows and act upon them > without having to do various polling hacks. > > Since

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Armando M. wrote: > > > On 25 May 2016 at 13:31, Elzur, Uri wrote: >> >> Kyle >> >> Thx for your comment. I think these are orthogonal discussions. The heart >> of this one, for me, and in the Neutron context, is plotting a

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] process for making decisions?

Hi Jim, Thanks for responding. >If we do think we need a formal process for making decisions as you >define above, I think it should be something like: > >* bring it up on the mailing list >* someone /must/ propose a solution along the way, in gerrit, perhaps > the person that started the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova Live Migration of rescued instances

Hello Paul, So, Hyper-V supports nova-rescue at the moment, the patch actually got in last week, thanks to Dan Smith and Jay Pipes. \o/ I've tested live-migration of rescued Hyper-V instances, and it works for both Generation 1 and Generation 2 VMs. I'm thinking that a tempest test for this

[openstack-dev] [glance] [stable] Proposal to add Ian Cordasco to glance-stable-maint

Hi all, I would like to propose adding Ian to glance-stable-maint team. The interest is coming from him and I've already asked for feedback from the current glance-stable-maint folks, which has been in Ian's favor. Also, as Ian mentions the current global stable team isn't going to subsume the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] determining or clarifying a path for gabbi+nova

On Wed, May 25, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > > Earlier this year I worked with jaypipes to compose a spec[1] for using > gabbi[2] with nova. Summit rolled around and there were some legitimate > concerns about the focus of the spec being geared towards replacing the > api sample

[openstack-dev] [puppet] proposal about puppet versions testing coverage

Greating folks, In a recent poll [1], we asked to our community to tell which version of Puppet they were running. The motivation is to make sure our Puppet OpenStack CI test the right things, that are really useful. Right now, we run unit test jobs on puppet on 3.3, 3.4, 3.6, 3.8, 4.0 and

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

On 05/25/2016 06:48 AM, Sean Dague wrote: I've been watching the threads, trying to digest, and find the way's this is getting sliced doesn't quite slice the way I've been thinking about it. (which might just means I've been thinking about it wrong). However, here is my current set of thoughts

Re: [openstack-dev] [PTLs][all][mentoring] Mentors needed in specific technical areas

I can be one of the mentors for those interested in the Neutron project -- Sean M. Collins __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] Trove Meeting notes

Here are the notes from the (just concluded) Trove meeting. http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/trove/2016/trove.2016-05-25-18.00.html Two actions: ACTION: pmalik and stewie925 to look into the rebase issue (amrith, 18:41:32) ACTION: amrith pmackinn cp16net to see what this mysql issue is

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] determining or clarifying a path for gabbi+nova

On Wed, 25 May 2016, Andrew Laski wrote: After reading this my first thought is that gabbi would handle what I'm testing in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/263927/33/nova/tests/functional/wsgi/test_servers.py, or any of the other tests in that directory. Does that seem accurate? And what would

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] determining or clarifying a path for gabbi+nova

On Wed, 25 May 2016, Sean Dague wrote: I still would rather not put gabbi into the compute API testing this cycle. Instead learn from the placement side, let people see good patterns there, and not confuse contributors with multiple ways to test things in the compute API. Because that requires

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

On 25 May 2016 at 10:24, Tim Rozet wrote: > In my opinion, it is a better approach to break this down into plugin vs > driver support. There should be no problem adding support into > networking-sfc plugin for NSH today. The OVS driver however, depends on > OVS as the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

On 25 May 2016 at 12:29, Elzur, Uri wrote: > Armando > > > > I’m asking for a clear answer “I think the position here is as follows: > if a technology is not mainstream, i.e. readily available via distros and > the various channels, it can only be integrated via an

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

On 25 May 2016 at 13:31, Elzur, Uri wrote: > Kyle > > Thx for your comment. I think these are orthogonal discussions. The heart > of this one, for me, and in the Neutron context, is plotting a road forward > on new technologies INDEPENDENT of external (even if related) open

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

Armando I’m asking for a clear answer “I think the position here is as follows: if a technology is not mainstream, i.e. readily available via distros and the various channels, it can only be integrated via an experimental path” If we can allow for the EXPERIMENTAL path for NSH, then we can

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

Tim +1 for me (guess not surprising...) Thx Uri (“Oo-Ree”) C: 949-378-7568 -Original Message- From: Tim Rozet [mailto:tro...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 10:24 AM To: Armando M. ; Elzur, Uri Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] determining or clarifying a path for gabbi+nova

On 05/25/2016 02:54 PM, Andrew Laski wrote: > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Chris Dent wrote: >> >> Earlier this year I worked with jaypipes to compose a spec[1] for using >> gabbi[2] with nova. Summit rolled around and there were some legitimate >> concerns about the focus of the spec

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

Hi Armando I hear (hopefully right ☺) that we have an agreement that the SFC abstraction we want to follow (and that includes in my mind networking-sfc and OVN – pls feel free to correct me if wrong!) is use of NSH approach. This includes internal representation of the chain, support of

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] proposal about puppet versions testing coverage

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Greating folks, > > In a recent poll [1], we asked to our community to tell which version > of Puppet they were running. > The motivation is to make sure our Puppet OpenStack CI test the right > things, that are really

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Unable to set metadata_encryption_key

Hello Nikhil, Looking at how my proposed solution ( https://review.openstack.org/319659) was inefficient. Instead of using a dummy string to identify encrypted data, I have been thinking about handling the exceptions that are generated when you try to decrypt unencrypted data, since it would

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [defcore] [interop] Proposal for a virtual sync dedicated to Import Refactor May 26th

The agenda is up https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-glance-import-refactor-midcycle-sync-1 Please note https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/VirtualSprints#Image_Import_Refactor_Sync_.231_--_Newton If you are having issues connecting the hangout, you can reach out to me on IRC at around 1505UTC

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] New Core Reviewer (sent on behalf of Steve Martinelli)

Thank you all, it's a privilege to be part of a team from where I've learned so much. =) On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Brad Topol wrote: > CONGRATULATIONS Rodrigo!!! Very well deserved!!! > > --Brad > > > Brad Topol, Ph.D. > IBM Distinguished Engineer > OpenStack > (919)

[openstack-dev] [craton]

__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Horizon in devstack is broken, rechecks are futile

Dear Horizon contributors, The test job dsvm-integration fails for a reason for the last ~24 hours, please do not recheck your patches if you see that almost all integration tests fail (and only these tests) - it won't help. The fix for django_openstack_auth issue which has been uncovered by the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Elzur, Uri wrote: > Armando > > > > I’m asking for a clear answer “I think the position here is as follows: if a > technology is not mainstream, i.e. readily available via distros and the > various channels, it can only be integrated via an

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo_config] Improving Config Option Help Texts

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:58 PM, John Garbutt > wrote: > >> On 24 May 2016 at 19:03, Ian Cordasco wrote: >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Erno Kuvaja

Re: [openstack-dev] [PTLs][all][mentoring] Mentors needed in specific technical areas

Hi Sean, Thanks for volunteering! Please fill out the signup form here: https://openstackfoundation.formstack.com/forms/mentoring ~Emily Hugenbruch IRC: ekhugen Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 18:22:21 + From: "Sean M. Collins" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] New Core Reviewer (sent on behalf of Steve Martinelli)

++ very well deserved! On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Rodrigo Duarte wrote: > Thank you all, it's a privilege to be part of a team from where I've > learned so much. =) > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Brad Topol wrote: > >> CONGRATULATIONS

Re: [openstack-dev] [higgins] Continued discussion from the last team meeting

Hello to All. See inline comments. Kind regards, Denys Makogon 2016-05-24 23:55 GMT+03:00 Hongbin Lu : > Hi all, > > > > At the last team meeting, we tried to define the scope of the Higgins > project. In general, we agreed to focus on the following features as an >

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] input erroneous `vitrage_id` in `vitrage rca show`API or `vitrage topology show` API

Hi dwj, I'm passing the question (and answer) to openstack mailing list. You are right. In case of an invalid vitrage id, we should not return HTTP 404 error. I think the correct behavior would be to return a nice error message like "Alarm XYZ does not exist". You can open a bug about it.

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]weekly meeting of May. 25

Hi, IRC meeting: https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=openstack-meeting on every Wednesday starting from UTC 13:00. Let's continue the working items: # implementation discussion of 'cross pod L2 networking' and 'dynamic pod binding' # bugs review If you have other topics to be discussed in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ansible][ironic] Reusing Ansible code in OpenStack projects

Hi All, I had the same question in "legal-discuss" ML and would like to summarize the outcome to benefit all. It appears that we are in green in regards of the subject in question: - from the driver itself we are launching "ansible-playbook" as a subprocess - our custom Ansible callback plugin

Re: [openstack-dev] [OVN] [networking-ovn] [networking-sfc] SFC and OVN

Ryan, Ok – I will let the experts weigh in on load balancing. In the meantime I have attached a couple of files to show where I am going. The first is sfc_dict.py and is a representation of the dict I am passing from SFC to OVN. This will then translate to the attached ovn-nb schema file. One

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][nova][horizon] Serial console support for ironic instances

Jim, thank you so much for having discussed with johnthetubaguy and added this topic to the agenda. I also will attend to Nova IRC meeting. Best Regards, Yuiko Takada Mori 2016-05-25 20:27 GMT+09:00 Jim Rollenhagen : > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 01:58:18PM +0900, Yuiko

Re: [openstack-dev] [craton]

On May 25, 2016 6:26 PM, "Gerald Bothello" wrote: > Hi Gerald! Did you have some questions about craton that I can help by answering? - Ian __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

My responses are inline and to question 5, which, like you, I think is the key. On 25 May 2016, at 3:48, Sean Dague wrote: > I've been watching the threads, trying to digest, and find the way's > this is getting sliced doesn't quite slice the way I've been thinking > about it. (which might just

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

> On May 25, 2016, at 12:43 PM, Ben Swartzlander wrote: > > On 05/25/2016 06:48 AM, Sean Dague wrote: >> I've been watching the threads, trying to digest, and find the way's >> this is getting sliced doesn't quite slice the way I've been thinking >> about it. (which might

Re: [openstack-dev] [OVN] [networking-ovn] [networking-sfc] SFC and OVN

John McDowall wrote on 05/25/2016 07:27:46 PM: > From: John McDowall > To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS > Cc: "disc...@openvswitch.org" , "OpenStack > Development Mailing List"

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Proposal for a mid-cycle virtual sync on operator issues

I’m hoping some people from the Large Deployment Team can come along. It’s not a good time for me in Australia but hoping someone else can join in. Sam > On 26 May 2016, at 2:16 AM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > > Hello, > > > Firstly, I would like to thank Fei Long for

Re: [openstack-dev] [OVN] [networking-ovn] [networking-sfc] SFC and OVN

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 09:27:31AM -0500, Ryan Moats wrote: > As I understand it, Table 0 identifies the logical port and logical > flow. I'm worried that this means we'll end up with separate bucket > rules for each ingress port of the port pairs that make up a port > group, leading to a

[openstack-dev] [kolla] Cross project spec liason

Fellow core reviewers, I have a lot of liasing to do as a PTL and would like to offload some of it so I can get some actual sleep :) Are there any takers on Mike's requirement for a cross-project liason for Kolla? The job involves reviewing all specs in the cross project spec repository and

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] API changes on limit / marker / sort in Newton

Thanks for the information, really hope these two can get merged for Newton: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/240401/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239869/ On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 5:55 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > +1 on all your suggestions below, Sean. > > -jay > > > On

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr][magnum]Installing kuryr for mutlinode openstack setup

Hi Akshay, Sorry about that. You need to run "tox -e genconfig" . After this inside kuryr/etc "kuryr.conf_sample" file will get generated. Copy this file to /etc/kuryr/ after renaming to kuryr.conf. Documentation will be updated soon. -Vikas . On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Akshay Kumar

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] input erroneous `vitrage_id` in `vitrage rca show`API or `vitrage topology show` API

Hi, You are right. The API should return 404, and the CLI should issue the nice error message. Best Regards, Ifat. From: Zhang Yujun [mailto:zhangyujun+...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 10:10 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions);

Re: [openstack-dev] [OVN] [networking-ovn] [networking-sfc] SFC and OVN

Ben Pfaff wrote on 05/25/2016 07:44:43 PM: > From: Ben Pfaff > To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS > Cc: John McDowall , > "disc...@openvswitch.org" , OpenStack > Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Cross project spec liason

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Fellow core reviewers, > > I have a lot of liasing to do as a PTL and would like to offload some of > it so I can get some actual sleep :) Are there any takers on Mike's > requirement for a cross-project liason for

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Proposal for a mid-cycle virtual sync on operator issues

Thanks Sam. We purposefully chose that time to accommodate some of our community members from the Pacific. I'm assuming it's just your case that's not working out for that time? So, hopefully other Australian/NZ friends can join. On 5/26/16 12:59 AM, Sam Morrison wrote: > I’m hoping some people

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [Plugins] Netconfig tasks changes

Hi folks, we had to revert those changes [0] since it's impossible to propery handle two different netconfig tasks for multi-role nodes. So everything stays as it was before - we have single task 'netconfig' to configure network for all roles and you don't need to change anything in your plugins.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [Plugins] Netconfig tasks changes

Hello Alex, I have a question about the proposed changes. Is it possible to introduce new vlan and associated bridge only for controllers? I think about DMZ use case and possibility to expose public IPs/VIP and API endpoints on controllers on a completely separate L2 network (segment vlan/bridge)

[openstack-dev] [kuryr][magnum]Installing kuryr for mutlinode openstack setup

Hello Akshay, responses inline: On Wed, 25 May 2016 10:48, Akshay Kumar Sanghai wrote: > Hi, > I have a 4 node openstack setup (1 controller, 1 network, 2 compute nodes). > I want to install kuryr in liberty version. I cannot find a package in > ubuntu repo. There is not yet official version of

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] discovery and deploy a compute node automatically

Hi Igor, Thanks, and yes you got my point, my "automatically ", means after a new node has been discovered , the deployement process starts automatically. Cron may help, but what if I need more info to check if that new discovered node deserves to be a compute node or not? Can the cron script

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Launch work group for cross-pod L2 networking feature

Hi members, Thanks for attending the work group meeting. Our discussion log can be viewed here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15meGv7wL2ClWZMKd4BPN0Q3br-ac2JDmTvFPLOgUHt0/edit?usp=sharing BR Zhiyuan On 24 May 2016 at 09:51, Yipei Niu wrote: > Hi, all, > > Since I have

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

On Tue, May 24 2016, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > For recent example, there has been a lot of talk about reimplementing features > from Barbican in Magnum, Keystone, etc, and not wanting to depend on Barbican. > In the pre-tent days, we'd just fix Barbican to do the things we all need it > to, and then

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Launch work group for cross-pod L2 networking feature

Hi Team, Reading today's discussion log, I would encourage you to refer to each documentation as much as you can. [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kZZ1snMOCD9IQvUKI5NVDzSASpw-QKj7l2zNqMEd3g/edit#heading=h.fx4zy2u9se10 [2]

[openstack-dev] [devstack] let's give a different warning message for different OS_PROJECT_NAME ?

Hi All, A warning message leave me a doubt. After having installed openstack by devstack, when I use the cmd "source openrc", a warning message is printed in the terminal that "WARNING: setting legacy OS_TENANT_NAME to support cli tools." and then when I

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] let's give a different warning message for different OS_PROJECT_NAME ?

On 05/25/2016 04:05 AM, li.yuanz...@zte.com.cn wrote: > Hi All, > A warning message leave me a doubt. > > After having installed openstack by devstack, when I use the cmd > "source openrc", a warning message is > printed in the terminal that "WARNING: setting legacy

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

I've been watching the threads, trying to digest, and find the way's this is getting sliced doesn't quite slice the way I've been thinking about it. (which might just means I've been thinking about it wrong). However, here is my current set of thoughts on things. 1. Should OpenStack be open to

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr][magnum]Installing kuryr for mutlinode openstack setup

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Jaume Devesa wrote: > Hello Akshay, > > responses inline: > > On Wed, 25 May 2016 10:48, Akshay Kumar Sanghai wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a 4 node openstack setup (1 controller, 1 network, 2 compute > nodes). > > I want to install kuryr in

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] discovery and deploy a compute node automatically

Hi Aleksandr, Thanks for the examples! That will really help me a lot. On May 25, 2016 6:26 PM, "Aleksandr Didenko" wrote: > Hi, > > +1 to Igor. It should be easily doable via some sort of "watcher" script > (run it as a daemon or under cron), that script should: > > -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [Plugins] Netconfig tasks changes

Thanks Alex, will experiment with it once again although AFAIR it doesn't solve thing I'd like to do. I'll come later to you in case of any questions. On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Aleksandr Didenko wrote: > Hey Adam, > > in Fuel we have the following option

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo_config] Improving Config Option Help Texts

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:58 PM, John Garbutt wrote: > On 24 May 2016 at 19:03, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Erno Kuvaja > > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] discovery and deploy a compute node automatically

Hey Jason, What do you mean by "automatically"? You need to assign "compute" role on that discovered node, and hit "Deploy Changes" button. If you really want to deploy any new discovered node automatically, I think you can create some automation script and put it under cron. Hope it helps,

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] input erroneous `vitrage_id` in `vitrage rca show`API or `vitrage topology show` API

Hi, all I'm not sure if vitrage follows the RESTful API. In RESTful API, it is reasonable to return 404 error when the requested resource does not exist. If we want to display a friendly message, it could be implemented in front end. The backend API should remain simple and consistent since we

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova Live Migration of rescued instances

I'm working on a spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/307131/ to permit the live migration of rescued instances. I have an implementation that works for libvirt and have addressed lack of support for this feature in other drivers using driver capabilities. I've achieved this for libvirt driver

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [Plugins] Netconfig tasks changes

Hey Adam, in Fuel we have the following option (checkbox) on Network Setting tab: Assign public network to all nodes When disabled, public network will be assigned to controllers only So if you uncheck it (by default it's unchecked) then public network and 'br-ex' will exist on controllers

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [Plugins] Netconfig tasks changes

Hi Adam, Maybe you want to look into network templates [1]? Although the documentation is a bit sparse, it allows you to define flexible network mappings. BR, Simon [1] https://docs.mirantis.com/openstack/fuel/fuel-8.0/operations.html#using-networking-templates On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:26 AM,

[openstack-dev] [fuel] discovery and deploy a compute node automatically

Hi All, Is there any way for fuel to deploy a newly discovered node as a compute node automatically? I followed the openstack doc for fuel but did not get any answer. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] discovery and deploy a compute node automatically

Hi, +1 to Igor. It should be easily doable via some sort of "watcher" script (run it as a daemon or under cron), that script should: - watch for new nodes in 'discover' state. CLI example: fuel nodes - assign new nodes to env with compute role. CLI example: fuel --env $ENV_ID node set --node

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: keystone federation user story

On 25 May 2016 at 03:55, Alexander Makarov wrote: > Colleagues, > > here is an actual use case for shadow users assignments, let's discuss > possible solutions: all suggestions are appreciated. > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Andrey Grebennikov

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Need helps to implement the full baremetals support

Hi Yuanying, please upload your workaround. I can test it and try to fix the conflicts. Even if it conflicts we can have some iterations on it. I'll upload later what worked for me on devstack. Thanks, Spyros On 25 May 2016 at 05:13, Yuanying OTSUKA wrote: > Hi,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral][Zaqar][Ceilometer][Searchlight] Triggering Mistral workflows from Zaqar messages

On Wed, May 25 2016, Fei Long Wang wrote: > Thanks for raising the topic and adding Ceilometer and Searchlight to > this thread. I think a similar topic about user notification was > discussed before. There are a lot of events/notifications in the infra's > message queues and tenant users are

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova Live Migration of rescued instances

Hi, The VMware driver supports rescue. Live migration should be pretty simple here as the rescue is only for the disk. So you can migrate the instance to whatever host you want. The only concern with the VMware driver is that the live migration patches are in review and I think that they

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Log spool in the context

Doug Hellmann said on Tue, May 24, 2016 at 02:53:51PM -0400: > Rather than forcing SpoolManager to be a singleton, maybe the thing > to do is build some functions for managing a singleton instance (or > one per type or whatever), and making that API convenient enough > that using the spool logger

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum][Octavia] Need help for LBaaS v2

Hi Wanghua, I think that you have a networking issue within your setup - Octavia service is unable to connect to the running Amphora. If this is the case - you will have to debug your setup as this is a connectivity issue and not a software problem. On May 24, 2016, at 05:45, 王华

[openstack-dev] How to run a task when multiple tasks are completed

Fuel Team, I have couple of tasks in Fuel (deployment_tasks.yaml) as below – Task1 Task2 Task3 Task4 Now, I want to run Task4 only when Tasks-1,2,3 are completed. How I can configure this in deployment_tasks yaml ? Please suggest. Thanks & Regards, J. Venkata Mahesh

[openstack-dev] [nova] nova-bugs team meeting (Europe/Asia-friendly) is now earlier

Please be aware that the Europe/Asia-friendly time slot of the nova-bugs-team meeting [1] got moved from 10:00 UTC to 08:00 UTC. I'm doing this because this time slot isn't well attended in the last weeks and I think this new time slot will make it easier for folks in (East) Asia to attend. This

Re: [openstack-dev] How to single sign on with windows authentication with Keystone

Link: https://openstack.nimeyo.com/85057/?show=85707#c85707 From: imocha I am trying to follow the steps. I am able to install ADFS and would like to proceed further. However, I am having issues with setting up SSL endpoints for Keystone V3. I am using Mitaka. Is there any

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

On 25/05/16 06:48 -0400, Sean Dague wrote: [snip] 4. Do we want to be in the business of building data plane services that will all run into python limitations, and will all need to be rewritten in another language? This is a slightly different spin on the question Thierry is asking. Control

  1   2   >