Hi,
I am not a core reviewer but having met Dawid in person and working closely
with him on some important bug fixes – I fully support the idea.
From: Anastasia Kuznetsova
>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
On 27 July 2016 at 19:10, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 04:09:54PM +0200, Markus Zoeller wrote:
> > Since yesterday, Nova uses "oslo.context" 2.6.0 [1] but the needed
> > change [2] is not yet in place, which broke "gate-nova-python27-db"[3].
> > Logstash
Hi,
You posted a project for "Google summer of code 2016" named: "Neutron -
Metering agent add port statistics".
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Internship_ideas
The project is listed as 'Open' on the wiki and i could’t find a "open project"
regarding this on the GSOC website or
Thanks for working on this.
Modified the subject to be 'community-wide goals'.
-Qiming
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 04:55:22PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> One of the outcomes of the discussion at the leadership training
> session earlier this year was the idea that the TC should set some
>
Neutrinos,
For those of you who are going to attend the Neutron mid-cycle [1] in
person or be engaged on IRC, please refer to [2] for a list of topics we
should give some attention and priority during our time in Cork.
The list of topics is already pretty packed, however if you would like to
Hey folks,
I just wanted to let the core team and others in the community know this tag
application was rejected. The Kolla core team made a choice when we decided to
make Liberty non-dangerous. We knew at the time it would imperil an
application for stable:follows-policy. We thought at the
Right this is step #1 there, although slightly different because this
project isn't really retired, its just moved to a different place; but
good enough :-P
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On 07/30/2016 03:20 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
[...]
As I recall we no longer "move" the git repositories. We
+1, good job, Dawid!
Regards!
---
Lingxian Kong
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Elisha, Moshe (Nokia - IL)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not a core reviewer but having met Dawid in person and working closely
> with him on some important bug
Yes, this was intentionally done.The logical-source-port is important only at
the point of classification.All successive classifications rely only on the 5
tuple and MPLS label (chain ID).
Consider an extension of the scenario you mention below.
Sources: (similar to your case)a b
Port-pairs:
Jamie,
I’ve updated your review re: u-c oslo.context==2.7.0 in Trove. It will fail but
that is understood. I’ve manually tested o.c 2.7.0 and it appears to work.
-amrith
From: Jamie Lennox [mailto:jamielen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2016 2:17 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing
Doug,
Thanks for doing this. In the interests of transparency and full disclosure, I
was at the leadership training and heard about this idea there (and was
strongly in favor of it then, as I am now).
I think it is very important that OpenStack not devolve into a loose
confederation of bags
for a second I thought that would be a great life cycle operation for
bays .. :)
Ton,
From: Adrian Otto
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Date: 07/29/2016 11:31 AM
Subject:
On 07/30/2016 03:20 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
> [...]
> As I recall we no longer "move" the git repositories. We simply remove
> the permissions/ACLs so new reviews aren't added/approved, and often the
> repo is emptied with only a readme pointing to the new location.
Full documentation for the
13 matches
Mail list logo