Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposing Abhishek Raut as neutronclient core

+1 On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Brandon Logan wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 02:22 +0100, Armando M. wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Abhishek Raut's recent involvement in OSC and python-neutronclient has > helped moving a few efforts along in the right

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]agenda of weekly meeting Dec.14

Hello, team, Agenda of Dec.14 weekly meeting: 1. VxLAN L2 networking across Neutron feature 2. Ocata feature development review 3. Open Discussion How to join: # IRC meeting: https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=openstack-meeting on every Wednesday starting from UTC 13:00. If you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/glance failed

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 09:46:54AM -0600, Ian Cordasco wrote: >   > > -Original Message- > From: Andreas Jaeger > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Date: December 12, 2016 at 01:39:17 > To: 

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [all] Known issue with CentOS 7.3 and qemu-kvm(-ev) 2.6.0

- Original Message - > From: "Steve Gordon" > To: "David Moreau Simard" > Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > , "OpenStack > Operators" >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][monasca] Can we uncap python-kafka ?

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:03:13AM +, Keen, Joe wrote: > I don’t know, yet, that we can. Unless we can find an answer to the > questions I had above I’m not sure that this new library will be > performant and durable enough for the use cases Monasca has. I’m fairly > confident that we can

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

> On Dec 13, 2016, at 19:43, Ed Leafe wrote: > > On Dec 12, 2016, at 10:30 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > >> The issue raised is they violate the 4 opens. > > Not necessarily. If you have regular planning meetings and discussions in an > open manner as

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposing Abhishek Raut as neutronclient core

+1 On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 02:22 +0100, Armando M. wrote: Hi folks, Abhishek Raut's recent involvement in OSC and python-neutronclient has helped moving a few efforts along in the right direction. I would like to suggest we double down on core firepower for the neutronclient repo alongside

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [all] Known issue with CentOS 7.3 and qemu-kvm(-ev) 2.6.0

- Original Message - > From: "David Moreau Simard" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > , "OpenStack > Operators" > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 6:13:12 PM

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposing Abhishek Raut as neutronclient core

+1 From: Kevin Benton [mailto:ke...@benton.pub] Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 6:57 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposing Abhishek Raut as neutronclient core +1 On Dec 13, 2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposing Abhishek Raut as neutronclient core

+1 On 2016/12/14 11:56, Kevin Benton wrote: +1 On Dec 13, 2016 17:27, "Armando M." > wrote: Hi folks, Abhishek Raut's recent involvement in OSC and python-neutronclient has helped moving a few efforts along in the right direction. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

On Dec 12, 2016, at 10:30 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > The issue raised is they violate the 4 opens. Not necessarily. If you have regular planning meetings and discussions in an open manner as prescribed, an occasional conference to discuss a particular matter is not a

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

hi, On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Lingxian Kong wrote: > Hi, Takashi, > > Thanks for working on this project, we (Catalyst Cloud) also provide VPNaaS > in our OpenStack based public cloud, so maybe we can also provide help from > our side. which driver are you using? >

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > I really fail to see how add hoc meetings, if link will be posted openly on > IRC, notes made public and invitation extended to everyone would violate 4 > opens. It's virtuality impossible in globally distributed

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposing Abhishek Raut as neutronclient core

+1 On Dec 13, 2016 17:27, "Armando M." wrote: > Hi folks, > > Abhishek Raut's recent involvement in OSC and python-neutronclient has > helped moving a few efforts along in the right direction. I would like to > suggest we double down on core firepower for the neutronclient

[openstack-dev] [openstack][nova][nova-api] index() method in InstanceUsageAuditLogController return an object rather than a list

Hi, all. As we know, the "index()" method usually return object list and the "show()" method return an object for detail in api's controller. But I found in our InstanceUsageAuditLogController[1], the 'index' method return an object, I'm really not sure that index() is buggy, and I wonder what it

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposing Abhishek Raut as neutronclient core

Hi folks, Abhishek Raut's recent involvement in OSC and python-neutronclient has helped moving a few efforts along in the right direction. I would like to suggest we double down on core firepower for the neutronclient repo alongside Akihiro [1]. This not only will help speed up our transition to

[openstack-dev] Feedback requested on Lwood

Hi, I’m grateful that Lwood [1] still generates positive commentary from across the OpenStack Community, but figure as the year draws to a close, it’s a good time to gather some feedback. To that end I’ve put together a survey; https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/3FQX2YR It will probably take

[openstack-dev] [all] Known issue with CentOS 7.3 and qemu-kvm(-ev) 2.6.0

Hi, CentOS 7.3 was released yesterday and a newer version of qemu-kvm-ev was shipped as part of this release if you have the CentOS Virtualization SIG repositories enabled. If you're using RDO >= Newton, you will have this repository enabled. It was not yet enforced in the Mitaka release so you

[openstack-dev] [tacker] Weekly meeting agenda - Dec 14, 2016

Here is the agenda for today's tacker weekly meeting, https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Tacker#Meeting_Dec_14th.2C_2016 - Announcements - Spec-less blueprints rundown - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tacker/+spec/deprecate-legacy-template-dsl (need owner)

Re: [openstack-dev] Golang technical requirements

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > Not sure if it's already been brought up, but I really like govendor: Govendor and glide are the two most promising candidates at this point. I just read today's summary of the Package Management Committee [0] and that

Re: [openstack-dev] Golang technical requirements

On 12/13/2016 03:17 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 12/13/2016 12:45 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: I am working on scoping the tasks required for the technical pieces of Golang adoption in OpenStack. This work has been informed somewhat by flaper87's reference doc proposal[0] for new language additions

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Requesting files from the overcloud from the undercloud

On 12/12/16 09:09, Steven Hardy wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 01:54:34PM -0700, Alex Schultz wrote: Hey folks, So I'm in the process of evaluating options for implementing the capture-environment-status-and-logs[0] blueprint. At the moment my current plan is to implement a mistral workflow

[openstack-dev] [glance] Propose Steve Lewis for Glance core

I'd like to propose Steve Lewis (stevelle on IRC) for Glance core. Take a look at any of his reviews, and you can see that he's thorough and comprehensive in his reviewing. He's knowledgeable about Python, Glance, and software engineering in general. He's gained a lot of experience in various

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] release status

I thought it would be useful to share our roadmap for TripleO releases. As a reminder, this is the official source of trust for OpenStack releases schedule: https://releases.openstack.org/ocata/schedule.html Over the last weeks, we discussed about how TripleO project would produce better releases

Re: [openstack-dev] Golang technical requirements

On 12/13/2016 12:45 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: > I am working on scoping the tasks required for the technical pieces of > Golang adoption in OpenStack. This work has been informed somewhat by > flaper87's reference doc proposal[0] for new language additions and is > (mostly) compatible with it,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Useful metrics?

On 12/13/2016 01:45 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 12/13/2016 12:36 PM, Sean Dague wrote: >> On 12/13/2016 01:29 PM, Augustina Ragwitz wrote: >>> Previously Markus Z. did some great work in putting together a dashboard >>> we've been using for bug queue maintenance. Are there additional reports >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Useful metrics?

On 12/13/2016 12:36 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 12/13/2016 01:29 PM, Augustina Ragwitz wrote: >> Previously Markus Z. did some great work in putting together a dashboard >> we've been using for bug queue maintenance. Are there additional reports >> or visualizations of the bug queue that might be

[openstack-dev] Golang technical requirements

I am working on scoping the tasks required for the technical pieces of Golang adoption in OpenStack. This work has been informed somewhat by flaper87's reference doc proposal[0] for new language additions and is (mostly) compatible with it, pending that proposal's final approval by the TC. As a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Useful metrics?

On 12/13/2016 01:29 PM, Augustina Ragwitz wrote: > Previously Markus Z. did some great work in putting together a dashboard > we've been using for bug queue maintenance. Are there additional reports > or visualizations of the bug queue that might be interesting or useful > for the team? Is there

[openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Useful metrics?

Previously Markus Z. did some great work in putting together a dashboard we've been using for bug queue maintenance. Are there additional reports or visualizations of the bug queue that might be interesting or useful for the team? Is there some information that might make bug skimming, triaging,

[openstack-dev] [infra][neutron] RADWARE CI voting permission in Neutron

Hi Neutron, Infra Cores, Radware CI would like to acquire voting (+/-1 Verified) permission. We voted before but we had to install a new CI and also changed our old gerrit user with a new user because ssh key issues. We are triggered by neutron-lbaas changes.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Deep dive session about the UI - January 12

On 13/12/16 14:07, Ana Krivokapic wrote: If you'd like a calendar invite for this deep dive, email me and I'll add you to the meeting invite. Yes please! Miles __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] Barcelona Summit - Speaker slide upload problem

The issue with file size uploads is resolved. Should be all good to go now. Thanks for your patience! Jimmy Jimmy Mcarthur December 13, 2016 at 10:46 AM Hi all - A quick note for those of you that have had trouble uploading slides for your Barcelona presentation.

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova]Quotas: Store resources and limits in the Keystone

On 12/13/2016 11:27 AM, Sajeesh Cimson Sasi wrote: Hi, There was an ongoing project of delimiter for Cross Project Quota Management. But I don't know the current status. Kindly have a look at it. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/284454/ More discussions are required on

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Network Configuration in TripleO UI

On 12/08/2016 08:10 PM, Jason Rist wrote: > On 12/08/2016 05:28 PM, Dan Sneddon wrote: >> On 12/08/2016 06:05 AM, Jiri Tomasek wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've been investigating how to implement TripleO network configuration >>> in TripleO UI. Based on my findings I'd like to propose a solution.

[openstack-dev] Barcelona Summit - Speaker slide upload problem

Hi all - A quick note for those of you that have had trouble uploading slides for your Barcelona presentation. We are working on the file size issue, which is throwing some errors on the site. Hope to have a fix up shortly, and apologies for the trouble. Thank you, Jimmy McArthur

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova]Quotas: Store resources and limits in the Keystone

Hi, There was an ongoing project of delimiter for Cross Project Quota Management. But I don't know the current status. Kindly have a look at it. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/284454/ More discussions are required on this.As more and more projects or services are having

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] New extensions for HAProxy driver based LBaaSv2

This features are supported by default in Octavia. So like keeping HAProxy namespace driver up and running is really loosing the whole value added which Octavia delivers. You can still work on NLBaaS v2 project but you need to remember that by default octavia will be used in cloud as LBaaS and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun][Glare][Glance] Building Docker images

Denis, Per my understanding, container image building is out of the scope of the Zun project. Zun assumes an image has been built and uploaded to a image repository (i.e. Glance, docker registry), then the image will be pulled down from the repo to host. However, feel free to let us know if

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Rechecking, gate breakages, the whiteboard, and you

My client munged the link :(. http://bit.ly/ironic-whiteboard is a correct link. Thanks, Jay > On Dec 13, 2016, at 8:08 AM, Jay Faulkner wrote: > > Hi all, > > I’ve noticed on several patches over the last few weeks, during various gate > outages, that some folks are blindly

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Rechecking, gate breakages, the whiteboard, and you

Hi all, I’ve noticed on several patches over the last few weeks, during various gate outages, that some folks are blindly rechecking their patches even when the gate is hard broken. Just a reminder that if you see a gate failure, and you aren’t sure it’s related to your change, to please check

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Upgrade Squad syncup]

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Marios Andreou wrote: > Hi OOOs o/ as discussed on this week's upstream weekly irc meeting [1] > lets schedule a syncup on the Ocata composable upgrades work and how we > will build on Steve Hardy's base ansible driven implementation. > > IMO a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Deep dive session about the UI - January 12

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Ana Krivokapic wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > On the 12th of January 2017, I'll lead a TripleO deep dive[1] session on how > to contribute to the TripleO UI. Hope to see many of you there! That's awesome! Thanks for this work. Is there some

[openstack-dev] [TripleO][Upgrade Squad syncup]

Hi OOOs o/ as discussed on this week's upstream weekly irc meeting [1] lets schedule a syncup on the Ocata composable upgrades work and how we will build on Steve Hardy's base ansible driven implementation. IMO a call would be the best format (I propose to schedule a bluejeans call, though I am

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Re-defining network templates/isolation

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:12:30PM -0500, Tim Rozet wrote: >> Hello, >> I wanted to get thoughts about re-thinking how users configure and create >> new networks with OOO. The current way to configure network settings for

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [ceilometer]

On 12/12/16 10:13 PM, Li, Xiaoyan wrote: > The new notification reports kinds of capacity information, includes total, > free, allocated, provisioned, visual_free. that's cool. just for reference, you can easily add support to generate metrics from this by editing the meters.yaml file[1].

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] New extensions for HAProxy driver based LBaaSv2

Hello, Just to be sure about adding new feature to lbaas, should we still proposing new features like this proposed by Zhi to neutron/lbaas or already to Octavia ? @Zhi, yep I like those two extensions it will be very helpful for LB. Have you already do something with that, or for now you just

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [inspector] RFC: deprecating "set IPMI credentials" feature in ironic-inspector

> On Dec 13, 2016, at 4:40 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > Hi folks! > > Since nearly its beginning, ironic-inspector has had a controversial feature: > we allow a user to request changing IPMI credentials of the node after > introspection. The new credentials are passed

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Cheatsheets for FOSDEM and devconf

On 12/13/2016 07:32 AM, Carlos Camacho Gonzalez wrote: > Hi TripleOers! > > We are working preparing some cheatsheets for people jumping into TripleO. > > So there is an early WIP version for a few cheatsheets that we want to share: > > -TripleO manual installation (Just a copy/paste step-wise

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

I really fail to see how add hoc meetings, if link will be posted openly on IRC, notes made public and invitation extended to everyone would violate 4 opens. It's virtuality impossible in globally distributed project to have everyone interested around at all times. All decisions made will be

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Cheatsheets for FOSDEM and devconf

Hi TripleOers! We are working preparing some cheatsheets for people jumping into TripleO. So there is an early WIP version for a few cheatsheets that we want to share: -TripleO manual installation (Just a copy/paste step-wise process to install TripleO) - Deployments debugging tips (Relevant

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [inspector] RFC: deprecating "set IPMI credentials" feature in ironic-inspector

Given that this seems to be a special case outside of what ironic-inspector normally handles, I'd be +1 to removing it. Perhaps this feature, if needed, is best implemented as a vendor passthru in ironic itself. Mario On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Deep dive session about the UI - January 12

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Ana Krivokapic wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > On the 12th of January 2017, I'll lead a TripleO deep dive[1] session on > how to contribute to the TripleO UI. Hope to see many of you there! > > > [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova]Quotas: Store resources and limits in the Keystone

On 12/13/2016 08:09 AM, Kseniya Tychkova wrote: Hi, I would like to share a spec [1] with you. The main idea of this spec is to start a discussion about quota management in the OpenStack. Quotas are scattered across OpenStack services. Each service defines it's own model and API for managing

[openstack-dev] [keystone][nova]Quotas: Store resources and limits in the Keystone

Hi, I would like to share a spec [1] with you. The main idea of this spec is to start a discussion about quota management in the OpenStack. Quotas are scattered across OpenStack services. Each service defines it's own model and API for managing resource's limits. Because of that, there are

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

On 12/13/2016 08:02 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Ed Leafe wrote: >> On Dec 12, 2016, at 11:16 AM, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: >> >>> Some contributors in kolla have had unscheduled video meetings. This has >>> resulted in complaints about inclusiveness. Some contributors can’t

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

Ed Leafe wrote: > On Dec 12, 2016, at 11:16 AM, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > >> Some contributors in kolla have had unscheduled video meetings. This has >> resulted in complaints about inclusiveness. Some contributors can’t even make >> the meeting we have, and another

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] drbdmanage is no more GPL2

Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-12-12 16:44:53 + (+), Duncan Thomas wrote: > [...] >> Having read the Openstack rules linked to earlier in the thread >> ( https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/licensing.html ) >> we're clearly violating that. > [...] > > Keep in mind that those

[openstack-dev] [ironic] [inspector] RFC: deprecating "set IPMI credentials" feature in ironic-inspector

Hi folks! Since nearly its beginning, ironic-inspector has had a controversial feature: we allow a user to request changing IPMI credentials of the node after introspection. The new credentials are passed back from inspector to the ramdisk, and the ramdisk calls "ipmitool" to set them. Now

[openstack-dev] [charms] bug squash thursdays

Hi Team Our last (and only) bug day was quite popular/successful, so lets try and have one focus day on bugs a month. So from January, the first Thursday of the month will officially be 'Charm Bug Squash Day'. The objective of the day is to triage any untouched bugs, sift through triaged bugs

[openstack-dev] [charms] irc meetings for next few weeks

Hi All As we're approaching a period where quite a few people will be having time off, I'm cancelling the IRC meetings on Mondays (1000 and 1700 on alternate weeks) until the 9th January at 1700 UTC - at which point we'll resume normal service, with the next meeting after that at 1000 UTC on the

[openstack-dev] Stuart McLaren stepping down from Glance core

Stuart McLaren has communicated to me that he's no longer able to commit time to working on Glance, and he's stepping down from the core reviewers' team. I'd like to thank Stuart for all his past service to Glance, which has been substantial ... he'll be much missed. I'd particularly like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] iscsi-deploy vs agent-deploy comparison

Hi Pavlo, On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: > Hi all, > > recent comments in some of my patches hinted me that I might be missing some > understanding of ironic workings, so I'd like to ask the following question: > > What

[openstack-dev] [ironic] iscsi-deploy vs agent-deploy comparison

Hi all, recent comments in some of my patches hinted me that I might be missing some understanding of ironic workings, so I'd like to ask the following question: What features/possibilities the iscsi-deploy currently has that agent-deploy has not (for example comparing pxe_ipmitool and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [ironic] Need to update kernel parameters on local boot

Yep, what Saravanan said is fine. The idea i had on mind, is to drop the config on /etc/default/grub, so when ironic deploys the image and installs grub, the parameters are applied properly. We did some POCs with that in the past, and Ironic was booting the images with the right kernel params. The

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack New Years Resolutions

Jean-Philippe, > s/COBOL/go/g and it makes your comment even funnier. It makes it scary =) Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Jean-Philippe Evrard < jean-philippe.evr...@rackspace.co.uk> wrote: > s/COBOL/go/g and it makes your comment even funnier. > > Best

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [ironic] Need to update kernel parameters on local boot

Hi Saravanan, Ah, ok. I'd assumed ironic didn't touch the bootloader as the docs show a mkconfig & reboot to customize grub for localboot: http://docs.openstack.org/project-install-guide/baremetal/draft/advanced.html#appending-kernel-parameters-to-boot-instances. Thanks, Ollie On 13 December

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

[openstack-dev] [Blazar] Meeting in PTG

Hi Blazar folks, Blazar team is thinking of whether having a meeting in PTG or not. IIRC, most of the team members is also a member of another team. So if someones are in PTG and has free time slot, we could have blazar team meeting in PTG. Of cause, we don't have official rooms and time

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [ironic] Need to update kernel parameters on local boot

Hi Oliver, During the deployment, Ironic will start the node with IPA ramdisk, which will copy the overcloud image to the node's disk, then configure the grub cfg [1], set the node to local boot and reboot the node. After which the node will be boot with the overcloud image. So no reboot required

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [ironic] Need to update kernel parameters on local boot

Hi Yolanda, > these changes will be created by ironic before the image is deployed The question I'm asking is how are the changed created without a reboot? Typically when setting this via a manual change or via tuned the process is to modify /etc/default/grub, run grub2-mkconfig, and then

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [ironic] Need to update kernel parameters on local boot

It won't need a reboot, because these changes will be created by ironic before the image is deployed. So it will boot with the right parameters. The alternative of doing with puppet after the image was deployed, needed a reboot, because the changes were done post-deploy. So ironic build steps are

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [ironic] Need to update kernel parameters on local boot

Hi, Saravanan wrote: > If ironic "deploy steps" can configure this "tuned" setting and run the > command How does this avoid the reboot? Yolanda wrote: > The idea will be to define custom deployment steps for ironic, like including > the kernel boot parameters. Again, is this avoiding the

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack New Years Resolutions

s/COBOL/go/g and it makes your comment even funnier. Best regards, JP On 13/12/2016, 00:00, "Jay Pipes" wrote: On 12/12/2016 06:40 PM, Nick Chase wrote: > OK, so if you were putting together New Year's Resolutions for OpenStack > development for 2017, what would

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Dec 14th kuryr-kubernetes syncup

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: > Hi fellow kuryrs! > > December 14th at 11:00 UTC we'll be having a video meeting [1] to sync > about the current Kubernetes integration. > We're moving the meeting to bluejeans [3] so that we can have a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [ironic] Need to update kernel parameters on local boot

Hi Yolanda, The flow for "tuned" will be like set the "tuned" configuration files, and then activate the profile by running the command "tuned-adm tuned-profile-nfv". This command will actually write the required configuration files for tuning the host. If ironic "deploy steps" can configure this

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] lxml gate issues

On Mon, Dec 12 2016, gordon chung wrote: > this is just a headsup, i'm fast approving my own magic[1] to fix gate > of the error 'fatal error: libxml/xpath.h: No such file or directory'[2]. > > some notes: > - i don't know why it doesn't affect aodh (so far) even though aodh has > the same lxml

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] how to use mock driver

Understood now. It could be less confusing if we give a better variable name (without `_re`) or put some comments after removing `exrex` :-) On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 4:03 PM Rosensweig, Elisha (Nokia - IL) < elisha.rosensw...@nokia.com> wrote: > Yes. We actually had to remove the regex

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] how to use mock driver

Yes. We actually had to remove the regex generation support a few months ago, since the python package we were using – exrex – was not one that OpenStack supported. From: Yujun Zhang [mailto:zhangyujun+...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 8:32 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing