[openstack-dev] [Networking-vSphere] whether support Ocata ?

Hi Networking-vSphere Team Networking-vSphere project whether support Ocata. I check the github, only have tag Mitaka? what about the Ocata? -- Shake Chen __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][tripleo-quickstart] Multiple parallel deployments on a single virthost

I've just submitted a slew of changes to tripleo-quickstart with the ultimate goal of being able to spin up multiple openstack deployments in parallel on the same target virthost. The meat of the change is an attempt to clearly separate the virthost from the undercloud; we had several tasks that

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][infra] does someone cares about Jenkins? I stopped.

thanks for noticing the gate related issue. for #1, feel free to push a patch to improve this. Kolla is very open for code change and gate change. So if you have any idea, try to push it. for #2, yes. Network causes some issue when building or pulling images. OpenStack-infra provide lots of

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] Stable/Ocata Version

any update for releasing stable/ocata branch or tag? It is Mar already. On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:23 AM, Henry Fourie wrote: > Gary, > >The plan is to have a stable/ocata branch by end of month. > > -Louis > > > > *From:* Gary Kotton

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Containers] Creating launchpad bugs and correct tags

On 03/02/2017 04:33 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 02/03/17 10:57 +, Dougal Matthews wrote: > > On 2 March 2017 at 10:40, Flavio Percoco wrote: > > > >> Greetings, > >> > >> Just wanted to give a heads up that we're tagging all the containers > >> related > >> bugs with

[openstack-dev] [neutron] networking-ofagent officially

Hi neutrinos, As stated a while back [1], it's about time to pull the trigger on the retirement of networking-ofagent. Please find the retirement patches available at [2]. Users of this repo must use the neutron OVS agent with of_interface set to native to retain the same level of capability.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][keystone] Pike PTG recap - quotas

The irc conversations have been continuing in #openstack-dev, which has had a solid mix of Nova and Keystone folks quite active in that. Out of it we've started to form 2 documents in the keystone-specs repository. 1) A high level spec on an unified limits approach -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Errors on $.instance.deploy() ... WHEN RUNNING WITHOUT MURANO-AGENT RABBIT

Greg, you're right in everything you said. This was fixed in master in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/387993/ with intent to fix tests and unblock the gate. But since those tests were introduced in Ocata the fix was not backported to Newton. So I've just did a partial packport of the root

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] API-WG PTG recap

On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Chris Dent wrote: * I produce a next version of the guidelines integrating the feedback. I've pushed out a new version that tries to integrate some chunk of the feedback. Probably missed some. Please comment as required: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/421846/ --

Re: [openstack-dev] Disabling glance v1 by default in devstack

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 7:38 PM Matt Riedemann wrote: > I've got a change proposed to disable glance v1 by default in devstack > for Pike [1]. > > The glance v1 API has been deprecated for awhile now. Nova started > supporting glance v2 in Newton and removed the ability to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] PTG Recap

Thanks Sean & Jay! And for those of you that weren't able to make it to the PTG or if there was a conversation you couldn't make it to, here is the Cinder youtube channel with all of our discussions from the first two days [1], nova discussion included. I added topics to the descriptions of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

On 2017-03-03 13:27:16 -0600 (-0600), Gregory Haynes wrote: [...] > I hadn't heard anything to the effect of infra not wanting us, but > AFAIK none of us has stepped up to really ask. One issue with > infra is that, typically, OpenStack projects do not depend > directly on infra projects. I am

[openstack-dev] [Murano] Errors on $.instance.deploy() ... WHEN RUNNING WITHOUT MURANO-AGENT RABBIT

Looking for guidance on fixing the following error (end of email) that we are seeing when ‘deploying’ a very simple murano package/app on a Murano deployment WITHOUT the second rabbit server for murano-agent. So we have a NEWTON-version of MURANO integrated into our OpenStack solution. We have

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement][nova] PTG summary

On 3/3/2017 10:49 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: Implementation news --- Discussions at the PTG identified that in order to actually implement priority #1, however, we would need to complete #2 first :) And so, we are currently attempting to get the os-traits library in shape [4],

[openstack-dev] [neutron] neutron-lib impact: ServicePluginBase and PluginInterface moved

Head's up: the ServicePluginBase and PluginInterface classes are being removed from neutron. - ServicePluginBase is available in neutron-lib. - PluginInterface is likely going to remain private in neutron-lib; pretty much everyone is using ServicePluginBase anyway. A patch is proposed to neutron

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] PTG Recap

I leiu of a lengthy email that very few will read, this is just a pointer. Jay Bryant (jungleboyj) did a great job during the PTG of capturing notes and action items from our discussions. One of the items discussed was around improving capturing these details and making them easier to find months

[openstack-dev] Disabling glance v1 by default in devstack

I've got a change proposed to disable glance v1 by default in devstack for Pike [1]. The glance v1 API has been deprecated for awhile now. Nova started supporting glance v2 in Newton and removed the ability to use nova with glance v1 in Ocata. It also turns out that Tempest will do things

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

Hello, Thanks for bringing this back to life. As I am sure some are aware I have been mostly absent from DIB lately, so don't let me stop you all from going forward with this or any of the other plans. I just wanted to do a bit of a braindump on my thought process from a while back on why I

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

On 03/03/2017 03:25 AM, Ligong LG1 Duan wrote: I am wondering whether DIB can become a component of Glance, as DIB is used to create OS images and Glance to upload OS images. I see a big difference between creating images and storing them. I can't imagine Glance would have any interest in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

On 03/02/2017 03:31 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Yolanda Robla Mota wrote: From my point of view, i've been using that either on infra with puppet-infracloud, glean.. and now with TripleO. So in my opinion, it shall be an independent

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] state of the stable/mitaka branches

On 2017-03-02 09:56:28 -0800 (-0800), Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy > wrote: > > I'm also kind of wondering what the grenade job in stable/newton will test > > after mitaka EOL? upgrade from mitaka-eol tag to

[openstack-dev] [Manila] PTG summary

Here is a brief summary of the Manila PTG. For more details, check out the PTG etherpad [1]. Retrospective - The specs process was a success, but tweaks are needed, especially around "high priority" specs. Ensure Share This driver interface is currently being used

[openstack-dev] [Sahara][infra] Jenkins based 3rd party CIs

Hello, we from Sahara use the compatibility layer with Zuulv2.5 and we are wondering if with the change to Zuulv3 this compatibility layer will still be maintained. If the layer is removed it will reflect into some changes on our side and we are looking for this information to identify how much

[openstack-dev] [all] [api] API-WG PTG recap

The following attempts to be a summary of some of the API-WG related ativity from last week's PTG. Despite some initial lack of organization we managed to have several lively discussions in a room that was occasionally standing room only. I had intended to do a daily summary of my time at the

[openstack-dev] [placement][nova] PTG summary

Hi Stackers, In Atlanta, there were a lot of discussions involving the new(ish) placement service. I'd like to summarize the topics of discussion and highlight what the team aims to get done in the Pike release. A quick refresher - The placement service's mission is to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][release] Pike release management communications

On 3/3/2017 9:56 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hello, fellow PTLs, As Doug did for the past few cycles, I want to start the Pike cycle by making sure the expectations for communications with the release team are clear to everyone so there is no confusion or miscommunication about any of the process

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][release] Pike release management communications

On 3/3/2017 10:16 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 3/3/2017 9:56 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hello, fellow PTLs, As Doug did for the past few cycles, I want to start the Pike cycle by making sure the expectations for communications with the release team are clear to everyone so there is no confusion

[openstack-dev] [ptl][release] Pike release management communications

Hello, fellow PTLs, As Doug did for the past few cycles, I want to start the Pike cycle by making sure the expectations for communications with the release team are clear to everyone so there is no confusion or miscommunication about any of the process or deadlines. This email is being sent to

[openstack-dev] [nova] placement/resource providers update 13

This week's resource providers/placement update operates only slightly as a summary of placement-related activity at least week's PTG. We had a big etherpad of topics https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ptg-pike-placement and an entire afternoon (plus some extra time elsewhen) to cover

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] where the mail-man lives?

"bogda...@mail.ru" writes: > The mail-man for the openstack-dev mail list is missing at least 'kolla' > and 'development' checkboxes. It would be nice to make its filter case > unsensitive as well, so it would match both 'All' and 'all' tags. How > could we fix that? Any place

Re: [openstack-dev] Zuul v3 - What's Coming: What to expect with the Zuul v3 Rollout

"bogda...@mail.ru" writes: > That's great news! In-repo configs will speed up development for teams, > with a security caveat for infrastructure team to keep in mind. The > ansible runner CI node which runs playbooks for defined jobs, should not > content sensitive information,

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][release][ptl] Adding docs to the release schedule

-Original Message- From: Brian Rosmaita Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: March 2, 2017 at 16:55:10 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Create backup with snapshots

In the original backup API design, volume_id is a required field. In the CLI, volume_id is positional and required as well. So when I added support to backup from a snapshot, I added snapshot_id as an optional field in the request body of the backup API. While backup is in process, you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Shaker] Shaker Image Builder fails in Ocata due to OS::Glance::Image deprecation

Hi Sai, As we discussed at PTG, I've added an option to build image using diskimage-builder tool. The code is not merged yet, please see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/441126/. With this patch shaker-image-builder can automatically switch to do local build using diskimage-builder when Glance v1

[openstack-dev] [infra] where the mail-man lives?

The mail-man for the openstack-dev mail list is missing at least 'kolla' and 'development' checkboxes. It would be nice to make its filter case unsensitive as well, so it would match both 'All' and 'all' tags. How could we fix that? Any place to submit a PR? -- Best regards, Bogdan Dobrelya,

Re: [openstack-dev] [gluon] Regarding multi-network and multi-tenant support

Hi Mohammad > I have question regarding multi-networks and multi-tenants > Currently Gluon supported only one network and subnet i.e GluonNetwork and > GluonSubnet respectively > which i can see hard code values at path >

Re: [openstack-dev] Zuul v3 - What's Coming: What to expect with the Zuul v3 Rollout

That's great news! In-repo configs will speed up development for teams, with a security caveat for infrastructure team to keep in mind. The ansible runner CI node which runs playbooks for defined jobs, should not content sensitive information, like keys and secrets in files or exported env vars,

[openstack-dev] [chef] release of stable/newton cookbook set

Hi, i just wanted to let you all know that we recently released the stable/newton cookbook set. For this cycle the released cookbook set includes: cookbook-openstack-block-storage (deploying cinder) cookbook-openstack-common (shared configuration and libraries) cookbook-openstack-compute

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

I am wondering whether DIB can become a component of Glance, as DIB is used to create OS images and Glance to upload OS images. Regards, Ligong Duan -Original Message- From: Matthew Thode [mailto:prometheanf...@gentoo.org] Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 9:36 AM To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Freeze dates for Pike

Le 02/03/2017 23:46, Matt Riedemann a écrit : > I mentioned this in the nova meeting today [1] but wanted to post to the > ML for feedback. > > We didn't talk about spec or feature freeze dates at the PTG. The Pike > release schedule is [2]. > > Spec freeze > --- > > In Newton and

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] final day recordings for the Virtual Team Gathering

Hi Kuryrs, Thank you all for participating in the VTG. Here you can find the last two recordings: https://youtu.be/ti4oOK6p_Dw https://youtu.be/iEdOTngEw4I Let's discuss the priority of all the action items next week! Toni

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

Emilien Macchi writes: > DIB folks: please confirm on this thread that you're ok to move out > DIB from TripleO and be an independent project. As a DIB user (and occasional contributor of patches in the past) and TripleO non-user, I'm in favor of the separation. > Also please decide if we want

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

As user and contributor for diskimage-builder, i think that being an independent project, and moving to the big tent, will benefit it. +1 from my side On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 2:35 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 03/02/2017 03:31 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >>> 1) Move

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][gate][all] dsvm gate stability and scenario tests

Thanks. +1. i added my list in ethercalc. Left put scenario tests can be run on periodic and experimental job. IMO on both ( periodic and experimental) to monitor their status periodically as well as on particular patch if we need to. -gmann On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Andrea Frittoli