Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][all][tc] A proposal to rearchitect Trove

On 06/22/2017 11:59 AM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: My $0.02. That view of dependencies is why Kubernetes development is outpacing OpenStacks and some users are leaving IMO. Not trying to be mean here but trying to shine some light on this issue. Kubernetes at its core has essentially something

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all][ptl] Most Supported Queens Goals and Improving Goal Completion

On 22/06/17 01:57 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > An idea that came from the meeting was creating a role of "Champions", > who are the drum beaters to get a goal done by helping projects with > tracking status and sometimes doing code patches. These would be > interested volunteers who have a good

[openstack-dev] [nova] Need volunteer(s) to help migrate project docs

The spec [1] with the plan to migrate project-specific docs from docs.openstack.org to each project has merged. There are a number of steps outlined in there which need people from the project teams, e.g. nova, to do for their project. Some of it we're already doing, like building a config

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptls][all][tc][docs] Documentation migration spec

> On Jun 23, 2017, at 12:10 PM, j.kl...@cloudbau.de wrote: > > Hi Doug, > > first of all sorry for the late response. I am the current PTL of the > openstack-chef project and read the spec a while ago, but did not really > connect it to our project. To be honest, i am not really sure what we

[openstack-dev] [nova] bug triage experimentation

The Nova bug backlog is just over 800 open bugs, which while historically not terrible, remains too large to be collectively usable to figure out where things stand. We've had a few recent issues where we just happened to discover upgrade bugs filed 4 months ago that needed fixes and backports.

Re: [openstack-dev] realtime kvm cpu affinities

On 06/23/2017 09:35 AM, Henning Schild wrote: Am Fri, 23 Jun 2017 11:11:10 +0200 schrieb Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui : In Linux RT context, and as you mentioned, the non-RT vCPU can acquire some guest kernel lock, then be pre-empted by emulator thread while holding this

Re: [openstack-dev] realtime kvm cpu affinities

Am Fri, 23 Jun 2017 11:11:10 +0200 schrieb Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui : > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:47:27PM +0200, Henning Schild wrote: > > Am Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:04:30 -0400 > > schrieb Luiz Capitulino : > > > > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:48:23 +0200

Re: [openstack-dev] any known issue on http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/requirements link?

On 2017-06-23 07:52, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > Hi All, > > Seems like many of the repository link on http://git.openstack.org > stopped working where no issue on github.com. > > any known issue, i cannot run tox due to that and so gate. thanks, some admins are currently investigating! Btw. best

[openstack-dev] [telemetry][ceilometer][gnocchi] RBAC for attributes in resource

Hi, Current gnocchi code supports RBAC at operation level [gnocchi/gnocchi/rest/policy.json]. Is it possible to add RBAC for attributes in a resource? For eg: Restrict resource search/show should display specific attributes only when query is performed by resource creator or admin. Thanks,

[openstack-dev] upper-constraints.txt is missing

Hi, I run "tox -epy27" in nova repository just now. As a result, following error message was printed. HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not found for url: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/requirements/plain/upper-constraints.txt Actually following URI is missing.

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptls][all][tc][docs] Documentation migration spec

Hi Doug, first of all sorry for the late response. I am the current PTL of the openstack-chef project and read the spec a while ago, but did not really connect it to our project. To be honest, i am not really sure what we would move and how to do it. Currently we have some wiki pages, but most

[openstack-dev] [barbican] Help for Barbican and UWSGI Community Goal

The Barbican team is currently lacking a UWSGI expert. We need help identifying what work items we have to meet the UWSGI community goal.[1] Could someone with expertise in this area review our code and docs [2] and help me put together a to-do list? Thanks! Dave (dave-mccowan) [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Ilya Shakhat wrote: > Hi Ken, > > Please check scenarios and reports that exist in Performance Docs. In > particular you may be interested in: > * O.M.Simulator - https://github.com/openstack/o > slo.messaging/blob/master/tools/simulator.py >

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Help for Barbican and UWSGI Community Goal

On 6/23/17, 2:24 PM, "Matthew Treinish" wrote: >On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 04:11:50PM +, Dave McCowan (dmccowan) wrote: >> The Barbican team is currently lacking a UWSGI expert. >> We need help identifying what work items we have to meet the UWSGI >>community goal.[1] >>

[openstack-dev] [docs][all][ptl] Contributor Portal and Better New Contributor On-boarding

Hello all, Every month we have people asking on IRC or the dev mailing list having interest in working on OpenStack, and sometimes they're given different answers from people, or worse, no answer at all. Suggestion: lets work our efforts together to create some common documentation so that all

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][all][ptl] Contributor Portal and Better New Contributor On-boarding

Great idea! I would also throw another issue new people often have (I had it too). Namely what to contribute. Lot's of people wants to do something but not quite know where to start. So few ideas for start: * List of triaged bugs * List of work items of large blueprits Thoughts, Michal On 23

Re: [openstack-dev] [Gnocchi] Difference between Gnocchi-api and uwsgi

On 23/06/17 03:08 PM, mate...@mailbox.org wrote: > The quantity of metrics is very low. I'm not sure that batch_size works. > Regarding the batch_timeout. What will be when the timeout reached ? Will > ceilometer throw error to the log file and > discard the whole batch ? I've got this timeout

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all][ptl] Most Supported Queens Goals and Improving Goal Completion

I think more than one champion is helpful in some cases, but its dangerous when you get more than two that each person thinks the other two will handle things unless they are very communicative with one another :) Somewhere else in this thread the idea of a committee and a chair was mentioned

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][all][tc] A proposal to rearchitect Trove

​Kevin, just one comment inline below. ​ ​ On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > No, I'm not necessarily advocating a monolithic approach. > > I'm saying that they have decided to start with functionality and accept > whats needed to get the task done. Theres

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Help for Barbican and UWSGI Community Goal

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 04:11:50PM +, Dave McCowan (dmccowan) wrote: > The Barbican team is currently lacking a UWSGI expert. > We need help identifying what work items we have to meet the UWSGI community > goal.[1] > Could someone with expertise in this area review our code and docs [2] and

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] bug triage experimentation

Sean, This sounds amazing and Swift could definitely use some [automated] assistance here. It would help if you could throw out a WIP somewhere. First thought that comes to mind tho storyboard.o.o :\ -Clay On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > The Nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][all][tc] A proposal to rearchitect Trove

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > (Top posting. Deal with it ;) > > ​Yes, please keep the conversation going; top posting is fine, the k8s issue isn't 'off topic'. ​ > You're both right! > > Making OpenStack monolithic is not the answer. In fact,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Gnocchi] Difference between Gnocchi-api and uwsgi

On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 22:57 +, gordon chung wrote: > > On 22/06/17 04:23 PM, mate...@mailbox.org wrote: > > Hello everyone ! > > > > I'm sorry that I'm disturbing you, but I was sent here from > > openstack-operators ML. > > On my Mitaka test stack I installed Gnocchi as database for

Re: [openstack-dev] realtime kvm cpu affinities

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:47:27PM +0200, Henning Schild wrote: > Am Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:04:30 -0400 > schrieb Luiz Capitulino : > > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:48:23 +0200 > > Henning Schild wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > We are using

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [dev] [doc] Operations Guide future

Hey Blair, Thanks ( I appreciate your offer of assistance. We are in full swing at the moment. The spec is very close to being merged. You can view that here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472275/ I am still looking for someone who can help us out with the pandoc conversion. I am happy to

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][all][tc] A proposal to rearchitect Trove

Zane Bitter wrote: > But back in the day we had a process (incubation) for adding stuff to > OpenStack that it made sense to depend on being there. It was a highly > imperfect process. We got rid of that process with the big tent reform, > but didn't really replace it with anything at all. Tags

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all][ptl] Most Supported Queens Goals and Improving Goal Completion

Lance Bragstad wrote: > Is the role of a goal "champion" limited to a single person? Can it be > distributed across multiple people pending actions are well communicated? I'm a bit torn on that. On one hand work can definitely (and probably should) be covered by multiple people. But I like the

Re: [openstack-dev] Required Ceph rbd image features

On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 at 20:08 Jason Dillaman wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Jon Bernard wrote: > > I suspect you'd want to enable layering at minimum. > > I'd agree that layering is probably the most you'd want to enable for > krbd-use cases

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all][ptl] Most Supported Queens Goals and Improving Goal Completion

On 06/23/2017 05:44 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Lance Bragstad wrote: >> Is the role of a goal "champion" limited to a single person? Can it be >> distributed across multiple people pending actions are well communicated? > > I'm a bit torn on that. On one hand work can definitely (and probably >

Re: [openstack-dev] upper-constraints.txt is missing

On 2017-06-23 08:05, Rikimaru Honjo wrote: > Hi, > > I run "tox -epy27" in nova repository just now. > As a result, following error message was printed. > >> HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not found for url: >> https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/requirements/plain/upper-constraints.txt >> >

[openstack-dev] [QA][ALL] What tempest tests will go under tempest plugin for a Project?

Hello, In Queen OpenStack release, We have a community goal to split In-Tree tempest plugin to a separate repo[1.]. I have a couple question regarding the tempest tests movement within tempest plugins. [1.] Since some of the core OpenStack projects like Nova, Glance and Swift does have tempest

[openstack-dev] [oslo][rabbitmq] RPC demo code no response?

Hi, all. Recently, I do some research about RPC by using oslo-messaging. I write some demo code about RPC server and RPC client by following here [1]. And the demo codes locate here[2]. I think there is something wrong about these codes. The server code doesn't print response message

Re: [openstack-dev] upper-constraints.txt is missing

On 2017/06/23 16:17, Andreas Jaeger wrote: On 2017-06-23 08:05, Rikimaru Honjo wrote: Hi, I run "tox -epy27" in nova repository just now. As a result, following error message was printed. HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not found for url:

[openstack-dev] [tc] Status update, Jun 23

Hi! Here is our regular update on the status of a number of TC-proposed governance changes, in an attempt to rely less on a weekly meeting to convey that information. You can find a regularly-updated status list of all open topics at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee

[openstack-dev] [all][infra] git.openstack.org working again

Just a heads up: The recent failure of git.openstack.org - seen by many jobs with a download failure of the upper-constraints.txt file - has been fixed. Feel free to recheck failed changes where jobs failed to download from git.openstack.org. thanks to Clark, Monty, and Ian from the Infra team!

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][ceilometer][gnocchi] RBAC for attributes in resource

On Fri, Jun 23 2017, Deepthi V V wrote: > Current gnocchi code supports RBAC at operation level > [gnocchi/gnocchi/rest/policy.json]. > Is it possible to add RBAC for attributes in a resource? > For eg: Restrict resource search/show should display specific attributes only > when query is

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2][drivers][openvswitch] Question

Can you provide your ml2_conf.ini values you are using? On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 7:06 AM, Margin Hu wrote: > thanks. > > I met an issue , I configured three ovs bridge ( br-ex, provision, > provider) in ml2_conf.ini but after I reboot the node , found only 2 > bridges flow

Re: [openstack-dev] [l2gw] How to handle correctly unknown-dst traffic

Hi Saverio, Comments and questions inline: First of all, which backend are you using? the l2gateway agent? or something like OpenDaylight?? I'm currently testing an L2GW scenario with ODL. On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Saverio Proto wrote: > Hello, > > I have a

[openstack-dev] [ptls][all][tc][docs] Documentation migration spec

Hi everyone, This morning (afternoon) the specification for the documentation migration was merged. Thanks to all that took time to review :) You can now view here in all its glory: https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/docs-specs/specs/pike/os-manuals-migration.html If you have any

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][mistral][tripleo][horizon][nova][releases] release models for projects tracked in global-requirements.txt

We'll do that. Thanks Renat Akhmerov @Nokia 23 июня 2017 г., 18:54 +0700, Thierry Carrez , писал: > Dougal Matthews wrote: > > > We have been trying to break the requirement on mistral (from > > > tripleo-common) but it is proving to be harder than expected. We are > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][mistral][tripleo][horizon][nova][releases] release models for projects tracked in global-requirements.txt

On 22 June 2017 at 14:01, Dougal Matthews wrote: > > > On 22 June 2017 at 11:01, Thierry Carrez wrote: > >> Thierry Carrez wrote: >> > Renat Akhmerov wrote: >> >> We have a weekly meeting next Monday, will it be too late? >> > >> > Before Thursday EOD

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][placement] Add API Sample tests for Placement APIs

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, Shewale, Bhagyashri wrote: * who or what needs to consume these JSON samples? The users of placement API can rely on the request/response for different supported placement versions based on some tests running on the OpenStack CI infrastructure. Right now, most of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2][drivers][openvswitch] Question

Yes, let's move discussion to bug report. On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 5:01 AM, Margin Hu wrote: > Hi kevin, > > [ovs] > bridge_mappings = physnet1:br-ex,physnet2:provision,physnet3:provider > ovsdb_connection = tcp:10.53.16.12:6640 > local_ip = 10.53.32.12 > you can check the

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][mistral][tripleo][horizon][nova][releases] release models for projects tracked in global-requirements.txt

Dougal Matthews wrote: >> We have been trying to break the requirement on mistral (from >> tripleo-common) but it is proving to be harder than expected. We are >> really doing some nasty things, but I wont go into details here :-) >> If anyone is interested, feel free to reach out.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2][drivers][openvswitch] Question

Hi kevin, [ovs] bridge_mappings = physnet1:br-ex,physnet2:provision,physnet3:provider ovsdb_connection = tcp:10.53.16.12:6640 local_ip = 10.53.32.12 you can check the attachement, and more logs can be found at https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1697243 On 6/23 16:43, Kevin Benton wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [tripleo] [dib] RFC: moving/transitioning the ironic-agent element to the ironic-python-agent tree

As no objections were recorded, I'm proceeding with the plan. Governance change for ironic-python-agent-builder: https://review.openstack.org/476900. On 05/22/2017 04:59 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 05/22/2017 03:10 PM, Sam Betts (sambetts) wrote: I would like to suggest that we create a new

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptls][all][tc][docs] Documentation migration spec

I can say for Mistral . We only planned to add Mistral docs to the central repo but didn’t do it yet. So, as far as I understand, we don’t need to move anything. We’ll review the spec and adjust the folder structure according to the proposed. Thanks Renat Akhmerov @Nokia 23 июня 2017 г.,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all][ptl] Most Supported Queens Goals and Improving Goal Completion

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 06/23/2017 05:44 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> Lance Bragstad wrote: >>> Is the role of a goal "champion" limited to a single person? Can it be >>> distributed across multiple people pending actions are well communicated? >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][rabbitmq] RPC demo code no response?

You're using the eventlet executor and time.sleep(1) but not monkey-patching your server for eventlet. Try adding: import eventlet eventlet.monkey_patch() Above your other imports in the server file. Best, -jay On 06/23/2017 02:58 AM, zhi wrote: Hi, all. Recently, I do some research

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][all][tc] A proposal to rearchitect Trove

On 23/06/17 05:31, Thierry Carrez wrote: Zane Bitter wrote: But back in the day we had a process (incubation) for adding stuff to OpenStack that it made sense to depend on being there. It was a highly imperfect process. We got rid of that process with the big tent reform, but didn't really

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptls][all][tc][docs] Documentation migration spec

> On Jun 23, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Renat Akhmerov wrote: > > I can say for Mistral . We only planned to add Mistral docs to the central > repo but didn’t do it yet. So, as far as I understand, we don’t need to move > anything. We’ll review the spec and adjust the folder