[openstack-dev] [acceleration]Cyborg Team Weekly Meeting 2017.11.29

Hi team, We will have our weekly meeting as usual at #openstack-cyborg starting from UTC1500, initial agenda could be found at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/CyborgTeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_meeting -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Community managed tech/dev blog: Call for opinions and ideas

Jimmy McArthur wrote: > Thierry Carrez wrote: >> Historically blog.o.o used to be our only blog outlet, so almost >> anything would go in: >> >> "OpenStack Events Sponsorship Webinar" >> "New Foundation Gold Members & Corporate Sponsors" >> "HP Announces Private Beta Program for OpenStack Cloud"

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Community managed tech/dev blog: Call for opinions and ideas

On 29 November 2017 at 11:30, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Jimmy McArthur wrote: >> Thierry Carrez wrote: >>> Historically blog.o.o used to be our only blog outlet, so almost >>> anything would go in: >>> >>> "OpenStack Events Sponsorship Webinar" >>> "New Foundation Gold

[openstack-dev] [qa] [patrole] Question regarding Patrole API coverage

Hi Team, I have a question regarding to the API coverage of Patrole. Currently, Patrole as a Tempest plugin heavily relys on the Tempest code. However, Tempest only contains the API tests for the most common APIs of the most common projects(Nova, Neutron, Cinder, Glance, Swift, Keystone). So I

[openstack-dev] [octavia] openstack CLI output don't match neutron lbaas-* output

Hi colleagues, just to inform you: openstack CLI extension output don't match corresponsing 'neutron lbaas-*' CLI output, e.g. doka@lagavulin(admin@bush):~/heat$ neutron lbaas-loadbalancer-show db8ae876-b6eb-4c45-95d1-33e0ca6193de neutron CLI is deprecated and will be removed in the future.

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [patrole] Question regarding Patrole API coverage

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:28 PM Peng Liu wrote: > Hi Team, > > Hi Peng > I have a question regarding to the API coverage of Patrole. Currently, > Patrole as a Tempest plugin heavily relys on the Tempest code. However, > Tempest only contains the API tests for the most common

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [patrole] Question regarding Patrole API coverage

On 29/11/17 15:11, Andrea Frittoli wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:28 PM Peng Liu > wrote: > > Hi Team, > > Hi Peng >   > > I have a question regarding to the API coverage of Patrole. > Currently, Patrole as a Tempest plugin

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Dublin PTG format

On 29 November 2017 at 03:20, Masayuki Igawa wrote: > On 11/28, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: >> Mon-Tue/Wed-Fri works as most suitable format. There are always >> conflict for many of us but that can be adjusted by working with team >> planning. >> >> Another thing can help is

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Queens-2 Retrospective

Hey all, Just like for Queens-1, we're going to reuse the weekly meeting time [0] for the retrospective. That means we'll be holding our retrospective on December 12th during normal meeting hours. Some information can be found in Trello [1]. We had some issues last time with video conferencing,

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Queens-2 Retrospective

Hey all, Just like for Queens-1, we're going to reuse the weekly meeting time [0] for the retrospective. That means we'll be holding our retrospective on December 12th during normal meeting hours. Some information can be found in Trello [1]. We had some issues last time with video conferencing,

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][qa] Split tempest plugin from heat

On 19/11/17 03:08, Rabi Mishra wrote: Hi All, As part of community goal[1] for Queens, we've completed the repo split and created the new project[2]. The next objective to is to use the new plugin in our jobs. As we've merged some changes after the split, I've synced them and fixed some

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Community managed tech/dev blog: Call for opinions and ideas

Thierry Carrez wrote: Jimmy McArthur wrote: Thierry Carrez wrote: Historically blog.o.o used to be our only blog outlet, so almost anything would go in: "OpenStack Events Sponsorship Webinar" "New Foundation Gold Members& Corporate Sponsors" "HP Announces Private Beta Program for OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [oaktree] Follow up to Multi-cloud Management in OpenStack Summit session

On 11/28/2017 07:14 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: Small side-question, Why would this just be limited to openstack clouds? > Would it be? That's a great question. I think, at least for now, attempting to support non-OpenStack clouds would be too much and would cause us to have a thing that

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 48

Rereading your question, Gord, the tl;dr of my message is that current roadmap is not intended to dictate work or what future features should be—just captures and communicates work already in motion. Anne Bertucio Marketing and Certification, OpenStack Foundation a...@openstack.org |

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 48

On 2017-11-29 12:31 PM, Anne Bertucio wrote: > Rereading your question, Gord, the tl;dr of my message is that current > roadmap is not intended to dictate work or what future features should > be—just captures and communicates work already in motion. ah, i see. i was mainly curious to see how

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 48

On 2017-11-29 12:34 PM, Chris Dent wrote: > Sufficent answer? speaking for myself, yes. -- gord __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Propose Slawek Kaplonski for Neutron core

Hi Neutron Team, I want to nominate Slawek Kaplonski (irc: slaweq) to Neutron core. Slawek has been an active contributor to the project since the Mitaka cycle. He has been instrumental in the development of the QoS capabilities in Neutron, becoming the lead of the sub-team focused on that set of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Propose Slawek Kaplonski for Neutron core

+1! ... even though I haven't been around. :) On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Miguel Lavalle wrote: > Hi Neutron Team, > > I want to nominate Slawek Kaplonski (irc: slaweq) to Neutron core. Slawek > has been an active contributor to the project since the Mitaka cycle. He >

[openstack-dev] [monasca] Monasca at PTG in Dublin

Hello, As discussed in the meeting today I would like to ask for your opinion if Monasca team should gather at the Project Teams Gathering (PTG) event in Dublin, February 26 - March 2nd [1]. The goal of the PTG is "to discuss priorities for the upcoming cycle, iterate quickly on solutions for

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 48

The community does have an existing Roadmap, albeit this cycle we decided we need to change how we design the Roadmap and its final form. We have a small community Roadmap team (anyone want to join?!) who compiles this information. In the past, the Roadmap aimed to be a document for both

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 48

On 2017-11-28 11:36 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > * A somewhat bizarre presentation suggesting the Board and the TC >   manage the OpenStack roadmap. There wasn't time to actually discuss >   this as previous topics ran _way_ over, but at a superficial glance >   it appeared to involve a complete

[openstack-dev] [docs] Documentation meeting minutes for 2017-11-29

=== #openstack-doc: docteam === Meeting started by pkovar at 16:00:16 UTC. The full logs are available at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/docteam/2017/docteam.2017-11-29-16.00.log.html . Meeting summary --- * roll call (pkovar,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 48

On Wed, 29 Nov 2017, gordon chung wrote: On 2017-11-28 11:36 AM, Chris Dent wrote: * A somewhat bizarre presentation suggesting the Board and the TC   manage the OpenStack roadmap. There wasn't time to actually discuss   this as previous topics ran _way_ over, but at a superficial glance  

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ronelle Landy for Tripleo-Quickstart/Extras/CI core

On 11/29/2017 12:34 PM, John Trowbridge wrote: > I would like to propose Ronelle be given +2 for the above repos. She has > been a solid contributor to tripleo-quickstart and extras almost since the > beginning. She has solid review numbers, but more importantly has always > done quality reviews.

[openstack-dev] [octavia] [heat] errors during loadbalancer creation

Hi colleagues, Note: errors, described below, don't have a visible impact in my current configuration. But I draw attention on this since need to understand whether it's expected behaviour or something wrong with something and what exactly. When creating loadbalancer infra (balancer,

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron L3 agent/Keepalived

Hi I have a case where after running the system for a while I see that floating ip association API gets accepted and no Errors in neutron l3 logs But when I go into the qrouter namespace and check the qg- interface the floating ip is not added Also the keepalived.conf is not updated and SIGUP of

[openstack-dev] FW: [LCOO][RBAC] Topical session 11/30 1300 UTC

A topical session on Role Based Access Controls will be at 1300 UTC on Thursday 11/30. This is a type of LCOO working group discussion forum we plan to conduct on a monthly basis. Agenda and logistics to join can be found at https://openstack-lcoo.atlassiaBHIn.net/wiki/x/DwAvAQ

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [patrole] Question regarding Patrole API coverage

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:11 AM, Andrea Frittoli wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:28 PM Peng Liu wrote: >> >> Hi Team, >> > Hi Peng > >> >> I have a question regarding to the API coverage of Patrole. Currently, >> Patrole as a Tempest plugin

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][qa] Split tempest plugin from heat

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 19/11/17 03:08, Rabi Mishra wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> As part of community goal[1] for Queens, we've completed the repo split >> and created the new project[2]. >> >> The next objective to is to use the new plugin in

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] openstack CLI output don't match neutron lbaas-* output

Hi Volodymyr, This is a known issue with the neutron (neutron-lbaas) database getting out of sync and/or not properly handling driver errors. This is one reason we are moving to deprecate neutron-lbaas. If you can, we recommend you move to exclusively using Octavia without neutron-lbaas. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ronelle Landy for Tripleo-Quickstart/Extras/CI core

+1 On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 9:34 PM, John Trowbridge wrote: > I would like to propose Ronelle be given +2 for the above repos. She has > been a solid contributor to tripleo-quickstart and extras almost since the > beginning. She has solid review numbers, but more importantly

[openstack-dev] [nova] Etherpad for tracking nova cellsv1 to cellsv2 migration issues/questions/strategies/patches

Now that some cells v1 deployments are getting serious about migrating to cells v2, people have questions and are tackling the migration in different ways. I've started an etherpad where we can start putting notes which will hopefully help those getting started with the migration, and help

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Propose Slawek Kaplonski for Neutron core

On 29 November 2017 at 12:27, Korzeniewski, Artur < artur.korzeniew...@intel.com> wrote: > +1 from me , (even though my vote does not count) > > I know Slawek since Tokyo summit and I’m impressed of his knowledge and > hands-on experience to improve Neutron quality and functionality! > > It is

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Ansiblize init-runonce script

I wrote that script ages ago. I needed it in the repo so I could consistently deploy. It may still be entirely tailored around my environment ☺ That said, I had always hoped someone would make a generic cloud bootstrap for Kolla based upon the work in that script originally. Maybe this is

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron L3 agent/Keepalived

I noticed that this happens when the router HA interface shows status: Down what can cause the ha interface to do down Ajay From: Ajay Kalambur > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday Nov 30th at 8:00 UTC

Hello everyone, Please reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be Thursday, Nov 30th at 8:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel. The agenda for the meeting can be found here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_Nov_30th_2017_.280800_UTC.29

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Policy Goal Queens-2 Update

Hi all, I just want to share some related things to anyone are interested in. For the Neutron projects, I have discussed with them[1] but it is not really started, they want to consider more about all of networking projects before and I'm still waiting for the feedback to define the right way

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ronelle Landy for Tripleo-Quickstart/Extras/CI core

I would like to propose Ronelle be given +2 for the above repos. She has been a solid contributor to tripleo-quickstart and extras almost since the beginning. She has solid review numbers, but more importantly has always done quality reviews. She also has been working in the very intense rover

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ronelle Landy for Tripleo-Quickstart/Extras/CI core

+1 woot On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:34 PM, John Trowbridge > wrote: > > I would like to propose Ronelle be given +2 for the above repos. She has > > been a solid contributor to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Propose Slawek Kaplonski for Neutron core

+1 from me , (even though my vote does not count) I know Slawek since Tokyo summit and I’m impressed of his knowledge and hands-on experience to improve Neutron quality and functionality! It is great to see him joining the core reviewers team! Congrats Sławek! From: Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Propose Slawek Kaplonski for Neutron core

YES, FINALLY. On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Kevin Benton wrote: > +1! ... even though I haven't been around. :) > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Miguel Lavalle wrote: >> >> Hi Neutron Team, >> >> I want to nominate Slawek Kaplonski (irc: slaweq) to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ronelle Landy for Tripleo-Quickstart/Extras/CI core

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:34 PM, John Trowbridge wrote: > I would like to propose Ronelle be given +2 for the above repos. She has > been a solid contributor to tripleo-quickstart and extras almost since the > beginning. She has solid review numbers, but more importantly has

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ronelle Landy for Tripleo-Quickstart/Extras/CI core

On 29 Nov, John Trowbridge wrote: > I would like to propose Ronelle be given +2 for the above repos. She has > been a solid contributor to tripleo-quickstart and extras almost since the > beginning. She has solid review numbers, but more importantly has always > done quality reviews. She also has

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ronelle Landy for Tripleo-Quickstart/Extras/CI core

+1 On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:34 PM, John Trowbridge wrote: > I would like to propose Ronelle be given +2 for the above repos. She has > been a solid contributor to tripleo-quickstart and extras almost since the > beginning. She has solid review numbers, but more importantly

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ronelle Landy for Tripleo-Quickstart/Extras/CI core

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:34 AM, John Trowbridge wrote: > I would like to propose Ronelle be given +2 for the above repos. She has > been a solid contributor to tripleo-quickstart and extras almost since the > beginning. She has solid review numbers, but more importantly has

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Propose Slawek Kaplonski for Neutron core

"+1" I know, I'm not active, but I care about neutron, and slaweq is a great contributor. On Nov 29, 2017 8:37 PM, "Ihar Hrachyshka" wrote: > YES, FINALLY. > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Kevin Benton wrote: > > +1! ... even though I haven't been

Re: [openstack-dev] [E] Re: nova diagnostics in client library/SDK

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 11/03/2017 11:31 AM, Gordon, Kent S wrote: > >> Do any of the python client libraries implement the nova diagnostics API? >> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.op >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [oaktree] Follow up to Multi-cloud Management in OpenStack Summit session

On 11/29/2017 11:26 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: For instance - an OpenStack Availability Zone and an AWS AZ are **not** the same thing. This deserves repeating every week on the OpenStack mailing list. -jay __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ronelle Landy for Tripleo-Quickstart/Extras/CI core

+1 indeed :) On 11/29/2017 08:34 PM, John Trowbridge wrote: > I would like to propose Ronelle be given +2 for the above repos. She > has been a solid contributor to tripleo-quickstart and extras almost > since the beginning. She has solid review numbers, but more > importantly has always done