+1! Gaël has been doing a fantastic job in tripleo-validations for a long time.
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Ana Krivokapic wrote:
> Hey TripleO devs,
>
> Gaël has consistently been contributing high quality reviews and patches to
> the tripleo-validations project. The project would highly ben
I should have done this shortly after the PTG in September, surely
before the Summit in November, most certainly before the queens-2
milestone, but...I didn't. Anyway, better late than never. Here is the
patch that documents the review priorities for Queens, per my
recollection from the PTG:
Hi,
> On 12/07/2017 12:27 PM, Colleen Murphy wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> We have a following use case - several independent keystones (say KeyA and
>>> KeyB), using fernet tokens and synchronized fernet keys, and single external
>>>
Excerpts from Graham Hayes's message of 2017-12-07 17:08:55 +:
>
> On 06/12/17 23:33, James E. Blair wrote:
> > Chris Dent writes:
> >
> >> The expansion of the Foundation was talked about at the summit in
> >> Sydney, but having something happen this quickly was a bit of a
> >> surprise, le
Hi all,
It's that time again to figure out whether we'd hold physical sessions at
the PTG (February 26-March 2nd at Croke Park in Dublin, Ireland).
If you're interested in participating, please respond to the following.
1. What do you prefer between physical sessions at the PTG and remote
virtual
On 12/07/2017 12:27 PM, Colleen Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We have a following use case - several independent keystones (say KeyA and
>> KeyB), using fernet tokens and synchronized fernet keys, and single external
>> IdP for fed
On Dec 7, 2017, at 11:22 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> That brought up another issue: the current meeting time for the API-SIG is
> 1600UTC, which is not very convenient for APAC contributors. Gilles is in
> Australia, and so it was the middle of the night for him! As one of the goals
> for the API-SI
On 2017-12-07 16:20:43 -0500 (-0500), Paul Belanger wrote:
[...]
> It seems there is atleast some services they'd be interested in
> using, mailman for example. Does this mean it would be a-la-carte
> services, where new projects mix and match which things they'd
> like to be managed and not?
[...
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 05:28:53PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2017-12-07 17:08:55 + (+), Graham Hayes wrote:
> [...]
> > It is worth remembering that this is a completely separate project to
> > OpenStack, with its own governance. They are free not to use our tooling
> > (and conside
Short and sweet this week.
Development Focus
-
Queens-2 is here, but if you were late requesting the release, please do so as
soon as possible.
General Information
---
Teams should be focused on implementing planned work for the cycle. It is also
a good time to r
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Team,
>
> Wes has been consistently and heavily involved in TripleO CI work.
> He has a very well understanding on how tripleo-quickstart and
> tripleo-quickstart-extras work, his number and quality of reviews are
> excellent so far. His exp
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have a following use case - several independent keystones (say KeyA and
> KeyB), using fernet tokens and synchronized fernet keys, and single external
> IdP for federated auth.
>
> Is it generally possible to configure bo
Hi, Pavlo.
Looks like it's not just project/domain UUID should be equal, but also
audit_id, endpoints_id, protocol_id, roles_id and many other entities.
So, looks like it is not possible to implement this using current code
base, but I could be wrong.
You can take a look at mapped auth plugin [1]
>
> It seems like we need to test this in the gate somehow...
Let's enable the job in python-heatclient [1], so we won't have this issue
later
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/526461/
>
> - ZB
__
OpenStack Development Mai
On 2017-12-07 17:08:55 + (+), Graham Hayes wrote:
[...]
> It is worth remembering that this is a completely separate project to
> OpenStack, with its own governance. They are free not to use our tooling
> (and considering a lot of containers work is on github, they may never
> use it).
Rig
Greetings OpenStack community,
A good meeting this week [5], with the discussion centered mostly on a spec for
an API-schema guide [8]. The spec itself isn't quite fleshed out enough, so it
wasn't entirely clear what problem this would be adressing. The spec's author,
Gilles, will add additiona
During today's meeting we already got a +1 from Tosky and that covers all
of ours cores.
Congrats Shu Yingya, keep up the great work you've been doing.
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 1:15 PM Jeremy Freudberg
wrote:
> +1
>
> Thank you Yingya for all the reasons which Telles mentioned. Well-deserved!
>
>
Hi Kim,
Sorry you are having trouble after your upgrade.
From the log it appears that the neutron-lbaas Octavia driver is
unable to reach keystone to request an auth token.
Please make sure there is a [service_auth] section configured in your
neutron_lbaas.conf/neutron.conf file(s).
An example:
On 06/12/17 23:33, James E. Blair wrote:
> Chris Dent writes:
>
>> The expansion of the Foundation was talked about at the summit in
>> Sydney, but having something happen this quickly was a bit of a
>> surprise, leading to some [questions in
>> IRC](http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23op
On 07/12/17 11:13, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from zuul's message of 2017-12-07 15:00:43 +:
Build failed.
- release-openstack-python
http://logs.openstack.org/7a/7a54c5881cdd26d89775b638628c3f9c909a33a6/release/release-openstack-python/e5594bb/
: SUCCESS in 5m 41s
- announce-release
h
Hi all,
We have a following use case - several independent keystones (say KeyA and
KeyB), using fernet tokens and synchronized fernet keys, and single
external IdP for federated auth.
Is it generally possible to configure both KeyA and KeyB such that scoped
token issued by KeyA for a federated us
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Cédric Jeanneret
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While trying to add some unit tests for some resources in the
> puppet-tripleo repository, I stumbled on a not-so-nice case: the
> tripleo::firewall::service_rules definition.
>
> In there, a resource is dynamically taken from hi
Excerpts from corvus's message of 2017-12-06 15:33:29 -0800:
> Chris Dent writes:
>
> > The expansion of the Foundation was talked about at the summit in
> > Sydney, but having something happen this quickly was a bit of a
> > surprise, leading to some [questions in
> > IRC](http://eavesdrop.opens
+1!
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Team,
>
> Wes has been consistently and heavily involved in TripleO CI work.
> He has a very well understanding on how tripleo-quickstart and
> tripleo-quickstart-extras work, his number and quality of reviews are
> excellent so far. His
+1
Thank you Yingya for all the reasons which Telles mentioned. Well-deserved!
On Dec 7, 2017 11:05 AM, "Telles Nobrega" wrote:
> Hi Saharans,
>
> I would like to propose the addition of Shu Yingya to the Sahara Core Team.
>
> Shu Yingya has been with us for a while now and as of it is common f
Excerpts from zuul's message of 2017-12-07 15:00:43 +:
> Build failed.
>
> - release-openstack-python
> http://logs.openstack.org/7a/7a54c5881cdd26d89775b638628c3f9c909a33a6/release/release-openstack-python/e5594bb/
> : SUCCESS in 5m 41s
> - announce-release
> http://logs.openstack.org/7a/7
+1. Thank you for contributing
On Dec 7, 2017, 8:05 PM +0400, Telles Nobrega , wrote:
> Hi Saharans,
>
> I would like to propose the addition of Shu Yingya to the Sahara Core Team.
>
> Shu Yingya has been with us for a while now and as of it is common for all
> core he has shown a great knowledge
Hi Saharans,
I would like to propose the addition of Shu Yingya to the Sahara Core Team.
Shu Yingya has been with us for a while now and as of it is common for all
core he has shown a great knowledge of the Sahara code base, along with all
other small parts of sahara (SIE, sahara-tests, python-sa
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Ana Krivokapic wrote:
> Hey TripleO devs,
>
> Gaël has consistently been contributing high quality reviews and patches to
> the tripleo-validations project. The project would highly benefit from his
> addition to the core reviewer team.
>
> Assuming that there are n
This is a great overview - and a valuable point of reference.
Thanks Emilien!
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 1:46 AM, Marios Andreou wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>
>> Note: this is the first edition of a weekly update of what happens in
>> TripleO. The goal is to p
I forgot to update here, but I went ahead and added her to the gerrit
group. Welcome Ronelle and thanks for your contributions!
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 5:57 AM, Brad P. Crochet wrote:
> definite +1
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:35 PM John Trowbridge wrote:
>>
>> I would like to propose Ronelle be
Hey TripleO devs,
Gaël has consistently been contributing high quality reviews and patches to
the tripleo-validations project. The project would highly benefit from his
addition to the core reviewer team.
Assuming that there are no objections, we will add Gaël to the core team
next week.
Thanks!
+1
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Ronelle Landy wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Brad P. Crochet wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 10:46 AM Emilien Macchi
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Team,
>>>
>>> Wes has been consistently and heavily involved in TripleO CI work.
>>> He has a
+1
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Brad P. Crochet wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 10:46 AM Emilien Macchi wrote:
>
>> Team,
>>
>> Wes has been consistently and heavily involved in TripleO CI work.
>> He has a very well understanding on how tripleo-quickstart and
>> tripleo-quickstart-
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 3:24 AM, Goutham Pratapa
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are trying test environment deployment with OpenStack-ansible pike
> release. After executing setup-hosts.yaml, the lxc-containers were created.
> We have an issue while doing
> apt-get update in infra-repo-container as it couldn'
definite +1
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:35 PM John Trowbridge wrote:
> I would like to propose Ronelle be given +2 for the above repos. She has
> been a solid contributor to tripleo-quickstart and extras almost since the
> beginning. She has solid review numbers, but more importantly has always
>
+1
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 10:46 AM Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Team,
>
> Wes has been consistently and heavily involved in TripleO CI work.
> He has a very well understanding on how tripleo-quickstart and
> tripleo-quickstart-extras work, his number and quality of reviews are
> excellent so far. His
after pupgrading ocata to pike i'm unable to create loadbalancer.
# neutron lbaas-loadbalancer-create pike_sub
neutron CLI is deprecated and will be removed in the future. Use
openstack CLI instead.
Driver error: The resource could not be found. (HTTP 404) (Request-ID:
req-dff560fc-d1ed-49a8-9172-
On 6 December 2017 at 15:45, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Wes has been consistently and heavily involved in TripleO CI work.
> He has a very well understanding on how tripleo-quickstart and
> tripleo-quickstart-extras work, his number and quality of reviews are
> excellent so far. His experience with t
+1 !!!
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Marios Andreou wrote:
> +1 !
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>
>> Team,
>>
>> Wes has been consistently and heavily involved in TripleO CI work.
>> He has a very well understanding on how tripleo-quickstart and
>> tripleo-quicks
Hello,
Thanks everyone for attending QA office hour.
The IRC report [0] and full log [1] are available through meetbot.
Below is the list of 10 bugs traiged and discussed during office hour,
opened in last 14 days.
* Bug #1735667 in StackViz: "Use stestr instead of testrepository"
https://bug
Hi,
Well, curently there is an operationalState specified into the subnets in
IFA005/IFA006, but it was not specified what should happen when a subnet is
disabled. This is what was commented in the joint meeting between ETSI NFV and
OpenStack in Denver. During the discussions to resolve this is
Hi,
We are trying test environment deployment with OpenStack-ansible pike
release. After executing setup-hosts.yaml, the lxc-containers were created.
We have an issue while doing
*apt-get update *in infra-repo-container as it couldn't connect to the
proxy server.
The strange thing is that the infr
On Thu, Dec 07 2017, Jaze Lee wrote:
> Yes. I misunderstand here. If there any exception in gnocchi api, it
> won't store any measures.
> Just after all resource, and all metrics are there, gnocchi will store
> those measures. Am i right?
Yes.
--
Julien Danjou
# Free Software hacker
# https://j
Hi,
Can you please elaborate more about the subnet state? FYI -
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/APIv2-specification#Subnet
Thanks
Gary
From: "Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)"
Reply-To: OpenStack List
Date: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 3:13 PM
To: OpenStack List
Subject: [opens
2017-12-07 16:36 GMT+08:00 Julien Danjou :
> On Thu, Dec 07 2017, Jaze Lee wrote:
>
>>I think at line 416, we should remove some measures that already post at
>> 390.
>>Or may be i miss something?
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/publisher/gnocchi
On Thu, Dec 07 2017, Jaze Lee wrote:
>I think at line 416, we should remove some measures that already post at
> 390.
>Or may be i miss something?
>
>
> https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/publisher/gnocchi.py#L416
The code at L416 is only executed if L390
47 matches
Mail list logo