[openstack-dev] [neutron][dynamic routing] RYU Breaks lower constraints

Hi, It seems like ther RYU import is breaking the project: 2018-04-15 08:41:34.654681 | ubuntu-xenial | b'--- import errors ---\nFailed to import test module:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][dynamic routing] RYU Breaks lower constraints

Gary, I think this is caused by the recent pip change and pip no longer cannot import pip from code. The right solution seems to bump the minimum version of ryu. Thought? http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-March/128939.html Akihiro 2018/04/15 午後6:06 "Gary Kotton"

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][dynamic routing] RYU Breaks lower constraints

Hi, That sounds reasonable. I wonder if the RYU folk can chime in here. Thanks Gary From: Akihiro MOTOKI Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 12:43 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: Re:

[openstack-dev] [devstack][infra] pip vs psutil

Hi, The gate is currently broken with https://launchpad.net/bugs/1763966. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/561427/ Can unblock us in the short term. Any other ideas? Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] PBR and Pipfile

Hello, Thank you for this response. It took me quite some times to carefully read it, it was far beyond my expectation! So thanks a lot, lot of thing to understand. > >> There are actually three different relevant use cases here, with some > patterns available to draw from. I'm going to spell

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][dynamic routing] RYU Breaks lower constraints

On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 21:02:42 +0900, Gary Kotton wrote: > > [1 ] > [1.1 ] > Hi, > That sounds reasonable. I wonder if the RYU folk can chime in here. > Thanks I don't fully understand the recent g-r change yet, but I guess neutron-dynamic-routing should also have ryu>=4.24. I'll check this

[openstack-dev] [All][Election] Last Days for TC Nominations

Hello Everyone, A quick reminder that we are in the last hours for TC candidate announcements. Nominations are open until Apr 17, 2018 23:45 UTC. If you want to stand for TC, don't delay, follow the instructions at [1] to make sure the community knows your intentions. Make sure your nomination

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral]I think Mistral need K8S action

Thanks for your reply. I will refer to this Ansible action and developing actions for K8S somewhere externally. Regards, Xian Jun Hong From: Dougal Matthews Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2018 1:00 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] roadmap on containers workflow

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 5:58 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > A bit of progress today, I prototyped an Ansible role for that purpose: > https://github.com/EmilienM/ansible-role-container-registry > > The next step is, I'm going to investigate if we can deploy Docker and > Docker

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral]I think Mistral need K8S action

On 13 Apr 2018, 23:01 +0700, Dougal Matthews , wrote: > > I would recommend developing actions for K8s somewhere externally, then > > when mistral-extra is ready we can move them over. This is the approach > > that I took for the Ansible actions[1] and they will likely be one