[openstack-dev] [barbican] barbican migrated to storyboard

Hi all, Thanks to the hard work done by Kendall and Jeremy, Barbican has now been been migrated to storyboard. The new link for the Barbican storyboard is https://storyboard.openstac k.org/#!/project_group/81 This is the starting point for : python-barbicanclient, castellan-ui,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc][ptls] final stages of python 3 transition

Resending from an address that is subscribed to the list. Apologies to those of you who get this twice. On 04/30/2018 10:06 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: It would be useful to have more input from PTLs on this issue, so I'm CCing all of them to get their attention. Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc][ptls] final stages of python 3 transition

Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2018-04-30 16:16:35 -0500: > Resending from an address that is subscribed to the list. Apologies to > those of you who get this twice. > > On 04/30/2018 10:06 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > It would be useful to have more input from PTLs on this issue, so I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] REST limitations and GraghGL inception?

On 4/29/2018 10:53 PM, Gilles Dubreuil wrote: Remember Boston's Summit presentation [1] about GraphQL [2] and how it addresses REST limitations. I wonder if any project has been thinking about using GraphQL. I haven't find any mention or pointers about it. GraphQL takes a complete different

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Bug deputy report 23-29 April

Hello Team, I forgot about this: Deleting port doesnt delete dns records https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1741079 Re-open, confirmed. Cheers, Paweł W dniu 30.04.2018, pon o godzinie 08∶26 +0200, użytkownik Paweł Suder napisał: > Hello Team, > > Last week starting from 23 April until 29

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Default scheduler filters survey

On 4/30/2018 11:41 AM, Mathieu Gagné wrote: [6] Used to filter Ironic nodes based on the 'reserved_for_user_id' Ironic node property. This is mainly used when enrolling existing nodes already living on a different system. We reserve the node to a special internal user so the customer

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc][ptls] final stages of python 3 transition

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > Resending from an address that is subscribed to the list. Apologies to > those of you who get this twice. > > On 04/30/2018 10:06 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> >> It would be useful to have more input from PTLs on this

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc][ptls] final stages of python 3 transition

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 04:16:35PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > Resending from an address that is subscribed to the list. Apologies to > those of you who get this twice. > > On 04/30/2018 10:06 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > It would be useful to have more input from PTLs on this issue, so I'm > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc][ptls] final stages of python 3 transition

Excerpts from Alex Schultz's message of 2018-04-30 15:43:16 -0600: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > Resending from an address that is subscribed to the list. Apologies to > > those of you who get this twice. > > > > On 04/30/2018 10:06 AM, Doug

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are glad to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) Weekly priorities

Re: [openstack-dev] [masakari] Masakari Project Meeting time

It seems most of the team members are on vacation this week. By the way, 03:00 UTC is fine as well. -Original Message- From: Bhor, Dinesh [mailto:dinesh.b...@nttdata.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 9:09 PM To: Kwan, Louie Cc: Sampath Priyankara (samP);

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] REST limitations and GraghGL inception?

Yes, that’s was indeed the sens of my point. Openstack have to provide both endpoints type for a while for backward compatibility in order to smooth the transition. For instance, that would be a good idea to contact postman devteam once GraphQL will start to be integrated as it will allow a lot

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] REST limitations and GraghGL inception?

On 01/05/18 07:21, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 4/29/2018 10:53 PM, Gilles Dubreuil wrote: Remember Boston's Summit presentation [1] about GraphQL [2] and how it addresses REST limitations. I wonder if any project has been thinking about using GraphQL. I haven't find any mention or pointers

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] [Elections] Rocky TC Election Results

Bravo, well done! On 01/05/18 14:14, Zhipeng Huang wrote: Congratulations to the newly elected TC members ! On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 2:17 AM, Amy > wrote: Congrats to all who were elected! Amy (spotz) Sent from my iPhone On Apr 30,

[openstack-dev] [All] [Elections] Rocky TC Election Results

Hello Everyone :) Please join me in congratulating the 7 newly elected members of the Technical Committee (TC)! - Thierry Carrez (ttx)] - Chris Dent (cdent) - Sean McGinnis (smcginnis) - Davanum Srinivas (dims) - Zane Bitter (zaneb) - Graham Hayes (mugsie) - Mohammed Naser

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] [Elections] Rocky TC Election Results

Congrats to all who were elected! Amy (spotz) Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 30, 2018, at 7:02 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote: > > Hello Everyone :) > > Please join me in congratulating the 7 newly elected members of the Technical > Committee (TC)! > > Thierry Carrez (ttx)]

Re: [openstack-dev] Overriding project-templates in Zuul

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:58 AM, James E. Blair wrote: > Hi, > > If you've had difficulty overriding jobs in project-templates, please > read and provide feedback on this proposed change. > > We tried to make the Zuul v3 configuration language as intuitive as > possible, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] REST limitations and GraghGL inception?

On 30/04/18 20:16, Flint WALRUS wrote: I would very much second that question! Indeed it have been one of my own wondering since many times. Of course GraphQL is not intended to replace REST as is and have to live in parallel Effectively a standard initial architecture is to have GraphQL

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] REST limitations and GraghGL inception?

On 01/05/18 11:31, Flint WALRUS wrote: Yes, that’s was indeed the sens of my point. I was just enforcing it, no worries! ;) Openstack have to provide both endpoints type for a while for backward compatibility in order to smooth the transition. For instance, that would be a good idea to

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] [Elections] Rocky TC Election Results

Congratulations to the newly elected TC members ! On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 2:17 AM, Amy wrote: > Congrats to all who were elected! > > Amy (spotz) > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Apr 30, 2018, at 7:02 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote: > > Hello Everyone :) > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Overriding project-templates in Zuul

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 8:58 AM, James E. Blair wrote: [...] > === === > Matcher Template Project Result > === === > files ABBC ABC > irrelevant-files AB

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Bug deputy report 23-29 April

Hello Team, Last week starting from 23 April until 29 April I was bug deputy for Neutron project. Following bugs/RFEs were opened: [RFE] Create host-routes for routed networks (segments) https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1766380 RFE, importance not set. Seems to be very interesting.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun][k8s] AWS Fargate and OpenStack Zun

Thank you Hongbin. The article is very helpful. Regards, Madhuri From: Hongbin Lu [mailto:hongbin...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2018 5:16 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Zun][k8s] AWS

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] final stages of python 3 transition

Excerpts from Clark Boylan's message of 2018-04-26 11:22:15 -0700: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, at 7:27 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 04:54:46PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > It's time to talk about the next steps in our migration from python > > > 2 to python 3. > > > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] The Forum Schedule is now live

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 9:04 AM, Jimmy McArthur wrote: > Hello all - > > Please take a look here for the posted Forum schedule: > https://www.openstack.org/summit/vancouver-2018/summit-schedule#track=224 > You should also see it update on your Summit App. > Why TripleO

Re: [openstack-dev] The Forum Schedule is now live

Emilien, I believe that the Project Updates are separate from the Forum? I know I saw some in the schedule before the Forum submittals were even closed. Maybe contact speaker support or Jimmy will answer here. Thanks, Amy (spotz) On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Emilien Macchi

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Monthly bug day?

I've created a bluejeans channel for this meeting: https://bluejeans.com/309964257. I may be late for it, but I've set it up to be usable even without me. On 04/30/2018 02:39 PM, Michael Turek wrote: Just tried this and seems like Firefox does still require a browser plugin. Julia, could we

Re: [openstack-dev] Thank you TryStack!!

On 2018-04-30 10:23:34 -0400 (-0400), Paul Belanger wrote: [...] > The code is hosted by openstack-infra[1], if somebody would like > to propose a patch with the new information. > > [1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/trystack-site Yes, ideally it'd just be something along the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] The Forum Schedule is now live

Project Updates are in their own track: https://www.openstack.org/summit/vancouver-2018/summit-schedule#track=223 As are SIG, BoF and Working Groups: https://www.openstack.org/summit/vancouver-2018/summit-schedule#track=218 Amy Marrich April 30, 2018 at 10:44 AM

Re: [openstack-dev] Thank you TryStack!!

Jeremy Stanley April 30, 2018 at 10:12 AM [...] Yes, before the TryStack effort was closed down, there had been a plan for trystack.org to redirect to a trystack.openstack.org site hosted in the community infrastructure. When we talked to trystack we agreed to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Default scheduler filters survey

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 8:46 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 04/30/2018 09:18 AM, Mikhail Medvedev wrote: >> >> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 4:29 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: >>> >>> >>> Another data point that might be illuminating is: how many sites use a >>> custom (i.e., not

Re: [openstack-dev] Thank you TryStack!!

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 09:37:21AM +, Jens Harbott wrote: > 2018-03-26 22:51 GMT+00:00 Jimmy Mcarthur : > > Hi everyone, > > > > We recently made the tough decision, in conjunction with the dedicated > > volunteers that run TryStack, to end the service as of March 29, 2018.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] z/VM introducing a new config driveformat

> According to requirements and comments, now we opened the CI runs with > run_validation = True And according to [1] below, for example, [2] > need the ssh validation passed the test > > And there are a couple of comments need some enhancement on the logs > of CI such as format and legacy

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun][Kolla][Kolla-ansible] Verify Zun deployment in Kolla gate

Hi, This is something I've been thinking about recently. In particular, I noticed a patch go by to fix the same issue in the magnum role that has been broken and fixed previously. Kolla needs to up its game in terms of CI testing. At the very least, we need tests that verify that services can be

Re: [openstack-dev] Thank you TryStack!!

On 2018-04-30 09:34:15 -0500 (-0500), Jimmy McArthur wrote: > I'm working on redirecting trystack.openstack.org to > openstack.org/software/start. We have redirects in place for > trystack.org, but didn't realize trystack.openstack.org as a thing > as well. [...] Yes, before the TryStack effort

Re: [openstack-dev] Thank you TryStack!!

OK - got it :) Jeremy Stanley April 30, 2018 at 12:29 PM [...] I was thrown by the fact that DNS currently has trystack.openstack.org as a CNAME alias for trystack.org, but reviewing logs on static.openstack.org it seems it may have previously pointed there (was

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] The Forum Schedule is now live

We don't support deprecated browsers, I'm afraid. arkady.kanev...@dell.com April 30, 2018 at 1:14 PM Interesting. It does work on Chrome but not on IE. Here is IE screenshot. Thanks, Arkady *From:*Jimmy McArthur [mailto:ji...@openstack.org] *Sent:*

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Default scheduler filters survey

On 04/30/2018 09:18 AM, Mikhail Medvedev wrote: On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 4:29 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: Another data point that might be illuminating is: how many sites use a custom (i.e., not in-tree) filter or weigher? One of the original design tenets of the scheduler was that

Re: [openstack-dev] Thank you TryStack!!

I'm working on redirecting trystack.openstack.org to openstack.org/software/start. We have redirects in place for trystack.org, but didn't realize trystack.openstack.org as a thing as well. Paul Belanger April 30, 2018 at 9:23 AM The code is hosted by

[openstack-dev] Zuul memory improvements

Hi, We recently made some changes to Zuul which you may want to know about if you interact with a large number of projects. Previously, each change to Zuul which updated Zuul's configuration (e.g., a change to a project's zuul.yaml file) would consume a significant amount of memory. If we had

[openstack-dev] Overriding project-templates in Zuul

Hi, If you've had difficulty overriding jobs in project-templates, please read and provide feedback on this proposed change. We tried to make the Zuul v3 configuration language as intuitive as possible, and incorporated a lot that we learned from our years running Zuul v2. One thing that we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] The Forum Schedule is now live

Both are currently empty. From: Jimmy McArthur [mailto:ji...@openstack.org] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 10:48 AM To: Amy Marrich Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] The Forum

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc][ptls] final stages of python 3 transition

Hi Doug, There is no ec2-api project on the link. But we have voted job openstack-tox-py35 Regards, Andrey Pavlov. On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > It would be useful to

[openstack-dev] Is there any way to recheck only one job?

Hi, I wonder if there is any way to recheck only one type of job instead of rechecking everything. For example sometimes I have to debug some random failure in specific job type, like „neutron-fullstack” and I want to collect some additional data or test something. So in such case I push some

Re: [openstack-dev] Is there any way to recheck only one job?

2018-04-30 7:12 GMT+00:00 Slawomir Kaplonski : > Hi, > > I wonder if there is any way to recheck only one type of job instead of > rechecking everything. > For example sometimes I have to debug some random failure in specific job > type, like „neutron-fullstack” and I want

[openstack-dev] [watcher] May’s holidays

Hi Watcher team. I won’t be available in IRC till Wednesday because of national holidays. Some reviews and patch sets will be done during this time. Have a nice day! —— Alex __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] Thank you TryStack!!

2018-03-26 22:51 GMT+00:00 Jimmy Mcarthur : > Hi everyone, > > We recently made the tough decision, in conjunction with the dedicated > volunteers that run TryStack, to end the service as of March 29, 2018. For > those of you that used it, thank you for being part of the TryStack

Re: [openstack-dev] Is there any way to recheck only one job?

If your CI is using zuul, then you can try updating your zuul gerrit event comment in /etc/zuul/layout/layout.yaml accordingly. Since most ( if not all ) Cis are triggered by 'recheck' comment you can use your custom one. precedence: low trigger: gerrit: - event:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] z/VM introducing a new config driveformat

On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 17:40:20 +0800, Chen Ch Ji wrote: According to requirements and comments, now we opened the CI runs with run_validation = True And according to [1] below, for example, [2] need the ssh validation passed the test And there are a couple of comments need some enhancement on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] The Forum Schedule is now live

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Jimmy McArthur wrote: > Project Updates are in their own track: > https://www.openstack.org/summit/vancouver-2018/summit-schedule#track=223 > TripleO is still missing? Thanks, -Alex > As are SIG, BoF and Working Groups: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] The Forum Schedule is now live

Alex, It looks like we have a spot held for you, but did not receive confirmation that TripleO would be moving forward with Project Update. If you all will be recording this, we have you down for Wednesday from 11:25 - 11:45am. Just let me know and I'll get it up on the schedule. Thanks!

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Default scheduler filters survey

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > Mathieu, > > How do you handle issues where compute nodes are associated with multiple > aggregates and both aggregates have different values for a particular filter > key? > > Is that a human-based validation process to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] The Forum Schedule is now live

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Jimmy McArthur wrote: > > It looks like we have a spot held for you, but did not receive > confirmation that TripleO would be moving forward with Project Update. If > you all will be recording this, we have you down for Wednesday from 11:25

Re: [openstack-dev] Thank you TryStack!!

On 2018-04-30 12:10:29 -0500 (-0500), Jimmy McArthur wrote: > Yeah... my only concern is that if traffic is actually getting > there, a redirect to the same place trystack.org is going might be > helpful. [...] I was thrown by the fact that DNS currently has trystack.openstack.org as a CNAME

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] z/VM introducing a new config driveformat

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 09:21:22AM -0700, melanie witt wrote: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 17:40:20 +0800, Chen Ch Ji wrote: > > According to requirements and comments, now we opened the CI runs with > > run_validation = True > > And according to [1] below, for example, [2] need the ssh validation > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] z/VM introducing a new config driveformat

On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 12:42:40 -0400, Matthew Treinish wrote: On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 09:21:22AM -0700, melanie witt wrote: On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 17:40:20 +0800, Chen Ch Ji wrote: According to requirements and comments, now we opened the CI runs with run_validation = True And according to [1]

[openstack-dev] [Oslo][Nova][Sahara][Tempest][Cinder][Magnum] Removing broken tox missing requirements tests

Folks, Here in Oslo land a number of projects define a tox test for missing dependencies. These tests are based on a tool - pip-check-reqs - that no longer functions under the latest release of pip. The project's upstream github repo hasn't had any commit activity in a year and appears to no

Re: [openstack-dev] Thank you TryStack!!

On 2018-04-30 11:07:27 -0500 (-0500), Jimmy McArthur wrote: [...] > When we talked to trystack we agreed to redirect trystack.org to > https://openstack.org/software/start since that presents > alternative options for people to "try openstack". My suggestion > would be to redirect

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Default scheduler filters survey

Mathieu, How do you handle issues where compute nodes are associated with multiple aggregates and both aggregates have different values for a particular filter key? Is that a human-based validation process to ensure you don't have that situation? Best, -jay On 04/30/2018 12:41 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] The Forum Schedule is now live

Hmm. I see both populated with all of the relevant sessions. Can you send me a screencap of what you're seeing? arkady.kanev...@dell.com April 30, 2018 at 10:58 AM Both are currently empty. *From:*Jimmy McArthur [mailto:ji...@openstack.org] *Sent:* Monday,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Default scheduler filters survey

Hi, On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 5:29 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Apr 29, 2018, at 1:34 PM, Artom Lifshitz wrote: >> >> Based on that, we can definitely say that SameHostFilter and >> DifferentHostFilter do *not* belong in the defaults. In fact, we got >> our

[openstack-dev] [nova] review runway status

Howdy everyone, This is just a brief status about the blueprints currently occupying review runways [0] and an ask for the nova-core team to give these reviews priority for their code review focus. * XenAPI: Support a new image handler for non-FS based SRs

Re: [openstack-dev] Thank you TryStack!!

Yeah... my only concern is that if traffic is actually getting there, a redirect to the same place trystack.org is going might be helpful. Jeremy Stanley April 30, 2018 at 12:02 PM On 2018-04-30 11:07:27 -0500 (-0500), Jimmy McArthur wrote: [...] [...] Since I don't

[openstack-dev] [os-upstream-institute] Meeting reminder

Hi, Don’t forget that we switched to the US - Europe slot only till the training in Vancouver. See you on #openstack-meeting-3 at 2000 UTC! Thanks, Ildikó (IRC: ildikov) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Monthly bug day?

Just tried this and seems like Firefox does still require a browser plugin. Julia, could we use your bluejeans line again? Thanks! Mike Turek On 4/30/18 7:33 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi, On 04/29/2018 10:17 PM, Michael Turek wrote: Awesome! If everyone doesn't mind the short notice, we'll

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] The Forum Schedule is now live

LOL From: Jimmy McArthur [mailto:ji...@openstack.org] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 1:22 PM To: Kanevsky, Arkady Cc: a...@demarco.com; openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org; openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] The Forum Schedule is now live We

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Monthly bug day?

Hi, On 04/29/2018 10:17 PM, Michael Turek wrote: Awesome! If everyone doesn't mind the short notice, we'll have it again this Thursday @ 1:00 PM to 3:00 PM UTC. ++ I can provide video conferencing through hangouts here https://goo.gl/xSKBS4 Let's give that a shot this time! Note that the

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] REST limitations and GraghGL inception?

I would very much second that question! Indeed it have been one of my own wondering since many times. Of course GraphQL is not intended to replace REST as is and have to live in parallel but it would likely and highly accelerate all requests within heavily loaded environments. So +1 for this

Re: [openstack-dev] Thank you TryStack!!

Hmm. It appears our redirects have stopped working. Checking on this... Jens Harbott April 30, 2018 at 4:37 AM Seems it would be great if https://trystack.openstack.org/ would be updated with this information, according to comments in #openstack users are still

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote]Retire kolla-kubernetes project

Thanks all guys. Per the voting result, we will retire kolla-kubernetes project. On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:48 PM, Surya Singh wrote: > +1 > > As we don't have active core team in Kolla-kubernetes since months, > unfortunately going for sunset is reasonable. > >

[openstack-dev] [ironic] [all] The last reminder about the classic drivers removal

Hi all, This is the last reminder that the classic drivers will be removed from ironic. We plan on finish the removal before Rocky-2. See below for the information on migration. If for some reason we need to delay the removal, please speak up NOW. Note that I'm personally not inclined to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun][Kolla][Kolla-ansible] Verify Zun deployment in Kolla gate

Thanks hongbin In Kolla, one job is used to test multi OpenStack services. there are already two test scenarios. 1. without ceph 2. with ceph each scenario test a serial of OpenStack services. like nova, neutron, cinder etc. Zun or kuryr is not tested now. But i think it is OK to add a new

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Default scheduler filters survey

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 4:29 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > > Another data point that might be illuminating is: how many sites use a custom > (i.e., not in-tree) filter or weigher? One of the original design tenets of > the scheduler was that we did not want to artificially limit what