Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] podman: varlink interface for nice API calls

On 08/16/2018 12:10 AM, Jason E. Rist wrote: > On 08/15/2018 03:32 AM, Cédric Jeanneret wrote: >> Dear Community, >> >> As you may know, a move toward Podman as replacement of Docker is starting. >> >> One of the issues with podman is the lack of daemon, precisely the lack >> of a socket

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release][docs] FFE for openstackdocstheme 1.21.2

On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 06:27:39AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > Ocata should be retired by now ;) Let's drop it... *cough* extended maintenance *cough* ;P So we don't need the Ocata docs to be rebuilt with this version? Yours Tony. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release][docs] FFE for openstackdocstheme 1.21.2

On 2018-08-15 21:28, Tony Breeds wrote: On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 09:10:18AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Andreas Jaeger's message of 2018-08-15 09:28:51 +0200: On 08/15/2018 07:25 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 04:22:16PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: Now that

[openstack-dev] [release][qa][devstack][all] Pre-Notifiaction for DevStack branch cut for Rocky

Hi All, We are in process of cutting the Rocky branch for Devstack[1]. As per process[2], we need to wait for minimum set of project (which needed branch) used by Devstack to be branched first. As dhellmann mentioned on patch, All of the cycle-with-milestone projects are branched and we are

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI is blocked

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 7:13 PM Alex Schultz wrote: > Please do not approve or recheck anything until further notice. We've > got a few issues that have basically broken all the jobs. > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1786764 > https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1787226 >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Proposing Zane Bitter as oslo.service core

Belated +1. Welcome Zane! On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 5:35 AM Ben Nemec wrote: > Since there were no objections, I've added Zane to the oslo.service core > team. Thanks and welcome, Zane! > > On 08/03/2018 11:58 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Zane has been doing some good work in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] ansible roles in tripleo

On Wed, 2018-08-15 at 13:08 -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Jill Rouleau > wrote: > > > > Hey folks, > > > > Like Alex mentioned[0] earlier, we've created a bunch of ansible > > roles > > for tripleo specific bits.  The idea is to start putting some basic > >

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI is blocked

Please do not approve or recheck anything until further notice. We've got a few issues that have basically broken all the jobs. https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1786764 https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1787226 https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1787244

[openstack-dev] [requirements] moved to [storyboard]

We've moved, please forward future correspondence to the following location. https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/requirements -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) signature.asc Description: PGP signature __

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] podman: varlink interface for nice API calls

On 08/15/2018 03:32 AM, Cédric Jeanneret wrote: > Dear Community, > > As you may know, a move toward Podman as replacement of Docker is starting. > > One of the issues with podman is the lack of daemon, precisely the lack > of a socket allowing to send commands and get a "computer formatted >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] podman: varlink interface for nice API calls

On 08/15/2018 04:01 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 5:31 PM Emilien Macchi > wrote: More seriously here: there is an ongoing effort to converge the tools around containerization within Red Hat, and we, TripleO are interested to continue

[openstack-dev] [nova] Stein subteam tracking etherpad now available

Hi all, For those of us who use the global team etherpad for helping organize reviews for subteams, I just wanted to give a heads up that I've copied over the content from the Rocky etherpad [1] and created a new etherpad for us to use for Stein [2]. I've removed some things that appeared

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Proposing Zane Bitter as oslo.service core

Since there were no objections, I've added Zane to the oslo.service core team. Thanks and welcome, Zane! On 08/03/2018 11:58 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: Hi, Zane has been doing some good work in oslo.service recently and I would like to add him to the core team.  I know he's got a lot on his plate

Re: [openstack-dev] [releases][requirements][cycle-with-intermediary][cycle-trailing] requirements is going to branch stable/rocky at ~08-15-2018 2100Z

On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 11:13:13AM -0500, Matthew Thode wrote: > This is to warn and call out all those projects that do not have a > stable/rocky branch yet. > > If you are in the folloing list your project will need to realize that > your master is testing against the requirements/constraints

Re: [openstack-dev] [releases][requirements][cycle-with-intermediary][cycle-trailing] requirements is going to branch stable/rocky at ~08-15-2018 2100Z

On 18-08-14 11:13:13, Matthew Thode wrote: > This is to warn and call out all those projects that do not have a > stable/rocky branch yet. > > If you are in the folloing list your project will need to realize that > your master is testing against the requirements/constraints from stein, > not

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [cinder] backup restore in api v2

On 8/15/2018 8:00 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 07:52:47AM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote: On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 09:32:45AM +0200, Artem Goncharov wrote: Hi all, I have recently faced an interesting question: is there no backup restore functionality in block-storage api v2?

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] migrating to storyboard

On 8/15/2018 11:43 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: On 08/14/2018 10:33 AM, Tobias Urdin wrote: My goal is that we will be able to swap to Storyboard during the Stein cycle but considering that we have a low activity on bugs my opinion is that we could do this swap very easily anything soon as

[openstack-dev] [nova] Rocky blueprint burndown chart

Howdy everyone, Keeping with the tradition of Matt's burndown charts from previous cycles [1][2], I have a burndown chart for the Rocky cycle [3] to share with you. Apologies for the gap in the data -- I had an issue keeping up with the count for that time period. I also focused on only

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How to debug no valid host failures with placement

On 08/04/2018 05:18 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/3/2018 9:14 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: I'm of two minds here. On the one hand, you have the case where the end user has accidentally requested some combination of things that isn't normally available, and they need to be able to ask the provider

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] podman: varlink interface for nice API calls

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 5:31 PM Emilien Macchi wrote: > More seriously here: there is an ongoing effort to converge the tools > around containerization within Red Hat, and we, TripleO are interested to > continue the containerization of our services (which was initially done > with Docker &

[openstack-dev] OpenStack Diversity and Inclusion Survey

The Diversity and Inclusion WG is asking for your assistance. We have revised the Diversity Survey that was originally distributed to the Community in the Fall of 2015 and are looking to update our view of the OpenStack community and it's diversity. We are pleased to be working with members of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release][docs] FFE for openstackdocstheme 1.21.2

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 09:10:18AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Andreas Jaeger's message of 2018-08-15 09:28:51 +0200: > > On 08/15/2018 07:25 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 04:22:16PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > > >> Now that

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] ansible roles in tripleo

On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Jill Rouleau wrote: > Hey folks, > > Like Alex mentioned[0] earlier, we've created a bunch of ansible roles > for tripleo specific bits. The idea is to start putting some basic > cookiecutter type things in them to get things started, then move some >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][qa][congress] tempest test conditioning on release version

On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 8:59 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 06:40:57 +0900 Eric K > wrote > > Anyone have an example handy of a tempest test conditioning on service > > release version (because new features not available in past versions)? > > Seems like it could

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release][docs] FFE for openstackdocstheme 1.21.2

On 2018-08-15 10:33, Tony Breeds wrote: On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 09:28:51AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: openstackdocsstheme has: sphinx!=1.6.6,!=1.6.7,>=1.6.2 So, we cannot use it on branches that constraint sphinx to an older version, Sorry, can't check this right now from where I am,

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] migrating to storyboard

On 15/08/18 10:43 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: On 08/14/2018 10:33 AM, Tobias Urdin wrote: My goal is that we will be able to swap to Storyboard during the Stein cycle but considering that we have a low activity on bugs my opinion is that we could do this swap very easily anything soon as long

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican][oslo][release] FFE request for castellan

Done. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/592154/ Thanks, Ade On Wed, 2018-08-15 at 09:20 -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > > On 08/14/2018 01:56 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > > On 08/10/2018 10:15 AM, Ade Lee wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I'd like to request a feature freeze exception to get

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] migrating to storyboard

On 08/14/2018 10:33 AM, Tobias Urdin wrote: My goal is that we will be able to swap to Storyboard during the Stein cycle but considering that we have a low activity on bugs my opinion is that we could do this swap very easily anything soon as long as everybody is in favor of it. Please let me

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] migrating to storyboard

It's a +1 from me. I don't think there is anything linked specifically to it. On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 6:33 PM Tobias Urdin wrote: >> >> Please let me know what you think about moving to Storyboard? > > Go for it. AFIK we don't have

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] podman: varlink interface for nice API calls

Hi Jay, On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:59 PM Jay Pipes wrote: > This was news to me. Is this just a triple-o thing? > It's in the newspapers! https://www.serverwatch.com/server-news/red-hat-looks-beyond-docker-for-container-technology.html More seriously here: there is an ongoing effort to

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] migrating to storyboard

On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 6:33 PM Tobias Urdin wrote: > Please let me know what you think about moving to Storyboard? > Go for it. AFIK we don't have specific blockers to make that migration happening. Thanks, -- Emilien Macchi

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican][oslo][release] FFE request for castellan

On 08/14/2018 01:56 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: On 08/10/2018 10:15 AM, Ade Lee wrote: Hi all, I'd like to request a feature freeze exception to get the following change in for castellan. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/575800/ This extends the functionality of the vault backend to provide

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] podman: varlink interface for nice API calls

On 08/15/2018 05:32 AM, Cédric Jeanneret wrote: Dear Community, As you may know, a move toward Podman as replacement of Docker is starting. This was news to me. Is this just a triple-o thing? -jay __ OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [oslo][castellan][python3][goal] need help debugging stable/queens failure in castellan functional tests

The patch to add the zuul job settings to the castellan stable/queens branch is failing the castellan-functional-devstack job. It looks like the job fails to set up some of the services correctly (I see lots of messages about services not responding or not starting). When was that job added to

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release][docs] FFE for openstackdocstheme 1.21.2

Excerpts from Andreas Jaeger's message of 2018-08-15 09:28:51 +0200: > On 08/15/2018 07:25 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 04:22:16PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > >> Now that https://review.openstack.org/#/c/591671/ has landed, we need > >> someone to propose the backports

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release][docs] FFE for openstackdocstheme 1.21.2

Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2018-08-15 15:25:29 +1000: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 04:22:16PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > Now that https://review.openstack.org/#/c/591671/ has landed, we need > > someone to propose the backports of the constraint updates to all of the > > existing

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [cinder] backup restore in api v2

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 07:52:47AM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 09:32:45AM +0200, Artem Goncharov wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have recently faced an interesting question: is there no backup restore > > functionality in block-storage api v2? There is possibility to create

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [cinder] backup restore in api v2

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 09:32:45AM +0200, Artem Goncharov wrote: > Hi all, > > I have recently faced an interesting question: is there no backup restore > functionality in block-storage api v2? There is possibility to create > backup, but not to restore it according to >

[openstack-dev] oracle rac on openstack: openfiler as shared storage

Hello, regarding: openstack for having "shared-storage" needed for Oracle RAC: I have used openfiler in a vmware environment, for creating iscsi targets and accessing iscsi luns on target machines with iscsi-initiator. On db machines, LUNs were used via multipath.conf and udev rules, to be

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] podman: varlink interface for nice API calls

Dear Community, As you may know, a move toward Podman as replacement of Docker is starting. One of the issues with podman is the lack of daemon, precisely the lack of a socket allowing to send commands and get a "computer formatted output" (like JSON or YAML or...). In order to work that out,

[openstack-dev] [placement] extraction etherpad for PTG

I've created an etherpad to prepare ideas and plans for a discussion at the PTG about extracting placement to its own thing. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/placement-extract-stein Right now it is in a fairly long form as it gathers ideas and references. The goal is to compress it to

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release][docs] FFE for openstackdocstheme 1.21.2

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 09:28:51AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > openstackdocsstheme has: > sphinx!=1.6.6,!=1.6.7,>=1.6.2 > > So, we cannot use it on branches that constraint sphinx to an older version, > > Sorry, can't check this right now from where I am, Constraints ---

[openstack-dev] [api] [cinder] backup restore in api v2

Hi all, I have recently faced an interesting question: is there no backup restore functionality in block-storage api v2? There is possibility to create backup, but not to restore it according to https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/block-storage/v2/index.html#backups-backups. Version v3 ref

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release][docs] FFE for openstackdocstheme 1.21.2

On 08/15/2018 07:25 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 04:22:16PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: Now that https://review.openstack.org/#/c/591671/ has landed, we need someone to propose the backports of the constraint updates to all of the existing stable branches. Done:

[openstack-dev] [watcher] weekly meeting

Greetings, We’ll have meeting today at 8:00 UTC on #openstack-meeting-3 channel. Best Regards, Alex __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] migrating to storyboard

Hello Kendall, Thanks for your reply, that sounds awesome! We can then dig around and see how everything looks when all project bugs are imported to stories. I see no issues with being able to move to Storyboard anytime soon if the feedback for moving is positive. Best regards Tobias On