Hi all,
I think that TaskFlow is an interesting initiative that could provide us
some benefits like good encapsulation of logical code blocks, better
exception handling and management of actions taking place in Climate core,
rollbacks and replays management.
It looks like that we should
Hi,
Although not a voting member, I would like to thank Mark for a phenomenal job
on Neutron and LBaaS and would like to see him continue to lead Neutron forward.
Regards,
-Sam.
-Original Message-
From: Mark McClain [mailto:mark.mccl...@dreamhost.com]
Sent: Friday, September
I would like to run for the OpenStack QA Program PTL position.
I'm the current/interim PTL for OpenStack QA, chosen when QA was
promoted to an official program mid cycle for Havana.
I started working on OpenStack just before the Essex release, and am
currently a core reviewer on Tempest,
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Previously, upstream decided to use = 1.5.7 for Python 2.x, then the
2.x branch for Python 3.x. Then later on, Python 2.x was added to the
Pyparsing 2.x branch, and upstream released version 2.0.1, which has
support
Hi,
I already mentioned in this list that we need to be compatible with
SQLAlchemy 0.8.x. However, I've seen both regressions happening in the
global-requirements.txt and in Ceilometer:
SQLAlchemy=0.7.8,=0.7.99
Please, do not add =0.7.99, this breaks badly, and all of OpenStack
really needs to
Hi,
Anyone know why the devstack gating is broken?
Thanks
Gary
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 09/22/2013 11:10 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know why the devstack gating is broken?
Thanks
Gary
I was just looking over logs, especially the last merge on integrated
projects before things went funny (at about midnight last night).
The root cause is guests not spawning, and going
Thanks!
On 9/22/13 6:41 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 09/22/2013 11:10 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know why the devstack gating is broken?
Thanks
Gary
I was just looking over logs, especially the last merge on integrated
projects before things went funny (at about midnight
On 09/22/2013 11:36 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2013-09-22 23:00:26 +0800 (+0800), Thomas Goirand wrote:
I already mentioned in this list that we need to be compatible with
SQLAlchemy 0.8.x. However, I've seen both regressions happening in the
global-requirements.txt and in Ceilometer:
Hi all,
I'm writing to declare my intention to run for OpenStack documentation
program technical lead. [1]
I've been working on OpenStack docs since September 2010, and it has been
an honor and a privilege to serve in this position informally prior to
having documentation declared a program. I've
I am running for DevStack PTL. I have been the acting PTL since DevStack
became a program and have been working on DevStack since its first public
demo in a lightning talk at the Essex Design Summit. In addition I have
also contributed to Grenade and python-openstackclient.
Over the last
On 09/23/2013 05:43 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
Since we now have at least some integration testing on our global
requirements list, I uploaded https://review.openstack.org/47745 to
see what breaks (though unit tests for individual projects are not
covered by this test and may also need fixing).
On 09/23/2013 03:36 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 09/23/2013 05:43 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
Since we now have at least some integration testing on our global
requirements list, I uploaded https://review.openstack.org/47745 to
see what breaks (though unit tests for individual projects are not
Looks like this problem happens in systems that use pip1.4 but upgraded
tox to 1.6.1
http://tox.readthedocs.org/en/latest/config.html#confval-install_command=ARGV
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2013-09-19 09:24:08 +0800 (+0800), Yongsheng Gong
Hello Justin,
First off, the current implementation of Barbican only supports one encrypted
payload per secret record. We plan to revisit this once we begin work on the
SSL certificate processing features.
As for the Barbican API, please note that the latest Barbican API is located
here:
On 09/23/2013 01:36 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 09/23/2013 11:04 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
OpenStack should be compatible with sqlalchemy 0.8.x at this stage,
or should be easily tweaked to be so.
My view as well.
sqlalchemy-migrate will be a bit awkward though as upstream
seems to have
16 matches
Mail list logo
