On 13 нояб. 2013 г., at 6:39, Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com wrote:
Your work mates;) https://github.com/rackerlabs/qonos
how about merge qonos into mistral, or at lest put it into stack forge?
Just got to looking at qonos. It actually looks similar in some ways to Mistral
but with some
On Nov 14, 2013 1:10 PM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote:
Noorul,
On Nov 13, 2013, at 7:43 PM, Noorul Islam K M noo...@noorul.com
wrote:
Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com writes:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Noorul Islam K M noo...@noorul.com
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Clint Byrum [mailto:cl...@fewbar.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 9:24 PM
To: openstack-dev
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [heat] Custom Flavor creation through Heat
Excerpts from Kodam, Vijayakumar (EXT-Tata Consultancy Ser - FI/Espoo)'s
message of
From: Steve Baker [mailto:sba...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 9:25 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [heat] Custom Flavor creation through
Heat
On 11/13/2013 07:50 AM, Steven Dake wrote:
On 11/12/2013 10:25
Responses to both Jay and George inline.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for top-posting, but in summary, I entirely agree with George here.
His logic is virtually identical to the concerns I raised with the initial
proposal for Glance Tasks here:
On 13 November 2013 23:39, Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD - Corvallis)
mark.m.mil...@hp.com wrote:
I finally found a set of web pages that has a working set of configuration
files for the major OpenStack services
not the video I was looking for, but he kind of makes the point about
planning...
http://youtu.be/2E0C9zLSINE?t=42m55s
# Shawn Hartsock
Thanks Shawn for your inputs. As I have mentioned earlier, the usecase is
mostly for telecom cloud applications running in our private cloud.
The hardware
Kurt Griffiths wrote:
Also does it place a requirement that all projects wanting to request
incubation to be placed in stackforge ? That sounds like a harsh
requirement if we were to reject them.
I think that anything that encourages projects to get used to the
OpenStack development process
On 13/11/13 17:20 -0800, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On 11/13/2013 04:34 PM, Colin McNamara wrote:
Not to be contrarian, but 92% of the commits in Havana came from
non-individual contributions. The majority of those came from big name
companies (IBM, RedHat, etc).
ow, that's harsh. Despite what
On 13/11/13 17:22 -0700, John Griffith wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/11/2013 12:44 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 03:20:20PM +0100, Nicolas Barcet wrote:
Dear TC members,
Our companies are actively encouraging our
Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On 11/13/2013 04:34 PM, Colin McNamara wrote:
Not to be contrarian, but 92% of the commits in Havana came from
non-individual contributions. The majority of those came from big name
companies (IBM, RedHat, etc).
ow, that's harsh. Despite what US Supreme Court Judges
On 14/11/13 10:13 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Kurt Griffiths wrote:
Also does it place a requirement that all projects wanting to request
incubation to be placed in stackforge ? That sounds like a harsh
requirement if we were to reject them.
I think that anything that encourages projects to
On 13/11/13 10:40 -0800, Tim Hinrichs wrote:
We're just getting started with Congress and understanding how it will
integrate with the OS ecosystem, but here's our current thinking about how
Congress relates to Oslo's policy engine and to Keystone. Comments and
suggestions are welcome.
On 14/11/13 11:29, Renat Akhmerov wrote:
As for EventScheduler proposal, I think it actually fits Mistral model
very well. What described in EvenScheduler is basically the ability to
configure webhooks to be called periodically or at a certain time. First
of all, from the very beginning the
Also, just to add some pedantry (which you know I am very fond of), it
would be the case to share on openstack-dev minutes and logs from eavesdrop
after each subteam meeting.
I know they're anyway at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ - but
sending an email will be useful to notify the rest
Sure, no problem.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.comwrote:
Also, just to add some pedantry (which you know I am very fond of), it
would be the case to share on openstack-dev minutes and logs from eavesdrop
after each subteam meeting.
I know they're anyway
In general, an error state make sense.
I think you might want to send more details about how this state plugs into
the load balancer state machine, but I reckon it is a generally
non-recoverable state which could be reached by any other state; in that
case it would be a generic enough case which
Although IRC requires typing, I find it more inclusive than Webex.
It's easy to have 100s of people in a IRC room, not so easy on a conf call.
Also, people like me whose 1st language is not English might find easier to
write read rather than listen speak.
Finally, the capability of generating
On 14 Nov 2013, at 18:03, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
What might be a downside is that sharing a back-end may not be technically
convenient - one thing we have been reminded of in Heat is that a service
with timed tasks has to be scaled out in a completely different way to a
Hello all,
I have made several patches that update modules in cinder/openstack/common
from oslo which have not been reviewed for more than a month already. My
colleague has the same problem with her patches in Glance.
Probably it's not a top priority issue, but if oslo is not updated
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 08:22:57AM +, Kodam, Vijayakumar (EXT-Tata
Consultancy Ser - FI/Espoo) wrote:
snip
Thanks Steve Baker for the information. I am also waiting to hear from Steve
Hardy, if keystone trust system will fix the nova flavors admin privileges
issue.
So, basically, no.
On 13 November 2013 23:22, Andrew Laski andrew.la...@rackspace.com wrote:
On 11/13/13 at 11:12pm, Jiang, Yunhong wrote:
Hi, Dan Smith and all,
I noticed followed statement in 'Icehouse tasks' in
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IcehouseNovaExtensibleSchedulerMetrics
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote:
We're just getting started with Congress and understanding how it will
integrate with the OS ecosystem, but here's our current thinking about how
Congress relates to Oslo's policy engine and to Keystone. Comments and
Hi everyone,
I think that we have recently reached critical mass for the
openstack-dev mailing-list, with 2267 messages posted in October, and
November well on its way to pass 2000 again. Some of those are just
off-topic (and I've been regularly fighting against them) but most of
them are just
Thierry Carrez wrote:
[...]
That will not solve all issues. We should also collectively make sure
that *usage questions are re-routed* to the openstack general
mailing-list, where they belong. Too many people still answer off-topic
questions here on openstack-dev, which encourages people to
Hi Folks,
As a first follow up after last week's design summit session,
let's discuss at today's Nova meeting the steps to be taken for putting in
continuous efforts for AWS compatibility in Openstack.
Nova Meeting: 21:00 UTC
Summit Etherpad:
On Thu, Nov 14 2013, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Other suggestion: we could stop posting meeting reminders to -dev (I
know, I'm guilty of it) and only post something if the meeting time
changes, or if the weekly meeting is canceled for whatever reason.
Good suggestion.
--
Julien Danjou
-- Free
On Thu, Nov 14 2013, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Thoughts ?
I agree on the need to split, the traffic is getting huge.
As I'd have to subscribe to both openstack-dev and stackforge-dev, that
would not help me personally, but I think it can be an easy and first
step.
--
Julien Danjou
-- Free
Yeah, that's big problem... Especially when you are trying to keep track on
lots of topics...
I suppose this solution will do letters' prioritisation at least easier for
developers and everybody who is subscribed on openstack-dev.
Nice idea.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Thierry Carrez
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 02:19:24PM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Thierry Carrez wrote:
[...]
That will not solve all issues. We should also collectively make sure
that *usage questions are re-routed* to the openstack general
mailing-list, where they belong. Too many people still answer
On Thu, Nov 14 2013, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Is there somewhere on the website which keeps a record of all regular
scheduled meetings people can discover / refer to easily ?
It's all on the wiki:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings
--
Julien Danjou
// Free Software hacker /
One critical reasons why tasks rather than resource status may be required is
because:
a) The system state may not be sufficient at time of POST/PUT to generate a
“minimum viable resource” and we don’t want to risk timeouts waiting for the
“minimum viable resource
b) There may be more stuff
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.netwrote:
Total reviews: 10705 (118.9/day)
Total reviewers: 406
Total reviews by core team: 5289 (58.8/day)
Core team size: 17
New patch sets in the last 90 days: 7515 (83.5/day)
This is the really interesting bit.
This would also have the added benefit of reducing the times people conflate
related open source projects from stackforge with OpenStack itself. Having
related oss discussions on a list called OpenStack-Dev may certainly have
given the wrong impression to the casual observer.
On Nov 14, 2013
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
So if everyone uploaded perfect changesets we'd only need 40 core reviews
per day :-)
And I should add in terms of changesets that are
Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14 2013, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Thoughts ?
I agree on the need to split, the traffic is getting huge.
As I'd have to subscribe to both openstack-dev and stackforge-dev, that
would not help me personally, but I think it can be an easy and first
step.
On 11/14/2013 08:12 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi everyone,
I think that we have recently reached critical mass for the
openstack-dev mailing-list, with 2267 messages posted in October, and
November well on its way to pass 2000 again. Some of those are just
off-topic (and I've been regularly
On 14/11/13 14:12 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi everyone,
I think that we have recently reached critical mass for the
openstack-dev mailing-list, with 2267 messages posted in October, and
November well on its way to pass 2000 again. Some of those are just
off-topic (and I've been regularly
On 13.11.2013 20:20, Jiang, Yunhong wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chris Friesen [mailto:chris.frie...@windriver.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 9:57 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Core pinning
On 11/13/2013 11:40 AM, Jiang,
On 14/11/13 04:40 -0800, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote:
We're just getting started with Congress and understanding how it will
integrate with the OS ecosystem, but here's our current thinking about how
Congress relates to
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 08:29:36PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
At the summit there were lots of discussions about reviews, and I made
the mistake of sending a mail to Russell proposing a few new stats we
could gather.
I say mistake, because he did so and then some... we new have extra
info
Hi,
We’ve created an etherpad to start thinking about Mistral main components and
listing out possible 3rd party technologies to use for their implementation.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MistralDesignAndDependencies
Feel free to share your ideas.
Thanks.
Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis
Hello all,
We need to decide on version scheme that we are going to use.
Monty Taylor said the following in one of the comments for review [1]:
Setting a version here enrolls solum in managing its version in a
pre-release versioning manner, such that non-tagged versions will
indicated that
On 11/14/2013 09:03 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 08:29:36PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
At the summit there were lots of discussions about reviews, and I made
the mistake of sending a mail to Russell proposing a few new stats we
could gather.
I say mistake, because
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 12:36:49PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
I've been thinking about review queues recently (since here at the
summit everyone is talking about reviews! :)).
One thing that struck me today was that Gerrit makes it easier to
review the newest changes first, rather than the
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2013-11-13 14:15:31 +0100 (+0100), Thierry Carrez wrote:
[...]
* Week of April 21
[...]
I've already got travel plans this week, so works for me (and
release week too, though it was scheduled well over a year
On 14/11/13 12:26, Renat Akhmerov wrote:
On 14 Nov 2013, at 18:03, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
mailto:zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
What might be a downside is that sharing a back-end may not be
technically convenient - one thing we have been reminded of in Heat is
that a service with timed
Hello devs,
I'd like to start working at this blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/port-mirroring
I didn't receive much feedback so please have a look at it.
It was not approved yet. What's the usual workflow? Shall I wait for
approval before I start implementing it? Sorry
On 11/14/2013 08:32 AM, George Reese wrote:
One critical reasons why tasks rather than resource status may be
required is because:
a) The system state may not be sufficient at time of POST/PUT to
generate a “minimum viable resource” and we don’t want to risk timeouts
waiting for the “minimum
++
On 11/14/2013 08:37 AM, m...@openstack.org wrote:
This would also have the added benefit of reducing the times people conflate related open
source projects from stackforge with OpenStack itself. Having related oss discussions on
a list called OpenStack-Dev may certainly have given the
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.netwrote:
Hi so - in http://docs.openstack.org/developer/hacking/
it has as bullet point 4:
Long lines should be wrapped in parentheses in preference to using a
backslash for line continuation.
I'm seeing in some reviews
Hi all,
At summit in Hong Kong we had a design session where we discussed adding
multi-region orchestration support to Heat. During the session we had
really heated discussion and spent most of the time on explaining the
problem. I think it was really good starting point and right now more
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Hi everyone,
I think that we have recently reached critical mass for the
openstack-dev mailing-list, with 2267 messages posted in October, and
November well on its way to pass 2000 again. Some of those are just
+1, agreed.
Personally, I’ll subscribe to both lists but I think it really could help to
prioritize emails.
Sincerely yours,
Sergey Lukjanov
Savanna Technical Lead
Mirantis Inc.
On Nov 14, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
I think that we have
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:04:04AM -0600, Dolph Mathews wrote:
I guarantee there's a few things I'm forgetting, but this is my collection
of things we discussed at the summit and determined to be good things to
pursue during the icehouse timeframe. The contents represent a high level
mix of
You can assign roles to users in keystoneclient ($ keystone help
user-role-add) -- the assignment would be persisted in SQL. openstackclient
supports assignments to groups as well if you switch to
--identity-api-version=3
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Avi L aviost...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh ok
In fact, there is a blueprint which would enable supporting this scenario
without partitioning --
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/cpu-entitlement
The idea is to annotate flavors with CPU allocation guarantees, and enable
differentiation between instances, potentially running on the
On 11/13/2013 05:31 AM, Roman Podoliaka wrote:
2) run tests on MySQL/PostgreSQL instead (we have a proof-of-concept
implementation here [2])
The latter approach has a few problems though:
1) even if tests are run in parallel and each test case is run within
a single transaction with ROLLBACK in
+1, This is a great idea. We could consider it as a general process for
all tests.
2013/11/14 Koderer, Marc m.kode...@telekom.de
Hi all,
I think we have quite the same issue with the neutron testing. I already
put it on the agenda for the QA meeting for today.
Let's make it to a general
Kyle,
Thank you for organizing this.
I think the original email you sent out did not solicit any comments
(except for possibly proposing a different time for the weekly meetings).
So that is probably why you have not heard from anybody (including me). So
we are ready to have the meeting but if
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
Other suggestion: we could stop posting meeting reminders to -dev (I
know, I'm guilty of it) and only post something if the meeting time
changes, or if the weekly meeting is canceled for whatever reason.
Good
Good idea.
-romain
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
I'm not a big fan of using date information in the version number. Is there an
advantage to doing that? Using a model like 0.0.1 makes it easier to
communicate.
A better approach might be to use Major.Minor.Revision.Build. If we want to
use dates, Year.Month.Day.Build or
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:29 AM, Renat Akhmerov rakhme...@mirantis.comwrote:
As for EventScheduler proposal, I think it actually fits Mistral model
very well. What described in EvenScheduler is basically the ability to
configure webhooks to be called periodically or at a certain time. First of
Hi all,
During the review of [1] I had a look at the tests that are related
with external authentication (i.e. the usage of REMOTE_USER) in
Keystone and I realised that there is a bunch of them that are setting
external as one of the authentication methods. However, in
keystone.auth.controllers
On 2013-11-14 04:41, Santosh Kumar wrote:
Hi Experts,
I am following Havana guide for installation of three node set up.
After installing all services of NOVA ( nova-api , nova-cert,
nova-scheduler, nova-consoleauth, nova-novncproxy ), when I tires to
verify
All the things by # nova
On 11/14/2013 10:36 AM, Murali Allada wrote:
I'm not a big fan of using date information in the version number. Is
there an advantage to doing that? Using a model like 0.0.1 makes it
easier to communicate.
A better approach might be to use *Major.Minor.Revision.Build*. If we
want to use
http://docs.heatautoscale.apiary.io/
I've thrown together a rough sketch of the proposed API for autoscaling.
It's written in API-Blueprint format (which is a simple subset of Markdown)
and provides schemas for inputs and outputs using JSON-Schema. The source
document is currently at
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
Looking to start a wider discussion, prompted by:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54651/
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/management-api
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/heat-management-api
Summary
- Original Message -
On 11/14/2013 10:36 AM, Murali Allada wrote:
I'm not a big fan of using date information in the version number. Is
there an advantage to doing that? Using a model like 0.0.1 makes it
easier to communicate.
A better approach might be to use
Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com writes:
On 11/14/2013 10:36 AM, Murali Allada wrote:
I'm not a big fan of using date information in the version number. Is
there an advantage to doing that? Using a model like 0.0.1 makes it
easier to communicate.
A better approach might be to use
Step 1: use flavors so nova can tell between the two workloads, and
configure them differently
Step 2: find capacity for your workload given your current cloud usage
At the moment, most of our solutions involve reserving bits of your
cloud capacity for different workloads, generally using host
On Nov 14, 2013, at 9:38 AM, Mohammad Banikazemi m...@us.ibm.com
wrote:
Kyle,
Thank you for organizing this.
I think the original email you sent out did not solicit any comments (except
for possibly proposing a different time for the weekly meetings). So that is
probably why you have
I completely agree that making Congress successful will rely crucially on
addressing performance and scalability issues. Some thoughts...
1. We're definitely intending to cache data locally to avoid repeated API
calls. In fact, a prototype cache is already in place. We haven't yet hooked
up
Anne Gentle wrote:
Just a question, did you consider a week off post-summit? I want to
ensure the tons of questions that come in about the schedule can be
answered. I felt the weeks up to the summit were still quite busy, not
just from a docs perspective, but from a PTL/scheduler/arranger
Greetings Stackers!
I hope you had a great time at the Summit! I'm expecting the VMwareAPI
sub-team's priorities to shift around a bit as we digest the outcomes from the
sessions. So, with that in mind, I'll stick to just updating on what reviews
are in flight and where they are as far as our
On Nov 14, 2013, at 10:19 AM, Christopher Armstrong
chris.armstr...@rackspace.commailto:chris.armstr...@rackspace.com
wrote:
http://docs.heatautoscale.apiary.io/
I've thrown together a rough sketch of the proposed API for autoscaling. It's
written in API-Blueprint format (which is a simple
On Nov 14, 2013 5:16 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
I think that we have recently reached critical mass for the
openstack-dev mailing-list, with 2267 messages posted in October, and
November well on its way to pass 2000 again. Some of those are just
off-topic
On 11/14/2013 08:21 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14 2013, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Thoughts ?
I agree on the need to split, the traffic is getting huge.
As I'd have to subscribe to both openstack-dev and stackforge-dev, that
would not help me personally, but I think it can be an easy
On Nov 14, 2013 6:58 AM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
Hi so - in http://docs.openstack.org/developer/hacking/
it has as bullet point 4:
Long lines should be wrapped in parentheses in preference
This ML is not for review requests.
Please read
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015264.html
best,
Joe
sent on the go
On Nov 14, 2013 4:26 AM, Elena Ezhova eezh...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hello all,
I have made several patches that update modules in
Good stuff! Some questions/comments:
If web hooks are associated with policies and policies are independent
entities, how does a web hook specify the scaling group to act on? Does calling
the web hook activate the policy on every associated scaling group?
Regarding web hook execution and cool
Thanks for the clear explanation Monty.
-Murali
On Nov 14, 2013, at 10:08 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 11/14/2013 10:36 AM, Murali Allada wrote:
I'm not a big fan of using date information in the version number. Is
there an advantage to doing that? Using a model
Hello Jesse,
Thank you for the information. Would you be so kind as to provide a URL to the
updated rcbops chef cookbooks for Quantum?
Regards,
Mark
From: Jesse Pretorius [mailto:jesse.pretor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 12:43 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Randall Burt
randall.b...@rackspace.comwrote:
Good stuff! Some questions/comments:
If web hooks are associated with policies and policies are independent
entities, how does a web hook specify the scaling group to act on? Does
calling the web hook activate
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Laski [mailto:andrew.la...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 3:22 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][object] One question to the resource
tracker session
On
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 14, 2013 6:58 AM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
Hi so - in http://docs.openstack.org/developer/hacking/
it has
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:20:02AM -0600, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
Looking to start a wider discussion, prompted by:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54651/
I believe I found it under nova-network.
Thanks,
Mark
From: Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD - Corvallis)
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 9:31 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Nova SSL Apache2 Question
Hello Jesse,
Thank you
Khanh-Toan Tran khanh-toan.t...@cloudwatt.com wrote on 14/11/2013
06:27:39 PM:
It is interesting to see the development of the CPU entitlement
blueprint that Alex mentioned. It was registered in Jan 2013.
Any idea whether it is still going on?
Yes. I hope we will be able to rebase and
On Nov 14, 2013, at 11:30 AM, Christopher Armstrong
chris.armstr...@rackspace.commailto:chris.armstr...@rackspace.com
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Randall Burt
randall.b...@rackspace.commailto:randall.b...@rackspace.com wrote:
Good stuff! Some questions/comments:
If web hooks are
On 14/11/13 17:19, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
http://docs.heatautoscale.apiary.io/
I've thrown together a rough sketch of the proposed API for autoscaling.
It's written in API-Blueprint format (which is a simple subset of
Markdown) and provides schemas for inputs and outputs using
On 11/14/13 at 05:37pm, Jiang, Yunhong wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Laski [mailto:andrew.la...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 3:22 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][object] One question
On 11/13/2013 08:08 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 14 November 2013 13:59, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
This is an area where we actually have consensus in our docs (have had
for a while), the reviewer was being consistent with them, and it feels
like you are reopening that for personal
On 11/14/2013 10:52 AM, Álvaro López García wrote:
Hi all,
During the review of [1] I had a look at the tests that are related
with external authentication (i.e. the usage of REMOTE_USER) in
Keystone and I realised that there is a bunch of them that are setting
external as one of the
On 2013-11-14 11:25:31 + (+), Salvatore Orlando wrote:
[...]
The fact that webex is not a free and open source service is
another aspect to take into account I'll now duck before stones
start being thrown as I'm not really the guy who can play FOSS
advocate.
Don't worry, I (and many
Since I just got back from HK yesterday, and I think others are still
recovering from that trip lets skip the weekly IRC meeting this week.
Also note that the US time has changed (due to the evil thing called DST).
Link: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TaskFlow
Channel:
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Laski [mailto:andrew.la...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 10:02 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][object] One question to the resource
tracker session
On
On Nov 13, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Collins, Sean (Contractor)
sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:20:55AM -0500, Shixiong Shang wrote:
Thanks a bunch for finalizing the time! Sorry for my ignorance….how do we
usually run the meeting? On Webex or IRC channel?
On 11/14/2013 10:03 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:04:04AM -0600, Dolph Mathews wrote:
I guarantee there's a few things I'm forgetting, but this is my collection
of things we discussed at the summit and determined to be good things to
pursue during the icehouse timeframe.
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
